Superior Court Penalties
Regions and Judges of Ontario
Central East Ontario Judicial Region Summary
Peter Karl Roscoe
Nov 2008
Central Eastern Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary
Contents
1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female
2 Region Ce – Central East Region
# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants
Penalties Against Men / Penalties Against WomenTotal / Major / Total / Major
Judge / 1 / 2 / # p / # sr / # p / # sr / # p / # sr / # p / # sr
Boyko / F / Ce / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0
Dunbar / F / Ce / 5 / 0 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Eberhard / F / Ce / 25 / 11 / 17 / 5 / 3 / 2 / 0 / 0
Ferguson / F / Ce / 9 / 3 / 6 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Lack / F / Ce / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Olah / F / Ce / 11 / 1 / 9 / 1 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 0
Rogers / F / Ce / 21 / 9 / 18 / 9 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0
Scott / F / Ce / 20 / 10 / 19 / 10 / 3 / 1 / 3 / 1
Wildman / F / Ce / 10 / 8 / 9 / 7 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0
Bryant / M / Ce / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Ditomaso / M / Ce / 9 / 6 / 9 / 6 / 3 / 0 / 2 / 0
Glass / M / Ce / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3 / 0 / 3 / 0
Graham / M / Ce / 2 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Howden / M / Ce / 18 / 3 / 14 / 2 / 4 / 0 / 2 / 0
Ingram / M / Ce / 4 / 2 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Logan / M / Ce / 3 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
MacDougall / M / Ce / 10 / 2 / 8 / 2 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0
Mackinnon / M / Ce / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Magda / M / Ce / 7 / 1 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
McIssac / M / Ce / 5 / 0 / 4 / 0 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 1
Misner / M / Ce / 4 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Nelson / M / Ce / 5 / 0 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Perkins / M / Ce / 32 / 4 / 23 / 4 / 5 / 1 / 2 / 1
Stong / M / Ce / 5 / 1 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Timms / M / Ce / 7 / 6 / 3 / 3 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0
Wood / M / Ce / 7 / 1 / 6 / 1 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0
Female Judges / 9 / 104 / 42 / 85 / 35 / 14 / 4 / 6 / 1
Male judges / 17 / 122 / 29 / 82 / 20 / 23 / 2 / 13 / 2
Total / 26 / 226 / 71 / 167 / 54 / 37 / 6 / 19 / 3
Central East Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )
Male Lump Sums missing 4
N = 13 Mean = 65.1 Total = 846.3
5.000 6.700 10.00 11.00 22.00 25.00 40.00 44.00 50.00 66.00 79.00 137.0 350.0
Male Imputed Income missing 9
N = 27 Mean = 75.5 Total = 2038.5
6.000 10.80 13.00 14.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 21.00 22.00 25.00 26.00 33.00 35.00 40.00 40.00 41.00 48.00 50.00 52.00 55.00 60.00 64.00 66.00 67.00 220.0 293.0 681.0
Male Cost Penalties
N = 55 Mean = 21.5 Total = 1182.5
0.7000 1.000 1.400 2.000 2.100 2.500 2.500 3.000 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.000 4.300 4.500 4.500 4.700 4.700 5.000 5.000 5.200 5.500 6.000 6.000 7.000 7.000 7.300 9.000 10.00 10.00 10.20 10.50 11.00 12.00 12.50 12.80 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.50 15.70 16.00 16.20 16.60 21.30 24.40 28.70 40.00 42.00 44.00 45.00 45.90 64.00 87.90 91.60 320.0
Female Cost Penalties
N = 17 Mean = 9.1 Total = 154.7
0.3000 0.7000 0.7000 1.300 1.800 2.000 2.000 3.500 7.500 9.000 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 16.00 20.00 40.00
Central East Region Case Summary
1) Penalties Against Men
Contents
1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female
2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east
E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west
Sw – south west T - Toronto
3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor
6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default
Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets
Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum
Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access
Sc – security St – striking pleadings
7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )
Judge / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / Case / 5 / 6 / 7 / DescriptionCe / L / L / McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2002 CanLII 2803 (ON S.C.) / Sa / Though primary caregiver in past made by wife to undergo supervised access, custody and access settled prior to trial
Boyko / F / Ce / M / M / Lascala v. Lascala, 2004 CanLII 5013 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 24.4 / Divorce action, husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial wife asks 100K gets 24.4 K
