ALDERMAN NEWSLETTER 50
March 23, 2010
From: Alderman John Hoffmann
TRAGEDY IN WARD 2: David and Vicki Kozeny live in Ward 2 in the Laurel Lakes subdivision. Recently their pregnant daughter, her husband, Dave Null, and their 18-month grandson moved in with the Kozenys.
At 5:45am, Tuesday March 16, Dave was riding his motorcycle to work at a St. Louis law firm. On Olive Blvd in Creve Coeur a 20-year-old woman was driving behind him going home from an all night party, when she took her eyes off the road to try and wake up a passed out passenger. She drove up on the median at Craig Road and then back onto the road hitting and killing David Null. The woman was charged with vehicular manslaughter and a number of other charges including drug possession.
A trust fund has been set up for the 18-month-old son and the unborn child.
Here is the address to send a donation:
Null Children Trust .
c/o
Ortmann Stipanovich Funeral Home
12444 Olive Blvd.
Creve Coeur, MO 63141
DANCING IN THE DARK! At the Board of Aldermen meeting my resolution to record meetings on the city’s digital recording system was back on the agenda. Keep in mind that we recorded meetings until last October when the city attorney without the knowledge of the Board of Aldermen suggested the city clerk stop recording meetings.
City Clerk Pam Burdt had been asked to do a survey of other towns in the area and contacted a number of cities asking if they recorded meetings. 17 city clerks responded. 14 of 17 cities record all meetings, with four of them actually posting the audio recordings of the meetings to their website.
14 of 17 or 82% got mayor Dalton’s attention and during the work session he stated that perhaps we were on the correct road, but need to do some more work. Hold it! We were always on the correct road until we allowed the city attorney to throw up a road block.
THE POLL: Here are the cities that record all meetings, which responded to Pam Burdt’s request for information: Chesterfield, Crestwood, Creve Coeur, Ellisville, Fenton, Florissant, Hazelwood, Kirkwood, Manchester, Olivette, Overland, Richmond Heights, University City and Webster Groves.
Cities that don’t record meetings which responded: Ladue, Frontenac and Des Peres.
THEN CAME THE OPPOSITION: I just cannot see why we don’t want to have the most accurate record possible for the public. Apparently there are some different opinions as to what the public actually is.
DUMB: First Tim Welby asked, “Why would we want to do this if our residents are not using it?”
If we don’t use the recording system that tax money bought how can the residents ever use it? Most residents had no idea it was available. However, making and storing the recordings cost us nothing.
AND DUMBER: Then Alderman Steve Fons said it was not fair to expect citizens serving on commissions to have recordings made that at some later date might be used in court.
I was quick to point out just like camera and audio recorders in police cars the system protects members from unfounded accusations. I added that knowing that a recording is being made also will keep a commissioner from making an inappropriate remark.
DUMBEST OF ALL: The city attorney, Steve Garrett, complained the only people who have ever requested recordings of meetings have been attorneys seeking to sue the city. What Steve did not mention is who hires these lawyers? It is residents and merchants within the city or in other words…the people we are supposed to be representing.
Actually Mr. Garrett was wrong. Jeremy Koehler of the Post-Dispatch obtained the recording of one meeting and later interviewed me about why I was questioning our judge about his lax DWI sentencing during his reappointment hearing. I hate to mention this but a free and open press in theory also represents the people.
THE NEW CONTINUATION: At the last Board of Aldermen meeting Fred Meyland-Smith said he wanted to ask the city clerk about the procedure she used in taping meetings. Unfortunately Pam Burdt was not at the meeting. On March 22 Fred was missing. Then Alderman David Karney, said he has listened to recordings of the Creve Coeur Planning and Zoning meetings on Creve Coeur’s website.
David apparently wants to be the peace maker and suggests we continue the resolution again and have the city clerk record a meeting and hear how it sounds afterwards.
In the actual meeting the resolution was continued to the first meeting in April.
CLAYTON ROAD RECCOMENDATIONS FOR THREE LANES ACCEPTED. Prior to the Board of Aldermen meeting aldermanic candidate from Ward-1 Maria Perron mailed to all the aldermen and the members of the Clayton Road Task Force, a rather detailed letter along with specs from MoDot and other engineering documents that all show why roadways should have four-foot wide or wider shoulders if at all possible. Maria lives on Clayton Road. While campaigning she met a number of other residents of Clayton Road who wanted the shoulders back.
I cast the vote several months ago to put Clayton Road temporarily back to two lanes with shoulders until the new sidewalks were built. Everything Maria talked about at the meeting and that was in her letter, I believe to be correct. She said if the residents filing out the survey cards had read the engineering reports their choice would have been different.
