Researcher 2016;8(2)
Effectiveness ofintervention based on quality of life therapy onthecontrol ofaggressiongirls frompoorquality families
MahmoudSadeghi*1, Zohreh Raeisi2, Hamid Kazemi3
1. MA, Student of clinical psychology Department, Najaf Abad Branch Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2. PhD of Psychology Department, Najaf Abad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3. Assistant professor, Psychology department, PayameNoor University. Tehran, Iran
Abstract: Background:This study aimed toinvestigate the effect of quality of life therapy onthecontrol ofaggressiongirls frompoorquality families. Materials andMethods: In thisstudy, thecategoryapplied researchanddesign, aquasi-experimental researchwithpre-testandpost-testandcontrol group. The study populationconsisted of all adolescentandyouthbetween the ages of16 to29 years, because ofthe irresponsibleandderelictorbeingin 2012 in thecityof IsfahanandGazBorkhar under welfare organizationandthefacilitieshave beenunder the care ofthe organizationandaffiliated centers. 32 women randomly selectedfromthepopulationandrandomly assigned totwogroups of 16(test andcontrol) were placed. Gauges,Buss-Perry AggressionQuestionnaire(1992) of databysoftwareSPSS-v19andanalysis of covariancewith thecontrolpre-testwere analyzed. Findings:There is significant differencebetweenthe mean scores foraggression, verbal aggression, anger and hostilitybased ongroup membership(two experimental and control groups) (P<0.01). The findings alsoshowed that themean scoresfor physicalaggression, there is no significantdifference(P<0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study, evidence of theusefulnessand effectiveness of theintervention of quality of life therapy onthecontrol ofaggressiongirls frompoorquality families.
[MahmoudSadeghi, ZohrehRaeisi, HamidKazemi. Effectiveness ofintervention based on quality of life therapy onthecontrol ofaggressiongirls frompoorquality families. Researcher 2016;8(2):53-61]. ISSN 1553-9865 (print); ISSN 2163-8950 (online). doi:10.7537/marsrsj08021609.
Keywords: Quality of life therapy, aggression, anger, hostility
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
1. Introduction
Nowadays,withthe development ofhealthpsychologyandpositive psychology, attitudeproblems, the scope ofmedicine,pathology andremovedone-factor model, the researchers believe that it is betterto take into accountthe formation and developmentof mental disordersfaultylifestylesandquality oflifewasrevealed (Donaldson, DollwetRao, 2013; Shoshani & Steinmetz, 2014). Because of that matter which psychologyis notonly focus ondiseases (Seligman, 2000; Kobau, Seligman, Peterson, Diener, Zack & Chapman, 2001; Wood & Tarrier, 2010; Hone, Jarden & Schofield, 2015), that's whypositive psychologybelieve thatrather than focusingsolely onpathology, we must seek to understandthe fullrangeof humanexperienceofloss, suffering, sickness,theprosperity, well-beingand happiness (Biswas-Diener, 2010; Parks, 2015; Gable & Haidt, 2005; Joseph & Lindley, 2006). One of the approachesin the field ofpositive psychology, withthe aim of increasingthe quality of life, satisfactionwith life andsubjective well-beingand reduceemotional, intervention based onquality of life therapy (Rodrigue, Mandelbrot & Pavlakis, 2011; Joachim, Deeg & Fairview Ave., 2015; AbediVostanis, 2010; Clark, 2006; Magyar-Moe, 2009-2011).
Based ona combination ofcognitiveTherapeuticinterventionquality of life ofAaronT.Beckin theclinicalfield, positivepsychology,SeligmanandCsikszentmihalyi for action theory, was designedin 2006byFrisch(Frisch, 2006). Thisstructuredtreatmentwithcognitive-behavioraltask andexerciseseeka change in16main areasof lifewhich are as follows: 1. Health and physical health, 2. self-esteem, 3. Goals and values, 4. money, 5. work, 6. play, 7. learning, 8. Creativity, 9. help others, 10. Love, 11.Friends, 12 children, 13.Relatives, 14.Neighbors home, 15.Society, 16.spouse.
