Graduate Studies in Counseling

Program Evaluation Report

2013-2014 Academic Year

Graduate Department of Psychology and Counseling

Lipscomb University

One University Park Drive

Nashville, TN 37024-3951

1-800-333-4358 x5906

615-966-5906

1

Table of Contents

Description of Program, Faculty and Curriculum

Mission Statement and Program Goals

Program Goals

Program Objectives

Program Description

Program Faculty

Curriculum

Courses

Systematic Plan for Program Evaluation

Accreditation Standards

Philosophy of Program Evaluation

Eight-Point Student, Faculty and Program Evaluation Plan

Application and Interview

New Student Orientation

First Semester

Pre-Practicum Semesters

Application to Candidacy

Clinical Semesters

Final Semester

Alumni

Meeting Program Goals and Objectives Through the Eight Point Assessment Plan

Program Goals

Program Objectives

Program Evaluation Calendar

Program Evaluation Responsibility Assignments

Internal Evaluation of Students

Description of Data Collection Procedure Pre-Admission

Review of Applicants

Description of Data Collection Procedure

Skills Course Evaluation

Progress Review Committee (PRC) Evaluation

Grades for Each Course

Student Candidacy Review

Clinical End of Semester Reviews

Final Student Review

Remediation and Gatekeeping for the Profession

Internal Program Evaluation of Students Review

Strengths

Areas to Improve

Internal Program Evaluation of Faculty and Program

Description of Data Collection Procedure

New Student Orientation Feedback

Course Evaluations

Mid-Program Evaluation

Practicum Orientation Evaluation

Group Supervisor Evaluation

Student Site and Site Supervisor Evaluations

Exit Interview

Final Program Evaluation

Internal Program Evaluation of Faculty and Program Review

Strengths

Areas to Improve

External Evaluation of Program and Students

Description of Data Collection Procedure

Site Supervisor Mid-Semester and End of Semester Evaluations

Site Supervisor Program Evaluations

CPCE Exam

Alumni Survey

Employer Survey

External Evaluation of Program and Students Review

Strengths

Areas to Improve

Program Modifications based on Review Data

Overall Program Strengths

Internal Evaluation of Students

Internal Evaluation of Program and Faculty

External Evaluation of the Program and Students

Strengths Indicated from All Internal and External Evaluations

Overall Program Areas to Improve

Internal Evaluation of Students

Internal Evaluation of Program and Faculty

External Evaluation of Program and Students

Areas to Improve Indicated by Internal and External Evaluations

Questions to Consider

Plan to Address Challenges

Conclusion

Table of Figures

Figure 1: Graduate Studies in Counseling within the College of Arts and Sciences

Figure 2: Diagram of Program Philosophy

Figure 3: Eight-Point Student, Faculty, and Program Evaluation

Figure 4: Internal and External Program Evaluation Assessments

Figure 5: Matching Assessments with Program Goals and Objectives

Figure 6: Program Evaluation Calendar

Figure 7: Assessment of Students and Philosophy of Program Evaluation

Figure 8: External Evaluations and Philosophy of Program Evaluation

Figure 9: Philosophy of Program Assessment with Strengths and Areas to Improve

1

Description of Program, Faculty and Curriculum

Mission Statement and Program Goals

The mission for the Lipscomb University Graduate Studies in Counseling program is to provide an educational environment characterized by academic excellence and Christian faith, where counseling students are prepared to become competent, confidant, committed and caring professional mental health counselors. See Figure 1.

Figure 1: The Four C's of our Mission

Program Goals

The Graduate Studies in Counseling program promotes the following goals:

  1. To attract and develop a high quality, diverse student body.
  2. To increase student knowledge in the field of professional counseling.
  3. To facilitate competence in the practice of professional counseling.
  4. To serve and improve the quality of life in the local, state, national, and international community.
  5. To encourage an understanding and commitment to the scientist practitioner model.
  6. To facilitate an understanding of the individual characteristics that each student brings to the counseling process.

Program Objectives

The Graduate Studies in Counseling program promotes the following objectives:

  1. To gain knowledge of the counseling profession and other related helping professionals.
  2. To gain knowledge of and become accountable to the ACA Professional Code of Ethics.
  3. To gain knowledge and competence in serving and advocating for culturally diverse populations, including assessment, treatment planning, treatment, and outcome evaluation.
  4. To gain knowledge of eight core knowledge areas: professional orientation and ethical practice, social and cultural diversity, human growth and development, career development, helping relationships, group work, assessment and testing, and research and program evaluation.
  5. To gain knowledge of a wellness model of mental health.
  6. To gain knowledge in the foundations of research and inquiry.

