CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW
CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW
SUMMARY
PX SOLUTIONS
Sources used 2
APPLICATION OF THE TPA 9
Is the D a constitutional corp? 9
Is R a trading corp? 10
Is R a financial corp? 10
Does D fall under the extended application of Pts IVA (UC), V, VB? 11
Is D a natural person to whom s6(3) applies? – unconscionable conduct + unfair practises offences only 11
Use of particular services 11
SHIELD OF THE CROWN 13
In right of the Commonwealth 13
Is the activity specifically excluded under s 2C? 13
Is Cth carrying on a business? 13
In right of a State or territory 14
Is respondent part of the crown in right of a State or territory? 15
Is respondent a third party contracting with a GBE? 15
IS THE CONDUCT IN TRADE OR COMMERCE? 16
Narrow view - authoritative 16
Wide view (not law) 16
Special cases 17
Sales of private assets 17
Sale of part of a business 17
One-off sale of capital asset by business 17
Employment Negotiations 18
Wilcox J’s view 18
Heerey J’s view 19
Representations in lectures subsequently sold 19
Professional activity 20
Government announcements and policy statements 20
Statements to Public 20
Internal corporate communications 21
ANCILLIARY LIABILITY 23
Imputed Conduct 23
Imputed to corporation 23
Imputed to natural person 24
Is there actual or ostensible authority? 24
‘Involved in’ Contravention - CIVIL 25
Active participant 26
Passive bystander 27
Innocent lack of knowledge 27
Criminal ancillary liability –s79 – MDC or s60 ONLY 27
UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT 29
s51AA 29
Is the conduct financial services? 29
Is there a corporation? 29
Is the conduct in Trade or commerce? 29
Is the conduct UC within the meaning of the ‘unwritten law’? 29
Duress 29
Undue influence 30
Unconscionable conduct 30
(in the sense of exploitation of a special disability) 30
Is there a special disability? 31
Has D taken advantage of the special disability? 33
s51AB – where App is a consumer 34
Is the conduct financial services? 34
Is there a corporation? 34
Is the conduct in Trade or commerce? 35
Is there the supply or possible supply of goods or services to a consumer? 35
Are the goods or services personal? 35
Is there UC? 35
s51AC 36
Is there a corporation? 36
Is the conduct in Trade or Commerce? 36
… in connection with the supply or possible supply or aquisisiton of goods 36
The goods or services must be priced higher than $3M 36
Respondent is corp? 36
Respondent is a person? 36
Is there UC? 37
Remedies 38
MISLEADING OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT 38
s52 is not a fresh cause of action 38
Who can use s52? 39
There must be a corporation 39
Conduct in trade or commerce 39
Misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive 40
- The burden is on the applicant 40
- Nail down the conduct 40
Identify the class 40
Test the conduct against all members of the class 40
Mere confusion is not misleading or deceptive 41
Deception 42
No need for actual evidence of people mislead 42
Intention is not an element, but is probative 42
Fault or lack of reasonable care is not an element 42
Value of subjective evidence of people misled 43
Establishing M or D conduct by evidence 43
Survey evidence 43
Similar fact evidence 43
Causation 43
Erroneous assumptions 43
Exclusion clauses 44
Common types of M or D conduct 45
Representation or mere puff? 45
Contractual promises 45
Opinions 46
Silence 47
Does silence amount to conduct? 47
What sort of conduct amounts to a breach? 47
Providing incomplete information- half-truth 48
Comparative advertising 48
Character merchandising 49
Passing off style breach 49
Passing on information 49
Exceptions 49
FUTURE REPRESENTATIONS 51
There must be a representation about a future matter 51
Reps as to present state of mind – present rep 51
Rep as to present intention 52
Future rep 52
What is reasonable? 53
Burden of proof reversed 53
Pleading 53
FALSE CONDUCT – s 53 54
Mens rea not required 54