In this model, thechangein quality of life, cognitive-behavioral therapy has doneinfivemain themes. Thefiveconceptsin a nutshellCASIO (the first fivelettersof the word) calledandinclude:
- Circumstance: The realobjective conditionsorwith the characteristics ofafield;
- Attitude: Perception, interpretationofafieldinpatternsof individualwell-being;
- Standards of fulfillment;
- Importance: a person'shappinessorwell-being ofvalue and importancetobeattachedtoadomain;
- Overall satisfaction.
This theory, 5method ormodel forquality of life andsatisfaction withlifeas a blueprint forpositive psychologyinterventionsorientededucation and treatmentbased on the qualityof lifethatis called andon the creationofsatisfactiongapbetweenwhat onewantsandwhatthat raisethe quality of life(Frisch, 2006). Thusit can be statedthat thequality of life fortherapeuticinterventiontries usethe latestresearch andtheories ofhappiness, positive psychologyandmanagementas well asknowledge ofclinical worknegative emotionsandpositive psychologyto be effectiveand efficient andcoherent (Frisch, 2012&2013; Toghyani, 2011; Rief, 2012; Godfrin, 2010; Allain, 2007; Hallböök, 2005). One of theareas ofapplication of theintervention, especially inareas related tocontrolemotionsiscontrolledaggression. Aggression, behavioraimed athurting himselfor others. In this definition, theintentionis important (Karimi, 2010). Aggressionisone of the areasthatbehavioras a responseto theperceived threatisconsidered (Niazi, S & Adil). Aggression mayarisein many different formsthatinclude:
1)Motor dimension: Thisdimensionappearsin the form ofphysical andverbal aggressionandits main purposeisto harmothers.
2)Affective dimension: Thisangerafter theaggressionthatfinds physiological arousalandemotionalfactorsand internal conditionstopreparethe organism.
3)Cognitive dimension: Thisfactorsthathostilityname, creates a feeling ofprejudice, hatred andmalicetowardsothers (Buss & Perry, 1992).
One ofthe mostconsistentgender differences are thatboysaremore aggressivethan girlsphysicallyand girlsshowtheirindirectaggression (Archer, 2004). Whenit comes toverbal aggression, gender differencesare removed andsometimes evenits incidenceis reportedingirls (EgliStephen, 1986; quoted by Biyabangard, 2012). Variousfactorscan beeffectiveinaggressive behaviorisbut one ofthe most importantfactors causingaggressioninpeople andfamily (Stover, Connell, Leve, Neiderhiser, Shaw, Scaramella & Reiss, 2012; Smith, 2012). Family, the smallestandthe most importantsocialinstitution, so if youareundergoingturmoilandeconomic and social problems, primarilyon themental health ofmembersandtraumaticand sometimesirreparableeffectsonsocietyleaves (Dingwall, Eekelaar & Murray, 2014; Hetherington & Blechman, 2014). In fact,healthy, successfulsociety actorshave come outofthehealthy families, andmostunhealthy, unhealthyfamilieshavegrown. Asseveral studies, the role andinfluence ofthe familyin shaping theconcepts ofhealth anddisease,provide a model ofnormal and abnormalbehaviorhave pointed out (Stuart & Jose, 2012; Fuller-Iglesias, Webster & Antonucci; 2015).
According to the subjectsand backgroundsthatstated, inthis studybelieve thatusingtherapeutic modelsFrisch(Quality of Life Therapy) isanintegratedcombinationofcognitivetherapy andpositive psychology, to intervenein the area ofaggressiondaughters ofpoorpayandusing thistherapeuticmodel, changes inthese areastogether.Accordinglyresearch hypothesesare:
1)Intervention basedon thequality of life forchildren ofpoorphysicaltherapyis effectivein reducingaggression.
2)Therapeuticintervention based onthe quality of lifeofpoorchildrenis effectivein reducingverbal aggression.
3)Therapeuticintervention based onthe quality of lifeofpoorchildrenis effectivein reducinganger.
4)Therapeuticinterventionsto reducehostilitybased on thequality of lifeofpoorchildrenare effective.
5)Intervention based onthe quality of lifeofchildren ofpoortreatmentis effectivein reducingaggression.
