1

Team Contribution Evaluation Tool
Name of person completing form:
Name of Class, Section, and Term:
Using your best, objective, and fair professional analysis, complete the following evaluation regarding each member of your team’s performance on the assigned project, paper, or presentation. Use the Definitions on page 2 to help you in the assessment. Select either Needs Improvement, Met Expectations, or Above Expectations and point score for each team member, e.g. Met Expectations, Level of effort = 4, Above Expectations, Quality of effort = 8.
Needs Improvement
0-3 points / Met Expectations
4-6 points / Above
Expectations
7-10 points
Team Member Name: Ted Domke
  1. The LEVEL of effort this team member gave toward the project was…

  1. The QUALITY of that effort was…

  1. The INPUT this team member contributed to the team discussions was…

  1. How would you rate this team member’s level of participation?

  1. This team member met team deadlines

  1. Additional comments

Team Member Name:
  1. The LEVEL of effort this team member gave toward the project was…

  1. The QUALITY of that effort was…

  1. The INPUT this team member contributed to the team discussions was…

  1. How would you rate this team member’s level of participation?

  1. This team member met team deadlines

  1. Additional comments:

Self-Evaluation Name:
  1. The LEVEL of effort this team member gave toward the project was…

  1. The QUALITY of that effort was…

  1. The INPUT this team member contributed to the team discussions was…

  1. How would you rate this team member’s level of participation?

  1. This team member met team deadlines

  1. Additional comments

Team Contribution Evaluation Definitions
Needs Improvement
0-3 Points / Met Expectations
4-6 points / Above Expectations
7-10 points
Involvement / Students did not involve themselves in the group activities / Students were involved in the group activities / Students involved themselves in the group activities and volunteered frequently
Respect / Students did not respect other group members' opinions / Students always respected other group members' opinions / Students actively sought out the opinions of others and always respected other group members' opinions
Attitude / Student had a negative attitude about the assignment and working with group members / Student had an okay attitude about the assignment and working with group members / Students had a positive attitude about the assignment and working with group members
Communications / Did not communicate with group members. Not accessible when needed / Responded in a reasonable time period. Reasonably accessible. / Responsive to communications to and from group. Easily Accessible (Email, phone)

Original tool development and permission to use (December 2015): Boettcher, J. & Conrad, R. (2010). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. San Francisco, CA: Jossey –Bass. Revisions made by Lynette Savage, RN, PhD, COI (December 2015-December 2017).