Dunbar / F / Ce / L / L / Berzins v. Straughan, 2002 CanLII 2695 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ro / Granted but award for damages denied, husband convicted of assault, daughter testifies, wife gets custody,
Dunbar / F / Ce / Griffin 2004 / mj / St / Mans pleadings struck
Dunbar / F / Ce / M / M / Lindo v. Lindo, 2002 CanLII 2702 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 50.0 / Lump sum over 50 K given by transfer of home, $ 225 per month spousal support
Dunbar / F / Ce / M / M / Lindo v. Lindo, 2002 CanLII 2702 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ro / Man imprisoned for assault not allowed back home, vesting order on house to wife
Dunbar / F / E / M / M / Murano v. Murano, 2002 CanLII 49352 (ON C.A.) / mj / C / Man sentenced to jail for contempt for failing to provide disclosure
Dunbar / F / Ce / M / F / Vukovic v. Vukovic, 2003 CanLII 1987 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / 23 K held as security, security and 17 K more ordered to wife for spousal support arrears
Eberhard / F / Ce / M / sr / Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 50.0 / Man must be hiding income so set at 50 K per year, wife imputed at 64 K, Man must pay 1.1 K per year, wife mild
Eberhard / F / Ce / M / sr / Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ro / Restraining order, police visit to get personal items, wife gets custody, underemployed, mans stated income doubled by court
Eberhard / F / Ce / M / sr / Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 13.0 / Intransient with alcohol problem for many years ordered to pay 43 K in arrears and imputed from 12 K claimed to 25 K, must pay $ 600 per month
Eberhard / F / Ce / Critch v. Critch, 2005 CanLII 16630 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 4.0 / Motion, 4 K costs
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr / F / Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 40.0 / Divorce action, wife asks 58 K gets 40 K, man had a lawyer at trial
Eberhard / F / Ce / M / F / Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) / mj / F / Mans properties including those transferred to others are frozen for 90 days so wife can make claims against them
Eberhard / F / Ce / M / F / Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / Mans payment is secured against his mortgage
Eberhard / F / Ce / M / F / Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 350.0 / Wife has exclusive possession for 36 months and man is ordered to pay 350 K mortgage due to fraudulent loan he forged wifes signature to get, criminal charges
Eberhard / F / Ce / M / F / Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 40.0 / 1 K per month spousal support, 1.6 K per month child support and $ 50 per month s.7 expense, 4 K arrears, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr / M / Ernyes v. Rachlin, 2004 CanLII 47867 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 4.5 / Contempt motion, 4.5 K costs
Eberhard / F / Ce / M / F / J.H. v. S.H., 2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ep / Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 305 per month child support and $ 1000 spousal support
Eberhard / F / Ce / L / L / Korevaar v. Allard, 2003 CanLII 2151 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 20.0 / Man with declared income of 46 K imputed to 66 K
Eberhard / F / Ce / L / L / Korevaar v. Allard, 2003 CanLII 2151 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sa / Supervised access, both spouses have other children, domestic violence history, impaired driving, urine testing and AA meetings ordered, inspection for alcohol by supervisor, must turn over car keys to supervisor install device on car ignition, supervision during visits relaxed, 2.4 K per month total support ordered
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr(ex) / F / Koster v. Koster, 2002 CanLII 2693 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 6.0 / Ex parte trial, vesting order on home separation agreement overturned, support ordered though man denies being a parent, 6 K costs
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr( ex) / F / Koster v. Koster, 2002 CanLII 2693 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Ex parte trial, vesting order on home separation agreement overturned, support ordered though man denies being a parent, 6 K costs
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr / ex / Leroux v. Walker, 2001 CanLII 28194 (ON S.C.) / mn / D / Man owes 4.1 K arrears and must pay $ 125 per month
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr / M / McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 1.0 / $ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K, 1 K costs
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr / M / McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 14.0 / $ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K, 1 K costs
