Addendum to the Pricker, Eighth Edition

A True Story of Assassination, Terrorism And High Treason.

By Kevin Harris.

Introduction: There are weapons and techniques that kill in ways which appear natural. Handgun crime statistics tell us that when there is a weapon present, the people most likely to be killed by it are the people closest to the person with the weapon, especially a spouse or ex-spouse. Thus, we should expectthe spouses of the people who can kill in ways which appear natural to have a higher than natural rate of lethal conditions. The spouses and their families know and fear the people with these weapons so, when attacking a spouse, the most common, least suspicious available diseases are used – especially cancer.

I have found a group of ex-spouses that do have an impossibly high rate of cancers. They were married to people who do have access to these weapons. The existence of proof of these murders has caused reactions, including the 9/11 attacks, which are hard to understand without knowing this background. To give you tangible evidence up-front, I start by describing one of the greatest weapons of all time.

The Pricker: The pricker is an assassin’s weapon that deposits biological agents into a victim’s skin, on contact, without their knowledge. It can be deployed in the palm of a hand, or hidden in a ring worn on a finger. The pricker is capable of inducing a wide array of lethal, potentially lethal and non-lethal conditions.

By introducing live microorganisms into skin the pricker can induce things like AIDS, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, hepatitis D, encephalitis, tetanus, typhus, bubonic plague, rabies, necrotizing fasciitis, kala-azar, American leishmaniasis, Chagas’ disease, African sleeping sickness, malaria (kills thousands each day), yellow fever and other hemorrhagic fevers. The assassin is protected by vaccine or antibiotic when handling these agents. Viruses can be divided so they are not dangerous until they combine in the victim. Hepatitis D virus, for example, is harmless without hepatitis B. Microorganisms can be used on large numbers of targets, where the targets do not suspect foul play.

The pricker can be used to inoculate cancer causing viruses. An example of virally induced humancancer, described in the public literature, is the rapidly progressive Burkitt’s lymphoma. It is my understanding that there are others, not described in the public literature. Breast cancer, leukemias, sarcomas, lymphomas and carcinomas are all known products of animal viruses.

By inoculating antigens and adjuvant the pricker can induce allergic hypersensitivities and autoimmune disorders. The victim who is injected with the antigen to which they are hypersensitive (such as insect venom or medical products) may collapse in anaphylactic shock and die within minutes. The asthmatic (thousands of US deaths/year) who inhales medication that has been laced with the antigen to which they are hypersensitive may suffer acute respiratory failure and die. These products will not affect other people in an unusual way and, as with cancer, the death is assumed to be of a totally natural, endogenous mechanism.

Autoimmune mechanisms may contribute to the following potentially lethal disorders: multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, myasthenia gravis, diabetes mellitus (the severe, insulin-dependant form), scleroderma, glomerulonephritis (kidney disease), poly-arteritis nodosa, polymyositis, polyneuropathy, thrombocytopenia and hemolytic anemia. Like cancer, and infectious disease, these disorders can be exacerbated or complicated by more pricking or other means. The victim can be made intensely aware of their dependence on – and vulnerability to –‘the system’. Thus they are controlled even as they are killed. Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease which, by crippling the fingers, can keep the victim from being able to write.

The pricker is entirely different from the widely advertised poisoned umbrellas where assassination by toxin is immediate. Pricker victims never know what killed them. Properly made and used the pricker is usually not seen, heard or felt. Do you feel a mosquito during the many seconds it takes for it to bite? Would you feel it if it took only an instant, in the middle of someone squeezing your arm, or patting your back? There is usually no detectable wound. It is difficult to even tell whether or not it is working. Most of the microorganisms listed above make no mark.

Antigen inoculations (repeated over a period of weeks or years) make marks at the sites. These may appear as small (5mm, 1/5 inch), firm, raised, red, stellate lesions with no pus. A favored site for these inoculations has been the outside of the upper arm – where your doctor makes IM injections. The relatively insensitive skin at this common social contact site openly displays the marks, so the assassin and his handlers can see that the pricker is working, and that the victim’s immune system is responding. Such repeated inoculations are usually made by someone who has developed a personal relationship with the victim; the buttocks may be targeted. I have only seen a pricker used once in a handshake, under special circumstances, with additional precautions.

There is only one way to stop the use of the pricker; by publicizing its existence. You can prove that the pricker exists by building one for yourself. Use figure 1 as a guide.

