Louis Althusser
Althusser, Louis. 1969. "The 'Piccolo Teatro' Bertolazzi and Brecht." In For Marx, Penguin Press (1965).
Spectatorship:
Spectatorial consciousness in Althusserian model:
- Enlist spectator for an active and living critique
- Production of a new consciousness in spectator
Estrangement model versus Identification model of Fascist
- Techniques of decentering by not relating to or focusing on the hero
- Attack the invisibility of the ideological apparatus
- Mechanics of not knowing oneself
- Hegemonic spectator
- Consciousness is purely psychological
Spectatorial consciousness in Brechtian model:
- Not a community of spectatorship
- Structural recognition of how to change the situation
- Method is for political ends (for whose politics?)
Althusser, Louis. 1971. "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses." In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, 127-184. New York and London: NLB.
Ideology and the State:
- IIIIIDEO
- Ideas are a product/reproduction of the means of production
- Theory comes out of a set of practices
- Repressive State Apparatus
- Ideological State Apparatus [We know about this normalizing system because we act (within) it]:
- Religious, educational, family, legal, etc.
- The Church has been replaced by The School
- School as determining the working classes
- Subjecthood:
- Interpolation of individuals as already subjects
- Subject participates in the practices of the ideological apparatus
Walter Benjamin
Benjamin, Walter. 1968. "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction." In Illuminations, New York: Harcourt (1937).
- Aura: that which cannot be reproduced
- Reproduction is what is killing art
Bertolt Brecht
Brecht, Bertold. "A Short Organum for the Theatre." In Brecht on Theater, edited and translated by John Willet, 179-205. New York: Hill and Wang.
Nature of Art:
- Emphasis on historical specificity: each society produces its own kinds of theater
- Art is by definition a political intervention. It can never be apolitical
Role of Pleasure:
- Art works producing entertainment. Theatre’s ultimate purpose is pleasure
- Pleasure and politics: Marxist approach to pleasure in politics
- Pleasure does not need justification
Rationality versus Emotionality:
- Need to work with emotions, but at distance (anti-theatrical)
- Theatricality trains the audience to be a good (complaint) audience, anti-instrumentality of the endeavor (as opposed to fascist art?)
- Alienation effect “A” effect
- Brechtian theater contradicts the hegemonic training of actors in the US
Contradictions
- Rational as reason and emotion as the irrational
- Role of Science not thought through although scientific methods were to be used for social life.
- Relationship between the working class and intellectuals
Proposal for Theater:
- Its goal was to transform audience to a state of suspicious inquiry. Make strange the ordinary
- Its t
- ool was making the state of things looks “strange.” Split between representation and the reality of the object represented.
- Theater was to be for “children of the scientific age”
- Simple plays provided weak pleasure while stronger pleasure was derived from more complex ones.
- Attitude towards society the same as attitude towards nature
- Appeals to rationality (as opposed to the irrationality of fascism)
- Anti-naturalist: making things look strange: separating the character and the actor/actress so there is no way of identify both
Adorno
Theodor Adorno on Brecht, "Commitment." In Aesthetics and Politics.
Nature of Art:
- There is no un-political art, for there is no outside of society
- even when oppositional, art is always part of society
- Committed art: explicit political involvement and message of art. Art as a means
- Autonomous art: art for art’s sake. Art as an end
Trauma and Violence:
- Showing suffering was obscene
- Audience c
- onsumerism / victimizing the audience by portrayals of violence
- How to talk about violence without reproducing violence?
- Reenactment of traumatic situation can be healing