EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION AND RELATED SERVICES EFFECTIVENESS

1998-99

District ______LEA# ______

1.Number of students receiving special education service during current school year:

IS / II / RR / SC / SDT / DSC / RES / HSP / HMB
Elementary (K-6)
Secondary (7-12)

2.Major strengths of special education program (prioritized) identified by:

(See codes on following page -- if other, please specify)

Special Education Teachers a) ______b) ______c) ______

Regular Education Teachers a) ______b) ______c) ______

Administration a) ______b) ______c) ______

3.Major weaknesses of special education program (prioritized) identified by:

(See codes on following page -- if other, please specify)

Special Education Teachers a) ______b) ______c) ______

Regular Education Teachers a) ______b) ______c) ______

Administration a) ______b) ______c) ______

*4. Number of students receiving related services during current school year:

IS / II / RR / SC / SDT / DSC / RESHSP / HSP / HMB
Counseling and Therapy
Medical Services
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Specialized Equipment
Special Transportation
Education Aids
Psychological Services
Specialized Materials
Inservice
Curriculum Development
Orientation/Mobility
Interpreter Services

* Found in Student Data System

EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION AND RELATED SERVICES EFFECTIVENESS

1998-99

District ______LEA# ______

INDICATE BY PERCENTILE (%)

Reg. Ed.
Teachers / Spec. Ed.
Teachers / Adminis-
trators / Parents / Graduates
5a) Modifications are utilized for
instructional materials
5b) Modifications are utilized for
instructional methods
6a) Materials are sufficient to
provide special education
6b) Materials are sufficient in
quantity to provide special
education services
7a) Effectiveness of special
education academically
7b) Effectiveness of special
education program socially
7c) Effectiveness of special
education program vocationally

8.Students who have graduated within last two (2) years

a) ______% employed full time

b) ______% employed part time

9.Students who have graduated within last two (2) years who have received post secondary training.

a) ______% rehabilitation service

b) ______% technical school

c) ______% community college

d) ______% four year college

______

Signature of SuperintendentDate

______

Signature of Special Education SupervisorPhone

EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION AND

RELATED SERVICES EFFECTIVENESS

CODES

Major Strengths

01Precise entry and exit criteria

02Ability to meet individual student needs

03Ability to individualize instruction

04Motivated students

05Innovative program

06Work Study program

07Vocational training program

08Relevant materials

09Effective mainstreaming

10Regular staff acceptance of mainstreaming

11Team teaching

12Classroom circles

13Adequate support services

14Administrative support

15Parental interest and involvement

16Community involvement

17Other (please specify)

Major Weaknesses

01Need for additional personnel

02Need for additional support services

03Lack of parental interest

04Lack of job sites

05Lack of peer acceptance of special education

06Lack of regular staff acceptance of special education

07Inability to meet student needs

08Scheduling problems

09Lack of consistency of curriculum materials

10Lack of administrative support

11Outdated materials

12Insufficient materials

13Lack of vocational training

14Lack of precise entry and exit criteria

15Other (please specify)

EVALUATION OF IEP EFFECTIVENESS

1998-99

District ______LEA# ______

1.Percent of IEP completed with respect to essential components (See placement codes on following page):

IS / II / RR / SC / SDT / DSC / RES / HSP / HMB
Elementary (K-6)
Secondary (7-12)

2.Percent of goals attained:

IS / II / RR / SC / SDT / DSC / RES / HSP / HMB
Elementary (K-6)
Secondary (7-12)

3.Percent of objectives attained:

IS / II / RR / SC / SDT / DSC / RES / HSP / HMB
Elementary (K-6)
Secondary (7-12)

4.IEP essential components found to be missing (prioritized - please indicate first, second, and/or third components) - See codes on following page.

a) ______b) ______c) ______

5.______% of parents felt their child had made satisfactory progress in the special education program.

6.Effectiveness of IEP as a communication tool:

% of Regular Education Teachers / % of Special Education Teachers / % of Administrators
a) Between levels and grades within the
special education program
b) Between regular education and special
education staff

______

Signature of SuperintendentDate

______

Signature of Special Education SupervisorPhone

Educational Placement Codes

(Items 1, 2, & 3)

IS:Indirect ServiceDSC:Day Service Center

II:Itinerant InstructionRES:Residential

RR:Resource RoomHSP:Hospital

SC:Self-containedHMB:Homebound

SDT:School-based Day Treatment

Codes for Essential Components of IEP

(Item 4)

01Statement of student participation in regular class

02Statement of student participation in special education

03Modifications for regular class

04Signature of plan developers

05Projected date of initiation of special education

06Projected date for duration of special education

07Parental participation

08Present level of educational performance

09Annual goals

10Short-term objectives

11Projected evaluation schedules for short-term objectives

12Criteria review for LRE

13LRE

14Justification of placement options

15Related services

16Transition services

EVALUATION OF STAFF DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS

1998-99

District ______LEA# ______

1.During the current school year, inservice training on special education issues provided what percent of:

______% regular education staff

______% special education staff

______% administration

2.Effective methods of inservice training (prioritized) -- See codes on following page; if other, please specify)

a) ______

b) ______

c) ______

3.Special education inservice training to be addressed (prioritized) -- See codes on following page; if other, please specify)

a) ______

b) ______

c) ______

______

Signature of SuperintendentDate

______

Signature of Special Education SupervisorPhone

EVALUATION OF STAFF DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS

Methods of Inservice Training

01Graduate school courses

02Continuing education

03Professional journals

04Faculty discussion groups

05Peer consulting

06Skill building workshops

07Clinical supervision

08Workshops provided by district co-op

09Other (please specify)

Special Inservice Topic

01Instructional techniques

02Vocational training

03Counseling training

04Behavior management

05Psychological testing

06Role of support services

07Adapted physical education

08Stress management

09Classroom management

10Computer usage

11Language development in the classroom

12Other (please specify)

EVALUATION OF ASSESSMENT EFFECTIVENESS

1998-99

District ______LEA# ______

*1.Number of children who moved through the due process procedures (system) during the current school year.

Black Male / Black Female / White Male / White Female / Other Male / Other Female
Referred
Evaluated
Not Evaluated
Received Special Education Services
Did Not Receive Special
Education Services
Terminated From Special
Education Services

2.Assessment information was appropriate and beneficial -- Indicate by percentile (%)

**a) ______% Evaluation answers referral questions

b) ______% Evaluation provides results for all areas related to suspected disabilities.

c) ______% Specific recommendations for instruction and behavior intervention are offered.

3.______% of parents felt the assessment provided needed information.

______

Signature of SuperintendentDate

______

Signature of Special Education SupervisorPhone

* Found on Student Data System

** Sample surveys do not reflect this data.