1. END-OF-SCHOOL-YEAR SCHOOL REPORT CARD (SRC) APPRAISAL TOOL

(Based on DO No. 44, s. 2015, ANNEX11SRCSummaryofInformation)

DATA:
  1. Enrollment
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Total No. of Learners Enrolled

  1. By Gender

  1. For theLast 3 School Years

  1. Used End of School Year (EoSY) Data

  1. Used Stacked Bar Graph by Gender per Year

  1. Compared Year-End Data with the Mid-Year Data through line/bar graph

● Optional: If the school has special programs, they can also present in a separate graph the enrolment number of the different types of learners by program (e.g. SPED, ADM, ALS, IPEd, ALIVE) of the current year – schools can show the total for each type of learner
  1. Health and Nutritional Status
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. No. of Learners who are Severely Wasted or Wasted

  1. By Gender

  1. For Every Key Stage (K-3, 4-6, JHS, SHS)

  1. Data are for the Current School Year

  1. Used Stacked Bar Graph by Gender per Key Stage

  1. Learners’ Materials
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. The count of shortages/excess learners materials per grade level is based on what the students are using during the School Year

  1. Only subjects which have shortage/excess learners materials will be listed per grade level

  1. Data are for the current School Year

  1. Data are presented using tables per grade level that show the number of shortage/excess learners materials (by subjects)

  1. Teachers’ Professional Development
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Number of teachers who attended training/further studies

  1. By kind/type of professional development (e.g. ICT, Further studies, INSET, LAC, etc)

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Bar graph by kind/type of professional development

  1. Funding Sources
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Funding amount and sources (MOOE, LGU, canteen, donors, etc.)

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Pie graph by funding source

  1. School Awards and Recognitions
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Top 3 awards/ recognition from award-giving bodies duly recognized by DepEd

  1. Listing by title, award-giving body, level (school, division, regional, national, international)

  1. Categorized into student, teacher, school head, and school awards

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Presented using tables.

  1. Number and Rate of Dropouts by Causes
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Count and percentage of learners who do not finish a particular grade level. (It does not capture learners who finish a grade level but do not enrol in the next grade level the following school year)

  1. Five (5) major causes of dropout in the school

  1. For the last 3 years

  1. Stacked bar graph by causes per year; percentage is shown through a line graph over the bar graph

  1. Percentage of learners who completed the School Year (Promotion Rate)
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Percentage of learners who completed the school year (Number of promoted learners over number of total learners x 100)

  1. Per grade level

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Presented using bar graph

  1. National Achievement Test (NAT) – by Mean Percentage Score (MPS)
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. MPS per subject

  1. Grade 6 or 10 or 12 results

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Bar graph by MPS of each subject

*Use the average of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Quarterly Assessment Results (QAR).
  1. Literacy Level
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Total number of learners who are in the frustration, instructional, and independent levels for English and Filipino (oral and silent reading)

  1. Should show pre and post test results

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Bar graphs showing oral and silent reading results (one for English and Filipino)

* If PHIL-IRI is used, will cover grades 2-6 only
* In the absence of a tool to measure literacy, schools can use PHIL-IRI results or any existing tool to measure literacy
  1. School-Based Management Assessment Level
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. SBM Level and its corresponding qualitative interpretation

  1. Child-Friendly School Survey result
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Points and Status

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Stakeholders’ Participation
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Percentage (number of attendees over those invited) of parents/guardians and other stakeholders who attend during: a. Co-curricular activities (Science month, Reading month, contests, etc.) b. Extra-curricular activities (Boy Scouts, BrigadaEskwela, sports fests, etc.) c. Meetings and Assemblies (SIP, CI, General PTA, etc.)

  1. Total contribution (in kind, manhours, etc.) of stakeholders which are accounted

  1. By reporting period (Midyear and Year-end) of the current School Year

  1. For percentage: stacked bar graph by activity (cocurricular, extracurricular, meetings/ assemblies) per stakeholder

  1. For total contribution: stacked bar graph by type of contribution per reporting period, with total

  1. Learner-Teacher Ratio
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to teachers against the standard:
-Kinder (25:1)
-Grades 1 & 2 (40:1)
-Grades 3 to 10 (45:1)
-SHS (40:1)
  1. Per grade level

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Ratio per grade level shown as bar graph

  1. Standard is shown as line graph over the bar graph

  1. Learner-Classroom ratio
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to classrooms against the standard:
Kinder (25:1)
Grades 1 & 2 (40:1)
Grades 3 to 10 (45:1)
SHS (40:1)
  1. Per grade level

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Ratio per grade level shown as bar graph

  1. Standard is shown as line graph over the bar graph

  1. Learner-Toilet Ratio
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to functional toilets against standards (50:1)

  1. Total number of toilets

  1. By gender

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Standard is shown as line graph over the bar graph

  1. Learner-Seat Ratio
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Comparison of the actual ratio of learners to seats against the standard (1:1)

  1. Total number of chairs

  1. For the current School Year

  1. Standard is shown as line graph over the bar graph

  1. Status of Annual Implementation Plan (AIP)/Continuous Improvement (CI) Projects*
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Top three (3) Priority Projects

  1. Target vs. Actual Accomplishment

  1. Percent of accomplishment based on the target

  1. Other Stakeholders’ Accomplishments
/ EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. Top three (3) stakeholders’ accomplishments/initiatives/activities

*Initiatives/activities independent from the PIA/CI projects (e.g. activities of the SGC, SPG/SSG, etc.)

Appraised by:

NAME / SIGNATURE / DATE
  1. End-of-School-Year Project Monitoring Report (EoSY PMR) Appraisal Tool

(Based on DO No. 44, s. 2015)

PARTS / EVIDENT / NOT EVIDENT / REMARKS
  1. NAMES OF PROJECTSare the same as those in the SIP and implemented during Year 1 of the SIP cycle.

  1. OBJECTIVES are SMART.
(Specific, MEASURABLE, Achievable, Realistic and TIME-BOUND.)
  1. DATE OF MONITORING is during the End of School Year

  1. ACCOMPLISHMENT/STATUS TO DATE is GIVEN IN PERCENT ONLY of accomplishments

  1. REMARKS
Target vs. Actual Accomplishments
-contains explanations of the percent of accomplishment (with computations if necessary), and describes the actual status of the project (e.g. number of learners who became readers, comparison of before and after data, amount of work done for construction, etc.)
  1. ISSUES/PROBLEMS/CHALLENGES describes the hindering factors encountered during project implementation.

  1. RECOMMENDATIONS/ACTION POINTS states the actions done by the project team to address the issues/problems/challenges

  1. SIGNATURES OF THE SPT AND PROJECT TEAM LEADER
-printed copy contains the signatures of the School Planning Team (SPT) members and the Project Team Leader for each of the projects.

Appraised by:

NAME / SIGNATURE / DATE

(EoSY PMR Template)

END-OF-SCHOOL-YEAR PROJECT MONITORING REPORT FORM

(For Projects Implemented on Year 1 of the SIP Cycle)

S.Y. 2016-2017

Name of Project / Project Objectives and Targets / Date of Monitoring / Accomplishments/ Status to Date
(In Percent)
Based on Year 1 Targets / Remarks
(Target Vs. Actual Accomplishment) / Issues/Problems/
Challenges / Recommendations/
Action Points / Signatures of SPT and Project Team Leader

______

SCHOOL HEAD

1