St. Mary’s Catholic High School
HZT4U Philosophy
Final Exam Review – June 2012

PART A: Knowledge & Understanding; Thinking & Inquiry

A1. Multiple Choice / 25 marks

A2. Matching / 10 marks

A3. Fill in the Blanks / 10 marks

A4. Logic Problems / 5 marks

PART B: Communication; Application

B1. Short Answer / 15 marks (complete on lined paper)

PART C: Communication; Application

C1. Essay / 25 marks (complete on lined paper)

TOTAL: / 90 marks

Knowledge Based Topics (N.B.: refer also to review sheets from earlier in the semester)

philosopher/philosophy branches of philosophy Plato

pragmatism argument structures red herring

faulty analogy straw man ad hominen

post hoc tu quoque post hoc ergo propter hoc

non-sequitur syllogism subjectivism

Alan Turing soft determinists categorical imperative

Chinese Room T.E. ontological argument rationalism

empiricism utilitarianism Sartre

existentialism Descartes anti-foundationalism

atheism Socrates foundationalism

evil cynicism ethics

teleological deontological St. Thomas Aquinas

metaphysics epistemology cosmological

deism monotheism Aristotle

pantheism axiology remembering

determinism deism forgetting

autonomy nihilism

Thinking/Communication/Application-Based Themes

·  Identifying fallacies

·  Natural law, Church teaching on sexuality

·  Arguments for the existence/non-existence of God

·  Films we’ve watched/reviewed from a particular philosopher’s viewpoint

·  How cynics, hedonists, pragmatists and existentialists might respond to a “disaster” or moral dilemma

·  Plato and Aristotle’s ethics: the “good life”

·  Strict determinism’s perception of chaos theory, Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and William James’ arguments in “The Dilemma of Determinism”

·  Knowledge to be claimed as truth: conditions needed; Gettier’s challenge and theory

Note: bring your half-page “roster” of logical fallacies

MDTYGKFTE*

(* More Dumb Things Ya Gotta Know For The Exam)

Intro: What is Philosophy?

* branches of philosophy

* nature of philosophical questions

***************************************************

Logic:

* what is an argument?

* informal fallacies: straw man, red herring, etc.

Epistemology:

Descartes & rationalism

* the cogito – how he got from radical doubt to knowledge of and belief in God

Locke & empiricism

* impressions … sensations … ideas

Kant & “categories” of perception – bridging the rationalist-empiricist gap

Skepticism and chaos theory (Note: this latter does NOT mean everything is random!)

Distinction between rationalism & empiricism, & the reasons people opt for one or the other

Knowledge, Belief, and Opinion

·  “justified true belief” & Gettier’s objections to it; etc.

·  Direct & indirect knowledge, & other distinctions

***************************************************

Metaphysics:

Varieties of Theism/Atheism

Arguments for the existence of God: strengths and weaknesses

The nature of the person:

* free will and determinism (& its major weaknesses: James)

* criteria for defining “personhood”: Church teaching (catechism)

The mind-body problem: what it is, and various solutions

Permanence & change: various views

***************************************************

Ethics:

Various approaches to ethics: Plato, Aristotle, Natural Law (C.S. Lewis & natural law theory: the impact of natural law philosophy on the Church’s understanding of sexuality and reproductive technologies, etc.), Hedonism/Cynicism/Stoicism, Pragmatism, Utilitarianism, Existentialism, Kant (C.I.) – be ready to illustrate with applications to specific issues

***************************************************

Some key philosophers and their ideas:

Socrates

* the nature of virtue & evil – the “unexamined life”

* human learning = remembering; evil = forgetting (what you knew in pre-existence)

Plato

* the ideal world of “forms” – the allegory of the cave

* his ethics – philosopher kings – & the nature of happiness

Aristotle

* ethics – the golden mean – & the nature of happiness

Aquinas

* connection to Aristotle/empiricism

* the Five Ways + others’ “proofs” for the existence of God (Anselm, Pascal)

Mr. Phillips’ Web Page: http://www.start.ca/users/chesswiz/philosophy.html

2