Objective IV Outline

Determining the Appropriate Methodology for the Surveillance System

Learning Objectives

  • Define the Injury events and data elements to be included in the system
  • Develop the data collection instrument and determine data collection frequency
  • Plan for Systemization, Maintenance and Data Security
  • Define Key positions
  1. Introduction (will touch briefly on the following topics)
  2. Discussion of what people want in their system. – Comprehensive or specific – i.e. suicide, domestic violence, etc.
  3. Discuss ideal versus reality - tailored locally based on resources
  4. Size and type of injury problem
  5. Available data sources
  6. Feasibility of getting information
  7. Political aspects of getting information
  8. Potential for defining interventions
  9. Define the injury events and determine the data elements to include in the system
  10. Case Definition (Pages 32-41)
  11. Injury pyramid
  12. Death (the tip)
  13. Data Readily accessible
  14. Cause of death from injury Consistently reported
  15. Rare event
  16. Not a good guide to ascertain the overall injury problem or medical consequences
  17. Influenced by small numbers, especially population
  18. Hospitalizations (below deaths)
  19. When combined with mortality data, provides a much better picture of injury problem
  20. Disability and health care costs can be better described
  21. Access to data more difficult (privacy, HIPAA, manual records)
  22. Incomplete or inconsistent coding of injury causation.
  23. Data collection consumes human resources
  24. ED visits (below Hospitalizations)
  25. When combined with death and hospitalization data, helps provide the big picture
  26. Small populations with limited injury mortality & hospitalization may benefit by casting the net wider to include ED visits
  27. ED visits data can be useful for specialized study
  28. Large number of cases may be difficult to manage
  29. Access to data may be difficult – manual records
  30. Inconsistent or incomplete identification of injury causation
  31. Outpatient visits – Bottom of the pyramid
  32. May be good for specialized injuries (sports related, eye injuries)
  33. Might be good supplemental information, but in general not the place to start with injury surveillance
  34. Difficult access (data highly protected by practitioners)
  35. Summary
  36. Don’t try to do everything at once
  37. Start small with deaths and most severe injuries
  38. Plan to expand or phase-in other levels of severity as your resources permit
  39. You can work on prevention projects without knowing everything about every injury in your community
  40. The use of e-codesin your system
  41. E-codes – the value of e-codes
  42. Allow the ability to identify tends
  43. Allows the ability to describe the specific causes and contributing factors associated with an injury.
  44. Limitations of e-code
  45. Records not always coded
  46. Miscoding or inconsistent coding
  47. Poor Chart info results in non-specific e-code
  48. Don’t always provide the desired specificity
  49. Must stay apprised of updates
  50. Reading an e-code and coding data -- exercise – Note: 30 minutes was allotted for this exercise in IHS Course. The examples below were taken from IHS Material. Using ICD-9 (or 10?) code book, participants are asked to code the following events.
  51. Pedestrian run over by motor vehicle while walking in crosswalk at corner of Main Street and 3rd Avenue.
  52. Unrestrained passenger of pickup truck ejected when tire blew, driver lost control, ran off road, and overturned.
  53. 36 year old female diagnosed with depression attempted suicide by hanging.
  54. Boy admitted to hospital with BB gun shot to eye.
  55. Intoxicated individual fell out of bed of stationary pickup truck.
  56. Wife was assaulted and stabbed with knife by husband.
  57. Severe allergic reaction due to scorpion bite.
  58. Smoke inhalation from house fire that was caused by faulty wiring. There was no smoke detector in the home.
  59. Neck injury due to diving and striking head against bottom of swimming pool.
  60. Fall off bull during rodeo.
  1. Case definition exercise page 40 – Time ?
  2. Use the provided scenario to develop a case definition based on a real concern of someone in your group.
  3. The primary data you intend to use is hospital ED records and patient medical charts
  4. Considerations: person, place, time, intent, severity
  5. Debrief points:
  6. Do you think you will capture all injuries meeting case definition
  7. What additional data sources should you consider
  8. Group comments
  9. Case definition chart page 42 -- chart compares case definitions from the public health perspective (using ICD-10 codes) vs. the law enforcement perspective.
  1. Defining Variables
  2. General Discussion
  3. Keep the goal in mind – goal is intervention, prevention activity
  4. Be mindful of ideal vs. reality
  5. The simple form more likely to yield information, although it may not be everything you want to know.
  6. Consider subsequent forms to gather more details
  7. The variables you choose to include will depend on your locality, culture, etc. – rodeo injury related variables vs. snowmobile injury related variables
  8. Name – often not available, not used or not collected. Use hospital case number or DOB in lieu of name. Privacy/HIPAA issues.
  9. Age and sex –
  10. Education Level – consider the need for the information. Will the education level impact your intervention activities
  11. Employment Level – Same consideration as Education Level. Will it impact intervention.Why you might want it: Could help determine work related injuries.
  12. BAC – important variable, but not always available. May have to settle for Alcohol involved (needs to be defined) and Alcohol related (needs to be defined)
  13. Occupant Protection for Transportation – horses, skateboards, motorized vehicles, such as snow mobiles, boats – seat belts, helmets, life jackets, etc.