Eberhard / F / Ce / L / L / McNaughton v. Price, 2006 CanLII 1453 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 64.0 / Man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 100 K
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr / F / Pratt v. Pratt, 2003 CanLII 2201 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 10.0 / Divorce action, husband given supervised access to children, divided success, 10 K costs
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr / F / Pratt v. Pratt, 2003 CanLII 2201 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sa / Divorce action, husband given supervised access to children, divided success, 10 K costs
Eberhard / F / Ce / L / L / Savage v. Agnello, 2002 CanLII 2768 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 16.0 / Man claims 99 K and is imputed to 115 K
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr / M / Stancheff v. Stancheff, 2006 CanLII 22144 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 2.5 / Variation, 2.5 K costs
Eberhard / F / Ce / sr / L / Ward v. Bates, 2005 CanLII 2947 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 66.0 / Lump sums of 48 K and 18 K forced by FRO to pay arrears, intentionally unemployed, imputed income 100 K must borrow to stay out of jail, variation denied
Ferguson / F / Ce / sr / F / Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sa / Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs
Ferguson / F / Ce / sr / F / Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs
Ferguson / F / Ce / F / M / Dorion v. Merkley, 2006 CanLII 38357 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 5.2 / Husband loses interim motion 5.2 K costs
Ferguson / F / Ce / sr / M / Goodfellow v. Goodfellow, 2005 CanLII 4847 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 20.0 / Man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 60 K, variation refused
Ferguson / F / Ce / M / M / Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 6.0 / 6 K costs for interim motions to vary support
Ferguson / F / Ce / M / M / Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 293.0 / Man claims 62 K income but is not varied and must continue paying at 355 K income.
Ferguson / F / Ce / M / M / Lascala v. Lascala, 2004 CanLII 5013 (ON S.C.) / mj / St / Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 24 K costs
Ferguson / F / Ce / M / F / Merkand v. Merkand, 2006 CanLII 33420 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 2.1 / Interim motion on access variation, 2.1 K costs
Ferguson / F / Ce / M / F / Sciuk v. Sciuk, 2005 CanLII 16642 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / 10 K to be held for security
Lack / F / Ce / M / M / Coscarella v. Coscarella, 2000 CanLII 20376 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 1.4 / Interim motion, wife asks 2.6 K and gets 1.4 K, no costs for either side in divorce action
Lack / F / Ce / M / M / Laue v. Laue, 2000 CanLII 20295 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / 60 K arrears, man clains a 2 K per year income, variation denied
Olah / F / Ce / M / M / Berry v. Ollerenshaw, 2003 CanLII 2405 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sa / Allegations of drug use and sexual abuse by non biological father, supervised access, leave to appeal granted
Olah / F / Ce / M / M / David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 60.0 / Man claims 65 K imputed to 125 K, One year of spousal support at 2.5 K then unemployed wife imputed to 20 K and spousal support drops to 1.75 K for 5 years, wife minor
Olah / F / Ce / M / M / David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 22.0 / 22 K lump sum retroactive arrears
Olah / F / Ce / M / M / David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.) / mn / Pr / Wife gets prejudgment interest on 22 K equalization
Olah / F / Ce / M / M / David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ro / Man convicted of assault, wife gets children, 4 K per month support
Olah / F / Ce / M / M / David v. David, 2005 CanLII 10541 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 42.0 / Divorce trial, wife gets 42 K
Olah / F / Ce / M / F / Denby v. Denby, 2003 CanLII 2097 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 28.7 / Divorve action, 4 day trial, 28.7 K costs
Olah / F / Ce / F / M / MacPherson v. MacPherson, 2005 CanLII 28543 (ON S.C.) / mn / C / Lump sum 11 K support arrears, contempt, 1.5 K penalty
Olah / F / Ce / F / M / MacPherson v. MacPherson, 2005 CanLII 28543 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 11.0 / Lump sum 11 K support arrears, contempt, 1.5 K penalty
Olah / F / Ce / sr / M / Rilli v. Rilli, 2006 CanLII 34451 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 48.0 / $ 1050 per month spousal support, man unemployed has 48 K income imputed to him, wife is unemployed and remarried to man who makes 14.4 K per year, wife has 9 K income imputed to her
