Supplemental Information
Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI
Julien Dubois* and Ralph Adolphs
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States
* Correspondence: (J. Dubois)
Contents
-Simulations for Figure 5
-Table S1: Reliability and individual-differences studies from fMRI-derived measures.
-Table S2: Individual-differences studies from fMRI-derived measures.
-Supplemental references
Simulations for Figure 5.
A large sample of 1,000,000 instances (the “population”) was drawn from two normally distributed variables, X and Y, using Matlab’s mvnrnd function with μX = μY = 0, σX=σY=1 and σXY=0.1. In this “population”, the correlation between X and Y is 0.1 -- a small effect size, representative of the effect size expected in fMRI studies of individual differences. 100,000 series of 1,000 samples were drawn randomly without replacement from the population. Pearson correlation was computed for sample sizes [10:5:100 120:20:200 250:50:500 600:100:1000] in each of the 100,000 series, yielding 100,000 trajectories of correlation values (gray lines in Figure 5(a) are 1,000 of these trajectories). A leave-one-out prediction based on a simple linear regression model was also performed at each sample size for each of the series, yielding 100,000 trajectories of prediction R-squared [R2=1-sum((Yreal-Ypred).^2)/sum((Yreal-mean(Yreal)).^2)] (gray lines in Figure 5(b) are 1,000 of these trajectories). The exact same simulation was run with μX = μY = 0, σX=σY=1 and σXY=0, which represents the null hypothesis of no correlation between X and Y. All plots in Figure 5 are derived from these simulations.
(back to TOC)
Table S1 (related to Figure 1): Reliability and individual-differences studies from fMRI-derived measures.
There are many ways to analyze fMRI data, which is captured in this list of fMRI-derived measures. This table is included to elicit a sense of which measures have been studied in terms of reliability and assessed for individual differences in the literature so far, and which have not. Reliability column: studies are from a Pubmed search with terms “test-retest” AND “fMRI” since 2010-01-01 (273 results, which were then hand selected), plus studies reviewed in [1]. Individual differences column: studies are from a Pubmed search with terms “individual differences” AND “fMRI”, hand selecting the 100 most recent relevant studies. The Pubmed searches were conducted in November 2015. If a cell of the table was empty, we specifically searched for at least one relevant reference, and put a question mark if we did not find any. The purpose of this table is primarily illustrative, and it may be that we missed existing references given the fairly simple search strategy that we implemented.
fMRI-derived measure / Time- locked / Reliability(between- and within-subject) / Individual differences
AMPLITUDE of evoked activation (height) / Yes / [2–33] / [30,34–95]
EXTENT of evoked activation
(voxel overlap) / Yes / [6,7,13,18,21,27,28,96–104] / [105]
PEAK LOCATION of evoked activation / Yes / [21] / ?
ONSET of evoked activation / Yes / [106] / ?
LAG of evoked activation
(time-to-peak) / Yes / [106] / ?
DURATION of evoked activation (width) / Yes / [106] / ?
HABITUATION/ADAPTATION / Yes / [107] / ?
model-based regressor / Yes / [108] / [109,110]
ACCURACY of classification / Yes / ? / ?
PPI (Psychophysiological interactions) / Yes / [111] / [66,82,112–116]
DCM (dynamic causal modelling) / Yes / [117] / ?
Representational geometry / Yes / [118] / [118,119]
Inter-subject correlation / Yes / ? / [120]
ROI-to-ROI correlation / No / [101,111,121–139] / [43,55,57,140–159]
whole-brain FC / No / [137,160–162] / [163]
functional parcellation / No / [164–166] / [166,167]
ICA decomposition / No / [104,126,128,137,168–172] / [173,174]
network structure (graph edges) / No / [130,175] / [162,176]
graph-theoretical metrics / No / [128,131,132,137,175,177–186] / [82,187–190]
dynamic connectivity / No / [191,192] / [153,192,193]
ALFF (amplitude of low frequency fluctuations, a.k.a. LFO) / No / [128,129,131,132,136,194–198] / [154,189,199,200]
ReHo (regional homogeneity) / No / [128,129,131,132,136,201] / [189,202,203]
(back to TOC)
Table S2 (related to Figure 1): Individual-differences studies from fMRI-derived measures.
