Approved Centre IV Feedback Form – Ref: AB/QA/0011/Sept15/V3

This form should be completed by the Internal Verifier afterthe assessment decisions have been made by the Assessor and before feedback is issued to Learners. If the Internal Verifier does not agree with the Assessor’s judgement then clear actions should be set and the sample adjusted if necessary. When work is re-presented by the Assessor,IV comments and further sample details should be added in another colour, thus enabling CMI to see the original assessment decision was over-turned and monitor the actions taken by the Assessor. Both Assessor and IV must sign and date this IV feedback form each time additional information is added.

Qualification Title and Level:
Assessor Name:
IV Name:
Batch/Claim Details: Please list below the unit numbers and names of Learners for each unit that make up the entire claimand are represented by this IV report (add rows if required) Note:
Unit Number: / Name of Learner (s):
IV Sample Details: Please enter below the Learner names and Units you have sampled. Please indicate those Learners/units you have agreed/disagreed. For resubmitted work, please use a different colour to indicate subsequent assessment decisions– this will indicate to CMI that the original Assessor decision was overturned by the IVand enable CMI to monitor assessment process.
Learner Name / CMI Number / Unit(s) Sampled / Assessment Decision Agreed/
Disagreed / Notes
Internal Verifier Checklist / Yes/No / Actions/Comments
Have any internally written assignment briefs been authorised by CMI?
Has the Assessor ensured a Statement of Authenticity is included and is signed and dated by the Learner?
Has the Assessor ensured the Learner has adhered to CMI word-count?
Has the Assessor ensured that the Learner has applied appropriate referencing for use of all secondary sources?
Has the Assessor ensured the Learner has not included in Appendices any evidence required to meet the assessment criteria?
Has the Assessor ensured that Learners have generated sufficient evidence to demonstrate they have met the assessment criteria?
Has the Assessor ensured that the evidence presented is well structured and linked to the assessment criteria?
Has the Assessor included a Mark Sheet with formative and summative feedback for each unit?
Has the Assessor indicated on the Mark Sheets a pass/refer decision against each assessment criteria?
Has the Assessor signed and dated Mark Sheets?
IV comments on general performance of Learners in this sample / Yes/No / Actions/Comments
Was there evidence of the Learner’s ability to:
- grasp concepts
- link theory to practice
- communicate clearly in the relevant discipline at the expected level
IV comments to Assessor on quality of support to Learner / Yes/No / Actions/Comments
Has the assessor provided constructive feedback?
Has the assessor linked their feedback to the assessment criteria?
Has the assessor provided developmental(formative)
feedback to Learners?
Is the Assessor’s Feedback clear in terms of any actions required by the Learner?
General Feedback from IV to Assessor / Positive/Strengths
Developmental
IV should identify any training Needs/Changes to sample plan

Once remedial action has been completed Assessor and IV are required to sign to confirm that the assessment decision and feedback are 'fit for purpose'and Learner workfor this cohort/batch can be submitted to CMI for external moderation.

Assessor Name,Signature and Date / IV Name, Signature and Date
IV feedback discussed with Assessor
Actions (if required) completed
Batch ready for moderation
I hereby confirm that the Learner work meets all CMI requirements and is ready to be submitted to CMI for external moderation having been subject to internal quality assurance processes.
Signed:
Name: Date:

NB: CMI reserves the right to request all Learner work within this sample for external moderation.

1 | Page