UNIT GUIDE: HONOURS BY DESIGN
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL ARTS
UNIT GUIDE Semester 1, 2007
ARCT5502 Architectural Design Honours
LACH4402 Landscape Honours Studio
Honours co-ordinator
Gary Marinko
6488 2797
UNIT GUIDE: HONOURS BY DESIGN
ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
CONTENTS
1 Description 3
2 Content 3
3 Outcomes 3
4 Design Research Proposal and Project Brief 3
5 Teaching Staff and Consultation hours 3
5.1 Available Design Supervisors 3
6 Communication 3
7 Unit Structure and formats 3
8 Interim Student Presentations 4
9 Feedback 4
10 Attendance and Performance 4
11 Assessment Mechanism 4
12 Submission and Examination of Folio 4
13 Examination Method 4
14 Faculty and University Policy and Procedures 5
15 Academic Conduct 5
16 Learning Outcomes 5
17 Assessment Criteria 5
18 Grading Bands 6
19 Submission and Presentation guidelines 6
Description
Students who have been accepted into these Design Honours units undertake their final design semester as a self-initiated (independent) design project.
Content
Independent Design requires the development and demonstration of ability and acquired competence. It is expected that, in addition to addressing a design brief, students will also establish theoretical parameters (aesthetic, critical, and/or technical) that will form the basis for design investigation. While projects may vary in scale, and exhibit varying levels of complexity, they will be required to incorporate the full range of knowledge and skills required for a fully resolved design proposition. Projects of an experimental nature are encouraged.
Outcomes
Students illustrate the capacity to develop a coherent architectural project brief; respond effectively to the requirements set out in the project brief; and develop a sound theoretical basis and a high conceptual and design quality, with an appropriate level of technical resolution, depending on the nature of the project. Students also gain the capacity to clearly and effectively communicate design ideas.
Design Research Proposal and Project Brief
All students enrolled in Independent Design will have prepared and submitted a design research proposal to the Resource Room, marked to the attention of the Honours Coordinator, no later than Monday of Week One.
Guidelines for the preparation of this proposal are outlined later in this document.
Teaching Staff and consultation hours
Honours Coordinator
Gary Marinko
Tel: 6488 2797 e:
Available Design Supervisors
All design staff who are not on leave are available to supervise honours by design, subject to consideration of their other teaching and workload commitments.
Communication
Formal communication in this unit will occur by email, so all students should ensure that they have an active UWA Student email account ( viz: ) and that they check their account regularly (at least weekly).
Students must communicate with University staff ONLY through their Student account, and Staff have been advised not to respond by email to any other addresses.
Unit structure and formats
The primary contact mode is supervision by way of arranged regular meetings with a designated supervisor, nominally one hour per week for the teaching semester.
Other formal juries, meetings and information sessions are scheduled in the semester diary.
Interim Student Presentations
Students will be advised to make interim presentations in Weeks 1, 4, 7 and 10 of the semester in which they are enrolled in Independent Design.
The dates and times are noted in the semester diary. Venues will be advised by the Honours coordinator.
These presentations are intended to provide each student with the opportunity to discuss their work with a cross section of people and to receive constructive advice. In addition to the verbal feedback that students receive during the interim presentations.
Feedback
In addition to the verbal feedback that students receive during the interim presentations, each supervisor will provide students with a written interim feedback report in the week following the presentation in Week 7. Each Independent Design student will also receive a brief written report that outlines the main strengths and weaknesses of the final Design folio relative to the assessment criteria. The report will be forwarded to the candidate no later than the date of the publication of examination results.
Attendance and Performance
University rules require students to attend prescribed classes and complete the prescribed work of the unit at a satisfactory standard (Rule 1.2.1.15 UWA handbook). The University may require a student who does not attend classes or satisfactorily complete work to withdraw from the unit, or to exclude them from submitting work for examination (Rule 1.2.1.16 UWA Handbook).
Assessment Mechanism
Assessment of this unit is conducted 100% by examination of a submitted design portfolio.