Studies from Table S1, individual differences column, were sorted by hand as relating fMRI-derived measures to different aspects of individual differences
Demographics / age [91,204,205]gender [176]
Neuropsychological test scores / intelligence [89,188]
personality [35,86,113]
anxiety [53,62,74,144,156]
depression [44,53,115]
affect [30,41,50,85]
creativity [158]
other [42,46–48,51,58,70–72,75,76,79,90,94,149,153,189,206]
Physiological measures / [66,84,90]
Behavioral task measures / task performance or strategy [34,37–39,43,45,49,52,54,56,57,59,60,63,68,73,77,80,81,83,87,88,90,91,105,114,116,119,145–147,150–152,154,155,157,159,192,200,203,207–212]
reaction time [36,69,82]
subjective ratings [38,40,55,61,67,112,118,148]
Neuropsychiatric disorder / disorder onset [78]
future outcome [64,65,92]
(back to TOC)
Supplemental references
1 Bennett, C.M. and Miller, M.B. (2010) How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1191, 133–155
2 Aron, A.R. et al. (2006) Long-term test-retest reliability of functional MRI in a classification learning task. Neuroimage 29, 1000–1006
3 Raemaekers, M. et al. (2007) Test–retest reliability of fMRI activation during prosaccades and antisaccades. Neuroimage 36, 532–542
4 Zandbelt, B.B. et al. (2008) Within-subject variation in BOLD-fMRI signal changes across repeated measurements: quantification and implications for sample size. Neuroimage 42, 196–206
5 Fliessbach, K. et al. (2010) Retest reliability of reward-related BOLD signals. Neuroimage 50, 1168–1176
6 Mc Kinsey, R.D. et al. (2010) Assessment of multiple task activation and reproducibility in patients with benign and low-grade neoplasms. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 9, 319–326
7 Atri, A. et al. (2011) Test-retest reliability of memory task functional magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer disease clinical trials. Arch. Neurol. 68, 599–606
8 Blokland, G.A.M. et al. (2011) Heritability of working memory brain activation. J. Neurosci. 31, 10882–10890
9 Koolschijn, P.C.M.P. et al. (2011) A three-year longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study of performance monitoring and test-retest reliability from childhood to early adulthood. J. Neurosci. 31, 4204–4212
10 Putcha, D. et al. (2011) Reliability of functional magnetic resonance imaging associative encoding memory paradigms in non-demented elderly adults. Hum. Brain Mapp. 32, 2027–2044
11 Plichta, M.M. et al. (2012) Test-retest reliability of evoked BOLD signals from a cognitive-emotive fMRI test battery. Neuroimage 60, 1746–1758
12 Raemaekers, M. et al. (2012) Test-retest variability underlying fMRI measurements. Neuroimage 60, 717–727
13 Sheu, L.K. et al. (2012) Test-retest reliability of an fMRI paradigm for studies of cardiovascular reactivity. Psychophysiology 49, 873–884
14 Swisher, J.D. et al. (2012) Multishot versus single-shot pulse sequences in very high field fMRI: a comparison using retinotopic mapping. PLoS One 7, e34626
15 Bennett, C.M. and Miller, M.B. (2013) fMRI reliability: influences of task and experimental design. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 13, 690–702
16 Brandt, D.J. et al. (2013) Test-Retest Reliability of fMRI Brain Activity during Memory Encoding. Front. Psychiatry 4, 163
17 De Simoni, S. et al. (2013) Test-retest reliability of the BOLD pharmacological MRI response to ketamine in healthy volunteers. Neuroimage 64, 75–90
18 Gorgolewski, K.J. et al. (2013) Single subject fMRI test-retest reliability metrics and confounding factors. Neuroimage 69, 231–243
19 Sauder, C.L. et al. (2013) Test-retest reliability of amygdala response to emotional faces. Psychophysiology 50, 1147–1156
20 van den Bulk, B.G. et al. (2013) How stable is activation in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex in adolescence? A study of emotional face processing across three measurements. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 4, 65–76
21 Weiss, C. et al. (2013) Mapping the hand, foot and face representations in the primary motor cortex - retest reliability of neuronavigated TMS versus functional MRI. Neuroimage 66, 531–542
22 Denison, R.N. et al. (2014) Functional mapping of the magnocellular and parvocellular subdivisions of human LGN. Neuroimage 102, 358–369