Method:
Populationandsample:
The study populationconsisted of all adolescentandyouthbetween the ages of16 to29yearsbecauseofthe irresponsibleandderelict, in 2012 in IsfahanandGazBorkharcityunder welfare organizationandthefacilitieshave beenunder the care ofthe organizationandaffiliated centers. A total of 32peoplerandomly selectedfromthepopulationandrandomly divided intotwogroups of 16(test andcontrol) were placed. In this study,the list of allchild care centersandunsupervised adolescentsorderelictcityof the Welfare Organizationwas prepared. Also listscasesofthe same familieswhoworkcentersto August2012,were referredthroughsocial workcenterswere preparedunder the supervision ofwell-being. For everycasewas placedina codeandthenthecodes andusing thetable of random numbers, number32of theCode32 (women) wererandomly selected andrandomlydividedintocontrol and experimental groups. InTable 1, demographicsampleis provided.
Asit’s obviousin Table1, thecharacteristicsof the age,frequency percentileforage groups21-25and26-30yeargroupsrelated toequalthesix peoplewhoeach37.5% of the wholegroup membershipform it, andleast frequent inexperimental and control groupsregarding ageis16-20years, 4 people,25Percentageof the experimental groupand 3percent of thecontrol groupmake upabout18.75. Themost frequentagecategory25-20yearsof age inthe control group, which is equal to7% of the total of control groupmake up43.75inmale and femalecharacteristicsinthe entire group, the participants them are women.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table 1. Percentagedemographic characteristicsin terms ofmembershipgroups
Demographic characteristics / Test group / Control groupAge / Frequency / Percentage / Frequency / Percentage
16-20 / 4 / 25 / 3 / 18.75
21-25 / 6 / 37.5 / 7 / 43.75
26-30 / 6 / 37.5 / 6 / 37.5
Gender / Woman / 16 / 100 / 16 / 100
Total / 16 / 100 / 16 / 100
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Research Tools
Aggression Questionnaire:
The questionnairewas createdin 1992byBuss and Perry. The questionnairehas 29questions,4verbal aggressionfactors (5 questions), physical aggression(9 questions), anger(7 questions) andhostility(8 questions)about themeasure. Inthisquestionnaire, the optionsare setin such a waythatthepersoninquestion,onafive-point scalefrom1(not perfectlydescribesme) to 5 (totally describesme). The internalreliabilityof the questionnaire0.89(high reliability) and subscalescorrelatedwitheach otherandwiththe0.25to0.45rangeofscalethatindicatesgood internalvalidityis(Buss and Perry, 1992).
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table2. The Minutes oftherapeutictreatment basedon quality of life
Sessions / Commenton thequality of life therapy, speechrulesinGroupcompany, designsobjective of theGroupand expectations ofparticipants, pre-testSession 1 / Overthe previous session, introducingaspects ofquality of life, assessedareas oflife, use of metaphors, the strengthsandskills(growth areas), determination
Session 2 / Overthe previous session, introducedfiveroots, the introduction ofliving conditionsas afirst strategy, designprinciples(inner richness, qualitytime, meaning construction, spreadhappiness, servehumbly), determination
Session 3 / Overthe previous session, introducedthestrategy of"attitude", designprinciples,determination
Session 4 / Overthe previous session, the thirdstrategy, "the objectives and criteria", statedprinciples, determination
Session 5 / Overthe previous session, introducedthe fourthstrategy"priorities", designprinciples,determination
Session 6 / Overthe previous session, the fifthstrategy"to strengthen other areasof satisfaction" principles(basket of eggs), determination
Session 7 / Overthe previous session, layout, Homework
Session 8 / Overthe previous session, designprinciples,determination
Session 9 / Overthe previous session, designprinciples,determination
Session 10 / Overthe previous session, review the contentpostedinprevious sessions, summarized andgeneralizedfive-roots training, implementationand post-test
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Research method:
In this study,the list of allchild care centersandunsupervised adolescentsorderelictcityof the Welfare Organizationwas prepared. Also listscasesofthe same familieswhoworkcentersto August2012,were referredthroughsocial workcenterswere preparedunder the supervision ofwell-being. Thecases of adolescent and young girls between the ages of 16 to 29 years old were considered. Selected anddiscardedthe rest. Of theyoung peoplewho, for whatever reason, and livingincare centersunder the supervision ofwelfare organizationwere selected. Some of thesereasonscan beaddictedparents, orhas severe mental disorders(unsupervised) or death ofone orboth parents(orphans) or extreme povertythat led to theeconomicanddropsherchildand entrustthe organizationwaswellnoted. Amongthepeoplewhoweregiventheyoung ageWelfare Organizationandat the time ofthe studyhad reachedadolescenceand young adulthood. The selectionofa minimumcertificationrequirementforacademicguidance is important. Othercases thatdid nothavethese conditionswere excluded. For everycasewas placedina codeandthenthecodes andusing thetable of random numbers, 32number or 32codes, randomlyselected. ntworandomly assignedtoexperimental and control groups. Each group consisted of16 peopleisdaughterafteran initial interviewandexplanationof theprojectteam memberspresentwereaskedto testBussand Perry.