Submission and Examination of Folio
Students are required to submit their Independent Design folio to a designated room on the time and date scheduled in the semester diary. An assessment panel will meet separately, in the absence of the supervisor, to assess the project as a portfolio.
Examination method
Examination is conducted by a panel of at least 3 assessors, comprising the Honours Coordinator and at least 2 independent assessors (ie not the supervisor). Consistent with UWA Honours policy[i] and postgraduate research practice, external markers will be sought where possible. This necessitates that students explicitly communicate objectives in the brief and in folio submissions.
Students will be given the opportunity to set out the folio for examination in an exhibition space, and to make a short presentation to the examiners in order to satisfy themselves that all elements of the folio will have been noted for examination. The examiners will question the students about the work, limiting themselves to clarifying matters of fact.
Faculty and University Policies and Procedures
Students should refer to the Level 4/5 Architecture and Landscape Architecture Study Book available at: http://www.alva.uwa.edu.au/current_students/course_materials/course_and_unit_guides/study_books_semester_1,_2006 or from the Resource Room.
The Study Book contains information about all of the relevant University and Faculty policy and procedures.
Academic Conduct
Students should refer to the University’s policy on Ethical Scholarship, Academic Literacy and Academic Conduct at: http://www.teachingandlearning.uwa.edu.au/__data/page/72852/Acad-Conduct-Principles.pdf
And the Faculty’s Academic Conduct policy at: http://www.alva.uwa.edu.au/current_students/forms_and_Policies
It is vital that students have read and understood both the definitions of and penalties for academic misconduct.
Learning Outcomes
Performance area 1: Problem formulation
Prepare a design proposal to an adequately resolved level from which an architectural or landscape solution can form.
Performance area 2: Concept
Define personal values systems and ethical positions in response to complex architectural project requirements.
Performance area 3: Development
Resolve at a professional level architectural propositions of substantial complexity.
Performance area 4: Technical Integration
Integrate to a professional level advanced technical and environmental knowledge in the resolution of an architectural proposition.
Performance area 5: Contextual awareness
Incorporate the breadth of professional concerns impacting upon the design process.
Performance area 6: Communication
Deploy the full range of architectural and landscape communication skills at a professional level.
Assessment Criteria
Assessment of Independent Design will be made in 6 areas of performance, according to criteria as detailed below:
Performance area 1: Problem formulation
Capacity to investigate and articulate a design problem plausibly integrating problems from diverse domains of knowledge, viz: aesthetic/historical/cultural/contextual problems, applicable social/ethical/economic/political questions, applicable scientific/technical problems.
Performance area 2: Concept
Demonstration of aesthetic sensibility, compositional skill, and the representation of ideas fundamental and central to the problem.
Performance area 3: Development
Appropriate use and the representation of background studies and design precedents; staged refinement and improvement of the design concept through the exploration and determination of theoretical and technical aspects of the design; and adequacy of response to the requirements set out in the project brief (how convincingly the design addresses the formulated problem).
Performance area 4: Technical Integration
Display of scientific/environmental/technical understanding as well as appropriate knowledge and control of constructional methods, structural systems, services implications.
Performance area 5: Contextual awareness
Demonstration of advanced sensitivity towards some or all of the historical, cultural, social, ethical, economic and political parameters influencing the project.
Performance area 6: Communication
Demonstration of effectiveness and quality of drawings, models and other communication media; sufficiency of drawings/models to completely and appropriately describe the proposition.
Guide to Grading Bands (HD, D, CR, P etc)
HD For a folio to be awarded a high distinction, it must be of excellent standard in nearly all areas, and in the few criteria where it is not of excellent standard, it will at least be of high standard. It will not be compromised in relation to any criterion.
D For a folio to be awarded a distinction, it must be of uniformly high standard across all areas, perhaps excelling in a number of areas, but is not significantly compromised in any.
CR For a folio to be awarded a credit, it must be generally of a competent or high standard, but is significantly compromised in one of the criteria.
P For a folio to be awarded a pass, it must be of passable standard in all areas, but is significantly compromised in a number of criteria.