Program Description

The Graduate Studies in Counseling program is housed in the College of Arts and Sciences. The department of Psychology and Counseling is part of the School of Communications and Social Sciences within that college. Our department includes programs in Undergraduate Psychology, Graduate Studies in Psychology, Graduate Studies in Counseling and Marriage and Family. See Figure 2.

1

Figure 2: Graduate Studies in Counseling within the College of Arts and Sciences

1

Program Faculty

Faculty

Our departmental faculty consists of full-time and part-time professors representing the areas of professional counseling, marriage and family therapy, and the fields of clinical, experimental, neuroscience, developmental and cognitive psychology. We supplement this group with excellent part-time faculty members who are experts in their fields. For further information about each faculty member, visit our website.

Core Faculty

Jake Morris, B.A., M.Ed., Ph.D. (University of Mississippi), LPC, Director of Graduate Studies in Psychology and Counseling, Professor of Psychology and Counseling

Melanie H. Morris. B.S. (Lipscomb University), M.S., Ph.D. (University of Mississippi), Licensed Psychologist, HSP, Clinical Director of Graduate Studies in Professional Counseling, Assistant Professor of Psychology and Counseling

Shanna D. Ray, B.S. (Lipscomb University), M.S. (Middle Tennessee State University), M.S., Ph.D. (Vanderbilt University), Department Chair of Graduate Studies in Psychology and Counseling, Thesis Coordinator, Associate Professor of Psychology and Counseling

Paul E. Turner, A.A. (Faulkner University), B.S. (Auburn University), M.A. (Southern Christian University), M.S. (University of Western Kentucky), M.A. (University of Southern Mississippi), Ph.D. (University of Southern Mississippi), Professor of Psychology and Counseling

Roy W. Hamley, B.S. (Tennessee State University), M.S. (Middle Tennessee State University), Ed.D. (Tennessee State University), LPC, Professor of Psychology and Counseling

J. Dale Alden III, B.S. (Freed Hardeman University), M.S. (Abilene Christian University), Ph.D. (Virginia Polytechnic University), Internship/Residency, (Vanderbilt University School of Medicine), Licensed Psychologist, HSP, Assistant Professor of Psychology and Counseling

Christopher J. Gonzalez, B.A. (Harding University), M.M.F.T. (Abilene Christian University), Ph.D. (University of Minnesota), LMFT, Associate Professor of Psychology and Counseling

Douglas Ribeiro, B.S., M.S. (Freed Hardeman University), Ph.D. (Georgia State University), Assistant Professor ofPsychology and Counseling

Denis’ Thomas, B.A. (Abilene Christian University), M.Ed. (Middle Tennessee State University), Ph.D. (University of Tennessee),NCC,Coordinator of Play Therapy Specialization, Assistant Professor ofPsychology and Counseling

Curriculum

The Master of Science in Clinical Mental Health Counseling offers a 61-hour curriculum designed to meet the academic and graduate clinical experiences required for licensure as a Professional Counselor with Mental Health Service Provider designation (LPC-MHSP) in the State of Tennessee (TN). This credential allows students to provide counseling services in a variety of settings as outlined by the State Board of Certification for Professional Counselors and Marital and Family Therapists and Clinical Pastoral Therapists. For detailed information about this licensure, see the rules of the State Board of Certification for Professional Counselors and Marital and Family Therapists and Clinical Pastoral Therapists. Our program’s emphasis on faith integration is especially helpful for those who wish to practice in faith-related settings (although students are not limited to only these settings). Graduation from the Counseling Program requires the following completed steps:

  • Cumulative GPA of 3.0 or higher
  • Successful completion of Plan of Study (POS)
  • Successful completion of the Progress Review process
  • Approval for Candidacy
  • Successful completion of Clinical Experiences
  • Successful completion of Coursework including Capstone and comprehensive exam
  • Completion of Application for Graduation and completing all required paperwork
  • Recommendation of the Graduate Studies in Counseling faculty

Courses

1

Core Courses (46 Hours)

