Greenfield DLT Agenda

November 17, 2016

8:30a.m.-12:00p.m.

  1. Welcome Mr. Potts 8:30-8:35
  2. Review norms—Mr. Potts
  3. Note-taker—Brady Streitenberger
  4. Time Keeper—Jan Wilson
  5. Process Observer—Leah Unger
  6. Adding a Special Education Team Member

-All team members seemed interested in adding a member

-One to represent Elementary, MS, and HS

-Marta Allen- Elementary

-Maribeth Mitchell- High School

-Middle School will be discussed and decided upon.

  1. Report on Building Action Plans—Action Steps Building Team Reps8:35-9:10

Buildings reported out

-Rainsboro

-Ongoing, high quality PD for SWD

-Invited Hopewell rep to attend BLT meeting and shared information with her about practices

-Rep revisited building and observed classrooms in action as well as specific students

-Came back a third time and provided feedback based on what she saw with Mrs. Gray

-HS

-Strategy 1B1

-Focused technology use by teachers

-Technology Teacher Trainings

-Montly

-Based on Pre-test

-Technology site visits (2)

-Buckskin

-Strategy 1B1

-Brain Breaks- Motor Learning

-Looking for someone to come in to speak to teachers

-Poverty Book Study

-Structured Extended Response

-Writing and Math

-Elementary

-1B9

-Writing and Data to Instruction

-Writing program for K-4

-Consistent prewriting templates

-MS

-PD for Instructional Strategies

-Videos during built in time

-BLT decided upon differentiation videos

** New Meeting Item**

-NWEA Linking Study

-Linking projected proficient for AIR test based on last year’s test submissions

-Now available in each MAP user profile (reports)

-What percent of growth do we want to expect of our students/teachers?

-BLT’s will discuss and bring back to the next meeting.

  1. Reflection on Implications for Practice Brooke Novak9:10-9:25

& Data Team Feedback

  1. Adult & Student Indicator 1A & 1B

1A

  1. Building reports—Progress of Actions

-Went over OIP Next Steps from October 11 meeting

  1. Any Additions
  2. Further commitment to actions

-Possible PD in the future on OTES rubric

-Teams will take back to the BLT to decide on visits/videos.

1B

1)Interest in seeing what Buckskin is doing (100%)

2)Focus on students not meeting expected growth

3)Continue to monitor what other buildings are doing and stay the course

  1. OIPIR Data Review Linda Mead9:25-10:45
  2. Data Review Protocol Data Teams

Deanne is taking notes on our form

BREAK—Process Observer Report 10:45-10:55

Leah reported out that the process is going well and all members are participating.

  1. OIPIR Data Review Linda Mead
  2. 5-Step Process Data Teams10:55-11:50

Deanne is taking notes on the “Quick Fix” and “Long Term Fix” wins based on the Implications for Practice

A Google Form will be created by Brady to help buildings define differentiation.

-Open ended questions

*** By the next meeting, each DLT member will come to the meeting with some feedback on differentiation, and some evidence to support our claims. (Example- could be an article, video, or clip or book) **

  1. Wrap Up Bobbie Hurtt 11:50-12:00

a. Dec. 13, 2016—11:30-3:00

b. Process Observer Report

c. BLT Take-Backs

d. Next Month’s Agenda Items

BLT Take-Backs

  • Item #1—Reflection on Implications for Practice
  • Adult & Student 1A & 1B
  • BLT Discussion—Teachers Observing Other Master Teachers
  • Item #2--Continue to Follow-up and Share Action Plan for District & Building Action Steps
  • Item #3—BLT Discussion of Target for Student Indicator 1B—Met Expected Growth
  • Item #4—OIPIR Data Review
  • BLT will review the district’s Steps 1-3 and as the BLT reviews the Building OIPIR determine any additional actions the building will implement to support the district.
  • Item #5—OIP Data Review—Adult & Student 3A—Building
  • BLTs will complete Steps 1-4 of the 5-Step Process with the building’s Adult & Student Indicator 3A and submit the minutes.
  • Item #6—Google “Differentiation” Survey

December 13, 2016

Agenda Items

  1. Additional Special Education Team Members
  2. Welcome Maribeth Mitchell
  3. Elementary and Middle school
  1. Report on Building Action Plans—Action Steps
  2. Any District & Building Action Steps Less Than 90%
  3. OIPIR
  4. Survey
  5. Did the building decide on any additional steps
  1. BLT Suggestions for Strategy 1B—Student Indicator—% Met Expected Growth
  1. BLT Suggestions for Strategy 1A—Adult Indicator—Teachers Observing Other Master Teachers--Differentiation
  1. OIPIR—Differentiation Discussion
  2. Share and facilitate discussion
  3. Next steps
  1. Reflections on Implications for Practice from OIP Data Review
  2. Strategy 3A—DLT will provide feedback on Buildings’ minutes
  3. District OIP Data Review—Adult & Student 3A