UNIVERSITY of CAMBRIDGE
Local Examinations Syndicate
WHAT MAKES A GOOD WRITING STIMULUS?
-11 year olds express their views
Martin Johnson
A paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference
University of Exeter, 12th - 14th September 2002
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and are not to be taken as the opinions on the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
Note
This research is based on data collected by the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
Contact Details
Martin Johnson
Primary Assessment Unit
Research and Evaluation Division
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate
Syndicate Buildings
1 Hills Road
Cambridge
CB1 2EU
www.ucles-red.cam.ac.uk
Tel: 01223 553843
Fax: 01223 552700
Email:
Introduction
The latest report on standards at key stage 2 (children aged 7-11) by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) restates the continued concern about levels of attainment in writing for 11-year-old children (QCA, 2002). This follows in the wake of a QCA press release on the 13th January 2000 which also claimed that ‘at 11-years-old the performance of boys and girls in reading [has] improved, [but] overall pupils’ writing is less good than reading’ (QCA, 2000). Added to this, a recent evaluation report of national test results has also shown that boys’ achievement lags behind that of girls to the point where 'girls are ten percentage points ahead of boys in English by the end of KS2 [key stage 2]' (HMI, 2001, p.1).
These statements are increasingly important when set in relation to the recent general improvements in standards in primary school literacy, which have been identified by the Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) (HMI, 2001). The extent of the lag in writing achievement behind that of reading is a concern for policy makers at a national level who have set particular targets for attainment at the end of key stage two. It could be argued that the discrepancy between achievement in writing and reading is an inevitable consequence of the different demands of the two activities.
Frater (2001) highlights many of the reasons why writing is a more difficult activity than reading. He suggests that the requirement to control the symbolic codes and systems of text generation at the simultaneous levels of word, sentence and text sets it apart from the simpler reading skills needed to respond to ‘black marks on a page’. Several theoretical models (Goswami & Bryant, 1990; Frith, 1985) further reinforce the claim that the acquisition of reading skills leads to the development of writing skills, therefore necessitating a writing lag behind reading attainment.
Concerns about children’s attainment in writing highlight the importance of appraising some of the factors that may affect children’s writing performance. Understanding the effect of a stimulus requires the recognition of factors that affect children as they approach the writing process. Sharples (1999) suggests that good writing relies on an uninterrupted transition from reflection to engagement. The purpose of the effective stimulus is to reduce the fragmentation of the cycle of 'reflection and engagement'. The stimulus does this by reducing the 'coherence of constraints'. Constraints upon an individual's ability to write can be identified as being external and internal.
The external constraints include the writing task, the audience, the tools available for writing and the surrounding world of human and physical resources. The internal, mental constraints are of two general types: content (what to write, including the facts and experiences we are able to summon up) and rhetoric (how to write it, including style and structure, to fit the audience and purpose). (Sharples, 1999, p.41)
Although constraints allow writers to control the multitude of possibilities that thought and language offer, Sharples argues that the writing process may become fragmented when constraints combine and become coherent. The perspective that the performance of children may be affected by stimuli in very individual ways is reinforced by a recent study of children's views of national reading test stimuli. Green, Hamnett & Green (2001) found that a link could be established between children’s interest and their level of motivation.
The aim of this study was to investigate the stimulus features that children felt stimulated their ideas when selecting a task, and those which did not. It aimed to do this through an investigation of 'construct awareness'. 'Construct awareness' relates to the ideas and concepts that children are conscious of when they encounter and engage with a stimulus. The study also explored the interaction of constructs, and the effects that the combination of constructs had on children's preferences.
The idea of a ‘good’ stimulus was explored through a number of key questions:
· Which constructs of a task stimulus did children perceive to be salient?
· Did children prefer more or less defined tasks?
· How important were the audience and purpose?
· How might differences in ability and gender have affected the choice of task?
· How did differences between genres affect children's choices?
It was felt that by gaining an understanding of the salience that children attached to different stimuli features, the findings of this study would be relevant to anyone who devises writing tasks for children. By acknowledging the opinions of children, task designers can help to make sure that the stimuli that they provide appeal to those being asked to engage with the task.
Methodology
192 year 6 children were shown three stimuli which were from different genres (see Appendix 1). The children were asked which one they would choose to do and why, they were also asked about which one was their least favoured and why (see Appendix 2). This study was designed to investigate children’s perceptions of task stimuli or 'construct awareness' at three levels.
At the first level, data were collected about the choices which children had made. Teacher assessments for writing were also collected so that issues of children’s ability could be explored in relation to their stimuli choices.
At the second stage of the study, children’s open responses were coded, and this allowed their reasons for their choices to be clarified and explained further. This allowed the study to identify and group salient features or constructs that influenced children during the decision-making process.
At the third stage, issues identified in the earlier stages will be probed in a qualitative study.
Findings
Choices
Percentage of pupils who chose the stimulus as their favoured option
All(n=192) / Girls
(n=98) / Boys
(n=94)
What was that?
(explanatory) / 36 / 33 / 39
A door opens
(narrative) / 28 / 26 / 31
Spider supporter
(persuasive) / 36 / 42 / 30
The explanation card (What was that?) and the persuasive letter (Spider supporter) were equally popular overall, whilst the narrative (A door opens) was least popular overall. More girls preferred the persuasive letter. More boys than girls preferred the narrative and explanatory writing stimuli, with most boys liking the explanation card (What was that?).
What children liked and disliked about the explanatory task (What was that?)
