Program Proposal Reviewers Form Worksheet

Program Title: ______

Proposal # ______

Reviewer: ______

ACPA Equity and Inclusion Statement

ACPA - College Student Educators International actively promotes and recognizes principles of fairness, equity, and social justice in relation to, and across intersections of race, age, color, faith, religion, ancestry, national origin, citizenship, sex, sexual orientation, social class, economic class, ethnicity, gender identity/expression, and all other identities represented among our diverse membership.

By appreciating the importance of inclusion, we acknowledge that the collective and individual talents, skills, and perspectives of members, constituent groups, and partners foster a culture of belonging, collaborative practice, innovation, and mutual respect. ACPA seeks to empower and engage professionals, scholars, and partners in actions that productively contribute to accomplishing the goals of our association.

Is this proposal consistent with the "ACPA Equity and Inclusion Statement"? If not, please give a brief explanation indicating why the proposal is not consistent with the guidelines.

Yes No

Comments:

Please use the following scale to rate the proposal, assigning the appropriate number to each criterion and based on the Rubric. Do not leave any items blank. Please use whole number, not fractional values. Excellent, Good, Average, Fair, and Poor

0 = Poor Criterion is not evident within content of proposal

1 = Fair Criterion is difficult to discern without further clarification

2 = Average Criterion is evident but needs to be more clearly defined

3 = Good Criterion is clearly met and well articulated

4 = Excellent Criterion is fully demonstrated in proposal, flawless adherence to proposal criteria

Question # / Score (0 – 4) / Question Text
1 / The proposal articulates the connection between learning outcomes to one or more professional competencies.
Comments:
2 / The proposal’s content is clear, concise, organized, and thorough.
Comments:
3 / The proposal represents innovative or creative approaches to professional practice, theory or research.
Comments:
4 / The proposal is grounded in relevant conceptual and theoretical constructs.
Comments:
5 / The proposal demonstrates relevance and significance to the field of Student Affairs.
Comments:
6 / The proposal describes interactive opportunities for attendees to apply content learned.
Comments:

TOTAL SCORE from items 1 - 6 (maximum score = 24 points)

RECOMMENDATION: Excellent Good Average Fair Poor (select one)

Please give any general comments not covered in items 1–6 above and comments that support your recommendation for this proposal.

In addition, in an effort to learn more about assessment practices for future program proposal processes, do you feel that this session addressed any forms of assessment (i.e. opportunities for attendees to assess their own learning/knowledge, any best practices around assessment, etc.). Please list any that would be applicable.

You will know that your review was successfully submitted when you see "Review Successfully Submitted" at the top of the page. If you do not see this, then please resubmit the review.