Here Come the 2012 Movies – Caveat Emptor!
Editorial by Marshall Masters
Janice Manning, Contributor
19-January-2009
The 2012 movie trailer from Sony Pictures (releasing in July 2009) asks a simple, but crucial question. “How would the governments of our planet prepare six billion people for the end of the world?” Then they give the answer: “They wouldn't.”
There is nothing entertaining or theatrical about it, as others are asking similarly difficult questions, such as Inner Glow Picture LLC. A small independent film company (indie), their Seeking Closure due out this year takes the viewers the next step beyond Sony’s 2012; how the uniformed shall choose to die.
While Sony and Inner Glow both travel very different paths to the cataclysms of 2012, what they both have in common is the most urgent question of all. Why are we not being told? The question is urgent, because more than simple silence is happening. There is an organized and well-funded ongoing campaign to create that silence in many various and subtle ways. Where does most of this disinformation originate? The UK. One case in point is YouTube user futurestartsnow.
The first thing you notice about the futurestartsnow channel page is the lack of information. All that is revealed is the user is 40 years old and from the UK. Futurestartsnow’s claim to fame is a hoax movie trailer that is a cobbled-together forgery of snippets from various Hollywood blockbusters. It has received over 850,000 views since it was posted and has a 3-star rating. Obviously, some folks know they’ve been had, and others just swallow the bait.
This YouTube user futurestartsnow fits a clear pattern of disinformation. A purely anonymous fabrication that diverts attention from legitimate film trailers, such as those offered by Sony and Inner Glow Pictures. This hoax trailer further muddies these legitimate efforts by demeaning the integrity of legitimate efforts. It is designed to distract and exhaust the attention of those with a casual interest in the topic and the 3-star rating is proof that it works. It is a very subtle, yet huge win for the disinformation wolf pack team that is running the futurestartsnow persona along with countless others.
“Ah but it’s just Internet chatter,” you say. Remember this, the goal of disinformation is to deflect and exhaust public attention, and the people doing it have a real goal in mind. One best explained in the movie Gladiator (2000), when the character Juba, played by Djimon Hounsou, says “You have a great name. He must kill your name before he kills you." When paraphrased in the context of current disinformation tactics, it could easily read as, “You have a great right to choose, so they must kill your choices before they kill you.”
The point here is obvious. If you care about the integrity of your own choices, then do not waste your time (or your chances of survival) on the Machiavellian antics of disinformation operatives like futurestartsnow. If you see a trailer, Google the film and find the official movie site, which is something you can easily do with 2012 and Seeking Closure.
Likewise, just because you can find someone in Google does not mean they’re not directly or indirectly involved in disinformation.
Why some folks can think that Yowusa.com is a large organization still astounds me. There is just the three of us, Jacco van der Worp, Janice Manning and myself. However, we do have a very large network of friends and the information they provide us is phenomenal. One such friend of Yowusa.com is a gentleman by the name of Greg Salyards in Atlantic City, NJ.
He came across an interview on Coast to Coast AM that he wanted me to hear. He even sent me the MP3 files of the interview and this note:
Greg Salyards
Atlantic City, NJMarshall:
Attached hereto and to the next two messages you'll find hours 2, 3, & 4 (really 40 minutes of audio each) of the CoastToCoastAM.com Pole Shift program from last Sunday. In my own research, Planet-X will be the most likely cause for the Pole Shift described in that program, in the Bible, and in so many ancient cultures. Greg
The Coast to Coast AM show Greg Salyards mentioned was the Coming Polar Shift with host George Knapp and researcher Brent Miller, of The Horizon Project that first aired on Sunday January 11th, 2009.
Coast to Coast, Sunday January 11th, 20092nd Hour / 3rd Hour / 4th Hour
For the record, I’ve personally appeared on Coast to Coast several times as a guest, and I know this interview environment very well. (You can search my name on the Coast site.)
Since Greg has a habit of finding obscure but useful information, I loaded the MP3 files into my trusty SanDisk and set out for my usual walk in the Redwoods. It turned out to be a long, 2.5 hour walk as I strolled through the beautiful and quiet Redwoods near my home.
Just as Greg requested, I listened to the whole interview. Then I sat down on a bench and just thought about it and why it troubled me so. So what troubled me? It was not the scenarios or the facts. It was something that as a 2012 researcher troubled me even more.
Induced Cognitive Dissonance (ICD)
What tjroubled me was that Miller devoted his principal attention to giving the most alarming and dire predictions to generate fear, and anger. He avoided offering any hopeful statements that would give listeners any sense of empowerment.
Furthermore, each time he stated that it was not his intention to scare anyone; he would go back to doing the very same thing. At the end of the interview, the only emotion left to the listeners is then one of helplessness.
At yowusa.com, we’ve identified this disinformation tactic as Induced Cognitive Dissonance (ICD). What ICD does, is to surround the issue with so much negativity that audience members are induced into a state of cognitive dissonance where they simply switch on disbelief mechanisms in their minds, out of self-defense.
The consequence of ICD is a Pavlovian-style rejection of the topic as a whole, by those with a new or mild interest. For those with a more serious interest, it stunts ambition for a period of time commensurate with the individual’s commitment to the topic.
If you the reader remember anything from this article let it be this one thing. That ICD is likely being used against you whenever an “expert” on the topic leaves you feeling hopeless. Folks, this is going to be a survival event. Granted, there are no guarantees, but if you get it and want to get through it, you’ve got a clear advantage; one that those who wish you to feel helpless, do not want you to have.
Make-and-Break Promises (MBP)
Another tactic used by Brent Miller, of The Horizon Project that caught my attention is what we call the “make-and-break promises.” (MBP) This is a classic disinformation tactic, and Brent Miller used it throughout the interview.
