Annual PerformanceEvaluation for Tenure-Track Faculty
Form revised 3/2017
Name:Academic Year:
Department:Date:
Academic Rank:___ Assistant Professor___ Associate Professor___ Professor
Form revised 3/2017
After completing and signing this performance evaluation, department chairs should (a) review and discuss with the faculty member his or her performance for the year, and (b) provide the faculty member with a copy of the evaluation. If the faculty member wishes to take exception to the chair’s review, a statement of exception should be noted below and stapled to the original of this form.
This form has three areas for evaluation: Teaching, Professional Life, and Service (including advising).
Signatures:
______
Department ChairDate
By signing below the faculty member indicates that he or she has read and received a copy of the department chair’s evaluation. Faculty should also initial below as appropriate:
____ The chair has discussed this evaluation with me.
____ A statement of exception is attached.
______
Faculty MemberDate
______
Vice President and Dean of the CollegeDate
Chair’s Evaluation—Teaching
Please evaluate the teaching of the faculty member in light of the criteria for tenure and promotion. A thorough evaluation will include strengths, special areas of commendation, areas that need improvement in order to attain tenure and/or promotion, and recommendations for addressing those issues. Especially worthy of mention are the creation of new courses, large scale course revisions, implementation of innovative pedagogies, unusual level of offerings in the GST/INQ/HNRS programs and of independent studies, internships and/or student research, and attendance at teaching workshops/conferences. Please indicate if your evaluation is based upon additional sources of evidence, such as classroom visits or informal feedback from students.
Chair’s Evaluation—Professional Life
Form revised 3/2017
Check if secondary area of emphasis for this AY ______
Please evaluate the quality of the faculty member’s professional life (including the research agenda, professional engagement, professional activity, and professional productivity)in light of the criteria for tenure and promotion. A thorough evaluation will include strengths, special areas of commendation, areas that need improvement in order to attain tenure and/or promotion, and recommendations for addressing those issues.
Chair’s Evaluation—Service
Form revised 3/2017
Check if secondary area of emphasis for this AY ______
Please evaluate the faculty member’s advising and service to the department and the institutionin light of the criteria for tenure and promotion. A thorough evaluation will include strengths, special areas of commendation, areas that need improvement in order to attain tenure and/or promotion, and recommendations for addressing those issues.
Form revised 3/2017