False rep goods have particular standard etc: s53(a). 54
False rep that services are of particular standard etc.: s53(aa). 55
False rep that goods are new; S53(b) 55
What is new? Defined by context of goods or formal test? 55
False rep that person has agreed to acquire G or S: s53(bb) 55
False rep that G or S have certain attributes: s53(c) 55
False rep that corporation has approval etc: s53(d) 55
False rep about price of G or S: s53(e) 55
False rep about availability of repair/parts: s53(ea) 56
False rep about place of origin: s53(eb) 56
False rep about need for G or S: s53(f) 56
False rep about warranty etc: s53(g) 56
Harassment and Coercion: s60 57
Physical force 57
Undue harassment 57
Coercion 57
ACCC debt collection guidelines 57
There must be a consumer 59
There is a presumption of consumer 59
If goods are acquired 59
Ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use or consumption? 59
If services are acquired 60
There must be supply under contract 60
The supply must be by a corporation in the course of a business 60
Goods 61
Condition of compliance with description: s 70 61
There must be a sale by description 61
The goods must correspond with the description 61
Condition of merchantable quality: s 71(1) 62
Auctions are excluded: s71(1) 62
Are the goods of merchantable quality? 62
Does an exception apply? 63
Condition of fitness for particular purpose: s71(2) 64
The consumer’s purpose must be known 64
…to the corporation or person conducting antecedent negotiations 64
The goods must be ‘reasonably fit’ for that purpose 64
Exception: non-reliance or reliance unreasonable 65
Condition of correspondence with sample: s 72 65
Condition that seller has right to sell goods sold: s 69(1)(a) 65
Warranty of quiet possession: s69(1)(b) 66
Warranty that goods are free from encumbrances: s69(1)(c) 66
Services 66
Warranty of due care and skill: s 74(1) 66
Warranty of fitness related materials for purpose: s74(1) 66
Warranty of fitness for purpose made known: s 74(2) 66
Limited scope 66
The consumer’s purpose must be known 66
Services and materials must be reasonably fit for purpose: s74(2) 67
Exceptions 67
Some exclusion clauses void 67
Limitation of liability for domestic goods OK 68
Remedy 68
STATUTORY RIGHTS OF ACTION AGAINST MANUFACUTER OF GOODS– div 2A 69
Limitation period 69
Supplied by a corporation in trade or commerce 69
The goods must be manufactured by the corporation 70
The goods must be personal/domestic 70
There must be a middleman 71
The applicant can be a consumer or person deriving title from consumer 71
Consumer 71
Person deriving title from consumer 71
Non-excludability 72
Causes of Action 72
Goods not fit for purpose: s74B 72
Goods acquired for purpose made known 72
Defences 73
False description: s74C 73
There must be a sale by description: s74C(b) 73
Loss or damage suffered because goods do not comply 74
Defences 74
Unmerchantable quality: s74D 74
The goods must be of merchantable quality: s74D(c) 74
Damage must be suffered as a result: s74D(1)(d) 75
Defences 75
Non-correspondence with samples: s74E 76
Goods must be supplied by reference to a sample: s74E(c) 76
Non-correpondence 76
Loss or damage suffered as a result: s74E(e) 76
Defences 76
Failure to provide facilities for repairs or parts: s74F 77
Non-compliance with express warranty: s74G 77
Remedies 77
Manufacturer indemnifying seller 77
PARTVA – LIABILITY OF IMPORTERS AND MANUFACURERS 78
Limitation Period 78
Joint and Several Liability – s75AM 78
Manufacturer corporation, supplies goods, in T or C 78
Is R a manufacturer? 79
Defect 80
Causes of Action 82
Applicant is individual injured: s75AD 82
Applicant suffers loss because of individual’s injury or death:s75AE 82
Goods destroyed or damaged: s75AF 82
Damaged or destroyed goods must be personal/domestic: s75AF(c) 82
Loss suffered as a result of damage by user: s75AF(d) 83
Loss relating to buildings: s75AG 83
Private land, buildings or fixtures damaged or destroyed: s75AG(c) 83