Olah / F / Ce / M / M / Tomasone v. Tomasone, 2005 CanLII 1074 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / 5 K security for motion
Rogers / F / Ce / sr / F / Aguilera v. Reid, 2006 CanLII 6196 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sa / Assault charges, supervised access ordered, drugs, criminal record, final order for supervised access
Rogers / F / Ce / M / sr / Chernyakhovsky v. Chernyakhovsky, 2005 CanLII 6048 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 26.0 / Man claims income 35 K and is imputed to 61 K
Rogers / F / Ce / F / M / Cook v. Burton, 2005 CanLII 1063 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / Charging order for 30 K against property and life insurance policy as security for support
Rogers / F / Ce / M / M / Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 0.7 / 0.7 K for interim motion
Rogers / F / Ce / ex / M / Ho v. Ho, 2003 CanLII 2315 (ON S.C.) / mj / F / Preservation order already made against man, his pleadings struck, man does not answer, ex parte freezing order against mans family
Rogers / F / Ce / F / F / Ierullo v. Ierullo, 2006 CanLII 33301 (ON C.A.) / mn / Cts / 4.0 / 4 K costs of motion to vary and 5 K costs of appeal
Rogers / F / Ce / sr / sr / L.S.M. v. A.M., 2006 CanLII 13413 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 35.0 / Man unemployed and waiting for surgery imputed to 35 K per year
Rogers / F / Ce / sr / sr / L.S.M. v. A.M., 2006 CanLII 13413 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ro / Man jailed for domestic assault, wife claims he’s a drug addict, wife gets custody, imputed income, intentionally umemployed
Rogers / F / Ce / F / F / Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 64.0 / Answer struck, uncontested trial, 64 K in costs total, 15 K security already ordered, wifes pleadings also struck
Rogers / F / Ce / F / F / Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.) / mj / St / Answer struck, uncontested trial, 64 K in costs total, 15 K security already ordered, wifes pleadings also struck
Rogers / F / Ce / sr / F / Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 11.0 / Uncontested trial, husbands pleadings struck, 11 K costs
Rogers / F / Ce / sr / F / Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ro / Granted, the applicant has sworn to fear and 1 year order to let the respondents anger abates, 49 K equalization payment to go to FRO to secure support, arrears of retroactive support order varied, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 11K cost penalty
Rogers / F / Ce / sr / F / Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / Uncontested trial,49 K equalization payment to be held by FRO for security for support
Rogers / F / Ce / M / M / Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sa / Abducts child, no charges, supervised access at wifes discretion, must give up passport to get access
Rogers / F / Ce / M / M / Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.) / mn / Sc / Must give wife passport to get supervised access at her discretion
Rogers / F / Ce / sr / M / Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 45956 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 7.0 / Interims motions to strike pleadings, 7 K costs
Rogers / F / Ce / sr / M / Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 45956 (ON S.C.) / mj / St / Mans pleadings struck for failure to produce financial disclosure, uncontested trial ordered, 7 K costs
Rogers / F / Ce / sr / Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 44.0 / Lump sum and arrears and costs of 44 K owing, pleadings struck, must pay before he can ask for a variation, non dissipation order
Rogers / F / Ce / M / sr / Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.) / mj / F / Mans pleadings struck, non dissipation order, lump sum spousal support, 44 K in cost arrears, man violates non dissipation order
Rogers / F / Ce / M / sr / Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 44.0 / Lump sum and arrears and costs of 44 K owing, pleadings struck, must pay before he can ask for a variation, non dissipation order
Rogers / F / Ce / L / sr / Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.) / mj / St / Mans pleadings struck for disclosure, man blames lawyer, uncontesed trial, 44 K owing in costs
Scott / F / Ce / M / F / Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2003 CanLII 2056 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ro / Restraining order not to seek information from others, 5 K recognizance in case of breach
Scott / F / Ce / M / f / Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2003 CanLII 2056 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / 5 K recognizance for restraining order, bad faith, income and value of business imputed
Scott / F / Ce / M / F / Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2006 CanLII 20528 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 87.9 / Divorce action, 84.9 K costs, and 3 K costs to apportion award.