Although he continually alluded to prophecy, he only spoke in vague generalities, while avoiding specifics. This is a dead give-away. Anytime you hear someone promising specifics in an interview, take note to see if they deliver. If they do not make any attempt to satisfy the promise, then the promise is used as a way to quell or defer interest in a relevant question or issue. The speaker simply moves on and leaves the question behind.
To his credit, George Knapp of Coast to Coast AM tried to hold Brent Miller to his promise several times, and each time, Miller answered by wiggling out to a different subject. If you can remember a second thing from article, let it be never to trust anyone who is a consistent and methodical about breaking promises.
One thing that we also found odd in the context of Brent Miller’s MBP prophecy promise was his position on Remote Viewing (RV). It is important for readers to understand that this method was first developed by the KGB during the Cold War and then adopted by the CIA. In fact, the technique demonstrated so much potential, that the prestigious Stanford University in Palo Alto, CA ran the CIA’s own RV training program.
During the interview, George Knapp continually pressed Miller to express his views on Remote Viewing and greeted Miller’s answers with incredulity, and rightfully so. While admitting that he is a fully trained remote viewer, Miller steadfastly maintained that he does not use the technique because it lacks detail.
What puzzled George Knapp by this answer was the same thing that puzzled 2012 researchers, such as ourselves. Granted, RV is not an end-all source of information, but in this business, you find the crumbs where they lie.
Brent Miller’s stated aversion to using a powerful technique such as RV does not pass the smell test. Not when he states that he is moving on from science to prophecy, because science is no longer giving him enough answers. This is because most prophecy stems from ancient forms of RV and similar methods. Therefore, our only two explanations for his position are that either Miller is misrepresenting his actual RV skills, or, he recklessly scared himself witless during an RV session.
However, the one part of the interview that really resonated with me as a former Coast to Coast AM guest was the open lines segment in the last hour of the interview.
Off Topic Slander (OTS)
As a media personality, I’ve done several of these open lines segments on Coast to Coast AM and other syndicated shows.
What I immediately picked up on in this segment with Miller was George Knapp telling the audience that Coast’s call-in switchboard had suddenly and mysteriously gone down. As an agile interviewer, Knapp kept the dialogue rolling while the Coast producers worked to bring the switchboard back up.
That alone is not a condition for suspicion. These outages do happen. However, when a technical problem like this precedes something more insidious, the dots start to connect. What we heard was a quintessential case of what we call Off Topic Slander (OTS), aimed at Zacharia Sitchin.
The first two callers after the switchboards came back online were slick and very well spoken — actually, too slick and too well spoken. As a former Coast guest, I spotted these guys for ringers. This is because 95% of open line callers have been banging on their redial buttons for so long, they’ve forgotten what to ask about. They just keep hitting the button and hoping for their “15 minutes of fame” as the saying goes. Then by dumb luck, they find themselves on the top of the dog pile and choke.
Sure, you can get one slick guy in an open lines segment, but two, back-to-back, and just after the switchboard goes down? Oh please!
That brings us to why I believe these ringers came on to feed Brent Miller, of The Horizon Project, pre-programmed questions, so as to evoke planned statements that Miller did not get the opportunity to make during the interview.
Both callers focused their questions on the topic of Planet X, which had not been discussed in the interview, aside from Miller alluding to a “planetary body” as a possible causality for a future pole shift.
In his answers, Brent Miller not only rejected that altogether, but he also rejected a key component of his early research, and I would know. After he published his first video, he sent me a copy and requested an interview on my Cut to the Chase program. I liked his video and invited him on, but he just seemed to evaporate away. That’s the way it is with radio bookings. It’s a numbers game, and finding guests is not my problem. Rather, it’s finding the time to produce the shows.
Yet, I was puzzled as to why Brent Miller would reverse himself on his earlier work without stating that. Then turn around in the same breath and completely dismiss the historical accounts of previous Planet X flybys as noted in the collected works of Zacharia Sitchin and The Kolbrin Bible, an ancient wisdom text we publish.
The slam on Sitchin is another dead give-away, as the only guys that seems to slime him this way are religious fanatics or disinformation operatives. Why Brent Miller would trash Sitchin as he did made no sense. If you disagree, just state that you disagree. It is an honorable way to own your own opinion. Conversely, there is nothing honorable about impugning a lifetime of research in such a flip and disrespectful manner.
However, the Sitchin slam made sense once Miller went after The Kolbrin Bible. He called it “The Corbin.” Not once, but twice and he hesitated the second time, as though he was searching his memory for the correct pronunciation. Am I annoyed that he could not pronounce the name of the book? No. In fact, the more people attack the book, the more we sell, and speaking as a publisher, all I can say is bring it on. So then, why am I taking Brent Miller to task?
I'm taking Brent Miller, of The Horizon Project to task because the math tells me he's being managed:
1. The switchboard goes down;
2. Two slick-talking ringers come on back-to-back with targeted off-topic questions about Planet X;
3. In one answer, Miller rudely dismisses Sitchin with unprofessional disdain;
4. Then in the same answer, he mispronounces The Kolbrin Bible as “The Corbin;”
5. Then he later came back, and after thinking about the title, he mispronounced it a second time.
So how does it all add up?
Brent Miller and 2012 Movies
What this has to do with the 2012 movies. Plenty!
I’ve been writing and publishing on Earth changes and space threats since 1999 and before writing this editorial I played the DVD Brent sent me once again. Then I thought it all through again.
This is because taking a fellow researcher to task is something that should only be done in a way that you can honestly own.
In my honest, personal opinion, Brent Miller sold out and became a PTB mouthpiece. The reason why this concerns me is that he is wired into the mainstream media.