Hittites in the House of David (No. 67C)

Mysticism Bibliography Page 3

Christian Churches of God

No. 67C

Hittites in the House of David

(Edition 1.0 20100115-20100115)

There are many surprising and little understood aspects to the size and extent of the House of David and how it has expanded to cover the nations. It has extended the Messianic families and incorporated what are basically Hittite lineages.

Christian Churches of God

PO Box 369, WODEN ACT 2606, AUSTRALIA

Email:

(Copyright © 2010 Wade Cox)

This paper may be freely copied and distributed provided it is copied in total with no alterations or deletions. The publisher’s name and address and the copyright notice must be included. No charge may be levied on recipients of distributed copies. Brief quotations may be embodied in critical articles and reviews without breaching copyright.

This paper is available from the World Wide Web page:
http://www.logon.org and http://www.ccg.org

Hittites in the House of David

Mysticism Bibliography Page 3

Page 11

Page 11

In researching the aspects of the history of nations it became evident just how important the DNA structure was to the identity of the nations and their distribution and interrelationship.

The basic outline was written to explain the structure from one man Adam and one woman Eve and where the offspring developed and dispersed. That paper is The Genetic Origin of the Nations (No. 265).

The Sons of Noah were outlined in their respective branches of Shem, Ham and Japheth. The Bible story fits perfectly into the YDNA structure and explains perfectly the spread of humans and their origin. In fact it makes a complete nonsense of the Theory of Evolution once the correct time frames of the mutations are taken into account.

It is those mutations that in fact become obvious and relevant to understanding the YDNA mutations in the House of David. That DNA includes what is in fact Hittite YDNA that merged into the Davidic lineage in the Tenth century BCE.

When the writer was researching his YDNA some strange things happened with the results. There were a series of two, three and four step mutations that occurred that spread over both Europe and Asia and the Middle East. The first 12 sections were tested and led to a broad spectrum match with a number of groups of people. What was of interest was the number of three step mutation matches with Levites among Russian and Lithuanian Jews extending from Haplogroup (Hg.) R1b even into Haplogroup (Hg.) N in Lithuania.

What was to prove somewhat enigmatic was a three-step match with a Palestinian of Hg. RxR1 basic. This match was to prove relevant to later finds.

There were mutational matches also as far as Siberia and into Spain with a family also in Cuba, probably coming from Spain.

These finds were somewhat at odds with the fact that my YDNA was a known sub group of the Norse Celt range and extended all over Britain into the Scottish Isles of the Shetlands and the Orkneys and into Denmark Iceland and, strangely enough, into the European admixture of the Greenland Eskimos.

The explanation of that is fairly easy and of itself solved a long standing riddle of the Norse. We knew that at the early part of the Mediaeval Warm Period Greenland became ice free in summer and could be farmed. This view was put to the test when Eric the Red became involved in heated discussion in a banquet in Thule (now Iceland) in 996 and killed another and more powerful Thane. He took the road of discretion and loaded up the family and rowed to Greenland. The family settled it for the next 450 years and went on to colonise the northern areas of North America. It was thought that the Eskimos had wiped them out as it became colder in the recent Ice Age from 1450-1760 CE. From the DNA tests it appears that the family had not been wiped out at all. They simply joined the Eskimos and adapted to the colder conditions and are still there to this day.

The standard Evolutionary explanation of the Norse Celts is that they came in from the Middle East tens of thousands of years ago and settled North West Europe with a group also in what is Eastern Germany.

The problem is that that does not fit with what is known of British history and the ancient records.

The historical records show that the early inhabitants of Britain were a group of Magogites that came in from what is now the area of the Black Sea and who were termed Scythians. The original Irish were also described as coming in from that region of Greece/Thrace and Scythia. These people in Britain were subjugated by a group of Hittites from the kingdom of Wilusia, according to the early British Historians. Their capital at Troy was destroyed by the Hellenic alliance in the Trojan War. Troy fell in the year 1054 BCE, which was the last two years of the rule of Eli as judge in Israel, and the Irish histories denote this fact (see MacGeoghegan-Mitchell, The History of Ireland, Sadlier & Co., 1868, Chapters 2ff.).

