CONTENTS

Pages

I.FOREWORD

II.THE KASHMIR DISPUTE: Historical Perspective

  1. TREATY OF AMRITSAR
  2. UN RESOLUTIONS

UN Security Council Resolution, January 1948

UN Security CouncilResolution, April 1948

UN Commission for IndiaPakistanResolution, August 1948

UN Commission for IndiaPakistan Resolution, January 1949

UN Security CouncilResolution, March 1950

UN Security CouncilResolution, March 1951

UN Security CouncilResolution, January 1957

Statement of the President of Security Council, May 1964

UN Security CouncilResolution, September 1965

UN Security CouncilResolution,1971

UN Security Council Resolution,1998

  1. BILATERAL AGREEMENTS

Tashkent Accord, 1966

Simla Agreement, 1972

Islamabad Declaration, 1997

Lahore Declaration, 1999

Islamabad Declaration, 2004

  1. CONSTITUTIONS

Pakistan

India

FOREWORD

Need for compiling relevant papers on an issue can hardly be overemphasized. Therefore, it was need of the hour to bring out a publication, containing documents on such an important issue as Jammu & Kashmir.Besides, there was also a demand from various quarters in this regard. Hence, staff of the Kashmir Committee was tasked to prepare a brochure, comprising important papers on Kashmir.

The present brochure does not contain all the documents, discussions on Kashmir. However, an effort has been made to place important papers together. I hope the publication will be useful for the readers, especially the researchers.

(FAZL-UR-RAHMAN)

Chairman

ParliamentaryKashmirCommittee

July, 2011

THE KASHMIR ISSUE

The history of freedom struggle in Jammu & Kashmir is much older than the freedom struggle of the sub continent. In 1832, the Kashmiris revolted against the tyranny of the Sikh rule and their leaders were skinned alive. Thereafter, the Kashmiris kept on agitating. The KashmirValley(area in the east of the River Sindh) was sold by the British Rulers to Raja Gulab Singh of Jammu for 75 lac rupees under the ignoble of the Amritsar Treaty on 16th March, 1846.

The Kashmirissue is not only the oldest issue on the agenda of the United Nations, but is also an unfinished agenda of Partition of the sub-continent. As per the Partition Plan, option was given to the Rulers of the princely states (numbering 584) to preferably join either India or Pakistan, keeping in view the geographical contiguity and composition of population of their states. The Ruler of Hyderabad wanted to remain independent, whereas the Ruler of Junagarh acceded to Pakistan. However, India occupied both the states on the plea that the majority of their peoples were Hindus, who wanted to join India. But India was not ready to accept this formula in the case of Jammu & Kashmir, which was supposed to join Pakistan for its geographical contiguity and predominant Muslim population. India cajoled the Non-Muslim Ruler of the State, Mahraja Hari Singh to accede to India and sent its forces for the massacre of the Kashmiri Muslim, who were agitating to join Pakistan. The Kashmiris also took up arms, liberated some areas of the State and established anAzad Government of Jammu & Kashmir.

India went to the UN, seeking its help in resolving the issue. The UN passed quite a few resolutions, calling for holding a plebiscite in the State. The resolutions were accepted by India and Pakistan. The prominent leaders of India also repeatedly promised to hold plebiscite. However, they are not serious in fulfilling their promises. Rather, Indiahas tried to delay the matter on one pretext on the other.It also engaged in talks with Pakistan and the Kashmiri leaders as a delaying tactic.

Disgruntled with the sham elections, non-implementation of the UN resolutions on Kashmir and affected by the wave of democracy spreading across the globe in the late eighties, the people of the Occupied Kashmir started agitating for freedom. India tried to crush the movement by force, which further ignited the fire of freedom. India has deployed around eight hundred thousand military and paramilitary forces in the Occupied Kashmir, empowering them with draconian laws, which give them a free hand to play an orgy of death. They have unleashed a reign of terror. By now, over 90,000 Kashmiris have been killed, some10,000 women raped, over10,000 persons disappeared and property worth billions of rupees destroyed. The recent discovery of over four thousand unnamed graves has further exposed the horrible dimensions of human tragedy. The human rights violations perpetrated by the Indian Security Forces in the occupied territory have been condemned by various leaders of the world, the human rights organizations, like Amnesty International, Asia Watch, Human Rights Watch, UN Human Rights Commission/Council, European Parliament, etc. A delegation of the European Parliament, after a visit to the Occupied Kashmir, has called it “the most beautiful prison in the world”. Even Indian organizations and intellectuals, like Gautam Naulakha, Arundhatti Roy and others have condemned these brutalities. The foreign dignitaries may visit both parts of Jammu & Kashmir to see the ground reality. In AJK, they can meet the refugees from the Occupied Kashmir also and listen to their tales of woe. There will be no restriction on them, as they face in the Indian Occupied Kashmir.

Pakistan is a peace loving country and desires to resolve all disputes with India peacefully. It has shown maximum flexibility. It has offered to talk to India at any time, at any level and at any place. However, despite all efforts of Pakistan to resolve the issue, Indian leaders are adamant.