However, 70% of the Ward-2 residents who returned survey cards to the city indicated that they favored the center turn lane. While I agree that the 3-lanes has problems and may even affect property values by making Clayton Road appear busier than it is. In this case I went with the majority of the people I represent. They wanted all the board members to sign on as co-sponsors of the bill. I refused to be a sponsor, but I reluctantly voted for it to be accepted.
THE GREAT DEBATE or APRIL FOOLS! Actually, the Candidates Forum has been scheduled. It will be on April 1 at the Garden Villas. Yes, Delmar Gardens on the South Outer Road!
The Forum will be sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce and the League of Women Voters. There has not been a Candidates Forum since 2006.
The Garden Villas is kind of an unusual location for a Forum or Debate. Parking is limited and the meeting room is on a lower level. The Chamber president told me they had hoped to hold it at the Longview Farmhouse but that idea was nixed by Mayor Dalton. Now my opponent Al Gerber tried to rent Longview for a fundraiser and that would have been totally inappropriate. However I do not see the problem with using a city facility for a candidates’ forum. It seems like a perfect event for a city facility.
I was told that the Parkway School district wanted to charge to rent space, but Delmar Gardens stepped up and even offered to provide appetizers. Good business development on the part of Delmar Gardens. Everyone who lives long enough might need to look at a place like Garden Villas.
Concerning Alderman David Karney’s request to record the debate and put it on the city’s website…it does not appear as if that will happen. The mayor said there were no funds for the city to do anything. We were also told the city’s website was not capable of handling a video.
DIGNIFIED: Mayor Dalton has a record of making it difficult to hold a debate. Last year former Ward-1 Alderwoman and 2008 Aldermanic candidate Barbara Ann Hughes during a public comment portion of a Board of Aldermen meeting said the League of Women Voters reported there would be no debate (Forum) because of scheduling problem for the mayor. Mayor Dalton, who was billing himself as the “Dignified” candidate in the mayor’s race, lit into Mrs. Hughes from the dais. He began to treat her like a hostile witness in a trial and demanded to know who she spoke to, when she held the conversation and exactly what was said. Jon got redder and redder and Barbara Ann started to get flustered. After the “dignified” Mayor Dalton tore into Mrs. Hughes in public he quietly apologized in private after the meeting.
The next day I called the League and even wrote down the name of the person I was speaking to. Lo and behold it turned out Barbara Ann was RIGHT! The Chamber of Commerce told the League of Women Voters they could not schedule a Forum due to the mayor’s schedule.
On Monday March 22, 2010 Mayor Dalton announced that he had scheduling problems and would not be able to attend the 2010 debate/forum. At least he is consistent.
A LONG TWO WEEKS: On Thursday February 18 at a Mason Valley subdivision meeting, Mayor Dalton told the crowd had a big announcement to make concerning the vacant Wal-Mart store in Manchester Meadows in two weeks. However despite knowing something he could not share it for two weeks.
He did say how “the city” had been working hard in negotiations.
Frankly, the word from several shop owners and store managers in the almost dead shopping center has been that Bass Pro Shop was interested in leasing space.
When I spoke I mentioned this and Mayor Dalton shouted back…”That’s not true! You don’t run government by rumor.” If that is the case, perhaps the mayor should share a little more information. You are also not supposed to run government with secrets.
While local government can pass better sign ordinances and have development people encourage businesses to locate in towns, in the case of Town and Country I am at a lost how we are negotiating anything! Inland Property owns Manchester Meadows and signs leases. Last time I checked we did not purchase Manchester Meadows or became the leasing agent.
As of the Monday March 22 Board of Aldermen meeting Mayor Dalton has still not made an announcement. That is 32 days after he promised the residents in Mason Valley that he would have a big announce in two weeks.
Perhaps Mayor Dalton will have a big announcement to make sometime in April. However the point is no one should tell city residents all is well on the city’s retail front until there is a signed lease and occupancy permits have been filed with the city. Making a promise of a big announcement in two weeks and then not delivering is bad government.
Perhaps you remember when the city building inspector sent a letter to a builder giving him 30-days to comply with a city law and then over 200 days later nothing had happened to the builder who was still in violation. Apparently there is some odd counting and in “mayor speak” two weeks does not equal 14 days.
Deer hunts extend to KC parks
CHRIS OBERHOLTZ/Kansas City Star
Park officials who developed the proposal say it is the most effective and efficient method to reduce a deer population estimated at 400. Residents near the park have complained that deer are foraging for food in their subdivisions during the winter because there isn’t enough food in the park for the herd. CHRIS OBERHOLTZ/The Kansas City Star 061709
The deer cull at Shawnee Mission Park that caused so much fuss resulted in 342 kills, but a quieter program in Kansas City parks has killed 378 deer since 2006.