This was the beginning of the destruction of the Hittite Empire which continued on until the Assyrians had eradicated them as the Hittite Empire and assumed their place.

In Britain these people assumed control from the Tenth century BCE. They repelled an invasion by the Huns in the Tenth century under the Hun king Humber who was defeated and killed at the Humber River named after him. The Hittite Trojan Cymry continued in control for the next fourteen hundred years with conflict between them and the Picts in the North until the Anglo-Saxons came into Britain following the Jutes after the retirement of the Romans. For many centuries they traded with the Middle East and the Phoenicians and from them they received exposure to Judah and its merchants.

It is from this lineage that we see some very interesting developments. It is also probably the origin of the similar YDNA structure that we were to find among some Middle East people in some surprising places.

An example of this was the sequence of testing to determine the origins of the YDNA of the Cox family of Surrey that was to lead to a very interesting development.

The initial testing graded the lineage as Norse Celts at R1b1c which was later rearranged in the R1b Haplogroup structure as R1b1b and then with further testing to R1b1b2a1a4 from the 67 DYS sequence to the U106 group positive at the L48.

Contact with others in this group saw the assertion made that the YDNA link was of the House of David in Judah and many of the group were Jews from Israel and from Spain.

This of course was understood to be impossible. However, the contact alleged that to be true. These lineages were stated to be demonstrable genealogically.

This view coincided with those expressed by another earlier match with an old British family who claimed that they were Sephardi Jews persecuted in the 1205 persecutions in Britain and driven underground.

This investigation was to lead to some startling findings in relation to the House of David and its YDNA structure.

Hg. R in the House of David

Most people who know anything about YDNA will agree that Hg. R is a non-Semitic YDNA and stems in biblical terms from the Sons of Japheth. It is without doubt concentrated in the North of Europe and Asia and is related also to the Hg. Q Amerindians that also stemmed from the Hg. P ancestor which in turn is descended from the Hg. K ancestral link, which is linked to the Phoenicians and separate from the Hg. I and J ancestral Hebrew links. If David was anything he would have been an IJ Hebrew.

On being confronted with the amazing contentions of these Jews that claimed lineage from David yet were the U106 group linked to the R1b sub structure further research yielded the most amazing finds.

It was shown that at least two major lines of the house of David were in fact Hg. R. Most were R1b but one was in fact R1a and all were stated to be mutated significantly from one another.

Such a discovery makes a complete nonsense of the theory of Evolution and destroys the premises of the time frames of YDNA mutation.

For these people to be related from a single ancestor they had to be descended from an RxR1 basic ancestor that married into the Davidic Royal line and be absorbed into the genealogical structure just after David. In other words they had to have married one of David’s daughters or female line. This is quite possible genealogically as the genealogies in Judah do not mention females and the lines take the husband’s name even if a descent is taken in the female line. Only rarely are females mentioned. This fact is evidenced by the genealogy in Luke chapter 3 which ends with Joseph son of Heli but is widely known and acknowledged by Judah that the lineage in Luke 3 is that of Mariam the mother of Christ and the genealogy in Matthew chapter 1 is that of Joseph through Jeconiah or Coniah.

What has happened is that two of the major lines in the Royal House of David in Judah are descended from Celts who could only have come in to Judah in prominence after the fall of the Hittite empire in the north and this had to have been subsequent to the fall of Troy in 1054 BCE. There is only one Hittite famous enough and powerful enough to have entered the family of David and indeed David forced that situation himself.

The man was one of the Thirty of Israel and David had him killed to take his wife. That man was Uriah the Hittite and his wife was Bathsheba the mother of Solomon.

