DR.SC.-04 Annual Progress Report of the Doctoral Candidate

S V E U Č I L I Š T E U Z A G R E B U

U N I V E R S I T Y OF Z A G R E B

DR.SC.-04 Annual progress report of the doctoral candidate

DR.SC.-O4 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT OF THE DOCTORAL CANDIDATE[1]
GENERAL INFORMATION
Name of the doctoral study programme:
First and last name, and title of the doctoral candidate:
Scientist ID of the doctoral candidate: / Report for the year:
E-mail:
Type of study
(please fill in box): / full time / part time
MENTOR(S)
First and last name, title: / Institution, country:
First mentor:
Second mentor:
Advisor (only if a mentor has not been appointed):
ANNUAL REPORT
Has a work plan been made, and are you making progress according to the plan?
(please fill in box): / Work plan has been made: / Progress has been made according to work plan:
yes no / yes no
If you filled in “no” in the previous box, explain why and propose how to amend that:
Describe progress made since last report (no more than 500 words):
Briefly describe the work plan for the next period
(no more than 500 words):
Specify difficulties that are affecting or may affect the course of your studying:
On the scale from 1 to 5, grade the quality of your research progress
(since last report): / 1 - insufficient 2 - sufficient 3 - good 4 – very good 5 - excellent
If in the previous question you chose 1 or 2, explain why:
On the scale from 1 to 5, grade the overall quality of your work
(since last report): / 1 - insufficient 2 - sufficient 3 - good 4 – very good 5 - excellent
If in the previous question you chose 1 or 2, explain why:
Participation in instruction
(courses in the implementation of which you participate—specify the type and duration of instruction): / Course title / Type of instruction / Course length
(hours of instruction per week) / Total
(hours of instruction per semester)
Participation in scientific and professional projects
(in the current academic year): / Institution / From / To / Name and type of project
Courses taken, workshops attended and training abroad
(in the current academic year): / Country / Institution / From / To / Name of course, workshop or training programme
Participation in scientific and professional conferences
(in the current academic year): / Institution / From / To / Title of conference and type of paper
Courses required by the programme curriculum / Course / ECTS credits / Grade
Scientific/scholarly works: / Attach a printout of published scientific works from the CROSBI electronic bibliography for the previous academic year to the form DR.SC.-04
MENTOR EVALUATION
Please grade on a scale from 1 to 5:
(1 - insufficient,2 - sufficient, 3 -good, 4 – very good, 5 - excellent) / Clear articulation of research goals for and expectations from the doctoral candidate /
1 2 3 4 5
Help in planning annual research activities and professional training /
1 2 3 4 5
Mentor works with doctoral candidate on a regular basis /
1 2 3 4 5
Encouragement to publish, and help in publishing scientific/scholarly works /
1 2 3 4 5
Mentor’s overall relationship with the doctoral candidate /
1 2 3 4 5
EVALUATION OF THE DOCTORAL STUDY PROGRAMME
On the scale from 1 to 5, please grade your satisfaction with the quality of the annual programme of the doctoral study you are enrolled in: / 1 - insufficient 2 - sufficient 3 - good 4 – very good 5 - excellent
If in the previous question you chose 1 or 2, explain and propose how to amend that:
Place, date and signature
Zagreb, (date) Signature
(first and last name of doctoral candidate)
Official stamp here

Form DR.SC.-04 Annual progress report of the doctoral candidate

[1] Please send the filled -out form DR.SC.-04, in electronic and written format, and signed, to the appropriate Registrar's Office. The Registrar's Office forwards the filled-out form to the Council of the study programme.