Scott / F / Ce / sr / sr / Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 52.0 / Man claims he is unemployed and is imputed to 52 K
Scott / F / Ce / M / sr / Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.) / mj / F / Mutual, wife gets home and sells farm where man lives violating order, sentenced to jail for contempt, support not mentioned
Scott / F / Ce / F / M / Harris v. Stuart Harris, 2005 CanLII 28789 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 40.0 / Lump sum payment of 40 K for spousal support, equalization would of gone 10 K against the wife so she is given additional 10 K unjust enrichment award brining total lump to 50 K
Scott / F / Ce / M / sr / Hill v. Hill, 2002 CanLII 2790 (ON S.C / mj / Ip / 67.0 / Mans declared income of 58 K imputed to 125 K
Scott / F / Ce / ex / sr / Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) / mj / Cts / 45.0 / Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed
Scott / F / Ce / ex / sr / Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) / mj / Ip / Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed
Scott / F / Ce / ex / sr / Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) / mj / L / 137.0 / Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed
Scott / F / Ce / ex / sr / Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) / mj / Ro / Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott / F / Ce / ex / sr / Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) / mj / Sa / Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott / F / Ce / ex / sr / Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) / mj / Sc / Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott / F / Ce / ex / sr / Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) / mj / St / Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott / F / Ce / F / M / Lawson v. Lawson, 2006 CanLII 26573 (ON C.A.) / mj / Ip / 66.0 / Man quits job for farming and is imputed to 66 K, lowered to 60 K on appeal, 15 K costs of appeal
Scott / F / Ce / sr / M / Mindzak v. Turner, 2006 CanLII 9705 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sa / 2 ½ years supervised access changed to unsupervised 4 hours a week, completed parenting classes, mother objects, support increased
Scott / F / Ce / M / M / T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.) / mj / F / Man allowed to proceed with spousal support but all other issues dismissed, restraining order, freezing order, costs
Scott / F / Ce / M / M / T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.) / mj / Js / Man allowed to proceed with spousal support but all other issues dismissed, restraining order, freezing order, costs
Scott / F / Ce / M / M / T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ro / Granted for wife and child, man convicted of domestic assault, mans application to extend time limits for equalization dismissed, claim for access dismissed, wifes application for spousal support allowed to proceed, mans assets frozen
Scott / F / Ce / F / M / Wright v. Ingham, 2006 CanLII 591 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sa / Man charged with assault, wife gets custody and mans access changed back to unsupervised
Wildman / F / Ce / sr / L / Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.) / mj / Js / 15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman / F / Ce / sr / L / Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 15.0 / 15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman / F / Ce / sr / L / Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / 15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman / F / Ce / sr / L / Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.) / mj / St / 15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman / F / Ce / sr / sr / Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.) / mj / Ip / 6.7 K lump sum on account of arrears and 1K per month payments, 3.8 K per month child and spousal support, income imputed to 100 K, lump sum overturned on appeal
Wildman / F / Ce / sr / sr / Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.) / mn / L / 6.7 / 6.7 K lump sum on account of arrears and 1K per month payments, 3.8 K per month child and spousal support, income imputed to 100 K, lump sum overturned on appeal
Wildman / F / Ce / sr / sr / J.B.G. v. L.B., 2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.) / mj / St / Husbands answer struck
Wildman / F / Ce / M / M / Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.) / mj / St / Mans pleadings struck and can be reinstated on motion if he complies with 60 K payment and disclosure