  14. Time Related variable:
  15. Date and time of injury event, ideally time the injury occurred. Realistically most of the time you only know the time of medical treatment. Choose one variant and go with it, even if it’s not the most accurate indication of when the injury occurred.
  16. A drawback: in some cases people don’t seek medical treatment until much later. For example, A Navajo clinic was getting a lot of people coming in for fall related injuries on Monday morning, but the injuries were occurring over the weekend.
  17. Place Related Variables:
  18. Place where injury occurred, residence of injured person.
  19. Injuries often occur when people travel to places for activities – hunting, fishing, drinking -- ideally you collect both. But sometimes the information is very general – such as the nearest village. Specifics are great, but if you can’t get them you work with what you have.
  20. Variables related to the event circumstances
  21. Relationship of victim to aggressor
  22. Mechanism
  23. Context
  24. Criminal history of victim and/or aggressor
  25. Example: Phase 1/Phase 2-- There’s value in collecting as much information as possible, but the more information you try to collect, the likely your form will be filled out accurately or at all. Some IHS areas have used a two phased approach. -- Phase 1 form used to collect basic information about injury, Phase 2 used to collect more detailed information based on the specific injury
  26. Chart showing variables collected use forms supplied by group members as example of what variables are collected. Stress that each should customize forms to fit the needs of their community and available data. Give the example of white river having to re-do their entire system based on changes out in the real world.
  27. You must define what you want in your system and that leads to the creation of a form.
  28. System protocol examples – show what decisions you made in determining how to run the system.
  1. Develop Data Collection Instrument and Determine Data Collection Frequency
  2. Now must determine how design a form to capture the data/variables, we’ve decided to include.
  3. Data Collection Planning – most data is record abstraction, gathering data from somebody, recording what you need. on-going surveillance –
  4. Discussion of length – page 50
  5. Keep it simple
  6. Only include the data you need and then use analysis to answer case definition questions later.
  7. The simpler the form, the greater its usefulness over a long period of time, the more likely you’ll be able to collect that data over a long time. There’s no right or wrong approach, but length is a consideration.
  8. Keep the form easy on the eye
  9. Decide whether or not to precode the form. Provide a precoded list of possible answers to a question as opposed to open-ended questions. When possible use numbers rather than letters. Numbers a re easier to process and less prone to error.,
  10. Examples of forms from different area offices
  11. Each surveillance system is unique and will have access to different data sources.
  12. No such thing as a perfect system, find something that works for your needs
  13. Pre-test - page 51
  14. Pretesting done with a draft form of the instrument to allow changes to be made prior to a full investigation.
  15. Pretesting helps identify if the questions and format are appropriate, clear, relevant, and result in the appropriate data. Help determine if the case definition is accurate. It’s done with a draft form of the instrument to allow changes to be made prior to a full investigation.
  16. Not unusual to change a form two or three times or more before implementing it.
  17. Data Collection Planning Summary
  18. Decide what you want out of surveillance
  19. Identify your case definition
  20. Define your variables
  21. Develop your form
  22. Test it
  23. Include discussion of when to change or abandon your form
  24. Include discussion of quality control in general for the surveillance system
  25. Frequency of Data Collection up to each locality to determine. Some considerations:
  26. The protocol for your system,
  27. Your needs
  28. Your resources – human and financial
  29. The requirements of the stakeholders
  30. The magnitude of the injury problem in your area
  31. Active versus passive collection. Active collection where a patient is sought out and interviewed about his or her injury is not done as a rule. Most information comes from police reports, ER logs, etc. Patients are not usually questioned because it’s not practical in most cases. Most surveillance in IC is passive in that the data was extracted from forms that were filled out by health care providers in the course of doing their job – for example death certificates or ER logs filled in by doctors. See the list of possible data sources in the appendix.
  32. How confidentiality laws may impact your efforts –You should be familiar with HIPAA – the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. This law, passed in 1996 safeguard’s an individual’s private health information (PHI) andit may impact your surveillance efforts. Consult with your local Institutional Review Board if your area has one or with the medical records coordinator at facility where you are gather data regarding your surveillance efforts and federal privacy laws. For more information on HIPAA visit or check the appendix for a list of classes.
  33. Determine the type of Surveillance System -- there are several ways of setting up a surveillance system depending on the objectives to be met, budgetary considerations, the size of your staff, your locality. The Pan Am Health Organization describes several types of Surveillance systems some of which may not be appropriate for your needs
  34. Universalsurveillance:Thetotalnumberofcasesoccurringwithinadefined populationisincludedinthesystem.Thispopulation-basedsurveillance accountsforallcasesthatoccur.Thisisthepreferredmethodofmonitoring theoccurrenceoffatalinjuriesbecauseratesofinjuriesandinjuryriskfactors canbecalculatedandgeneralizedtothepopulation. Most surveillance in Indian Country is an attempt to capture all data. The methods below may be done as a follow up to capture more data on specific injuries.
