Calculation of Ratios:
Ratio / 2003 / 2004Current Ratio = Current Asset Current Liability / 0.87 / 0.90
Long-Term solvency Ratio = Total Asset / Total Liability / 1.38 / 2.06
Contribution Ratio = Largest Revenue Source/ Total Revenue / 0.51 / 0.49
Management Expense Ratio = Management Expense/Total Expense / 0.282 / 0.226
Program Expense Ratio = Program Expense/Total Expense / 0.718 / 0.774
Revenue Expense Ratio = Total Revenue/Total Expense / 0.945 / 0.111
(Calculation is attached as Excel Sheet. Calculation is done in work sheet “Ratios”)
Importance of Ratios:
Current Ratio: Current ratio measures the capability of the company in paying current liability. Higher the current ratio, better the liquidity position of the company. Generally, a current ratio of 2:1 is considered as good.
Current Ratio = Total Current Asset / Total Current Liability
Current ratio of XYZ organization is improving from 0.75 in year 2002 to 0.90 in year 2004. It indicates that organization is having good liquidity and capable of paying current liability. XYZ has actually improved its liquidity position.
Long-Term solvency Ratio: Long-term solvency ration measure a company's ability to meet interest and principal payments on long-term debt and similar obligations. It is the best indicator for assessing long-term solvency risk is a firm’s ability to generate earnings over a period of years.
Long-Term solvency Ratio = Total Asset / Total Liability
Long-Term solvency ratio has improved from 1.26 in year 2002 to 2.06 in year 2004. It means that XYZ has improved its ability to meet log-term debt obligations and its log-term solvency is intact.
Contribution Ratio: Contribution ratio is defined as a ratio of largest revenue from a source and total revenue. This ratio tells how much a particular source of revenue contributes to gross margin of the company. It also indicates the dependence of generating profit of a company on a single source.
Contribution Ratio = Largest Revenue Source/ Total Revenue
Contribution ratio of XYZ is very near to 0.5, which means single source is contributing about half of the gross margin. XYZ should decrease the dependence on single source.
Management Expense Ratio: Management expenses includes marketing, administrative costs, sales cost. It is not operating expense. High Management expense ratio is not considered good. Any company will try to reduce its management expenses to control cost.
Management expense ratio is defined as the management expense as a percentage of total cost.
Management Expense Ratio = Management Expense/Total Expense
Management Expense ratio has decreased from 29.6% in year 2002 to 22..6% in year 2004. It is a good indication and shown that XYZ has been able to control its management expenses.
Program Expense Ratio: Program Expense ratio is very important for Non-profit organizations. It indicates how much of the total expenses of a non-profit organization is program related. High program expense ratio indicates that non-profit organization is more efficient and it helps the organization in fund raising. Generally Program expense ratio more than 75% is considered as good.
Program Expense Ratio = Program Expense/Total Expense
Program expense ratio has improved from 70.4% in year 2002 to 77.4% in year 2004. It means XYZ is improving its efficiency and it will help it to raise fund in future.
Revenue Expense Ratio: Revenue expense ratio tells what is company’s revenue for each dollar spent by the company. High revenue expense ratio is considered as good and indicates that company is efficient. Generally, for a commercial firm, Revenue expense ratio is greater than but for a non-profit organization Revenue Expense ratio may be below 1.
Revenue Expense Ratio = Total Revenue/Total Expense
In year 2002, XYZ was having Revenue-Expense ratio below 1. By year 2003, XYZ has achieved Revenue expense ratio of 1.11 and became profit making. This may be the result of improving efficiency and controlling cost.
Overall, XYZ Organization is in good financial health. Its has enough liquidity and capability to meet short term as well as long term debt obligations. Organization is improving its financial health and efficiency.