23 Fournier, J.C. et al. (2014) Model specification and the reliability of fMRI results: implications for longitudinal neuroimaging studies in psychiatry. PLoS One 9, e105169
24 Grimm, O. et al. (2014) Striatal response to reward anticipation: evidence for a systems-level intermediate phenotype for schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry 71, 531–539
25 Hanlon, C.A. et al. (2013) Probing the frontostriatal loops involved in executive and limbic processing via interleaved TMS and functional MRI at two prefrontal locations: a pilot study. PLoS One 8, e67917
26 Letzen, J.E. et al. (2014) Test-retest reliability of pain-related brain activity in healthy controls undergoing experimental thermal pain. J. Pain 15, 1008–1014
27 Martuzzi, R. et al. (2014) Human finger somatotopy in areas 3b, 1, and 2: a 7T fMRI study using a natural stimulus. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 213–226
28 Quiton, R.L. et al. (2014) Intersession reliability of fMRI activation for heat pain and motor tasks. Neuroimage Clin 5, 309–321
29 Sousa, I. et al. (2014) Reproducibility of hypocapnic cerebrovascular reactivity measurements using BOLD fMRI in combination with a paced deep breathing task. Neuroimage 98, 31–41
30 Wu, C.C. et al. (2014) Affective traits link to reliable neural markers of incentive anticipation. Neuroimage 84, 279–289
31 Zanto, T.P. et al. (2014) Reliability measures of functional magnetic resonance imaging in a longitudinal evaluation of mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage 84, 443–452
32 Upadhyay, J. et al. (2015) Test–retest reliability of evoked heat stimulation BOLD fMRI. J. Neurosci. Methods 253, 38–46
33 Overgaauw, S. et al. (2015) A longitudinal analysis of neural regions involved in reading the mind in the eyes. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 10, 619–627
34 Yamashiro, H. et al. (2014) Activity in early visual areas predicts interindividual differences in binocular rivalry dynamics. J. Neurophysiol. 111, 1190–1202
35 Weiland, B.J. et al. (2014) Relationship between impulsivity, prefrontal anticipatory activation, and striatal dopamine release during rewarded task performance. Psychiatry Res. 223, 244–252
36 Andoh, J. and Zatorre, R.J. (2013) Mapping interhemispheric connectivity using functional MRI after transcranial magnetic stimulation on the human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 79, 162–171
37 Ziaei, M. et al. (2014) Brain systems underlying attentional control and emotional distraction during working memory encoding. Neuroimage 87, 276–286
38 Aupperle, R.L. et al. (2015) Neural substrates of approach-avoidance conflict decision-making. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 449–462
39 Greening, S. et al. (2014) Individual differences in the anterior insula are associated with the likelihood of financially helping versus harming others. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 14, 266–277
40 Dew, I.T.Z. and Cabeza, R. (2013) A broader view of perirhinal function: from recognition memory to fluency-based decisions. J. Neurosci. 33, 14466–14474
41 Bjork, J.M. et al. (2014) Dietary tyrosine/phenylalanine depletion effects on behavioral and brain signatures of human motivational processing. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 595–604
42 Bangen, K.J. et al. (2014) Brains of optimistic older adults respond less to fearful faces. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 26, 155–163
43 Barnes, K.A. et al. (2014) Individual differences in intrinsic brain connectivity predict decision strategy. J. Neurophysiol. 112, 1838–1848
44 Eryilmaz, H. et al. (2014) Lasting impact of regret and gratification on resting brain activity and its relation to depressive traits. J. Neurosci. 34, 7825–7835
45 Benningfield, M.M. et al. (2014) Caudate responses to reward anticipation associated with delay discounting behavior in healthy youth. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 7, 43–52
46 Shankman, S.A. et al. (2014) Anterior insula responds to temporally unpredictable aversiveness: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 25, 596–600
