PROGRAM DATA REPORT

educational leadership: Ed.s.

The University of West Georgia

summer and fall 2015; spring 2016

Prepared by

Selina lopez-nunez, Assessment Program Specialist

Goals for Improvement: 2014-2015 & 2015-2016

Directions: Review progress toward 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 goals using the 2015-2016 data found in this annual report. Complete the table and consider the results of your efforts as you plan for 2016-2017. Record your progress at

To record 2016-2017 goals, please click here:

2014-2015 Goals / Progress / Further Action / Data Used to Inform Responses / Strategic Imperative
By the end of AY 14-15, the educational leadership faculty will restructure the existing leadership degree program to strengthen areas of organizational management, classroom and operational technology, school safety, and educator ethics as identified by the program assessment criteria (assessment template). / Student Success, Academic Success, Successful Partnerships, Operational Success
2015-2016 Goals / Progress / Further Action / Data Used to Inform Responses / Strategic Imperative
By the end of AY 15-16, the educational leadership faculty will refine the existing M.ED leadership degree program to align with the new GA 2015 leadership standards and GA PSC requirements for Tier One leadership certification.
[Strategy(ies) program will use to achieve this goal]:By September 30, documentation supporting the Tier One certificate program will be submitted to the GA PSC review portal for review and approval. Documents include syllabi, key assessments, partnerships, and performance based field hours. This includes internal review on campus and external review by GA PSC reviewers. / Policy change drives the goal. The master's degree has not served students for several years, therefore we have no student performance data. / Student Success
[Enrollment Goals]
To admit a minimum of 25 Tier One candidates by next summer.
[Distinctive Features]
It's a new program that is not currently anywhere in Georgia. It will be offered fully online.

Percentage of Completed Rubrics

Type of Assignment / Number of Assignments Submitted by Students / Percent of Assignments Submitted by Students / Number of Rubrics Scored by Faculty / Percent of Rubrics Scored by Faculty
EDLE 8305 Ethics Dispositions Essay Summer 2015 / 31/37 / 83.78% / 12/31 / 38.7%
EDLE 8305 School District Talent Management Report Summer 2015 / 30/37 / 81% / 0/30 / 0%
EDLE 8305 School Risk Assessment Summer 2015 / 29/37 / 78.37% / 0/29 / 0%
EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Assignment Fall 2015 / 48/66 / 72.72% / 6/48 / 12.5%
EDLE 8306 Comprehensive School Data Profile Assignment Spring 2016 / 31/45 / 68.88% / 0/31 / 0%

Additional Key Assessments from Tk20:

Aggregate Data on Course Assignments and Portfolios:

THE TABLES BELOW CONTAIN AGGREGATE DATA FOR THE FORM : EDLE 8304 Analysis of Leadership Practices Assignment
EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Rubric
U = Unacceptable | D = Developing | P = Proficient | E = Exemplary | NR = No Response
Rubric: / # U / % U / # D / % D / # P / % P / # E / % E / # NR / % NR / Total Response / Mean / Median / Mode / Standard Deviation
Overall Assessment of School Communication Strategies / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Recommendations and Opportunities for Improvement / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Presentation and Coherence / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Data Collection/Clinical Work / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Total/Percentage / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 120 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 120
THE TABLES BELOW CONTAIN AGGREGATE DATA FOR THE FORM : EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Assignment
EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Assignment
U = Unacceptable | D = Developing | P = Proficient | E = Exemplary | NR = No Response
Rubric: / # U / % U / # D / % D / # P / % P / # E / % E / # NR / % NR / Total Response / Mean / Median / Mode / Standard Deviation
Completely addresses assignment criteria/questions. / 9 / 45% / 10 / 50% / 1 / 5% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 20 / 3.4 / 3 / 3 / 0.58
Describes and analyzes assignment concepts and information appropriately, using examples or supporting evidence. Describes and justifies own ideas and conclusions. / 19 / 95% / 0 / 0% / 1 / 5% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 20 / 3.9 / 4 / 4 / 0.44
Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) were flawless, and the essay itself was professional, well organized, and well written (sources cited using appropriate format if needed). / 13 / 65% / 7 / 35% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 20 / 3.65 / 4 / 4 / 0.48
Submitted on time / 18 / 90% / 2 / 10% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 20 / 3.9 / 4 / 4 / 0.3
Total/Percentage / 59 / 73.75% / 19 / 23.75% / 2 / 2.5% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 80
THE TABLES BELOW CONTAIN AGGREGATE DATA FOR THE FORM : EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Rubric
EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Rubric
U = Unacceptable | D = Developing | P = Proficient | E = Exemplary | NR = No Response
Rubric: / # U / % U / # D / % D / # P / % P / # E / % E / # NR / % NR / Total Response / Mean / Median / Mode / Standard Deviation
Overall Assessment of School Communication Strategies / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Recommendations and Opportunities for Improvement / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Presentation and Coherence / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Data Collection/Clinical Work / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 30 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Total/Percentage / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 120 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 120
THE TABLES BELOW CONTAIN AGGREGATE DATA FOR THE FORM : EDLE 8305 Ethics and Dispositions Essay Assignment Rubric
EDLE 8305 Ethics and Dispositions Essay Assignment
U = Unacceptable | D = Developing | P = Proficient | E = Exemplary | NR = No Response
Rubric: / # U / % U / # D / % D / # P / % P / # E / % E / # NR / % NR / Total Response / Mean / Median / Mode / Standard Deviation
Review of Content / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Reflection on ethical practice, personal values, and dispositions / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Improving and Refining Professional Practice / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Writing Mechanics / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Total/Percentage / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 68 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 68
THE TABLES BELOW CONTAIN AGGREGATE DATA FOR THE FORM : EDLE 8305 School District (Human Resources) Talent Management Report Rubric
EDLE 8305 School District (Human Resources) Talent Mangement Report
U = Unacceptable | D = Developing | P = Proficient | E = Exemplary | NR = No Response
Rubric: / # U / % U / # D / % D / # P / % P / # E / % E / # NR / % NR / Total Response / Mean / Median / Mode / Standard Deviation
Overall Assessment of School District Talent Management Report / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Recommendations and Opportunities for Improvement / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Presentation and Coherence / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Sustainability and Strategies for Improvement / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Total/Percentage / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 68 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 68
THE TABLES BELOW CONTAIN AGGREGATE DATA FOR THE FORM : EDLE 8305 School Risk Safety Assessment Rubric
EDLE 8305 School Risk Safety Assessment
U = Unacceptable | D = Developing | P = Proficient | E = Exemplary | NR = No Response
Rubric: / # U / % U / # D / % D / # P / % P / # E / % E / # NR / % NR / Total Response / Mean / Median / Mode / Standard Deviation
Overall Assessment of School Safety and Risk Management Program / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 18 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 18 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Recommendations and Opportunities for Improvement / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 1 / 5.56% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Presentation and Coherence / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 1 / 5.56% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Sustainability and Strategies for Improvement / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 17 / 100% / 1 / 5.56% / 17 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Total/Percentage / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 69 / 100% / 3 / 4.17% / 69
THE TABLES BELOW CONTAIN AGGREGATE DATA FOR THE FORM : EDLE 8306 Comprehensive School Data Profile Scoring Rubric
EDLE 8306 Scoring Rubric
U = Unacceptable | D = Developing | P = Proficient | E = Exemplary | NR = No Response
Rubric: / # U / % U / # D / % D / # P / % P / # E / % E / # NR / % NR / Total Response / Mean / Median / Mode / Standard Deviation
Overall Assessment of School Communication Strategies / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 1 / 3.85% / 25 / 96.15% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 3.96 / 4 / 4 / 0.19
Recommendations and Opportunities for Improvement / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 1 / 3.85% / 25 / 96.15% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 3.96 / 4 / 4 / 0.19
Presentation and Coherence / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 1 / 3.85% / 25 / 96.15% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 3.96 / 4 / 4 / 0.19
Data Collection/Clinical Work / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 1 / 3.85% / 25 / 96.15% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 3.96 / 4 / 4 / 0.19
Total/Percentage / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 4 / 3.85% / 100 / 96.15% / 0 / 0% / 104
THE TABLES BELOW CONTAIN AGGREGATE DATA FOR THE FORM : EDLE 8306 Reflective Research Essay - Summative School Improvement
EDLE 8306 Scoring Rubric
U = Unacceptable | D = Developing | P = Proficient | E = Exemplary | NR = No Response
Rubric: / # U / % U / # D / % D / # P / % P / # E / % E / # NR / % NR / Total Response / Mean / Median / Mode / Standard Deviation
Overall Assessment of School Processes in Identified Areas / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Recommendations and Opportunities for Improvement / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Presentation and Coherence / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Data Collection/Clinical Work / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 26 / 4 / 4 / 4 / 0
Total/Percentage / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 0 / 0% / 104 / 100% / 0 / 0% / 104

Comprehensive Data on Course Assignments

Summer 2015:

