Consolidated Summary Evaluation of the Workshop - IDRM Platform Network Workshop Jaipur

Consolidated Summary Evaluation of the Workshop - IDRM Platform Network Workshop – Jaipur

Code / HRDP|2009|ToT|xx
Training Institution / DMI Bhopal / InWEnt / CIF Rajasthan Gov.
Duration / from / 07.08.2009 / to / 08.08.2009
Overall training course and objectives / (Q: 9-1, 9-2, 6-1)
Number of questions (3) / Evaluation / Rating**
where response rounded average is equal to / Index (EI)*
1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
2 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 2,75 / very successful
Objectives:
6-1-1 / Discussion about the possibilities for a joint use for knowledge management and management of training events in IDRM of
6-1-2 / Identify the existing and relevant databases/websites - Start linkages to other web sites and agree on authors training in the future
6-1-3 / Discussion about the possibilities of integrating the web platform with the human resource development component with the national Action Plan of chemical/industrial Disaster Risk Management.
6-1-4 / Expolre the possibilities of organising a workshop in the Western part of th country to link the HIRA/Off-ste/On-site plans as one of the components of the National Action Plan of chemical/industrial Disaster Risk Management
Remarks
9-3 / I liked especially:
discussions and content; the approach advocated; the positive approach; Capacity Building and networking knowledge; online updating; Presentations by CIF; the event has been managed well with high level of integration among all; Perfect to feeling others; the environment of working style;
9-4 / I disliked especially:
Deviations form central theme; lack of coordination and cooperation of the different nodal agencies; HRD after removing all concerned authorities; Lot of discussions out of focus - more discussion on implementation and not on learning epitomes; Performance personnel level;
9-5 / What kind of awareness did you receive through this event?
Network and knowledge management - GTZ-InWEnt-DEMi and industry in this line; some good practices and good xx by the states; a lot of information regarding the means of networking; have motivation for implementation of HRD after removing all xxx to concerned authorities to provide provisions in environment act of some xxx; Helped in understanding the level implementation issues e.g.. CIF, DISH etc not under MoEF crisis groups and State / District authorities; make action plan with other non-gov. activist organisations; to train and awareness is more rigorously;
Organisation and venue / (Q: 7-1 to 7-10)
Number of questions (10) / Evaluation / Rating**
where response rounded average is equal to / Index (EI)*
1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
4 / 6 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 8,5 / very good
Analysis & conclusions by participants
Follow-up
8-1 / Which follow-up activities would you recommend? (e.g. further specialist events, e-Learning courses, etc.)
Workshop proceedings to be developed and circulated as well as follow up plans; Action plans to be practicable and implementable; further special events; Specialist events looking more into knowledge collection, collation and distribution platforms; e-learning course;
8-2 / Further comments and suggestions for improvements suggestions for improvement:
to organise the high level discussions with some selected gov. Officials; Should give more important to web platforms and its advantage/disadvantage over conventional tools to be given focus; reverence ground realities;
The moderator/facilitator and methods / (Q: 4-1 to 4-4)
Number of questions (4) / Evaluation / Rating**
where response rounded average is equal to / Index (EI)*
1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
1 / 3 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3,25 / very good
Participants - How do you assess / (Q: 3-1 to 3-5)
Number of questions (5) / Evaluation / Rating**
where response rounded average is equal to / Index (EI)*
1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
0 / 5 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 3,75 / very good
Relevance and impact of the work / (Q: 2-1 to 2-2)
Number of questions (2) / Evaluation / Rating**
where response rounded average is equal to / Index (EI)*
1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
2 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 2 / excellent
Remarks
Please name topics that were not covered but would have been important for your work!
or
Please name topics that were not on the agenda but would have been relevant to achieve event’s objectives.
Land use, ind. Siteing issues, vulnerability;