Calculation of fixed cost, variable costs, and break-even point:
(Calculation done in excel sheet. Worksheet “Costs”)
Purpose, advantages, disadvantages, and type of feedback provided by a
line item, performance, and program budget:
Line Item Budget: In Line item budget, the individual financial statement items are grouped together by cost centre or departments. It helps in comparing past financial data with current one. Another advantage to line-item budgets is that they are clear and simple to read. Sometimes line-item budget provides little information on the overall use of fund and so, it is hard to justify the amount allocated to a particular line item.
Program budget: In Program Budget, expenditures are based primarily on programs of work and secondarily on character. Proposed expenditure in the budget is set by analyzing functions . It allows top management to focus on objectives for which funds are allocated. It is easy to find for which function fund is used. However, program budget does not properly evaluates performance.
Performance Budget: Performance budget is compilation of programs and activities of different departments. It focuses on objectives and goals of different departments. There are three major elements to it.:
- Final Outcome
- Various ways to achieve the outcome
- Actual action to achieve the outcome
Advantage of performance budget is, it is easy to segregate good activities from those which are not expected to give desired result. It outlines the achievements viz.-a-viz. financial outlay set and goals set for each activity. However, using performance budget is not easy. It is very detailed and lengthy.
Approaches to fund development
All non-profit organizations need money .Traditionally this is known as fund raising. Fund development is creating a constituency which supports the organization because it deserves it and it is developing a membership that participates through giving (both as volunteers and financially). Fund development is more than fund raising. In fund raising, you appeal to the heart of the contributor which forces the contributor to donate to for charity. In fund development you appeal not just to the heart, but also to the head in an effort to build a continuing effort and solid base for the future.
The most common and traditional type of fund development is through fundraising. The most popular way of fund raising is from local donors. Local support can be acquired through creating awareness among the local people. Make them understand the work Non-profit organization is doing. A sponsored community walk may be helpful. Another way of fund raising is through Silent Auction. A large base of donors can be acquired by advertising, using word of mouth, having members spread over large geographical area. For a popular organization which is involved in a program which is rated high by local people, there may be plenty of donors who can contribute money, goods as well as services.
Second traditional way of fund development is through the contribution of members which can be membership fee or annual obligatory donation. A member of the non-profit organization is aware of the needs of the organization. The success of the organization means individual success of the member. So, members may be asked to pay an annual membership fee which can be utilized for funding programs. This method is followed by many churches. This is also a main source of fund of Rotary International where members are asked to contribute for charity and social programs. The organization may try to increase the membership base to raise more fund. More members do not only contribute in terms of money but in terms of loyalty, popularity, faith and service also. An organizations having more members is able to raise more fund from local contributors as well. They also help the organization in conducting more number of programs covering more geographical area giving access to more potential donors.
A non-traditional way of fund development is entrepreneurial way. As fund development is not just fund raising but having alliances for future also, the entrepreneurial way contracts high net worth individuals, other organizations as well as government. They become a key stakeholder. As a key stakeholder, they may ask to be a part of management also. In return, they provide financial stability to the organization. This kind of joint venture is beneficial for the organization as well as the other party. For example for government, government has the access to the resources, reach and expertise of the non-profit organization which can be utilized for social development. In return, government takes care of the financial needs of the organization through grants and other means.
Another non-traditional way of fund development is through campaign and promotion. promotion and campaign increases the visibility of the organization. It generates awareness in market about the work the organization is doing and how that work is beneficial for the society. The non-profit organization tries to convince the people that organization is involved in doing good work and the fund raised by the organization will be put into good use. This helps the organization in acquiring more potential clients and users. Well devised marketing strategy will allow the organization in communicating with the potential contributors and targeting the individuals who are ready to donate. This type of fund development has long term advantage. The organization builds reputation, base and reach in society which will help the organization in future as well.
Reference:
Drucker, Peter F. (1990) Managing the Non-Profit Organization, HarperBusiness
K.Gayithri (2006) Better Program Delivery through Budgetary Reforms -A Program Performance Budget Approach
Roth, Stephanie (2001) “Creating a Culture of Fundraising in your Organization” Grassroots Fundraising Journal Vol. 20, No. 9 Chardon Press