Loss suffered as a result of damage by user: s75AF(d) 83
Complete Defences: s 75AK 83
Defect did not exist at supply time: s75AK(1)(a) 83
Compliance with mandatory standard: s75AK(1)(b) 83
State of scientific knowledge: s75AK(1)(c) 83
Component defence: s75AK(1)(d) 84
Contributory Acts: s75AN 84
Commission can take representative action 84
PART IVB – CODES OF CONDUCT 85
Franchising code of conduct 85
Relationship with s51AC 85
Limitation period 86
REMEDIES 87
Fines – ACCC ONLY –- s79 + PART VC 87
What level of fine? 87
Dismissal of charge 88
Non-punitive order: s86C 89
Part V contraventions – s86D 89
Defences to prosecution: s85(1) 89
Reasonable mistake: s85(1)(a) 90
Reasonable reliance on 3rd party info: s85(1)(b) 90
3rd party act or accident 90
s80 Injunction – PRIVATE/PUBLIC –IVA, IVB AND V ONLY 91
What type of injuntion sought? 91
There must be a breach or proposed breach 91
What is the role of the respondent? 91
Test for interim (1-2 weeks) and interlocutory injunctions: s80(2) 92
Serious question 92
Balance of convenience 92
Undertaking 92
Mareva order 93
Undertaking 94
s 87B – enforceable undertaking to ACCC 94
Damages under s 82 – PART IVA, IVB, V – PRIVATE ONLY 95
Limitation period 95
Does remedy apply? 95
What are the damages? 95
Is there a break in the chain? 97
Other orders: s87 -- INCLUDES OFFENCES 97
Declaration: s163A 98
IS THE CONDUCT IN TRADE OR COMMERCE?
One must consider both the wide and narrow views:
Narrow view - authoritative
The conduct must be ‘itself an aspect or element of activities or transaction which, of their nature, bear a trading or commercial character’ [Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson, per Mason CJ, Deane, Dawson and Gaudron JJ – a statement by a foreman to a worker was not in trade or commerce.]
It is not necessary that the transaction be engaged in for profit [Re Ku-ring-gai, per Deane J]
Promotion of goods or services for sale is in T or C [Concrete Constructions ; Nixon v Slater v Gordon]
Wide view
(not the law)
The conduct must in be in the course of carrying on an activity of a trading or commercial nature [Concrete Constructions, per McHugh and Brennan JJ].
Wide view: all corporate activity is in trade or commerce [Larmar v Power Machinery]
Special cases
Sales of private assets
Sales of private assets are generally not in trade or commerce [O’Brien Smolonogov]
In Argy v Blunts
Facts: Representations were made by a real estate agent before selling a private house
Held: The vendor was not liable for misrepresentations made in the sale of a private house because his conduct was not in trade or commerce.
This case followed Smolonogov - The agent making the representations was doing so in trade or commerce, however, this is not imputed to the vendor by s84(4).
Sale of part of a business
If a sale of part of commercial dealings as part of a chain of such sales, it is probably in trade or commerce [Gentry Brothers v Wilson Brown Associates ].
One-off sale of capital asset by business
This is generally in trade or commerce [Bevanere ; Lake Koala]
Bevanere Pty Ltd v Lubidineuse
(PRE- CONCRETE)
Facts: The vendor that used premises sold the business
Held: The sale of a capital business asset can’t be separated from trading activities, hence it was in trade or commerce. The appellant may have continued her trading activities elsewhere. Distinguished Smolonogov – there, the land was not used for business.
Employment Negotiations
The FCA is divided on whether representations made during the negotiation of employment contracts are in T or C.
Wilcox J in Patrick (1987) and Barto (1991): negotiating with both current (in obiter) and prospective employees is in T or C.
Heerey J in Mulchay (1998) disagrees on both counts.
Wilcox J’s view
Subsequent single judges have followed Wilcox J in Barto (1991) - Sdad v Chaplain (1991) 146 FCR 243 and Stoelwinder v Southern Healthcare per Finkelstein J.
If you like what you see, maybe you would like to purchase this summary
lawskool.com.au © Page 2