Positive and negative features mentioned by the children are listed below in descending order of frequency:
Positive (n=69) / Negative (n=59) Activity theme (48)
Perceived activity easy (30)
Activity text type (16)
Activity purpose (12)
Activity allowing use of prior knowledge (9)
Activity long (8)
Stimulus long (5)
Stimulus providing options (5) / Activity theme (37)
Perceived activity difficult (17)
Activity text type (13)
Activity purpose (6)
Activity long (3)
Stimulus providing options (3)
Stimulus long (2)
Activity allowing prior knowledge (1)
For those who commented on this stimulus the theme was the most important feature. Most children expected it to be an easier task than the other tasks. The text type had both positive and negative effects. Of the minority of children who mentioned the facility to use prior knowledge, most of them liked it. There is evidence to suggest that the purpose of the task was liked overall. The length of the activity and stimulus were less important.
What children liked and disliked about the narrative task (A door opens)
Positive and negative features mentioned by the children are listed below in descending order of frequency:
Positive (n=54) / Negative (n=76) Activity theme (41)
Activity text type (31)
Activity allows freedom to write own ideas (16)
Perceived activity easy (7)
Stimulus has minimal detail (2)
Activity long (1)
Activity short (1) / Activity text type (38)
Perceived activity difficult (36)
Activity theme (23)
Stimulus has minimal detail (20)
Activity long (13)
Activity allows freedom to write own ideas (1)
For those who commented on this stimulus the theme was the most important feature, and there were more positive than negative comments about it overall. The text type had roughly equal positive and negative effects. The task was perceived as being difficult and this was a negative effect.
Some children liked the facility to 'think freely' without being restricted by the stimulus, this was a positive effect. The short stimulus that provided little support and the long activity both had a negative effect. There was evidence to suggest that the Level 4 writers liked the narrative option more (41%) than the Level 3 writers did (23%) (see Appendix 3, table 1).
What children liked and disliked about the persuasive task (Spider supporter)
Positive and negative features mentioned by the children are listed below in descending order of frequency:
Positive (n=69) / Negative (n=57) Activity text type (42)
Activity theme (33)
Perceived activity easy (21)
Stimulus long (19)
Activity purpose (16)
Activity short (7) / Activity theme (33)
Activity text type (24)
Perceived activity difficult (15)
Activity purpose (14)
Stimulus long (3)
Activity long (1)
For those who commented on this stimulus, the text type was the most important positive feature and there were more positive than negative comments about it overall. The theme had equal positive and negative effects. Task demand was evenly split between those who felt that the activity would be easy and those who felt that it would be difficult. Purpose had an even positive/negative effect. The long stimulus with greater support had a positive effect. The short activity also had a positive effect.
Genre comparisons
The narrative option was the least popular overall. This appears to have been related to the theme, the lack of support that the stimulus offered, or perceptions of difficulty. The narrative option was especially unpopular with girls.
Girls liked the persuasive stimulus more than the boys. There is evidence to suggest that this was because of the inclusion of the letter, since more girls liked the letter writing (29/41) than boys (13/28). The evidence also suggests that girls liked the greater level of support contained within the stimulus, despite the high reading demand (see Appendix 3, table 9). Overall, more girls felt the task to be easier than boys did, although more boys liked the spider topic (17/28) than girls (16/41).
Salient features listed in descending order of frequency
Explanatory / Narrative / PersuasiveTheme
Demand
Text type / Text type
Theme
Demand / Theme
Text type
Demand
Purpose
Activity length
Prior knowledge
Stimulus length
Stimulus options / Stimulus length
Freedom of thought
Activity length / Purpose
Stimulus length
Activity length
The three most important features mentioned in each of the different stimuli were theme, perceived task demand and text type. The relative importance of each varied by genre. Length of the stimulus and activity were also mentioned in all three genres. Children more often preferred longer stimuli and shorter activities than vice versa. Purpose was a significant feature in the non-narrative tasks, but not for the narrative. Freedom was an important feature for a minority of children in the narrative.
Conclusion
Theme, genre and difficulty were the most significant features that affected children's choices. Other features counterbalanced the effects of these features in a variety of ways.
Traditionally, narrative has been the most commonly chosen form of writing in key stage 2 writing tests. The introduction of the National Literacy Strategy (NLS) has led to a greater exposure of younger children to a wider variety of genres, and this might be reflected in the choices of the children in this study. Furthermore, story writing means writing more and this deters some children who choose tasks that they think are shorter and which they may perceive as being easier.
This raises an interesting point about children's perceptions of 'difficulty'. Although 'writing more' for a task may equate to it 'being harder', it appears that this perception may be influenced by other factors. For example, although the narrative was considered by many children to be difficult, the 'theme' still had an effect, with the boys liking the 'mystery/adventure' theme.
Purpose is important to children and this was the case in the non-narrative stimuli. It was not mentioned in the narrative comments, and this was one of the features that made the task less popular. The data appears to signal that for children the 'purpose' of writing stories is to be creative. This would reinforce the observation by Littlefair (1992) that children in the early years of education enjoy the emotional response and imaginative experience that early exposure to narrative forms involves.
There may be an argument here that the NLS has managed to promote the purpose of non-narrative genres very successfully, but has done so at the expense of narrative writing. This argument may be reinforced by the fears of primary practitioners that extended narrative writing has tended to be overlooked because it fails to sit comfortably within the classic 'literacy hour' time frame. The relative unpopularity of the narrative option may be a result of this lack of exposure to extended story writing, because of a preference for more compact genres. It may also be the result of children becoming more aware of both their own writing strengths and the expectations implicit in different writing genres.
Since the introduction of the national writing tests there has been a suspicion that some teachers are steering children towards forms of writing in which they feel that the children will be more successful. Narratives are considered by many to be difficult to do well, and perhaps this awareness of relative difficulty is permeating the thoughts of children and influencing their choices.