COUN 5103Theories of Counseling and Personality

COUN 5113Introduction to Clinical Mental Health

COUN 5203Introduction to Psychopathology and Adaptive Behavior

COUN 5303Lifespan Development

COUN 5603Research Methods and Statistics

COUN 5703Ethics and Professional Issues in Counseling

COUN 5803Integration of Psychology and Christianity Seminar

COUN 5903Introduction to Counseling Skills

COUN 6053Multicultural Issues in Counseling

COUN 6103Group Dynamics and Group Counseling

COUN 6253Career Counseling

COUN 6303 Substance Abuse Counseling

COUN 6603Advanced Psychopathology

COUN 6653Assessment Techniques

COUN 6703Effective Counseling and Treatment Planning

COUN 6951Capstone Seminar in Counseling

Clinical Experience Courses (9 Hours)

COUN 6803Practicum

COUN 6853Internship I

COUN 6903Internship II

COUN 6910Internship Continuation (if needed)

Elective Courses (select 9 Hours)

COUN 5003Surveyof Psychology (for students who did not major in psychology)

COUN 6003Grief and Crisis Counseling

COUN 6153Marriage and Family Counseling

COUN 6203Child and Adolescent Counseling

COUN 6353Addictive Disorders

COUN 6403Psychopharmacology

COUN 6453Gerontology

COUN 6503Human Sexuality

PSG 6553Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

COUN 675VPsychological/Counseling Topics

COUN 675VIntroduction to Play Therapy

COUN 675VAdvanced Play Therapy and Expressive Arts

PSG 6933Thesis I

PSG 6943Thesis II

1

Systematic Plan for Program Evaluation

Accreditation Standards

The primary accrediting body for the counseling programs is the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP). The 2009 CACREP standards and policies are guidelines for the plan for program evaluation for the Graduate Studies in Counseling program at Lipscomb University. The following sections are excerpted from these standards, which can be found in their entirety here,and guided our comprehensive program evaluation plan, including internal evaluation of students, internal evaluation of the program and faculty, and external evaluation of students and program.

Section I: THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT: STRUCTURE AND EVALUATION

THE ACADEMIC UNIT(CACREP, 2009, p. 5).

P. The program faculty conducts a systematic developmental assessment of each student’s progress throughout the program, including consideration of the student’s academic performance, professional development, and personal development. Consistent with established institutional due process policy and the American Counseling Association’s (ACA) code of ethics and other relevant codes of ethics and standards of practice, if evaluations indicate that a student is not appropriate for the program, faculty members help facilitate the student’s transition out of the program and, if possible, into a more appropriate area of study.

EVALUATION (CACREP, 2009, p. 8)

AA. Program faculty members engage in continuous systematic program evaluation indicating how the mission, objectives, and student learning outcomes are measured and met. The plan includes the following:

  1. A review by program faculty of programs, curricular offerings, and characteristics of program applicants.
  2. Formal follow-up studies of program graduates to assess graduate perceptions and evaluations of major aspects of the program.
  3. Formal studies of site supervisors and program graduate employers that assess their perceptions and evaluations of major aspects of the program.
  4. Assessment of student learning and performance on professional identity, professional practice, and program area standards.
  5. Evidence of the use of findings to inform program modifications.
  6. Distribution of an official report that documents outcomes of the systematic program evaluation, with descriptions of any program modifications, to students currently in the program, program faculty, institutional administrators, personnel in cooperating agencies (e.g., employers, site supervisors), and the public.

BB. Students have regular and systematic opportunities to formally evaluate faculty who provide curricular experiences and supervisors of clinical experiences.

CC. Annual results of student course evaluations are provided to faculty.

DD. Written faculty evaluation procedures are presented to program faculty and supervisors at the beginning of each evaluation period and whenever changes are made in the procedures.

Philosophy of Program Evaluation

The philosophical approach that guided our plan for program evaluation was to integrate three areas to create a comprehensive plan to uphold 1) the standards of the profession, 2) Lipscomb University’s ideals, and 3) student growth. The mission for the Lipscomb University Graduate Studies in Counseling is to provide an educational environment characterized by academic excellence and Christian faith. Counseling students are prepared to become competent, confident, committed and caring (the 4 C’s) professional mental health counselors in eight core areas of knowledge: professional orientation and ethical practice, social and cultural diversity, human growth and development, career development, helping relationships, group work, assessment and testing, and research and program evaluation. This takes place both inside and outside of the classroom and is characterized by academic, professional, and personal growth. See Figure 3.

Figure 3: Diagram of Program Philosophy

Student Learning Objectives

The Clinical Mental Health Counseling Program at Lipscomb University used our program philosophy to develop 15 student learning outcomes.