Wildman / F / Ce / ex / M / Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.) / mj / F / Wife gets ex parte orders freezing and seizing mans assets, man moved money out of country and abducted son, man gets supervised access, pleadings struck
Wildman / F / Ce / F / F / Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 22662 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 10.5 / Wifes loses motion for summary judgment, man pays 10.5 K costs
Bryant / M / Ce / M / F / Lee v. Lee, 2004 CanLII 5056 (ON S.C.) / mn / L / Unspecified one time lump support them motion for interim spousal and child support of 1.1 K per month granted
Ditomaso / M / Ce / sr / F / Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 21.0 / Man on unemployment is intentionally unemployed, 21 K support arrears, imputed to 27 K per year
Ditomaso / M / Ce / F / F / Margie v. Akogyeram, 2006 CanLII 16369 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 10.2 / Default for not abiding by court order to sell home, pleadings struck, 10.2 K costs
Ditomaso / M / Ce / F / F / Margie v. Akogyeram, 2006 CanLII 16369 (ON S.C.) / mj / St / Mans pleadings struck for non compliance in sale of the family home, 10.2 K costs
Ditomaso / M / Ce / M / M / Martin-Shore v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 17019 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 16.6 / I0 K costs against husband for questioning at which wife refused to answer, husbands motion to vary support stayed and 6.6 K costs for motion
Ditomaso / M / Ce / sr / M / Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / 267.0 / Default on child and spousal support Charging order on property and RRSP, 25K lump sum arrears no motion to vary until paid 500 K imputed income
Ditomaso / M / Ce / sr / M / Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / Man claims 3 year average 263 K income and is imputed to 530 K
Ditomaso / M / Ce / sr / M / Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 25.0 / Charging order against property and RRSP, 25 K lump sum payment
Ditomaso / M / Ce / sr / M / Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / Charging order against property and RRSP, 25 K lump sum payment
Ditomaso / M / Ce / sr / M / Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 9674 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 45.9 / Motion to stay support and arrears and security, 45.9 K costs
Glass / M / Ce / M / F / Kirby v. Chappell, 2003 CanLII 1990 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 9.0 / Divorce action with trial, 9 K costs
Glass / M / Ce / L / L / Wood v. Wood, 2002 CanLII 2717 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 5.5 / Interim motion, wife claims 7.7 K and gets 5.5 K, husband claims 8.2 K
Graham / M / Ce / sr / sr / A.N. v. M.A.Z., 2006 CanLII 12316 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ip / Man pays 1.8 K per month based on an imputed income
Graham / M / Ce / sr / sr / Desjardins v. Waters, 2006 CanLII 1203 (ON S.C.) / mn / D / Child support default, minor reduction of arrears, separation agreement overturned, imputed income
Howden / M / Ce / L / L / J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Man imprisoned and unemployed and imputed in arrears to Social services 38 K, varied to 11K
Howden / M / Ce / M / M / Manning v. Manning, 2004 CanLII 33295 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 15.0 / Support variation, 15.K
Howden / M / Ce / M / F / Merghani v. Merghani, 2000 CanLII 22473 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Uncontested trial, 300 K equalization, charging order on taxi license, unknown imputation of income, 32 K helds from seizure of property by FRO given to wife for default not set aside
Howden / M / Ce / M / F / Merghani v. Merghani, 2000 CanLII 22473 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / Uncontested trial, 300 K equalization, charging order on taxi license, unknown imputation of income, 32 K helds from seizure of property by FRO given to wife for default not set aside
Howden / M / Ce / M / F / Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 4.7 / Interim motion to vary support, 4.7 K costs
Howden / M / Ce / sr / F / Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Denied variation for support, costs, access changed, leave requirement
Howden / M / Ce / M / F / Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 40.0 / Man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K
Howden / M / Ce / M / F / Mills v. Mills, 2004 CanLII 4793 (ON S.C.) / mn / Js / Wife granted summary judgement, minor adjustment of minutes of settlement