During the last six decades, a number of rounds of talks were held between Pakistan and India on Kashmir, but all remained fruitless, because of the intransigency of India. It starts talks under pressure only and stops when the pressure is released. A number of years were consumed on the Composite Dialogue. Some progress has been recorded in the sectors of culture, sports, immigration, communications,etc. However, there is little progress on the core issue of Kashmir. If at all India is engaged in talks with Pakistan, it keeps on killing the Kashmiri people. It has also increased its defence budget enormously and is spending huge amounts on the enhancement of its firepower. Moreover, it is building dams in the Occupied Kashmir on the rivers, flowing towards Pakistan, in violation of the Indus Water Treaty 1960. This reflects the mindset of the Indian leaders against Pakistan.

The freedom struggle of the Kashmiris for their right to self-determination can’t be dubbed as terrorist movement, because this right has been accepted in the United Nations resolutions, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and by the international organizations, such as the Non-Aligned Movement. The peaceful mass movement, continuing since 2008, has also exposed the Indian propaganda,calling the upsurge in the Occupied Kashmir as a terrorist movement sponsored from abroad.

Kashmir is not a territorial problem. It’s a human problem, involving around 14 million Kashmiris. If the Kashmir issue is resolved, all other issues will automatically be resolved and both countries will save a lot of funds presently spent on defence, for bettering the lot of their peoples.Three wars have since been fought between the two countries on Kashmir. If atrocities in the Occupied Kashmir continue and the Kashmir issue is not resolved, situation in the nuclearized sub-continent can take an awful turn.

India desires to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council – the same body whose resolutions on Kashmir it is flouting with impunity for the last over six decades. Indian efforts to this effect are, therefore, no less than a joke and insult for this august body.

The world community should not remain a silent, disinterested spectator to the Jammu & KashmirImbroglio, because any conflagration in the sub-continent can affect peace and stability of not only the region, but the world as well. Hence, it should play its role in resolving the issue. The need of the hour is that Indiashould immediately withdraw its forces from the Occupied Kashmir, release the detenus, repeal the black laws, stop state terrorism and allow human rights organisations to visit the Occupied Kashmir.The international community should monitor the Pak-India dialogue and compel India to be serious in making the dialogue meaningful and result oriented.

TREATY OF AMRITSAR

(March 16, 1846)

The treaty between the British Government on the one part and Maharajah Gulab Singh of Jammu on the other concluded on the part of the British Government by Frederick Currie, Esq. and Brevet-Major Henry Montgomery Lawrence, acting under the orders of the Right Hon. Sir Henry Hardinge, G.C.B., one of her Britannic Majesty's most Honorable Privy Councillors, Governor-General appointed by the Honourable Companyto direct and control all the affairs in the East Indies, and by Maharajah Gulab Singh in person.

ARTICLE 1

The British Government transfers and makes over for ever, in independent possession to Maharajah Gulab Singh, and the heirs male of his body, all the hilly or mountainous country, with its dependencies situated to the eastward of the River Indus, and the westward of the River Ravi, including Chamba and excluding Lahore, being part of the territory ceded to the British Government by the Lahore State according to the provisions of Article IV of the Treaty of Lahore, dated 9th March, 1846.

ARTICLE 2

The eastern boundary of the tract transferred by the foregoing article to Maharajah Gulab Singh shall be laid down by the Commissioners appointed by the British Government and Maharajah Gulab Singh respectively for that purpose and shall be defined in a separate engagement after survey.

ARTICLE 3

In consideration of the transfer made to him and his heirs by the provisions of the foregoing articles Maharajah Gulab Singh will pay to the British Government the sum of seventy-five lacs of rupees (Nanakshahee), fifty lacs to be paid on ratification of the treaty and 25 lacs on or before the 1st October of the current year, A.D., 1846.

Article 4

The limits of territories of Maharajah Gulab Singh shall not be, at any time, changed without the concurrence of the British Government.

Article 5

Maharajah Gulab Singh will refer to the arbitration of the British Government any disputes or questions that may arise between himself and the Government of Lahore or any other neighboring State, and will abide by the decision of the British Government.

ARTICLE 6

Maharajah Gulab Singh engages for himself and heirs to join, with the whole of his Military forces, the British troops, when employed within the hills or in the territories adjoining his possessions.

ARTICLE 7

Maharajah Gulab Singh engages never to take to retain in his service any British subject nor the subject of any European or AmericanState without the consent of the British Government.

ARTICLE 8

Maharajah Gulab Singh engages to respect, in regard to the territory transferred to him, the provisions of Article V, VI and VII of the separate engagement between the British Government and the Lahore Durbar, dated 11th March, 1846.

ARTICLE 9

The British Government will give its aid to Maharajah Gulab Singh in protecting his territories from external enemies.

Article 10

Maharajah Gulab Singh acknowledges the supremacy of the British Government and will, in token of such supremacy present annually to the British Government one horse, twelve perfect shawl goats of approved breed (six male and six female), and three pairs of Cashmere shawls.

(Note: In 1893 it was agreed to drop the gift of “Twelve perfect shawl Goats)”.

