About the Breeder Net Process

Creating Usable Intelligence Scientifically

T

hese days, whenyou want to “find out” things that matter to you, you may think of using a survey (or a focus group). Next time this happens, think also (or else instead) of using a Breeder Net process. (This holds true for anyPurpose you might seek.) Compared with traditional, survey-based research, you will find the Breeder Net process notably:

  • Quicker.
  • Less costly.
  • Less conspicuous.
  • Less obtrusive.
  • More accurate.
  • More durable (longer “shelf-life”).
  • More creative (productive, fruitful, fecund).
  • Less risky (free of anomalies).
  • More explicit (and so more manageable).

This is becausethe Breeder Netprocessholographs the “bedrock” structures that holdand shape all the data about your sought Purpose.The structuresbreed and organize the data. (This is true for any target topic or Purpose.)The statistics that ensue (which researchers then can sample, survey, and analyze) mainly echo those source structures.

But the echoes only go in one direction. When you know (as above) the forms that hold all your possible data, you of course also know how to take “top value” from your data. (This is the high-leverage way of finding your data’s “hidden” potential.) Butwhen you focus just on analyzing your data, you do not thereby come also to know their governing forms.The data, once taken from their sponsoring source (the forms), never can rebuildthat source. No analysis of those data ever could make the broken eggshell whole again. (You cannot find your compassjust by analyzing your calendar!)

Say you rupture your appendix. That source event starts up a flow of datathat any observer can note. The bodily source here spurts out a stream of—measurable—data. Your pulse quickens. You develop a fever. You have sharp pain in your lower right torso. And so on. The cause here (your ruptured appendix) spawns your symptoms, certainly. But (since this is a one-way street) not the reverse! At best, your symptomsmay point to a ruptured appendix … only “statistically” (not certainly). So, asymptom-based diagnosis (and treatment) must bring a risk of error with it. But a source-based analysis (say, a hologram-made, Breeder NetMap) carries no such risk. (The same logic structure applies to social discourse, enticing us to deal—argue, maneuver, etc.—just at the “symptom”, rather than the “cause”, level.)

Thus, all “survey”-based inference mustbe partial and error-prone. By contrast, the Breeder Net process (which assays structurethe way sonar does) is free of any statistical error (doubt). It treats wholes truly as wholes (i.e., as quanta: not just parts that you “add up” to make a “whole”).[1]The Breeder NetMapthat emerges then makes the “diagnosis” (and “therapy”) into an open, clear, and sure thing. (And, it melts discord!)

***

These remarks contrast traditional survey tools, and the Breeder Net process. But there are, besides, many further elements that feed this contrast. Of course, in this spaceit is hard to discuss all these elements aptly. But in order to show that these further aspects do exist (and are central), consider two more issues.

***

First, there is the issue of Purpose. Most needs for information serve a Purpose. To attain our Purpose, there is something we want to knowbut do not know yet.

Purpose comes in many forms. We may wish to win the election. We may wish to improve the morale and productivity of our personnel. We may wish to expand sales. When we have a Purpose, we can have a sense of direction.

When you survey to help attain your Purpose, how do you fit your findings to your Purpose? Of course, this question has no “best” answer. Say you find out that the average age of your target group is 34.9 years. Is this good news for your Purpose? (Why?) On Tuesday, you may see it as good news. On Thursday, you may see it as bad news. On Sunday, you may see it as ambiguous news. And in any case—good, bad, or ambiguous—where does it fit in to the Purpose you seek?

The Breeder Net process answers such questions unequivocally. It organizes your research under any definite Purposethat you spell out. (It also helps you define your Purpose, to ensure that it can indeed succeed.) Then—routinely—Breeder Net gives you a specific, explicit recipe that harnesses your findings to your Purpose. It does this in context (naturally, inevitably). And it shows you the full chains of reasoning behind its advice. This empowers you far beyond the help that traditional surveying can give you.

***

The second issue here is about finding an independent, secure starting point. Few would dispute that, “Every journey of a thousand miles begins with one step!”—but traditional surveys remain silent as to Which step is inherently the proper instigating step? The Breeder Net process finds this step clearly. It shows plainly which first stepsuffices (independently) to advance your Purpose best … now. (It shows this not as a matter of rhetoric or aesthetics or common sense, but as a piece of scientific intelligence.)

***

Innately, these brief comments about the Breeder Net process must remainunfinished, here. They mainly aim just to alert you to some—universal (topic-neutral)—issues. If you would like more information about this subject, please contact Arthur Gillman at 204-896-1060 (or at the email address shown below).

Contact: Arthur Gillman, at (Page 1 of 2)

[1] More particularly, the Breeder Net process circumvents the central problem of statistical inference, viz., that there is no general theory of model specification, from which to regress (and therefore correlate, and similarly reduce) statistical data.