The bow-hunting managed by the Missouri Department of Conservation in Riverfront and Tiffany Springs parks has so reduced deer density that the number killed dropped sharply from 2008 to 2009. The hunts will continue this fall in those parks and in Hodge and Jerry Smith parks.
“If we stopped, the numbers would shoot back up,” said conservation agent Joe DeBold.
Read more:
NEW DEER INFORMATION : A resident from Ward-4 sent all the aldermen a research paper from Washington University concerning how deer are transmitting blood diseases in Missouri to humans through deer ticks. I sent this report to most people on my deer e-mail list. If you did not get one and would like one, please drop me an email and I’ll forward a copy to you.
ATTEMPT TO BAN PUBLIC AND ELECTED OFFICIALS FROM POLICE COMMISSION MEETINGS: So much for the 1st Amendment when Dorothy Rogers is in charge at a Police Commission meeting. Alderwoman Nancy Avioli who chairs the police commission, was a no show on Tuesday March 16. So Dorothy Rogers (Ward-1), who I voted against for reappointment to the police commission due to a lack of any qualifications for the position ( other than a front yard on Clayton Road that is great for political signs)…was in charge. The main purpose of the meeting was to approve the minutes and adjourn to the Aldermanic Chambers for a presentation on meth labs and legislation to ban certain cold medicines from over the counter sale.
After getting the minutes approved, which was tough as Dorothy was not at the February meeting, she got sidetracked.
“What can we do to ban Mr. Hoffmann from meetings,” asked Dorothy.
“Nothing,” replied Police Chief and City Administrator John Copeland. “These are public meetings.”
“Does Mrs. Avioli have the right to settle down Mr. Hoffmann.” She asked.
“Nancy can run the meetings as she sees fit,” replied Chief Copeland.
Here is the rub. I keep writing bills that have some police or public safety component. These bills come before the Police Commission for a recommendation. Dorothy is always against anything I introduce. I discuss the need for the particular bill and why it would be good for the citizens of Town and Country.
Over the last two years I have received considerable help on a couple of issues with support from Commissioner Don Larsen, a retired business executive and former Commissioner Armand Hoffstetter. But it is usually tough sledding with the Police Commission. Also the Police Department has a huge budget and I feel obligated to attend these meetings, especially since I have 30-years experience in law enforcement.
I wrote about the January meeting where a homeowner from Middlebury Lane came at the invitation of Nancy Avioli to discuss an ordinance to help fund some way for the residents of the subdivision to get some relief from the noise from Highway 141. Middlebury was denied a sound wall by MoDot, even though all other subdivisions received one, when the divided section of Hwy 141 was opened in 1993.
I had worked with the residents, done research and attended meetings with MoDot on the issue for the last 18 months.
The homeowner was rather badly treated by several members of the commission including Dorothy and Allen Allred. I did jump to her defense with the permission of Alderwomen Avioli and provided some background information, which apparently Dorothy was unhappy about.
“We are trying to be intimidated by him at these meetings. We do nothing when he attends these meetings,” said Mrs. Rogers, who appears to me to prefer the attention when the police command staff spoon feeds members with inside information seeking a recommendation to make an expensive purchase of new equipment and gadgets. .
“January’s meeting was so ridiculous,’ she said. “That woman was not listening to Mr. Allred and tried to tell him they had a neighbor giving them legal advice. Then Mr. Hoffmann does that computer thing and who knows what he puts on the computer.”
Mr. Allred then interrupted by asking, “What do you mean by ‘computer thing?’ Do you mean a blog?”
“Yes one of those blogs. I don’t like it,” said Dorothy who doesn’t have a computer and appears not to understand the concept of how they work. This puts a person at a clear disadvantage when sitting on a commission that makes recommendations concerning modern policing.
“Well maybe things will change next month,” said Dorothy referring to the upcoming elections.
Mr. Allred then congratulated her for speaking up and I suppose congratulated her for trying to close public meetings and keep people she doesn’t like from attending. Allred, a high dollar attorney at Thompson-Colburn, likes to dodge giving opinions on bills dealing with enforcement by saying, “I am not a Constitutional lawyer.” I kept this in mind when he complimented Dorothy on trying to keep the pubic and elected officials from attending meetings. You would not expect an attorney who is not a “Constitutional lawyer” to know much about THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
Dorothy was beaming at this compliment from Allen when John Copeland said they needed to adjourn and attend the presentation.
LOOKING TO BUY A CHURCH? That for sale sign on Des Peres Road for 11 acres including the Destiny Church.