Course Syllabus for 7th Grade US History - Mr. Steven M. Hammerman
Contact Information
Phone: 561-627-0740
Email:
Google Drive: (For sharing documents, images, videos, etc.)
Website: for events including trips, clubs, and additional activity information)
Grading Categories/Weights
Classwork = 35%
Homework (class prep) = 10%
Formal Assessments = 20%
Projects/Research = 35%
Late Assignments
Late assignments will be handled on an individual basis pending the needs of both the teacher and the student.
Planned Curriculum
Unit 1 - Understanding Choice and History
- PERSIA - Understanding how/why people make choices
- How Do We Know?
- Archeology vs. Pseudoscience
- Primary vs. Secondary Research/Resources
- Sourcing, Plagiarism, and creating Annotated Bibliographies
Unit 2 - Need for European Exploration
- Middle Ages, The Crusades, and "Marco!"… "Polo!"
- Age of Exploration, Merica!, and The Market for Exchange
- 90% - Death and a North American Facelift
Unit 3 - Getting North America Settled
- Spanish/French Florida, Luna, and Menendez
- England's Turn
- Roanoke - The Not so Lost Colony
- Popham - Popham who?
- Jamestown - An early sign of future Congress
- Plimoth - An early sign of American exceptionalism and Property Rights
Unit 4 - Growth of the Early American Culture
- New England Society and Growth
- Chesapeake Society and Growth
- The Frontier and Trade
Unit 5 - French Canada and the 14th Colony
- Crisis on the Frontier
- Seven Years War, George Washington, a Cherry Tree, Ben Franklin, and Nicolas Cage
- The Intellectual Revolution and The American
Unit 6 - The Battle to Solidify Revolution
- Tea, Taxes, and one spoon of Insurrection
- The Northern Campaign
- The Southern Campaign
- England just doesn't care anymore
Unit 7 - America's Infancy
- Growth of a Nation and a lot of Choices
- Political Parties, Presidencies, Economies, Ideology vs Pragmatism
- Peek-a-boo... We're Back!
- Quasi War
- War of 1812
- Did you know that our National Anthem was a British drinking melody? Are we shocked?
Unit 8 - Westward Expansion, Industrialization, and Southern Rights also known as Slavery
- Leaving the Mississippi River in our Dust
- Impact of new Technologies in Manufacturing and Transportation
- Southern Agriculture goes to Texas
- Rent-a-Slave
Unit 9 - Lincoln and the American Civil War
- Lincoln, Douglas, and Secession
- Ken Burns
- The Union Wins and Everything is Better
Unit 10 - Reconstruction, Civil Rights, and America moves Forward (Not Really)
- Rebuilding, If that’s what you can call it
- A look at the 1950s and 60s.What has changed?
- Today - Ferguson, Baltimore, Charleston
General Rubrics
Rubric for general class assignmentCATEGORY / Exemplary / Accomplished / Developing / NeedsHelptoGrow
Organization / Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and subheadings. / Information is organized with well-constructed paragraphs. / Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well constructed. / The information appears to be disorganized.
Quality of Information / Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. / Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples. / Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. / Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
Completion of Work / All topics are addressed and all questions answered in a proper manner for the assignment. / All topics are addressed and most questions answered n a proper manner for the assignment. / All topics are addressed, and most questions answered in a minimal manner. / One or more topics were not addressed.
Multiple Sources Cited / All sources (Multiple credible sources for information and graphics) are accurately documented in the desired format. / All sources (Multiple credible sources for information and graphics) are accurately documented, but a few are not in the desired format. / All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but many are not in the desired format. / Some sources are not accurately documented.
Internet Use / Successfully uses suggested and/or legitimate internet links to find information and navigate within these sites easily without assistance. / Usually able to use suggested and/or legitimate internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance. / Occasionally able to use suggested and/or legitimate internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance. / Needs assistance or supervision to use suggested and/or legitimate internet links and/or to navigate within these sites.
General Rubric for Individual Effort during Collaborative Work
Exemplary / Accomplished / Developing / Needs Help to Grow
Does an equal share of work and goes further by taking a leadership role.
When assigned a clearly defined role; group member performs role effectively
Always considers all views and helps team to reach fair decision
Never argues with teammates
Individual brings all needed materials and meets all deadlines / Does an equal share of work
Group member performs most of defined assigned role
Usually considers all views and helps team to reach fair decision
Rarely argues
Solves his/her problems with the team and asks classmates or teacher for help / Does almost as much work as others
Completes assigned roles, but goes off topic
Often sides with friends instead of considering all views
Sometimes argues
Individual settles problems and gives up easily / Does less work than other group members
No effort made towards assigned role
Acts as being in a clique or individuals rather than group
Argues within the group
Makes little attempt to solve problems; gives up easily
General Rubric for Projects
CATEGORY / Exemplary / Accomplished / Developing / Needs Help to Grow
Thesis and Conclusion / The project has a clear and concise thesis statement. The project has a well thought-out conclusion that supports or challenges the thesis statement. / The project has a clear and concise thesis statement. The project has a well thought-out conclusion that supports or challenges the thesis statement. / The project has a thesis statement but is not clear. The project has a conclusion that does not support or challenges the thesis statement. / The project does not have a thesis statement or a conclusion.
Content / Content of the project relates to the thesis and provides supporting evidence to the conclusion. / Content of the project relates to the thesis, provides supporting evidence to the conclusion, but has unnecessary content. / Content of the project does not fully match the thesis statement and includes distracting content. The content does not support the conclusion. / The project lacks the appropriate amount of content, nor does it match the topic or help support a conclusion.
Appearance / The projects appearance is professional and polished without distractive elements. / The projects appearance is quite professional and polished with only a few distractive elements. / The projects appearance is somewhat poor. Some distractive elements. / The projects appearance is quite poor. Many distractive elements.
Creativity / Project is excellently presented reflecting creativity and a lot of thought. / Good creative effort. Project is neat and shows evidence of time spent on it. / Some attempt made to add color and originality. Project is neat. / Little attempt to add color or originality. Project has sloppy appearance.
Presentation / Oral presentation is well-organized, well thought out and included answers to any required questions / Oral presentation is organized, thought out and included answers to any required questions. / Oral presentation is not organized or thought out and answered some of the questions. / Oral presentation is not organized or thought out and did not answer any of the questions.
Voice / Presented with no errors in a smooth, clear voice. Presenter also used expression when presenting. / Everyone could hear the presentation. Presenters voice was clear and smooth. / Presentation was completed with minimal errors (less than 3). Presenters voice was not continuously clear. / Presentation had more than 4 errors and the presenter could not be heard or understood clearly.