This Treaty, consisting of ten articles, has been this day settled by Frederick Currie, Esq. and Brevet-Major Henry Montgomery Lawrence, acting under the directions of the Rt. Hon. Sir Henry Hardinge, G.C.B., Governor-General, on the part of the British Government and by Maharajah Gulab Singh in person, and the said Treaty has been this day ratified by the seal of the Rt. Hon. Sir Henry Hardinge, G.C.B., Governor-General.

(Done at Amritsar, the sixteenth day of March, in the year of our Lord 1846 AD One thousand eight hundred and forty-six, corresponding with the seventeenth day of Rubee-ul-Awal, 1262 Hijree).

(Signed) H. Hardinge (Seal)

(Signed) F. Currie

(Signed) H.M. Lawrence

By order of the Right Honourable the Governor General of India

SignedF. Currie

Secretary of the Government of India with the Governor General

Signed Gulab Singh

RESOLUTION 39 (1948) OF UN SECURITY COUNCIL

(JANUARY 20, 1948)

The Security Council,

Considering that it may investigate any dispute or any siutation which might, by its continuance, endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, and that, in the existing state of affairs between India and Pakistan, such an investigation is a matter of urgency,

Adopts the following resolution:

  1. A Commission of the Security Council is hereby established*, composed of representatives of three Members of the United Nations, one to be selected by India, one to be selected by Pakistan, and the third to be designated by the two so selected. Each representative on the Commission shall be entitled to select his alternates and assistants.
  2. The Commission shall proceed to the spot as quickly as possible. It shall act under the authority of the Security Council and in accordance with the directions it may receive from it. It shall keep the Security Council currently informed of its activities and of the development of the situation. It shall report to the Security Council regularly, submitting its conclusions and proposals.
  3. The Commission is invested with a dual function; (1) to investigate the facts pursuant to Article 34 of the Charter of the United Nations; (2) to exercise, without interrupting the work of the Security Council, any mediatory influence likely to smooth away difficulties, to carry out the directions given to it by the Security Council; and to report how far the advice and directions, if any, of the Security Council, have been carried out.
  4. The Commission shall perform the functions described in Clause C: (1) in regard to the situation in the Jammu and Kashmir State set out in the letter of the Representative of India addressed to the President of the Security Council, dated 1 January, 1948, and in the letter from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan addressed to the Secretary-General, dated 15 January 1948; and (2) in regard to other situations set out in the letter from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan addressed to the Secretary-General, dated 15 January 1948, when the Security Council so directs.
  5. The Commission shall take its decision by majority vote. It shall determine its own procedure. It may allocate among its members, alternate members, their assistants, and its personnel such duties as may have to be fulfilled for the realization of its mission and the reaching of its conclusions.
  6. The Commission, its members, alternate members, their assistants, and its personnel, shall be entitled to journey, separately or together, wherever the necessities of their task may require, and, in particular within those territories which are the theatre of the events of which the Security Council is seized.
  7. The Secretary-General shall furnish the Commission with such personnel and assistance as it may consider necessary.

[*United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan –

Members: Argentina nominated by Pakistan, Czechoslovakia nominated by India, Columbia and Belgium selected by the Security Council and one additional member i.e. USA was nominated by the President of Security Council.

The Czech diplomat Josef Korbel, father of Ex-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was on the Commission as Representative of Czechoslovakia. Later he wrote a book on Kashmir titled “Danger in Kashmir” and highlighted the intransigence of India.]

RESOLUTION OF UN COMMISSION

FOR INDIAPAKISTAN

(AUGUST 13, 1948)

The United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan,

Having given careful consideration to the points of view expressed by the Representatives of India and Pakistan regarding the situation in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, and

Being of the opinion that the prompt cessation of hostilities and the coercion of conditions the continuance of which is likely to endanger international peace and security are essential to implementation of its endeavours to assist the Governments of India and Pakistan in effecting a final settlement of the situation.

Resolves to submit simultaneously to the Governments of India and Pakistan the following proposal:

PART I

Cease-fireorder

  1. The Governments of India and Pakistan agree that their respective High Commands will issue separately and simultaneously a cease-fire order to apply to all forces under their control in the State of Jammu and Kashmir as of the earliest practicable date or dates to be mutually agreed upon within four days after these proposals have been accepted by both Governments.
  2. The High Commands of Indian and Pakistan forces agreed to refrain from taking any measures that might augment the military potential of the forces under their control in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. (For the purpose of these proposals “forces under their control” shall be considered to include all forces, organized and unorganised, fighting or participating in hostilities on their respective sides).
  3. The Commanders-in-Chief of the Forces of India and Pakistan shall promptly confer regarding any necessary local changes in present dispositions which may facilitate the cease-fire.
  4. In its discretion, and as the Commission may find practicable, the Commission will appoint military observers who under the authority of the Commission and with the co-operation of both commands will supervise the observance of the cease-fire order.
  5. The Government of Pakistan agree to appeal to their respective peoples to assist in creating and maintaining an atmosphere favourable to the promotion of further negotiations.

PART II