Evolution and Society

Evolution and Society

Evolution and society

Creationism

 Over 40% of Americans believe that the human species was created directly by a god

 Most in Europe, Australia, etc. accept evolution

Evolution and religion

 Evolution conflicts with a literal interpretation of the bible

 Many believe that the bible contains symbolic truths, not literal ones

 Many deeply religious people believe in evolution

– Theistic evolution – evolution driven by a divine hand

– Pope John Paul II in 1996 affirmed evolution

Intelligent design

 Movement that asserts itself as science

 Belief that life is too complex to have formed “by chance”

 Many believe that intelligent design should be given equal time with evolution in science classes

– Is intelligent design science?

What is science?

 Science is a process for producing knowledge

 Science depends on making precise observations of natural phenomena and on formulating rational theories to make sense of those observations

 Science reduces our tendency to rely on emotional reactions and unexamined assumptions

Science

 Science searches for testable evidence that cultural and religious traditions do not

 Scientists do not accept proposed explanations until there is substantial evidence to support them

Science

 Science is a process of testing hypotheses about the material world using evidence and natural laws

 Scientists are always skeptical and provisional, even of evolution

 Intelligent design is not testable and is therefore not science

 Evolution has been tested and supported by evidence for the past 150 years

Hypothesis and theory

 An hypothesis is a conditional explanation

 After systematic testing, scientists either accept or reject the hypothesis

 When a large amount of evidence and many tests support a hypothesis and a majority of experts have reached general consensus, we call it a scientific theory

What is the evidence for evolution?

 Fossil record

– Has gaps, but even with gaps, data from the fossil record match the predictions of evolution

Evidence for evolution

 Phylogenetic and comparative studies

– Molecular and morphological phylogenies match

– Universal features in all organisms, e.g. L-isomer amino acids and DNA

– Intermediate species

Evidence for evolution

 Genes and genomes

– Molecular evolution is showing commonalities in all species

– Mechanisms for new genes to arise

– Molecular clocks match phylogeny and fossil record

Evidence for evolution

 Biogeography

– Distribution of species correspond to geologic events

Evidence for evolution

 Evolution in action

– Grants’ studies on Darwin’s finches

– Endler’s studies on guppies

– Speciation in fruit flies

– Natural selection

– Etc., etc., etc!

Fallacies of intelligent design

 What about inferior design?

– Panda’s thumb

– Vestigal structures

Arguments of creationism

 Evolution cannot be observed

 Evolution cannot be proved

 Evolution is not a scientific hypothesis because it is not testable; no possible observations can refute it

 The orderliness of the universe is evidence of intelligent design

Arguments of creationism

 Evolution of greater complexity violates the second law of thermodynamics, which holds that entropy increases

 It is almost infinitely improbable that even the simplest life could arise from non-living matter

 Mutations are harmful and do not give rise to complex new adaptive characteristics

Arguments of creationism

 Natural selection eliminates unfit mutants, rather than creating new characters

 Chance could not produce complex structures

 Complex adaptations such as wings, eyes and biochemical pathways could not have evolved gradually because the first stages would not have been adaptive

Arguments of creationism

 If an altered structure, such as the long neck of a giraffe, is advantageous, why don’t all species have that structure?

 If gradual evolution had occurred, there would be no phenotypic gaps among species and classification would be impossible

Arguments of creationism

 The fossil record does not contain any transformational forms representing the origin of major new forms of life

 The fossil record does not objectively represent a time series because strata are ordered by their fossil contents, and then are assigned different times based on the assumption that evolution has occurred

Arguments of creationism

 Vestigal structures are not vestigal, but functional

 The classic examples of evolution are false

 Disagreements among evolutionary biologists show that Darwin was wrong

 There are no fossil intermediates between humans and apes

Arguments of creationism

 As a matter of fairness, alternative theories, such as supernatural creation and intelligent design should be taught so that students can make their own decisions

Practical application of evolution

 Health and medicine

 Agriculture and natural resources

 Environment and conservation

 Understanding nature and humanity