The independent variableof thisresearch is toimprove the quality oflife based onthe quality of lifebased therapyapproachFrisch(2006). Dependent variables, including control anger and aggressionthatBuss-Perry Aggressionwas measuredby a questionnaire. Thenhealthandquality of lifeprojectsforgroup therapysessions, was appliedforthe experimental group. Afterrepeatedtreatmentsessionsofbothexperimental and control groupsweretestedBuss-Perry Aggression. It should be notedthatduring this periodthe control groupdid notreceive any treatment. In the end,similar meetingswerealsoheldforthe control group. Table 2summarizesthe topicsoffered ingroup sessionsfor test groupis given.
Researchand analysis ofdata
This studyispart of thecategoryapplied researchanddesign, thetype ofquasi-experimentalpre-testandpost-testwithcontrol group. The generalaspect ofthe researchissummarized in Table 3.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table3.Researchprojects
Groups / First choice / Second choice / Pre-test / independent variable / Post testGeneral and specifichypothesesA and B / Test / S / R / T1 / X / T2
Control / S / R / T1 / - / T2
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Asseenin Table3, the projectconsisted oftwogroups.
Given that thepresent study is toevaluate the effect oftreatmentonquality of lifeistocontrolanger and aggression, in order toexamine the hypothesis, theanalysis of covariancewith thecontrolpre-test andSPSS-v19softwareis used. Foranalysis of variancenormalityandhomogeneity ofvariancehave twodefaultstoprove thatto proveKolomogrov-Smirnov testfornormality of the datavarianceLevinetestwas used. Kolmogorov-Smirnovtestfornormality assumptionwasthatoperatingresultsin Table4.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table4.ResultsKolmogorov-Smirnovtestfor normalityassumptionsubscales
k-s-z / Sig. levelPhysical aggression / 0.674 / 0.796
Verbal aggression / 0.764 / 0.604
Anger Management / 1.04 / 0.228
Hostility / 0.725 / 0.670
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
According totheKolmogorov-Smirnovstatisticin α>0.05 is not significant, soassuming normalfollowingscalewill be accepted.
Levinetestforequality of varianceswasassumedthat the resultsin Table5below. IfPLevinetestishigher than0.05, typically equal variancesis confirmed. Ascan be seenin TableLevinePvaluegreater than0.05, so the assumption ofhomogeneity ofvariancesis confirmed.
After verifying theassumptionsofnormalityandequal variancesandcontrolpre-test, analysis ofcovariancewas performed.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table 5.Levine's testresultson theassumptionof equalvariances of thetwo groupsinsociety
Researchscales / F / df / First df (numerator) / Second df(denominator)Physical aggression / 0.052 / 1 / 30 / 0.821
Verbal aggression / 0.010 / 1 / 30 / 0.923
Anger Management / 1.816 / 1 / 30 / 0.285
Hostility / 2.4 / 1 / 30 / 0.144
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Findings:
The resultswere obtainedintwo levels ofdescriptive and inferential statisticsare reportedin the table below. InTable 6, compare the averagescoreto determine the effectof treatment onquality of life andphysical aggressionarethe two groups.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table 6.Effect oftherapy onquality of lifemean score ofphysical aggressionbetween the two groups
Pre test / Post testMean / S.D. / Mean / S.D.
