2016-2017Annual Update Review Checklist
Program Name: Health and Wellness Svcs.
Section / Yes / No / Feedback
I. Program Information
  1. Does the program mission describe students served and services offered? Yes
Is the language specific to that program?Yes
  1. Is the discussion of how the program supports the college mission clear?Yes
/ X
X
X
X / A very clear discussion about the program mission and its relevance to the College mission and strategic direction. Minor grammatical correction needed to change “it’s” in the mission statement to “its”
II. Program Assessment—Are the following discussions clear?
  1. the relationship between outcomes assessment and planning
  2. the relationship between outcomes assessment and resource requests
  3. Instructional Programs: how SLOs align with PLOs
  4. how PLOs align with Institutional Learning Outcomes.
  5. significant changes in the program’s strengths
  6. significant changes in the program’s weaknesses
  7. If applicable: Does the review discuss unplanned events?
/ X
X
X
X
X
X / -AUOs are clearly defined
-Section B: Do not refer to documents not easily accessible to readers and general public (e.g., Dean Collier’s previous program review). Instead, enumerate the concerns or weaknesses. Also, in the second paragraph ‘sever’ should be ‘severe’.
III. Resource Analysis—Are the following discussions clear? Has the appropriate
form been completed?
  1. Human Resources
  2. Additional positions—with form
  3. Professional development—with form
  4. Facilities
  5. Effectiveness
  6. Request—with form
  7. Technology
  1. New or repurposed technology
  2. Needs for technology—with form
  1. Budget
  2. Additional funding request—with form
/ X
X
X
X / X
X / Forms not ready for early submission
A good overview of resource needs. A reminder to accompany the AU with the relevant resource request forms.
Electronic Medical Records may require some tech support.
IV.Trend Data Analysis—Isthe analysis of significant changes in program data clear and complete? / X / Not much data available currently, but the data that is presented in the AU is very helpful. EMR will improve this. A very helpful and interesting discussion presenting in the ‘Metrics’ section; however, it is recommended that references to unrelated contextual information be removed. For example, “talking about this over dinner, my wife responded…” (the rest of the sentence is helpful and relevant, though).
Section / Yes / No / Feedback
  1. Progress on Program Goals
  1. Is the discussion of the program’s progress and changes in goals clear and complete?
  2. Is the discussion of the program’s goals for the future clear and complete?
/ X
X / Very clear discussion of goals. Minor corrections needed as follows:
-Goal A2, Comment 1: “Heitzberg” should be “Heitzeberg”
-No Goal A4 is listed (jumps from Goal A3 to Goal A5)
-Goal A5 doesn’t seem to fit the category of ‘Oversight and Accountability.’ If it is, more information in the ‘Comments’ section would be necessary.
VI.Curricular Revisions (Instructional Programs only)
Is the discussion of curriculum changes clear and complete? / N/A
VII.Conclusions and Findings
  1. Do the conclusions and findings support the previous discussion?
  2. Is the discussion clear?
/ X
X / Clearly, a lot of work has been done to expand and improve the services of this program.
Have all the appropriate forms been completed, including the required Best Practices form? / X / Early submission
Have programs with stackable Certificates of Achievement filled out the Certificate Form?
Is the response clear and complete? / N/A
Would you consider this Annual Update an effective example? / X / Unable to assess due to incomplete file (missing forms). Also, proofreading should occur before submission.

Revised by: Program Review Committee (September 15, 2014, Final)Comprehensive Review ChecklistPage 1