Educational Environment of Academic Excellence and Christian Faith

A.1.Students are prepared to become competent professional mental health counselors.

A.2. Students are prepared to become confidantprofessional mental health counselors.

A.3.Students are prepared to become committedprofessional mental health counselors.

A.4.Students are prepared to become caring professional mental health counselors.

Core Areas of Knowledge

B.1.Students gain academic and practitioner knowledge in professional orientation and ethical practice.

B.2. Students gain academic and practitioner knowledge in social and cultural diversity.

B.3.Students gain academic and practitioner knowledge in human growth and development.

B.4.Students gain academic and practitioner knowledge in career development.

B.5.Students gain academic and practitioner knowledge in helping relationships.

B.6.Students gain academic and practitioner knowledge in group work.

B.7.Students gain academic and practitioner knowledge in assessment.

B.8.Students gain academic and practitioner knowledge in research and program evaluation.

Student Growth

C.1.Students grow in academic knowledge of the counseling profession.

C.2.Students develop a professional counseling identity through involvement in local, state and national professional organizations.

C.3.Students experience personal growth including awareness of personal issues, potential biases, identification of a personal counseling theory, and strengths.

In order to monitor our effectiveness as a training program, we have implemented a comprehensive plan to provide continuous and systematic data that we review, consider, and evaluate to determine our areas of strength and address areas that could be improved. We believe this on-going process is critical in improving our program to meet the needs of a changing culture and profession.

The program is based on data collected at eight key points, structured around a student’s progress through the program: the application stage, orientation to the program, first semester, each pre-practicum semester, application to candidacy, each clinical semester, the last semester, and as alumni. Our system for program evaluation contains 26 different assessments, around 90 assessments during a typical student’s program cycle, and thousands of data points. We sought data from faculty, students, clinical site supervisors,alumni, employersof graduates, and an outside standardized test. See Figure 4.

1

Systematic Student, Faculty and Program Evaluation

Figure 4: Eight-Point Student, Faculty, and Program Evaluation

1

Eight-Point Student, Faculty and Program Evaluation Plan

The program evaluation plan for the Graduate Studies in Counseling Program revolved around three areas: eight evaluations of students within the program, twelveevaluations of the program within the program, and six evaluations of students and the program from external sources. See Figure 5. Some assessments were used multiple times during the program cycle. See Figure 4.

Figure 5: Internal and External Program Evaluation Assessments

Application and Interview

The first point of data collection for evaluating the program comes from information provided by potential students from applications to the program as well as assessment data from the interview process. This includes self-reported information on ethnicity, faith and gender, undergraduate GPA, and GRE scores. Also, during the summer semester we conductthe annual stakeholderreview of the program and each faculty member is evaluated.Since this conceptually gives us a starting point for the next academic year, we have placed those here.

New Student Orientation

For each new cohort admitted to the program, we hold an orientation early in the first semester. During the orientation, we distribute the counseling handbook and other materials, give an overview of the curriculum, and outline the clinical experiences and expectations. Students are asked to provide feedback on the orientation to help us make it more beneficial as the final agenda item for the orientation meeting.

First Semester

During the first semester, we conduct three internal evaluations of students and one student evaluation of faculty and facilities. The first semester in the program provides an important time for faculty to begin evaluating student skills, character, and grades and address any areas of deficiency that are identified. Since all first semester students are required to take the Introduction to Counseling Skills course, we conduct a skills evaluation for students in that course. The Progress Review Committee meets at the conclusion of eachsemester to review student dispositions, grades and any faculty concerns for each pre-candidacy student. Students provide feedback about faculty and facilities through course evaluations.

Pre-Practicum Semesters

For each semester between the first semester and Practicum, students are evaluated through grades. As with every semester, any concerns with student behavior, grades, or dispositions are discussed by the Progress Review Committee. Many students opt to go on an international service trip before clinical work begins, so we have added that opportunity for feedback here although students may opt to go during their clinical semesters as well. Students provide feedback through course evaluations.

Application to Candidacy

All students formally apply for candidacy. The candidacy application form verifies that students have: rectified any undergraduate deficiencies; completed at least 12 hours of graduate work, including a minimum of four core classes; maintained a 3.0 GPA; received successful reviews by the departmental Performance Review Committee; and earned successful evaluations on the Professional Performance Review forms during the first two semesters. Students also complete a mid-program evaluation at the practicum orientation meeting, which falls at about this time in the program cycle.