Control / 22.03 / 3.31 / 26.75 / 3.66
Experiment / 27.31 / 2.86 / 27.56 / 3.74
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Ascan be seenin Table6, the averageequal to27.31andtheexperimental grouppretestposttestmeanisequal to27.56. While in thecontrol group, the mean score of22.3in thepre-testandpost-test, the averageisabout26.75.
InTable 7, themean score ofverbal aggressionto evaluate the effectof treatment onquality of lifehas been reportedin both groups.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table 7.Compareaveragescoreevaluate the effect oftreatmentonquality of lifein both groupsexpressedverbal aggression
Pre test / Post testMean / S.D. / Mean / S.D.
Control / 23.06 / 3.53 / 23.31 / 4.14
Experiment / 21.87 / 2.55 / 19.12 / 3.26
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Ascan be seenin Table 7, the mean ofthe experimental grouppre-testtopost-testaverageis19.12and21.87. While in thecontrol group, the mean score of23.06in thepre-testandpost-test, the averageisabout23.31.
Inthe table 8,compare the averagescoreto determine the effectof treatment onquality of life,reduceangerhave been reportedin both groups.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table 8.Effect oftherapy onquality of lifemean scoredecreasedin both groupsanger
Pre test / Post testMean / S.D. / Mean / S.D.
Control / 27.50 / 6.58 / 27.31 / 6.68
Experiment / 27.25 / 5.80 / 23.75 / 5.80
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Ascan be seenin Table8, the mean ofthe experimental grouppre-testtopost-testwith27.25andtheaverageisequal to23.75. While in thecontrol group, the mean score of27.50in thepre-testandpost-test, the averageisabout27.31.
Inthe table 9,compare the averagescoreto determine the effects of treatment on quality of life are giventhehostilitybetween the two groups.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table9.Comparison of mean scoresdetermine the effect oftreatmentonquality of lifeanimositybetween the two groups
Pre test / Post testMean / S.D. / Mean / S.D.
Control / 30.62 / 5.23 / 30.06 / 5.49
Experiment / 30.93 / 4.66 / 24.75 / 3.90
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Ascan be seenin Table9, the mean ofthe experimental grouppre-testtopost-testwith30.93 andtheaverageisequal to24.75. While in thecontrol group, the mean score of30.56in thepre-testandpost-test, the meanisequivalent to30.6.
InTable 10, analysis ofthe effects ofgroup membershipon the amount ofphysical aggressionscoresinthe two groupsis given.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table10.Analysis ofthe effects ofgroup membershipon the amount ofphysical aggressionscoresin thetwo groups
Variables / df / meansquares / F / Significant(P) / Impact / Statistical powerPre-test / 1 / 35.68 / 2.75 / 0.108 / 0.087 / 0.362
Group Memberships / 1 / 4.19 / 0.324 / 0.574 / 0.011 / 0.085
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table 10showsthe meanscoresfor physicalaccording tomembergroups (two experimental and control groups) there is nosignificant difference(P<0.05).Thefirst hypothesiswas not confirmed.
InTable11, analysis ofthe effects ofgroup membershipon the level ofverbal aggressionscoresinthe two groupshas been reported.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table11.Results ofanalysis of covarianceeffects ofgroup membershipon the level ofverbal aggressionscoresin thetwo groups
Variables / df / meansquares / F / Significant(P) / Impact / Statistical powerPre-test / 1 / 231.89 / 36.29 / 0.001 / 0.556 / 1
Group Memberships / 1 / 74.70 / 11.69 / 0.002 / 0.287 / 0.911
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
As Table11 shows, based ongroup membership, the scores of verbalsubjects(two experimental and control groups) issignificant difference(P<0.01). Thesecond hypothesisis confirmed.This effectis28percentrate. Thequality of life therapyis effectiveonverbal aggression. 0.874statistical powerofthis testshowedhighstatistical accuracyandadequacy ofthe sample.