47 Morelli, S.A. et al. (2014) The neural bases of feeling understood and not understood. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 1890–1896
48 Steinbeis, N. and Singer, T. (2014) Projecting my envy onto you: neurocognitive mechanisms of an offline emotional egocentricity bias. Neuroimage 102, 370–380
49 Hehman, E. et al. (2014) The neural basis of stereotypic impact on multiple social categorization. Neuroimage 101, 704–711
50 Nelson, B.D. et al. (2015) Prefrontal engagement by cognitive reappraisal of negative faces. Behav. Brain Res. 279, 218–225
51 Rao, L.-L. et al. (2014) Probing the neural basis of superstition. Brain Topogr. 27, 766–770
52 McGettigan, C. et al. (2015) Individual Differences in Laughter Perception Reveal Roles for Mentalizing and Sensorimotor Systems in the Evaluation of Emotional Authenticity. Cereb. Cortex 25, 246–257
53 Keller, J. et al. (2013) Trait anhedonia is associated with reduced reactivity and connectivity of mesolimbic and paralimbic reward pathways. J. Psychiatr. Res. 47, 1319–1328
54 Dennis, N.A. et al. (2014) Age-related differences in the neural correlates mediating false recollection. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 395–407
55 Touroutoglou, A. et al. (2014) Amygdala task-evoked activity and task-free connectivity independently contribute to feelings of arousal. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 5316–5327
56 Huijbers, W. et al. (2014) Respiration phase-locks to fast stimulus presentations: implications for the interpretation of posterior midline “deactivations.” Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 4932–4943
57 Hermann, P. et al. (2015) Neural basis of identity information extraction from noisy face images. J. Neurosci. 35, 7165–7173
58 Rüsch, N. et al. (2014) You and your kin: Neural signatures of family-based group perception in the subgenual cortex. Soc. Neurosci. 9, 326–331
59 Fera, F. et al. (2014) Hippocampal BOLD response during category learning predicts subsequent performance on transfer generalization. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 3122–3131
60 Frydman, C. et al. (2014) Using Neural Data to Test A Theory of Investor Behavior: An Application to Realization Utility. J. Finance 69, 907–946
61 Egidi, G. and Caramazza, A. (2014) Mood-dependent integration in discourse comprehension: happy and sad moods affect consistency processing via different brain networks. Neuroimage 103, 20–32
62 Galván, A. and Peris, T.S. (2014) Neural correlates of risky decision making in anxious youth and healthy controls. Depress. Anxiety 31, 591–598
63 Stanger, C. et al. (2013) Neuroeconomics and adolescent substance abuse: individual differences in neural networks and delay discounting. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 52, 747–755
64 Cousijn, J. et al. (2014) Effect of baseline cannabis use and working-memory network function on changes in cannabis use in heavy cannabis users: a prospective fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 2470–2482
65 Sun, X. et al. (2015) Basolateral amygdala response to food cues in the absence of hunger is associated with weight gain susceptibility. J. Neurosci. 35, 7964–7976
66 Vachon-Presseau, E. et al. (2013) Acute stress contributes to individual differences in pain and pain-related brain activity in healthy and chronic pain patients. J. Neurosci. 33, 6826–6833
67 Zarnhofer, S. et al. (2013) Individual differences in solving arithmetic word problems. Behav. Brain Funct. 9, 28
68 Cascio, C.N. et al. (2015) Buffering social influence: neural correlates of response inhibition predict driving safety in the presence of a peer. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27, 83–95
69 Thakkar, K.N. et al. (2014) Frontal-subcortical circuits involved in reactive control and monitoring of gaze. J. Neurosci. 34, 8918–8929
70 Yoder, K.J. and Decety, J. (2014) The Good, the bad, and the just: justice sensitivity predicts neural response during moral evaluation of actions performed by others. J. Neurosci. 34, 4161–4166
71 Von Der Heide, R. et al. (2014) The social network-network: size is predicted by brain structure and function in the amygdala and paralimbic regions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 1962–1972
