Assessment Report for the Department of Political Science

July 1, 2007-June 30, 2008

PROGRAM ASSESSED: Department of Political Science, B.A. Program

Assessment Coordinator: Donna M. Schlagheck, Chair, PLS

Year 4 of a 5 Year Cycle

  1. Assessment Measures Employed:

-all graduating majors (32) and minors (13) were surveyed anonymously;

-all majors and minors participated in exit interviews with the Chair;

-selected employers of our graduates were interviewed;

-samples of student writing (PLS 367,370, 454, 460, and 486) were evaluated

to assess whether they demonstrate the analytical writing and critical thinking which are central goals of the program.

  1. Assessment Findings

-Objective One: Students will secure employment in their chosen field.

Findings: Seniors and new alumni report mixed success due to economic conditions in the MiamiValley. Three reported converting internships to fulltime employment upon graduation. Graduates who have relocated to Washington, DC report a high level of success finding work in their chosen field. Other placements include law firms, commissioned officers in the armed services, the US Foreign Service, and employment in the office of a member of Congress.

-Objective Two: Students will gain admission to law or graduate school.

Findings: 1 of 3 was admitted to graduate school; 6 of 8 applicants were admitted to law school, including Case Western Reserve.

Objective Three: Graduates will be prepared to assume their roles as effective and informed citizens.

Findings: All exit interviewees confirmed they were registered to vote. One is currently running for the Ohio legislature. Three others work in a local Member of Congress’ district office. One is heading a local Obama campaign office.

Learning Outcome #1:Students will be effective writers.

Findings: Employer interviews at NASIC and a local attorney’s office confirm the critical nature of this skill, and how central it is in hiring decisions. Evaluation of papers written in upper-division political science classes indicates that effective writing is produced by students in these advanced classes.

Learning Outcome #2:Students will be able to produce policy analyses.

Findings: NASIC and Congressional employers affirm that our graduates possess and can apply this skill. Evaluation of student writing in policy analysis courses also affirms this skill has been achieved.

Learning Outcome #3:Students will have strong critical thinking skills.

Findings: Employers and intern supervisors have offered high praise of student alumni analytical writing and critical thinking.

  1. Program Improvements

Expansion of student internships has occurred, primarily due to the presidential election year and the work of our faculty member centrally responsible for these active learning field experiences.

The department also plans to re-invigorate its student honorary society, Pi Sigma Alpha, to deepen alumni/student networking.

  1. Assessment Plan Compliance

No deviations from plan.

  1. New Assessment Developments

Assessment data will be reviewed at the department’s winter 2009 strategic planning workshop.

1