·  Attendees

o  George Knecht

o  Eric Eastman

o  Jim Price

o  Gary Graham

o  Jannet Lewis (FL 10th Circuit Trial Court Tech Officer)

o  Jim Harris

o  Jeff Karotkin

o  Philip Baughman

o  Kevin Nelson

o  Jim McMillan

o  Jim Cabral

·  Elections

o  ECF

§  JimC/JimH – continue as co-chairs

§  Philip – secretary

o  LegalXML Steering Committee

§  Chair: Jim McMillan

§  Prospective member from ECF TC: Gary Graham (will consider)

o  Jim McMillan - When are nominations due?

·  Members: Need to notify OASIS that you are active in Legal XML so that some of the money goes to our efforts

·  Litigant Portal

o  Jim Harris will send a link (to a document) to the TC

·  Budget

o  Due end of January

o  Cabral/Harris

·  Have IJIS re-consider the business model behind Springboard testing

o  Jim Harris to draft the message

·  CourtHack

o  All to consider participation

·  Evidence Tracking

o  Decided there is no current action.

o  Jim Cabral closed the action item

·  Decided that ECF 5 will proceed in targeting NIEM 3.2 (not waiting for NIEM 4)

·  Decided that we are not adopting JSON at this time

·  BOUML – Jim Cabral demoed, but will document as well

·  Limited Electronic Service of Process

o  New message: ServeProcess (similar to ServeFiling)

o  A call b/t EFSPs or EFSP to EFM, depending upon implementation

o  Proof of Service via a ReviewFiling and information to associate back to the ServeProcess

·  Multi EFM

o  CourtPolicy MDE

o  Decision: ECF needs to specific a mechanism to obtain a list of the court locations (so that you could then invoke GetPolicy for a given court location)

o  Recommendation: Implemented by same system as FilingReviewMDE

·  Doc Sigs

o  Decision: We are not going to hold up ECF5 - we may layer in a profile later in

·  Confidentiality

o  Two ECF code lists

o  Philip to take action

·  Decision: We are not going to hold up ECF5 - we may layer in a profile later in

·  Decision: We need augmentations for:

o  Metadata

o  Activities

·  Decision:

o  Augmentation at each ECF message (not its base types ElectronicFilingMessage and BaseMessage)

·  Action: All TC members should evaluate their extension needs (and ECF 5 mapping documents) to identify augmentation needs

·  Court Scheduling

o  Action: Cabral to fix arrow on AllocateCourtDate in activity diagram

o  Action: JimMc Need an asynchronous NotifyCourtDate from CRMDE to Scheduling MDE

o  Action: JimMc Need an asynchronous NotifyCourtDate from Scheduling MDE to FAMDE

·  Criminal Case Updates

o  Jim Harris to compare ECF to Global Charging Service Reference Specification

o  AZ to compare to AZ’s requirements

·  Bulk Update for substitution of counsel

o  Four Options

§  Individual filings

§  A filing into any one of the cases, along with a list of cases

§  Not e-filing – CMS issue

§  Relax the ECF constraint so as to allow >1 case identifier (requires changing ECF)

o  Decision: We will not change ECF

·  Format Web Services SIP as an SSP

o  We still agree that the Document Literal approach is correct.

o  Action: Cabral to ensure we have this.

·  MQ SIP

o  Action: Gary Graham will find the document (committee draft)

·  Training Materials/Outreach

o  JimMc – joint LegalXML webinar (with Monica)

o  Jim Harris: IJIS Courts Committee

·  Tech Assistance/Money

o  JimC: Contact Open Networks to inquire regarding QA of the Draft schemas and web services

·  Next Face to Face Meeting

o  Industry Summit and CourtHack

§  April 19-20 – Summit at Princeton, NJ

§  April 21 – Potential TC Face to Face

§  April 22-23 – CourtHack at New Brunswick, NJ

o  CTC 2017

§  Salt Lake (Sept 12-14)

§  Potentially meet afterwards (a few hours on 14th, then Sept 15)