Computer Vision Demonstration 1st May 2007

Page 1 of 4

Binn Thomas
Ke Zhang / 14:00 / MS
Assessor: / Clarity of explanation[2] / 1.0
Technical content of explanation[2] / 1.5
Appropriateness of evaluation (proposed or actual results)[2] / 0.5
Program operation[2] / 1.5
Ability to answer questions[2] / 1.5
Total[10] / 6
Comments:
The technical description of the algorithm is not clear – you must describe precisely what you have implemented in your report and what assumptions the algorithm makes. Almost no quantitative evaluation has been carried out. Also, I am not happy that you have taken a ‘black box’ approach to OCR using the HTK. Make sure you understand how the HMM is working

Computer Vision Demonstration 1st May 2007

Kuryati Kipli
Feng Liang / 14:25 / DP
Assessor: / Clarity of explanation[2] / 0.5
Technical content of explanation[2] / 1.0
Appropriateness of evaluation (proposed or actual results)[2] / 1.0
Program operation[2] / 1.5
Ability to answer questions[2] / 1.0
Total / 5
Comments:
A disorganised presentation with too many slides. The details of the first method are not clear and I doubt that you understand how the algorithm works. Using a MATLAB ‘black box’ is not generally appropriate for these projects. A good effort at quantitative evaluation overall which must be clearly outlined in the report

Computer Vision Demonstration 1st May 2007

Page 2 of 4

A Gomas
A Dissington / 1:50 / MS
Assessor: / Clarity of explanation[2] / 2.0
Technical content of explanation[2] / 2.0
Appropriateness of evaluation (proposed or actual results)[2] / 1.0
Program operation[2] / 2.0
Ability to answer questions[2] / 1.5
Total / 8.5
Comments:
Impressive piece of work and a very good working demonstration. Evaluation of the system will need to be clearly stated in the report and also the system’s limitations.

Computer Vision Demonstrations 1st May 2007

Atanas Chakalov
Doug Jacobs / 15:15 / MS
Assessor: / Clarity of explanation[2] / 1.0
Technical content of explanation[2] / 1.5
Appropriateness of evaluation (proposed or actual results)[2] / 0.5
Program operation[2] / 0.5
Ability to answer questions[2] / 1.5
Total / 5
Comments:
Some good ideas in the overall system design but clearly there are problems with the implementation. There are simpler methods of fitting ellipses so your method must be justified in your report. See if you can sort out the bug in your code so that you can demonstrate the final system in your final report

Computer Vision Demonstration 1st May 2007

Page 3 of 4

Omar Allaoui
Malek Darvishi / 15:40 / MS
Assessor: / Clarity of explanation[2]
Technical content of explanation[2]
Appropriateness of evaluation (proposed or actual results)[2]
Program operation[2]
Ability to answer questions[2]
Total
Comments:

Computer Vision Demonstrations 1st May 2007

Tala Skaik
Antonio Medina / 16:05 / MS
Assessor: / Clarity of explanation[2]
Technical content of explanation[2]
Appropriateness of evaluation (proposed or actual results)[2]
Program operation[2]
Ability to answer questions[2]
Total
Comments:

Computer Vision Demonstration 1st May 2007

Page 4 of 4

Stuart Hamilton / DP
Assessor: / Clarity of explanation[2]
Technical content of explanation[2]
Appropriateness of evaluation (proposed or actual results)[2]
Program operation[2]
Ability to answer questions[2]
Total
Comments:

Computer Vision Demonstrations 1st May 2007

MS
Assessor: / Clarity of explanation[2]
Technical content of explanation[2]
Appropriateness of evaluation (proposed or actual results)[2]
Program operation[2]
Ability to answer questions[2]
Total
Comments: