CEG – Governance Workshop
CEG – Governance Workshop
21/07/16
Each group was tasked with creating a governance model which dealt with two specific principles as set out by LGA’s principles of good governance.
This was in the context of a hypothetical scenario laid out in the task sheet on pages 2 and 3.
Workshop Task Sheet
GROUP 1
Attendee / OrganisationCaroline Court / Cornwall Council – Public Health
Ian Smith / VSF
Dr Robin Kirby / Falmouth University
Jane Cashmore / Truro/Penwith College
Kate Kennally / Cornwall Council
Philippa Dowling / Cornwall Council
Richard Williams / Cornwall Council
Cath Robinson / Cornwall Council
Principles of good governance / Questions to consider
Civic Leadership / Leadership includes the capacity to develop a vision for an area coupled with a governance arrangement that can ensure effective and accountable delivery of this vision. / Who makes the decisions, at a strategic level and at a local level? How do you ensure decisions are made effectively?
Transparency and efficiency / Transparency is fundamental not only in building trust and confidence in the political process, but also in ensuring efficiency. / How does the model contribute to transparency about who makes decisions, on what issues, when, why and how?
Model
Key discussions
- One overarching organisation
- Assembly?
- Current system complex, therefore hard to access and understand
- Simple structure required
- Mayor
- Would need public buy-in to consider
- Potential Mayor with expert input from deputy?
- Voting mechanism
- Does Cornwall have power over voting system in 2025?
- Mandatory voting?
- Reduce voting age?
- Cultural Catchment
- Allow local people to establish area they feel culturally affiliated with
Summary
Principle / Details of governance arrangementsCivic Leadership /
- Highly visible top strata sets direction as hybrid model balancing democracy and expertise
- Strategic body brings in representatives from functions
- Community level have devolved budgets, deal with local priorities
- Both strategic body and community level scrutinized by Councillors
Transparency and efficiency /
- Simplified structure for easier navigation of public sector
- Overarching body sets vision, freeing up capacity for strategic leadership
- Sight lines show decision making chain
GROUP 2
Attendee / OrganisationAllister Young / Coastline Housing
Phil Kennedy / Devon and Cornwall Police
Steve Matthews / JCP
Ian Knight / HCA
Phil Mason / Cornwall Council
CC Paula Dolphin / Councillor
Clare Salmon / Cornwall Council
Oliver Baines / GREG
Adam Birchall / Cornwall Council
Christopher Roy / Cornwall Council
Principles of good governance / Questions to consider
Accountability / Are sound arrangements in place to ensure that there is effective scrutiny of decision-making by those seeking to hold the executive to account (non-executives, the public, other parties)? / Does the governance model ensure that decision-makers are held to account, how?
Business engagement / Does the model provide for the effective involvement of local business interests?
What role will local enterprise partnerships (LEPs) play in governance? / How are local businesses involved?
Model
Key discussions
- Democracy vs Expertise
- 70% of budget – need expert input
- CEOs of public services elected?(Too busy for democratic process)
- Elected members given direct assistance from appointed experts
- Inclusion of under-represented
- Encourage diverse representation through work-friendly model with pay
- One combined public services organisation with powers/bodies underneath
- Is Cornwall the right scale?
- Similar to German models (e.g.Stuttgart > 2 million population)
- Include Plymouth, due to current draw in East Cornwall?
- Has to be level of regional co-operation, but not another layer of government
- Town and Parish Councils
- Don’t have enough responsibility - double devolution needed?
- Could Towns have Mayors? Highest voted councillor becomes mayor
- Will public sector become likea business in 2025?
- New strands of income likely to be required
- E.g. European municipality models; single energy company public sector owned
- LEP
- Current lack of faith from businesses in CC – branding issue
- Therefore require LEP
- Broad strategic basis for governance
- Can set clear vision + culture
- E.g. Auckland Model
- Research is key to business involvement
- Intelligence hub, with joint access to intel
- John Lewis Partnership model
- Citizens have a stake in the business and share in the profits/losses
Summary
Principle / Details of governance arrangementsAccountability /
- Directly elected, small group of top level decision makers, accountable to the electorate
- Highly visible decision makers
- Scrutiny from political opposition
- Independent audit/scrutiny committee required
- Evidence-based decision making, through use/investment in intelligence
Business Engagement /
- One combined public services organisation
- Set clear vision and culture
- LEP required
- Key Principle: Invest in Intelligence and Research
- Intelligence hub with joint access
GROUP 3
Attendee / OrganisationEthna McCarthy / RCHT
Paul Walker / CC (CFRS)
Mike Dann / DWP
Jim Pearce / Devon and Cornwall Constabulary
Stephen Marks / Environment Agency
Matthew Barton / CC
Principles of good governance / Questions to consider
Effective decision-making / The importance of creating sound arrangements for the development of deliberative local democracy is essential. / How does the model support high quality decision making?
Public involvement / Does the governance model provide for effective public involvement in decision-making?
The creation of a devolved governance structure should ensure that there is proper public debate about important public policy choices. Do the processes of decision-making ensure the inclusion of citizen voices? / To what extent does your model involve the public and what form does this take?
Key discussions
- Engagement of all groups
- Trying to ensure representational democracy that reflects Cornwall demographics
- Empowering decision-making to others
- Be less risk averse
- Balance of democracy
- Synergy required between the ‘traditional’ representational democracy and ‘newer’ forms of participatory democracy
- Could introduce new electoral system that allowstop-up of ‘seats’ on council/assembly allocated to under-representedgroups
- Develop bottom up model of governance
- Need to recognise communities of influence don’t respect traditional boundaries
- Incentivised voting
- Are there any ways in which we can we can incentivise voting?
- Can we use referendums to determine key decisions – such as the introduction of a tourist tax for Cornwall?
- How can we engage more effectively with the online community?
- Take into account that society will become increasingly emotive, reactionary and aggressive, as well asdemographic projections etc.
- Need to harness that ‘social energy’ by creating a model of governance that balances representational and participatory democracy.
- E.g. participatory budgeting the norm and not the exception!
- Opportunity to consider new electoral systems for 2021
- E.g. proportional representation or the ‘alternative vote’ system, with top-up for underrepresented minority groups
- Turn governance on its head
- Get clearer distinction/relationship between local and strategic decision-making
- Default should be all decisions are made at local level, rather than other way around
Summary
Principle / Details of governance arrangementsEffective Decision-making /
- Be less risk averse in empowering decision-making to others
- Define relationship between local and strategic decision-making
- Default should be locally-made decision making
Public Involvement /
- Ensure representational democracy of all demographics
- Balance of representational democracy and new participatory models
- Introduce ‘top-up’ of seats allocated to underrepresented groups
- Incentivise voting?
- Use referendums on key issues e.g. a tourist tax?
- Develop better ways to engage with online community
- Consider new electoral systems
1