InTable 12, analysis ofthe effects ofgroup membershipon thescoresof the two groupshas been reportedto reduceanger.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table12.Analysis ofvarianceto reducethe effects ofgroup membershipon thescores ofanger(anger) intwo groups
Variables / df / meansquares / F / Significant(P) / Impact / Statistical powerPre-test / 1 / 4165.24 / 182.154 / 0.001 / 0.863 / 1
Group Memberships / 1 / 1038.32 / 45.40 / 0.001 / 0.610 / 1
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table12 shows, aggressionscores betweensubjectsin terms ofmembershipgroups (two experimental and control groups) issignificant difference(P<0.01). Thethird hypothesisis confirmed.This effectis61percentrate. Thequality of lifeon reducinganger(anger) is effective. Statistical powerequal to 1indicateshighstatistical accuracyandadequacy ofthe testsample.
InTable 13, analysis ofthe effects ofgroup membershipon the level ofhostilityscoreswere reportedin both groups.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table13.Results ofanalysis of covarianceeffects ofgroup membershipon the level ofhostilityscoresin thetwo groups
Variables / df / meansquares / F / Significant(P) / Impact / Statistical powerPre-test / 1 / 484.31 / 71.06 / 0.001 / 0.710 / 1
Group Memberships / 1 / 247.54 / 26.32 / 0.001 / 0.556 / 1
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table13 shows, hostilityscores betweensubjectsin terms ofmembershipgroups (two experimental and control groups) issignificant difference(P<0.01). Thefourth hypothesisis confirmed.This effectis55percentrate. Thehostilityis effectiveonquality of life. Withahighstatisticalpowerof this testindicatestatistical accuracyandadequacy ofthe sample.
InTable 14, analysis ofthe effects ofgroup membershipon theoverall level ofaggressionscoresinthe two groupshas been reported.
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table14.Covariance analysisgroup membershipimpacton theoverall level ofaggressionscoresin thetwo groups
Variables / df / meansquares / F / Significant(P) / Impact / Statistical powerPre-test / 1 / 887.58 / 89.73 / 0.001 / 0.756 / 1
Group Memberships / 1 / 89.38 / 9.036 / 0.001 / 0.238 / 0.828
1
Researcher 2016;8(2)
Table 14shows thatangerscores betweensubjectsin terms ofmembershipgroups (two experimental and control groups) issignificant difference(P<0.01). Thefifth hypothesisis confirmed.This effectis23percentrate. Thequality of life therapyis effectiveanger. Statistical powerequal to0.828indicatesa relativelyhighstatistical accuracyandadequacy ofthe testsample.
Result and Discussion:
This study aimed toevaluate theeffectiveness ofquality of lifebasedon the control ofaggressioninchildren ofpoorfamilieswas conducted. Quality of life therapyapproachbased onpositive psychologyandcognitive therapywas established, and so many techniques andmethods thatareusedonthis basis. So with thatbackground,cognitive therapyapproachto increasehappinessanddecreasenegative emotions, it can be expectedthatquality of lifeisan effectivetreatmentin these cases. The result of the first hypothesis about the effect of therapy on quality of life for children of poor physical aggression was not confirmedandno significant differenceswere observedbetween thetwo groups. This means thatin thisstudytherapeuticintervention basedon quality of lifeshowed nosignificant rolein reducingphysical aggression. Sincedepressionand a sedentary lifestyleoftenassociatedwithboredGay andnumbness, as well as teenagersand young people wholiveincare centersandis under constantsupervision andcontroland, in many cases allowed toshowemotions (especially negative) do notusuallyhavealearned helplessness. Sowhen themoodgoes upanda person are happier and more energetic, motivated and energized to express emotions and display it in them increases and probably becomesphysical aggression.
A finding from the second hypothesis about the effect of treatment on quality of life in children of poor verbal aggression was approved. This means thatthescoresinpost-test andthere was significant differenceinphysical aggression. In general, it can be concluded thattherapeuticinterventionbased onquality of lifecanplay an effective rolein reducingverbal aggressionin adolescents andyoung people whohave grown upinfamilieshave thedisorder. It is obviousthat people arehappierwhentheyhavethe ability to adaptandbe more flexible (Biglaryan, 2012; WroschScheier, 2003; Carr, 2011). Itwill beeasierfor them toendure hardships (Inglehart, Borinskaya, Cotter, Harro, PonarinWelzel, 2013). When thehopeofthefuture, the abilityto delayhisunreasonable demands, but also the rise. This isin the Koran, the Torah, the Gospeland otherdivinereligionsalsostronglyemphasized(to the believersto Paradise andeternalcomfortgiven). Asalreadymentionedtherapeuticapproachlifequalityofadvicewasgreatdivinereligions. Andthe hypothesisof thetwo viewscan be explained. First, flexibility increasesandstrengthandhappiness and second, thatseveral recommendationsinthe divinereligionsthatdelaywasunreasonable demandsandcontrollanguage, which in thishypothesishas been effective.
