To Mario Toscano, Clerk of the Court of International Trade. May 11,2018

From Ron Vrooman 503 641 8375, General Delivery [97005]

Notice to the agent is notice to the principal and notice to the principal is notice to the agent.

Hello Mario,

I phoned your court again today. I spoke with Scott and Steve both are giving mis-information.

I was unable to speak to you in several tries. You staff was helpful. So, I’ll use a cover letter again.

You have others deal with me. Notice to the agent is notice to the principal and yatayata.

You are clerk of the CIT. I read the Constitution circa 1819 thru 1860-61. Oregon is a Nation State one of the several states admitted to the union antebellum. Article III states your court is the one. I need not the article 3 judges that removed the Constitution from their oath 1991. I need your court on the land on Oregon the state among several.

The Portland court is not Article III and the judges there do not provide their bona fides. If a judge does not enter their jurisdiction in writing into the court upon demand then that person has no standing. Two DOJ attorneys and 8 judges from Portland courthouse 740 are defendants. Oh, yeah, one deputy clerk of that court.

My investigation , Ronald Charles Vrooman Private Attorney Generals by the United States Congress 42 U.S.C.1988 and 18 U.S.C.1510 and 18 U.S.C. 1512 and to be known as “One of the People” also “Qualified Criminal Investigator” and “Federal Witness”, indicate your court is the only Article III court in the USA.

The mis-information starts here:

Steve and Scott deny, That if my work, as Pro Se Plaintiff party for, is deficient then your court must name what is deficient. So, I may correct it. A second denial will constitute a due process violation. Take Heed. They also Deny that your CIT court is the only Article III court in the USA. However they state the Portland Court is Article III. That is a lie. They remain silent when I bust them on the lie. They state there is one Article III court in every state. Lie. They state there are 94 Article III courts. Then refuse to identify one. They tell me they cannot give legal advice. Then tell me to find an attorney or lawyer.

I read the 12 presumptions in law. BAR attorneys belong to a criminal organization.

The Acarrdi and the Clearfield Doctrines both apply to this case. This Court has been challenged and is again here and now!

I am mailing this today and I received your deputy clerk’s letter today. Annotated and attached.

I will be submitting my two cases in law and equity again after 7 days and within 21 days. We expect them to be logged in given docket identification. That provides sufficient time to respond and for any deficiencies to be corrected.