The Bible is silent on the matter of Bathsheba having a son or sons previously and she is simply presented as losing the first child to David and then bearing Solomon. However the law of God speaks volumes regarding the requirement for Uriah to have had the opportunity to produce offspring by his wife before he was employed in battle. That he had done so is also evidenced by the fact that he was not concerned to do so when he returned to Jerusalem. He did not cohabit with Bathsheba when it was in fact desired and planned that he have the opportunity to do so.

That Bathsheba had the opportunity to marry her son into the House of David is beyond dispute. She was the favourite wife of the king and the mother of the king designate, namely Solomon, and all Israel knew it. The best way for her to place her son by Uriah into the Royal House was by having him marry one of David’s daughters by another wife and there is no question of incest involved.

It therefore follows as a matter of logic that such a union would have produced Hittite Hg. R YDNA into the genealogy of David.

For the presence of R1b and also a small amount of R1a YDNA it has to be assumed that the original YDNA had to be RxR1 Basic. Thus after 900 BCE the YDNA split into R1B and then further mutated into an R1a offshoot. The fact that such YDNA is found in the most powerful Davidic clans in Judah is evidence of this scenario.

It is therefore a matter of fact that this YDNA is of itself a marker of the Hittite lines in the Royal House of David through one of David’s daughters. It is a most powerful argument that the royal line of David was extended to the gentiles and that salvation was and is of the Gentiles and that this line is of the line of David and Uriah the Hittite through Bathsheba. It is unlikely to have been by a marriage with Solomon’s daughters, as that was prohibited by biblical law.

That line of R1b YDNA is now amongst the Britons. The fact is further attested by the genealogical understanding that a major element of this YDNA is derived from the family name or word meaning son of Isaac (i.e. Cox). Other families are linked to this YDNA in England and also in Spain and elsewhere.

This same YDNA extends to Scotland and into the Shetlands, and to Iceland and to Denmark. It is widely dispersed.

The tendency is to sit on the discovery rather than offend the scientists with their pet theories based on evolutionary theory and mutation cycles or the families involved. It is far too important a discovery to allow that to happen.

The House of David among the British and its impact on the Celtic Church

Another ancestor was called Bran the Blessed. He was asserted by the historians/genealogists to be the son-in-law of Joseph of Aramathaea, and his wife Anna was asserted to be the cousin of the Virgin Mariam and one of the Desposyni. Thus all this family and their offspring are Desposyni or the Family of Jesus Christ. The mention by Geoffrey of Monmouth that Marius, alleged son of Arviragus, married the daughter of Bran the Blessed is a confusion of name as Marius was the Latinised form of Arviragus in its short form Meurig. It was Arviragus snr. that married the daughter of Bran the Blessed. Geoffrey says he lived in Rome for a time. Their son Coel married the daughter of Cyllin, son of Caradog, his second cousin. That is also our family line. The problem is discussed in Mike Ashley, Mammoth Book of British Kings and Queens, Carroll and Graf, 1999, p. 78).

Caradog was a Briton of the Cantii (40 CE), the Catuvellauni and Silures (43-51) that fought the Romans. He was first defeated in Kent. His son or brother (or perhaps son/nephew) Togodumnos was killed at the head of a second army somewhere in Hampshire. Togodumnos is thought to have been the Chief of the Dumnoniae of Devon and Cornwall (i.e. Tog y Dymnaint whose real name may have been Guiderius, although it is suggested as Arviragus the elder also).

The Emperor Claudius, with the army under Aulus Plautius, captured Caradog and Arviragus after the great defeat in Wales, and his betrayal by Cartimandua of the Magogite Brigantes of what is now Lancashire. Claudius took the whole family in chains to Rome. Caradog literally talked his way out of being executed (strangled after a Roman Triumph) and was spared along with the family. He and the whole family were baptised under the Apostle Paul. His son Linus seems to have already been baptised by the Apostles and, according to Hippolytus, Linus was appointed one of the Seventy. He became the first bishop of Rome (see the paper Origin of the Christian Church in Britain (No. 266)). He would thus have gone to Canaan with the father of his aunt Anna, namely Joseph, at the time of Christ. Joseph was understood to be a trader in metals with Britain.