SAFE-T

ET3

TeacherContractlevel

DistrictGreenwood School District 50School

Gradelevel(s)/Subjectarea(s)Academicyear

ADEPTPerformanceStandards(APSs)forClassroom-BasedTeachers / ConsensusJudgment
Domain / KeyElementsintheDomain(Preliminary) / KeyElementsintheDomain(Final) / Preliminary / Final
Domain1:
Planning
APS 1
APS 2
APS 3 / *11
Total:
Met (>10)

Not Met(9) / *11
Total:
Met (>10)

Not Met (9) / Exemplary[11]
Proficient[10]
NeedsImprovement[4-9]
Unsatisfactory[1-3] / Exemplary[11]
Proficient [10]
NeedsImprovement[4-9]
Unsatisfactory[1-3]
Domain2:
Instruction
APS 4
APS 5
APS 6
APS 7 / *12
Total:
Met (11)
Not Met(10) / *12
Total:
Met (11)
Not Met (10) / Exemplary[12]
Proficient [11]
NeedsImprovement[4-10]
Unsatisfactory[1-3] / Exemplary[12]
Proficient [11]
NeedsImprovement[4-10]
Unsatisfactory[1-3]
Domain3:
Environment
APS 8
APS 9 / *6
Total:
Met (>5)
Not Met(< 4) / *6
Total:
Met (>5)

Not Met (4) / Exemplary[6]
Proficient [5]
NeedsImprovement[3-4]
Unsatisfactory[1-2] / Exemplary[6]
Proficient [5]
NeedsImprovement[3-4]
Unsatisfactory [1-2]
Domain4:
Professionalism
APS 10 / *5
Total:
Met (>4)

Not Met(3) / *5
Total:
Met (>4)

Not Met (3) / Exemplary[5]
Proficient [4]
NeedsImprovement[3]
Unsatisfactory[1-2] / Exemplary[5]
Proficient [4]
NeedsImprovement[3]
Unsatisfactory [1-2]
OverallProfessionalPracticeJudgment
Anoveralljudgmentofmetindicatesthat theteacherachievesthecriterion levelinall fourdomains / Overall PreliminaryProfessionalPractice / Overall FinalProfessionalPractice
PreliminaryMet
Not Met / Final
Met
Not Met / ExemplaryProficient
NeedsImprovementUnsatisfactory / ExemplaryProficient
NeedsImprovementUnsatisfactory
  • A rating of “Unsatisfactory” inanyof the fourdomainsresultsinoverallProfessionalPracticeratingof “Unsatisfactory.”
  • Anytworatingsof“NeedsImprovement”without“Unsatisfactory”resultsina“NeedsImprovement”ratingonProfessionalPractice.
  • Noratingsof“Unsatisfactory”andnomorethanone“NeedsImprovement,”butlessthan2“Exemplary,”resultsina“Proficient” ratingonProfessional Practice.
  • At least two “Exemplary” and no ratings of “Unsatisfactory” or “Needs Improvement” results in “Exemplary” onProfessionalPractice.

1

SAFE-T

ET3

Rating / Percentage of Students Meeting Growth Target
Exemplary / 76%-100%
Proficient / 50%-75%
Needs Improvement / 26-49%
Unsatisfactory / 25% or less

PreliminaryFinal

Teacher’s SignatureandDateTeacher’sSignatureandDate

Administrator’sSignatureandDateAdministrator’sSignatureandDate

Teacher Self-Reflection: Evaluator’s Rubric

Indicator / Exemplary / Proficient / Needs Improvement / Unsatisfactory
Insights on effective instruction and assessment / Identifies successful and unsuccessful instructional activities/assessments and synthesizes theory and research to highlight reasons for their success or lack thereof / Identifies successful and unsuccessful instructional activities/assessments and provides plausible reasons (based on theory or research) for their success or lack thereof / Identifies successful and unsuccessful instructional activities/assessments and superficially explores reasons for success level without the use of theory or research / Provides no rationale for why some instructional activities/
assessments were more successful than others
Alignment among goals, instruction, and assessment / Discussion of connections among goals, instruction and assessment results is highly insightful and reflects teaching maturity and experience / Logically connects learning goals, instruction, and assessment results / Connects learning goals, instruction, and assessment results, but conceptual gaps or misunderstandings are present / Discussion of connections and alignment is irrelevant or inaccurate
Insights on the relationship between classroom environment and instruction / Discussion of connections among classroom environment and instruction is highly insightful and reflects teaching maturity and experience / Logically connects classroom environment and instruction / Connects classroom environment and instruction but misunderstandings are present / Discussion of connections is irrelevant or inaccurate
Implications for professional development / Presents two professional growth goals that clearly emerge from experiences and details challenging professional development goals. / Presents two professional growth goals that clearly emerge from their teaching experience and insights. Describes steps to meet the goals. / Presents two professional growth goals that are somewhat related to their insights and teaching experience. Provides vague plan for meeting goals. / Presents two professional growth goals not related to their insights and teaching experience

Part 1: Beginning of the year prompts

Part 2: Self-reflection

Part 3: Self-reflection narrative and professional growth plan

Summative Teacher Evaluation Rating

Criteria / Weight
Professional Practice / 60%
Student Growth / 20%
District Choice (Teacher Self-Reflection) / 20%

Final Summative Teacher Evaluation Rating

Criteria / Weight
Unsatisfactory / Less than 2.0
Needs Improvement / 2.0-2.49
Proficient / 2.5-3.49
Exemplary / 3.5-4.0
Component / Rating / Score
Professional Practice-60%
SLO-20%
Teacher Self Reflection-20%
Overall Evaluation Rating

1

SAFE-T

ET3

Teacher:Bysigningbelow,IverifythatIhavereceivedtheresultsofthissummativeevaluation. MysignaturedoesnotnecessarilyimplythatIagreewiththeseresults.

Preliminary(Teacher’ssignatureanddate)Final(Teacher’ssignatureanddate)

______

Preliminary (Administrator’ssignatureanddate)Final(Administrator’ssignatureanddate)

1