Course Number / Course Title / Sec / CourseWork Name / Assessment Tool (s) / # of students that received this work / # of students that submitted this work / # of students that have been assessed
EDLE 8305 / EffecMgmt to promote learnin / E01 / EDLE 8305 Ethics Dispositions Essay Summer 2015 / ZEDLE 8305 Ethics Dispositions Essay Rubric / 11 / 9 / 0
EDLE 8305 / EffecMgmt to promote learnin / E02 / EDLE 8305 Ethics Dispositions Essay Summer 2015 / ZEDLE 8305 Ethics Dispositions Essay Rubric / 15 / 12 / 12
EDLE 8305 / EffecMgmt to promote learnin / E03 / EDLE 8305 Ethics Dispositions Essay Summer 2015 / ZEDLE 8305 Ethics Dispositions Essay Rubric / 11 / 10 / 0
EDLE 8305 / EffecMgmt to promote learnin / E01 / EDLE 8305 School District Talent Management Report Summer 2015 / ZEDLE 8305 School/District Talent Management Report Rubric / 11 / 8 / 0
EDLE 8305 / EffecMgmt to promote learnin / E02 / EDLE 8305 School District Talent Management Report Summer 2015 / ZEDLE 8305 School/District Talent Management Report Rubric / 15 / 14 / 0
EDLE 8305 / EffecMgmt to promote learnin / E03 / EDLE 8305 School District Talent Management Report Summer 2015 / ZEDLE 8305 School/District Talent Management Report Rubric / 11 / 8 / 0
EDLE 8305 / EffecMgmt to promote learnin / E01 / EDLE 8305 School Risk Assessment Summer 2015 / ZEDLE 8305 School Risk Assessment Rubric / 11 / 7 / 0
EDLE 8305 / EffecMgmt to promote learnin / E02 / EDLE 8305 School Risk Assessment Summer 2015 / ZEDLE 8305 School Risk Assessment Rubric / 15 / 13 / 0
EDLE 8305 / EffecMgmt to promote learnin / E03 / EDLE 8305 School Risk Assessment Summer 2015 / ZEDLE 8305 School Risk Assessment Rubric / 11 / 9 / 0

Fall 2015:

Course Number / Course Title / Sec / CourseWork Name / Assessment Tool (s) / # of students that received this work / # of students that submitted this work / # of students that have been assessed
EDLE 8304 / Ldshp for Org Change / E01 / EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Assignment / EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Assignment / 31 / 22 / 0
EDLE 8304 / Ldshp for Org Change / E02 / EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Assignment / EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Assignment / 5 / 4 / 0
EDLE 8304 / Ldshp for Org Change / E03 / EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Assignment / EDLE 8304 Designing High Performing Organizations Assignment / 30 / 22 / 6

Spring 2016:

Course Number / Course Title / Sec / CourseWork Name / Assessment Tool (s) / # of students that received this work / # of students that submitted this work / # of students that have been assessed
EDLE 8306 / Instruct Ldshp for ImprovSch / E01 / EDLE 8306 Comprehensive School Data Profile Assignment Spring 2016 / EDLE 8306 Comprehensive School Data Profile Scoring Rubric / 31 / 21 / 0
EDLE 8306 / Instruct Ldshp for ImprovSch / E02 / EDLE 8306 Comprehensive School Data Profile Assignment Spring 2016 / EDLE 8306 Comprehensive School Data Profile Scoring Rubric / 14 / 10 / 0

Admissions and Active Majors


Active Major & Graduate Trend Data – Last 5 Years*

*The number of active majors is inclusive of all students actively enrolled inEDLE Ed.S., including students that graduated in either Summer, Fall or Spring of those years. All graduation candidates were included in each term’s evaluation of all actively enrolled majors, therefore giving a larger number impression. While this is not the sole reason for the stark difference in numbers, it is important to know when considering outcomes and goals.

Active Majors Admitted 3+ Years Ago (2012-2013 or prior) / Active Majors Admitted 2 Years Ago (2013-2014) / Active Majors Admitted 1 Year Ago (2014-2015) / Current Active Majors 2015-2016 / 2015-2016 Cohort Admission GPA
*

* This number is not the total number of active majors as of 2015-2016. This is a calculation of all students with a record in Banner showing their first term with the EDLE Ed.S. major being either Summer 2015, Fall 2015, or Spring 2016 (Banner reads these codes as 201505,201508,201601, respectively).


Race- Active Majors and Graduates


Gender- Active Majors and Graduates

Progression to Graduation Data (Goal: 80% or more graduate in =/< 3 years from admission to TE)

% Graduated in 2 Years or less / % Graduated in 3 Years / Not Yet Graduated* / Graduated with Different Major
2011-2012 / 70/92 active: 76.08% / 1/22 active:
2012-2013 / 82/97 active: 84.53% / 0
2013-2014 / 85/92 active: 92.39% / N/A
% Graduated in 1 Year: / ------/ Not Yet Graduated* / Graduated with Different Major
2014-2015 / 35/45 active: 77.77% / N/A
2015-2016 / 18/85 active: 21.17% / N/A
*Remaining students are not necessarily currently active students—some of these have inactive records in Banner—all had to be checked manually to ensure number consistency.

Credit Hour Production

Student Learning Outcomes 2015-2016