The results alsoshow thatthe third hypothesisabout the effect oftherapy onquality of life,reduceangerofpoorchildrenalsowere approved. The resultsofresearchbyFrisch(2005), Momeni and Shahbazi(2012), Ghasemi(2011), Toghyani(2011) was consistent. Soit can be concludedthatinterventionsforeducationaboutquality of lifeandcognitive changethoughts,behaviors andemotions anditofferstargeted, effectivein reducingangerhas beentroubledyouth andadolescents.
The results ofthe fourth and fifthhypothesisthat the role oftherapeuticintervention based ontheextent of hostility andaggressionthe quality of lifeofthechildren ofpoorreviews, it was confirmed andthe results of theresearchfindingsMomeniandShahbazi(2012), Ghasemi(2011), Toghyani(2011) andFrisch(2005) was consistent. Ingeneral, and withregard to thefundamental rolethatcognitivetheoryandthethoughtschangeintherapeuticapproach basedon quality of life, it can beconcluded thattherapeuticinterventionbased onquality of life could possiblyplay an effective rolein reducinghostilityin adolescents andyoung people whohave grown upinfamilieshaveravages.
Inthefirst hypothesisthat the quality oflife therapyiseffectivein reducingphysical aggression, was not confirmed. Whileon the surfaceit seemsthatthisisnot in line withprevious research. But in factit is notbecausethestudy subjectsare oftenisolated, reclusiveand distant from thecommunityandparticipateinsocial relationshipslessarealsousuallyboredanddepressed mood. On the other hand, usually have experiencedrepeated failuresin turnhas causeda major offensivefound andpassiveaggressionbecausetheyusuallybenefitfromphysicalaggressionhaveespecially whenthe subjectswere female. Peoplealsomakeupmoreexchangesandcommunicationmoreandmore collisionsalsowill follownaturally. Theotherassumptionsthatthe role oftherapy onquality of life andreduce hostility, angerandverbal aggressionpays, were confirmedto be expected, as increasedsocialinteractionandverbalandphysical aggressionentail a reductionis, therefore, controlling anger. In general,thoughin this casethere was nosimilar researchbutwas consistentwiththe general principlesandtheories, and according toexperts.
Among thelimitations ofthis study isthat thestudy population, both male and femaleclientsliving inIsfahanand its suburbs(GazBorkhar). Butdue tolack of cooperationboysubjectsingeneralizing the resultsto othersectors of societyand patientswere male andthe restshouldtake precautionsto be observed. Therestrictions and regulationsgoverning themaintenancecenterssometimespossible to dosome exercisesdo notfullyacceptthatprobablyaffectedtheresults. Another limitation ofthestudy tool, because the toolis aquestionnaire, so we have to analyze theresultsofa questionnairestudylimitationsshould be considered.
Sinceresearch on thewelfarecare centersandwelfareoffices ofIsfahanand its suburbsis executed,it is recommendedthatit issimilarinothercities and provincesinthe countryareexamined. Thestudywas conductedonadolescent and young girls, recommendedthatsimilar studies intheboysrun. According to theresults ofresearch, treatment, intervention on quality of lifeandreduction indepressive symptoms, angerandeffectivecoping stylespatients’welfare organizationknows, theWelfare OrganizationandImam Khomeini Relief Committee(RA) and otherrelevant agenciesAliparticularworkcenterssuggested that therecommendationshaveclientsinthis case. Finally, since the emphasis onpreventionandquality of life therapy-based approach given the importance ofpreventive interventions, recommendedtoauthoritiesin theprevention ofmood disordersandmental healthbenefitmost fromthe findings.