Figure 1: a simple pricker, enlarged two times. The clear back cover (B) holds the lead weight (W) down so the tip of the penetrating element (P) is just inside a tiny aperture (not shown) in the front plate (F). When the front plate strikes the target skin (T) the inertia of the lead weight drives the penetrating element through the front plate into the target skin. The springy reed (R) then draws the penetrating element back into the pricker. The pricker sticks to the palm of the assassin’s hand (H) with double-sided tape. Glue (G) holds the reed and the back cover to the front plate. The penetrating element, a sharp spicule or tubule of glass, metal or plastic - like a wasp stinger - penetrates >1mm (1/25 inch) past the face of the front plate. You can use a 0.1mm (1/250 inch) bristle, from a fine stainless steel wire brush, honed to a point with a high-speed polishing wheel. Use a microscope to check your work. The front plate (about 2.5 cm (1 inch) long) and back cover are made from a thermoplastic peanut butter jar softened in boiling water. The lead weight, an air-gun pellet pressed flat on the end of the reed, is padded for silence. The reed is 2cm (0.8 inch) X 3mm (0.12 inch) X 0.3mm (0.012 inch) stiff plastic packaging material. Cover the front plate with flesh colored bandage. If the penetrating element passes through bandage that is wet with viral suspension it can pick up virus to strike a whole series of targets at one time. The professional pricker is smaller, spring powered and triggered by pressure.

In a world of death squads, massacres, disappearances and genocides, is it reasonable to say that this highly efficient, economical and obvious weapon has not been used? If it were used only by other countries, US intelligence agencies would be aware of its use. Why then has the US Government not denounced the use of this weapon and warned potential victims of its presence? They don’t do that because the US uses it too.

I have had personal experience with both domestic and foreign operatives using prickers within the US, at the request of the US Government. The rationale stated here should give you a reasonable indication that prickers are used in this country, but it is not an absolute proof. The diseases of the ex-spouses, which I will describe, provide a proof so strong that some of these attacks will have to stop.

Governments need to keep using natural looking diseases for assassination, they are addicted. If they quit ‘cold turkey’ then the cause of death of many of their previous victims would be known too plainly. Some diseases are caused mainly, or exclusively by intent. Have you heard of the meningococcusstrain that is covered with human protein? It is easy to see that such a bacterium would be highly lethal, but where does it come from? It has no evolutionary advantage. It immediately kills its only host. It has no natural reservoir. Its origin was a bioweapons lab. The so-called ‘flesh eating’ bacterium is the same way; every victim is promptly cured or killed.

The disease most commonly thought of in relation to the pricker is AIDS. That is because people have always suspected that AIDS was deliberately engineered. The AIDS virus is wholly dependant on the reverse transcriptase molecule, which is not needed by human cells. This presents an important target for AIDS drugs. The AIDS virus is able to develop new reverse transcriptase molecules so as to be resistant to any one drug. It has been described as a ‘smart virus’. I concur; it has actual intellect behind it. In Africa AIDS strikes heterosexuals. It is revealing that this more contagious strain remained confined to Africa, while the less contagious variety, which depends primarily on anal intercourse, was able to come to America. This is fortunate for Americans who do not have anal intercourse, but hate those who do. There is no real evidence that AIDS is ever transmitted sexually. There is a correlation with sexual activity, but that is because the people who use prickers know the sexual activities of their victims. Some diseases are used to establish a history of illness, without disabling or killing immediately. AIDS, Hepatitis C, systemic lupus erythematosus, and multiple sclerosis (MS) are common ones.

MS is an autoimmune degenerative disease of the central nervous system. It afflicts over 100,000 people in this country alone. It has a remarkable latitude related distribution. Sometimes it is used to debilitate, as in the case of Senator Paul Wellstone. He died in a plane crash shortly after I published this description of how to cause MS. The term ‘multiple sclerosis’ was coined around 1880-1885. It is now six times as common as it was a hundred years ago. That is because the pricker is now six times as common. Medical science says the cause is unknown, but an immunologic mechanism is suspected. Everything about MS says it is a well understood autoimmune disease. The blood brain barrier normally isolates the myelin of the central nervous system, so the immune system does not recognize it as ‘self’. There is antimyelin antibody in the MS victim’s blood. Progressive lesions are inflamed as an autoimmune lesion would be. The disease is induced experimentally in animals by inoculating myelin proteins. There are even bacteria, genetically engineered to carry human myelin protein on their surface, which induce MS after infecting an animal. Yet the medical profession can not be quite sure. It is as if a car smashed into your house, but the police could not quite prove that the car was not an elephant, or a tree, or a meteor shaped like a car. The medical profession doesn’t know what causes MS because their leaders know full well what, and who, causes it. I have presented something that really does cause MS as often as anyone wants to use it. If our adversaries say there is some other cause, let them show us what it is.