  35. Surveillancebasedonsamplesofcases:Theinformationisobtainedfrom aportionofthetotalnumberofcasesorevents.Thesamplemustbe representativesothatinferencescanbemaderegardingallpossible casesoccurringinthepopulation.Thismethodcanbeusedtocollect informationaboutnonfatalinjuries or as follow up to collect more data on specific injuries.
  36. Surveillancebasedonareviewofinstitutionalregistries:Institutional registriesarereviewedperiodicallytoanalyzeandidentifyvariablesof interest.Whenusingthismethod,itisimportanttoproperlyidentifythe institutionsandthesourceswithininstitutions,suchasclinicaland emergencyrecords,hospitaldischarges,orcomplaintsfiledwithpoliceor familywelfareinstitutions.Itisusefulformonitoringspecificinjuries.
  37. Survey-basedsurveillance:Informationisobtainedthroughquestionnaires focusedonaspecifictopic,withina predefinedperiodoftime,andat predefinedintervals.IntheUnitedStates,forexample,self-reportedseat beltandsafetyseatuseismeasuredatthestatelevelbyhouseholdsurveys conductedfortheBehavioralRiskFactorSurveillanceSystem(BRFSS),by school-basedsurveysconductedfortheYouthRiskBehaviorSurveillance System(YRBSS),andbydirectobservationofpassengervehicleoccupantsfor theNationalOccupantProtectionUseSurvey.11
  38. Sentinelsurveillance:Oneormoreinstitutionsarechosentomonitor trends,targetsurveillanceactivities,andsuggestpreventiveinterventions. Ingeneral,surveillancesystemsofthistypearenotrepresentativeofthe population,butareusefulforcallingspecialattentiontorisksituationsandthusfulfillakeyfunctionforinjurypreventiondecision-making. Oneexampleofthistypeofsurveillanceistheapproachtakenbychild deathreviewteams,whichgatherandanalyzedataonthecircumstances surroundingallcausesofchilddeaths.Sentinelsurveillancesystems complementothersourcesofinformationforinjuryprevention.
  39. Plan for Systemization, Maintenance and Data Security – Quality control issues and protocol
  40. If you don’t have an electronic database set up, seek the assistance of a programmer, an epidemiologist or a statistician. Epi Info 2002 is free software available through the CDC. For an overview of the software and installation and use instructions visit
  41. Data maintenance should focus on the following
  42. Reducing errors that may be introduced through flaws in the design.
  43. Improving the systems scope and services through routine maintenance, emergency maintenance and requests for special reports. Should be based on local needs. consider some of the following
  44. Backing up data and system files according an established schedule.
  45. Maintaining records in a secure environment
  46. Requiring requests for emergency maintenance to be in writing and entered into a log
  47. Assigning priorities for special requests on the basis of urgency of need and time and resources required for fulfillment
  48. Institutionalizing routine maintenance
  49. Documenting maintenance that is conducted
  50. Safeguarding your system. Should be based on local circumstances.
  51. Consider limiting access to one person
  52. Consider installing the database on two computers. A primary computer and one reserved for testing changes to the system. The second computer can also serve as a backup in case the first one fails.
  53. Consider keeping a second copy of the database off site. Routine updates of the offsite copy must be done.
  54. Threats to a database
  55. Human error
  56. Mechanical failure
  57. Malicious damage
  58. Cyber Crime
  59. Invasion of privacy
  60. Computer viruses
  61. Protocol – Successful surveillance systems will have clearly written protocol Include examples provided by Workgroup. Will vary with needs
  62. Include procedures for obtaining and securing data
  63. Maintenance
  64. Rules for data storage
  65. Rules for password protection and passwords
  66. Define staff and key positions necessary
  67. Ideally a surveillance system will have a core staff, both part time and full time, that would include program manager, data manager, research analyst and coordinator. This is seldom if ever possible in Indian Country. In Indian Country it is more like that your staff will consist of one or two people who will fulfill all of the functions of the system. Some of the key staff functions include:
  68. Coordinate system activities
  69. Establish contact with data sources and stakeholders
  70. Data entry
  71. Quality Control
  72. Analysis
  73. Preparation of Reports
  74. Advisory Board/Coalition – Just as with coalitions mentioned early an advisory board if possible could be helpful for offering technical advice, strategic planning and support for the surveillance system, but the reality is that often you will be working with just a few people. Whether your advisors are a board or just a few people, it may be necessary from time to time to seek a group or an individual’s assistance with the following
  75. Obtaining the data necessary for the injury surveillance system
  76. Review and Advice on policy and procedures for data collection, linkage, publications, and mechanisms for implementing a reporting system
  77. Identifying the best use of data
  78. Strategizing about how to remove obstacles and inefficiencies
  79. Providing speaking opportunities with professional organizations
  80. Obtaining data sharing agreements
  81. Showing broad, high-level support for the system.
  82. Getting local approval to start a surveillance system
  83. Navigating tribal politics or resistance to surveillance, data collection or data sharing
  84. Summary

1 / 7/10/12