72 Hermann, A. et al. (2014) Dispositional cognitive reappraisal modulates the neural correlates of fear acquisition and extinction. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 113, 115–124
73 Kilts, C.D. et al. (2014) Individual differences in attentional bias associated with cocaine dependence are related to varying engagement of neural processing networks. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 1135–1147
74 Carré, A. et al. (2014) Linear association between social anxiety symptoms and neural activations to angry faces: from subclinical to clinical levels. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 880–886
75 Molenberghs, P. et al. (2014) The influence of group membership and individual differences in psychopathy and perspective taking on neural responses when punishing and rewarding others. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 4989–4999
76 Wilbertz, T. et al. (2014) Response inhibition and its relation to multidimensional impulsivity. Neuroimage 103, 241–248
77 Gess, J.L. et al. (2014) Task-dependent recruitment of intrinsic brain networks reflects normative variance in cognition. Brain Behav. 4, 650–664
78 Kitada, R. et al. (2014) The brain network underlying the recognition of hand gestures in the blind: the supramodal role of the extrastriate body area. J. Neurosci. 34, 10096–10108
79 Canessa, N. et al. (2013) The functional and structural neural basis of individual differences in loss aversion. J. Neurosci. 33, 14307–14317
80 Haruno, M. et al. (2014) Activity in the nucleus accumbens and amygdala underlies individual differences in prosocial and individualistic economic choices. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 26, 1861–1870
81 van Duijvenvoorde, A.C.K. et al. (2015) Neural correlates of expected risks and returns in risky choice across development. J. Neurosci. 35, 1549–1560
82 Dwyer, D.B. et al. (2014) Large-scale brain network dynamics supporting adolescent cognitive control. J. Neurosci. 34, 14096–14107
83 Metcalfe, A.W.S. et al. (2013) Fractionating the neural correlates of individual working memory components underlying arithmetic problem solving skills in children. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 6, 162–175
84 Puglia, M.H. et al. (2015) Epigenetic modification of the oxytocin receptor gene influences the perception of anger and fear in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 3308–3313
85 Wilson, S.J. et al. (2014) Self-control, negative affect and neural activity during effortful cognition in deprived smokers. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 887–894
86 Servaas, M.N. et al. (2014) The neural correlates of worry in association with individual differences in neuroticism. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 4303–4315
87 White, C.N. et al. (2014) Decomposing decision components in the stop-signal task: a model-based approach to individual differences in inhibitory control. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 26, 1601–1614
88 Ordaz, S.J. et al. (2013) Longitudinal growth curves of brain function underlying inhibitory control through adolescence. J. Neurosci. 33, 18109–18124
89 Ripke, S. et al. (2015) Common neural correlates of intertemporal choices and intelligence in adolescents. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27, 387–399
90 Braams, B.R. et al. (2015) Longitudinal changes in adolescent risk-taking: a comprehensive study of neural responses to rewards, pubertal development, and risk-taking behavior. J. Neurosci. 35, 7226–7238
91 Peters, S. et al. (2014) Strategies influence neural activity for feedback learning across child and adolescent development. Neuropsychologia 62, 365–374
92 Swartz, J.R. et al. (2015) A neural biomarker of psychological vulnerability to future life stress. Neuron 85, 505–511
93 Denke, C. et al. (2014) Belief in a just world is associated with activity in insula and somatosensory cortices as a response to the perception of norm violations. Soc. Neurosci. 9, 514–521
94 Pincus, M. et al. (2014) The conforming brain and deontological resolve. PLoS One 9, e106061
95 Spunt, R.P. and Adolphs, R. (2015) Folk explanations of behavior: a specialized use of a domain-general mechanism. Psychol. Sci. 26, 724–736
96 Gountouna, V.-E. et al. (2010) Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) reproducibility and variance components across visits and scanning sites with a finger tapping task. Neuroimage 49, 552–560
97 Churchill, N.W. et al. (2015) An Automated, Adaptive Framework for Optimizing Preprocessing Pipelines in Task-Based Functional MRI. PLoS One 10, e0131520
98 Lukasova, K. et al. (2014) Test-retest reliability of fMRI activation generated by different saccade tasks. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 40, 37–46
99 Stevens, M.T.R. et al. (2013) Thresholds in fMRI studies: reliable for single subjects? J. Neurosci. Methods 219, 312–323
100 Wymbs, N.F. et al. (2013) Individual differences in neural regions functionally related to real and imagined stuttering. Brain Lang. 124, 153–164
101 Kristo, G. et al. (2014) Task and task-free FMRI reproducibility comparison for motor network identification. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 340–352
102 Gorgolewski, K.J. et al. (2012) Adaptive thresholding for reliable topological inference in single subject fMRI analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 245
103 Voyvodic, J.T. (2012) Reproducibility of single-subject fMRI language mapping with AMPLE normalization. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 36, 569–580
104 Mannfolk, P. et al. (2011) Can resting-state functional MRI serve as a complement to task-based mapping of sensorimotor function? A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 34, 511–517
105 Verghese, A. et al. (2014) Functional size of human visual area V1: a neural correlate of top-down attention. Neuroimage 93, 47–52
106 Shan, Z.Y. et al. (2014) Modeling of the hemodynamic responses in block design fMRI studies. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 34, 316–324
107 Plichta, M.M. et al. (2014) Amygdala habituation: a reliable fMRI phenotype. Neuroimage 103, 383–390
108 Chase, H.W. et al. (2015) Accounting for Dynamic Fluctuations across Time when Examining fMRI Test-Retest Reliability: Analysis of a Reward Paradigm in the EMBARC Study. PLoS One 10, e0126326
109 Suzuki, S. et al. (2012) Learning to simulate others’ decisions. Neuron 74, 1125–1137
110 De Martino, B. et al. (2013) In the mind of the market: theory of mind biases value computation during financial bubbles. Neuron 79, 1222–1231
111 Bilek, E. et al. (2013) Application of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the DLPFC alters human prefrontal-hippocampal functional interaction. J. Neurosci. 33, 7050–7056
112 Smith, D.V. et al. (2014) Functional connectivity with ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflects subjective value for social rewards. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 2017–2025
113 van den Bos, W. et al. (2014) Connectivity strength of dissociable striatal tracts predict individual differences in temporal discounting. J. Neurosci. 34, 10298–10310
114 Jack, A. and Morris, J.P. (2014) Neocerebellar contributions to social perception in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 77–92
115 Ho, T.C. et al. (2014) Functional connectivity of negative emotional processing in adolescent depression. J. Affect. Disord. 155, 65–74
116 King, D.R. et al. (2015) Recollection-related increases in functional connectivity predict individual differences in memory accuracy. J. Neurosci. 35, 1763–1772
117 Frässle, S. et al. (2015) Test-retest reliability of dynamic causal modeling for fMRI. Neuroimage 117, 56–66
118 Charest, I. et al. (2014) Unique semantic space in the brain of each beholder predicts perceived similarity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 14565–14570
119 Wolosin, S.M. et al. (2013) Distributed hippocampal patterns that discriminate reward context are associated with enhanced associative binding. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142, 1264–1276
120 Byrge, L. et al. (2015) Idiosyncratic brain activation patterns are associated with poor social comprehension in autism. J. Neurosci. 35, 5837–5850
121 Shehzad, Z. et al. (2009) The Resting Brain: Unconstrained yet Reliable. Cereb. Cortex 19, 2209–2229
122 Honey, C.J. et al. (2009) Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 2035–2040