It may be that the government is already preparing explanations for the missing diseases. In 2002 there was an ad on PBS’s News Hour where ADM ‘supermarket to the world’ said “Imagine a world where health problems are prevented before they even start; is the answer natural food supplements called ‘nutriceuticals’? We’re finding out. ADM – the nature of what’s to come.” The point of this ad was that if the government stops using natural looking diseases, the cessation of new cases of some of them would demand explanation. We could then have been told that ADM had been finding out about ‘nutriceuticals’ by adding them to the world’s food supply, and that ‘they must be working!’ When I asked what they were doing to ‘find out’ if ‘nutriceuticals’ were ‘the answer’, ADM management was deceptive and highly evasive.

Spousal Disease: Many years ago I met a woman who had just divorced a government agent. She had also just had a radical mastectomy. She was afraid of her ex-husband, afraid for her life. That a woman should have to live (and die) in fear of this ‘public servant’ struck me as very wrong. Since then I have met a couple of other women who have broken off marriages with government agents. In each case the woman was diagnosed with cancer within a year of breaking up.

This was not a natural occurrence. According to the California Cancer Registry, January 1991 the cancer rate for women of all races, aged 35-39 was 1/680 in 1988. The combined probability that all three young women that I had met, at random, from these marriages would have cancer within one year is then on the order of 1:680 X 680 X 680 or 1:314,432,000 by chance alone.

These women didn’t get cancer because divorce and mortal fear are stressful. Emotional stress as a factor in carcinogenesis can account for a few percentage points at most. That is too small an influence to be reliably detectable. This is a cancer rate that is thousands of percent too high. Among other things, several attempts on my own life have confirmed to me that these cancers are intentional assaults.

Viruses are not the only way to cause cancer. Breast cancer, for example, can first be simulated by drugging the victim and injecting foreign material. The victim’s body then slowly, apparently naturally, forms a fibrous mass that suggests malignancy. On biopsy, only the pathologist (from the agent’s healthcare provider) would know the difference. Once a person has a cancer in their medical history, they can be killed at any time without suspicion. For example, it may be desirable to wait until the children graduate from high school. Breast cells, transformed in vitro by inserting oncogenes, can be cultured and stored. Injected in suspension back into the victim, these cells can produce widespread deadly disease on demand.

That is a slow, calculated approach to murder; what if the heat of passion just won’t wait? “Turn her head slowly a little way one way, then quickly a long way the other way.” I am quoting a federal agent who was joking with an assassin about killing the assassin’s wife. The kind of hyper-rotation he was talking about results in a dislocation of the atlanto-axial joint. That is the connection between the top two neck bones. To make a broken neck look like an act of God, the victim is ventilated and taken to a special surgeon/assassin. The victim is then diagnosed with rising intracranial pressure due to brain cancer. The base of the skull and part of the top neck bone are removed, supposedly to remove the tumor and relieve the pressure, obscuring the real cause of collapse. The rumor was spread that perhaps cell phones caused cancers.

I think the justification that is used is that these spouses could pose a threat to national security. Section 412 in chapter 15 (national security) of title 50 (war and national defense) of the US code begins with “All laws, orders, and regulations inconsistent with the provisions of this title are repealed insofar as they are inconsistent with the powers, duties, and responsibilities enacted hereby”… [Except spending and financial reporting]. So Congress has repealed all laws against killing your spouse insofar as they are inconsistent with your duty to protect national security. The perpetrators find it necessary to violate the one law that they have sworn to defend and uphold – the Constitution. They also know this argument can hold only as long as outsiders do not hear about it.

The real threat to the national security establishment is the exposure of all the criminal activity of agents perpetrated under cover of title 50. These spouses have been in a position to witness and hear about many crimes. That position is a matter of public record and gives them some immediate credibility. The acrimony that often follows matrimony, or feelings of social responsibility, may motivate them to talk. Agents also have such usual motives as money, child custody, love, hate, anger, jealousy and power. They have the unusual temptations of convenience and invulnerability.

There are a few different statistical approaches to demonstrate this use of cancer. You could use a random sample of agent ex-spouses, under age 40. In a sample numbering 34 or less, a single cancer, within one year of divorce, represents a positive test result to the 95% confidence level, that this population is under some extraordinary influence. There is actually more than one in random sample that size.

I launched a Program to Uncover Regular Government Executions (PURGE). This program avoids the possibility of sampling error and fraud by using the entire population of the FBI and other agencies for which the number of agents is known. It will overcome the uncertainties of divorce rates and ages by showing that there are too many victims to be accounted for by chance even if every agent divorces a young spouse. If all 11,000 agents of the FBI divorce a young spouse every ten years they should have ((11000/10)/680)=1.62 of these cancers per year. Because these assumptions are extremely conservative, and we cannot identify more than a fraction of actual cases, identification of more than 16 cases from the years 1991-2000 is strong evidence. That is less than one case for every three states in the union.