gtPathways

GENERAL EDUCATION EVALUATION

CHAIR’S COVER SHEET & EVALUATION SUMMARY:

Content Committee: SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Course

Prefix/Number/Title: ______

(Example: ECO 101: Economics of Social Issues)

gtPathways Content Area and Subcategory: ______

(Example: GT-SS1)

Is this course a RESUBMISSION?Yes: No:

Course Reviewers

Name / Content Area / Institution

Chair: Please check the appropriate box based upon the results of the reviewers’ evaluations. Check ONLY ONE BOX per review session, attach all review sheets to this cover sheet and sign and date the cover sheet.

RECOMMENDED / DEFERRED
Date / Chairperson’s Name
(Printed) / Chairperson’s Name
(Signature)

CHAIR’S EVALUATION SUMMARY

FACULTY REVIEW COMMITTEE: SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

The purpose of this form is for the Chair to summarize the comments from each reviewer’s Evaluation Worksheet. For each of the content and competency evaluation criteria established below, an answer of ‘NO’ by the faculty review team must be explained in detail, as verbatim comments will be returned to the nominating institution.

Course Prefix/Number/Title: ______

RESUBMISSION: Yes No

CONTENT VALIDITY

(Must meet 1-3 below).

1. Indicate the content criterion for which this course is nominated.

___ HI1 (History)

___ SS1 (Economic or Political Systems)

___ SS2 (Geography)

___ SS3 (Human Behavior, Culture, or Social Frameworks)

Does the nominated course meet the designated content criterion?

Yes No

If no, why? (Please be as specific as possible).

2. Does the course provide students with the opportunity to use the social or behavioral sciences to analyze and interpret issues?

Yes No

If no, why? (Please be as specific as possible).

3. Does the course provide students with the opportunity to use the social or behavioral sciences to understand diverse perspectives and groups?

Yes No

If no, why? (Please be as specific as possible).

COMPETENCY REQUIREMENTS

(Must meet 1 AND either 2 OR 3 below).

1. Is there evidence in the nomination materials that students who successfully complete the requirements for this course will have developed their skills in critical thinking?

Yes No

If no, why? (Please be as specific as possible).

2. Is there evidence in the nomination materials that students who successfully complete the requirements for this course will have developed their skills in written communication?

Yes No N/A

If no, why? (Please be as specific as possible).

3. Is there evidence in the nomination materials that students who successfully complete the requirements for this course will have developed their skills in technology?

Yes No N/A

If no, why? (Please be as specific as possible).

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION BY FACULTY REVIEW COMMITTEE

Does the course meet the required content and competency criteria?

Yes No

If no, the course is not recommended for placement into the gtPathways curriculum.

If yes, the course is recommended for placement into the gtPathways curriculum.

Revised 12/19/2011

Chair’s Cover Sheet & Evaluation Summary: gtPathways Review – SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Colorado Department of Higher Education Pg. 1