Submission and Presentation Guidelines
Each student is expected to make a number of formal submissions and presentations marking crucial stages of the development of their project during the course of the semester.
1. Week 1: ‘Brief’ (Abstract)
This proposal should be written and illustrated to outline specific theoretical objectives and the details of a project scenario, or brief, in which these objectives can be pursued as a design proposition or propositions.
Arguments need to be presented for 1. the significance and value of pursuing these objectives, and 2. the mechanism by which the objectives can be achieved through the examination of the particular design elements proposed.
The scenario may incorporate aspects of a professionally developed design brief, but only to the extent that these create opportunity to explore the theoretical objectives.
It is foreseeable that certain objectives may be well served by adopting a complete and existing design brief, such as a real design competition, or a government standard document, in which case it is essential to argue for the relevance of pursuing the objectives through this brief.
It is also foreseeable that the researching and development toward the production of particular aspects of a brief may be essential to the achievement of objectives, in which case it is essential to detail how this methodology will achieve the aims.
In addition to the brief justification of the project, it is expected that the scenario will identify a programme, a site, and a schedule of deliverables with a timeline.
All students enrolled in Independent Design will have prepared and submitted a research proposal to the Resource Room, marked to the attention of the Honours Coordinator, no later than Monday of Week One.
Each proposal will be considered by a panel before permission is given to proceed to the design phase.
2. Week 1: First Jury Seminar
Objectives:
To allow students to outline theoretical / research objectives and project scenario/brief
a. outline theoretical / research objectives.
b. identify and clarify design opportunities for exploring those theoretical objectives within a project scenario or brief,
c. describe how you intend to respond to these opportunities (ie clarify project scope)
d. All suitable for obtaining critical feedback towards development and refinement of the design project. )
3. Week 4: Second Jury Presentation
Objectives
To allow students to present schematic design proposals.
To allow jury and audience to provide critical feedback towards development, refinement and completion of the design project.
Student presentation should outline:
· a project scenario or brief, with established stated design opportunities, framed by explicit theoretical / research objectives
· the schematic proposals and the strategies employed.
· the forecast extent and nature of the completed project (ie project scope)
4. Week 7: Third Jury Presentation
Objectives
to present developed design proposals.
To allow jury and audience to provide critical feedback towards successful completion of the design project.
Student presentation should outline:
· a project scenario or brief, with established stated design opportunities, framed by explicit theoretical / research objectives
· the schematic proposals and the strategies employed.
· Key features that have been developed
· the forecast extent and nature of the completed project (ie project scope)
5. Week 10: Third Jury Presentation
Objectives
to present developed design proposals and a strategy for the presentation of these proposals for the final folio.
To allow jury and audience to provide critical feedback towards successful completion of the design project.
Student presentation should outline:
· a project scenario or brief, with established stated design opportunities, framed by explicit theoretical / research objectives
· the schematic proposals and the strategies employed.
· Key features that have been developed
· the forecast extent and nature of the completed project (ie project scope)
· The proposal for the for the final folio presentation.
Note: On the Wednesday before each Jury seminar and jury session the students are to submit to the honours supervisor via electronic means a piece of text (one A4 @12 point maximum length) outlining the current position of their project and what they believe the next stage of their research will be. These abstracts as well as their original briefs will be distributed to the various juries throughout the semester.
6. Week 13: Folio (for Assessment)
What are the conceptual and theoretical objectives?
How will they be manifest in architectural design terms?
Why are they significant, what will they add to knowledge or understanding (yours, or the collective)?
Have you made this explicit in the folio? (ie are they clear without spoken description?)
In what ways is the project scenario/brief important or significant in the exploration of the objectives?
Is it clear to what extent the brief can become a generic opportunity to explore the issues (and thus be obtained en bloc) or to what extent the research and elaboration of the brief is a fundamental part of your objectives?
Have you directed attention to those aspects of the brief which are specifically significant, and which you have researched and explored your self? Is this evident without spoken description?)
9
Page
[i] http://www.secretariat.uwa.edu.au/home/policies/honours accessed 23/09/05