Course Code: / Name of Course: / Course Co-ordinator:
Major Code: / Name of Major: / Major Co-ordinator:
AQF: / Field of Education: / Credit Value:
Availabilities:
Location
Internal ☐
Curtin Online ☐
Curtin OUA ☐
Curtin Sarawak ☐
Other offshore locations ☐
Articulation Partners:
Course Completion Requirements:
Accreditation Status:
Course Entry Requirements:
ALIGNING LEARNING OUTCOMES
Curtin University Graduate Attributes / Brief description / Course/Major Learning OutcomesA graduate of this course can: / Professional Competencies/Standards
- Apply discipline knowledge, principles and concepts
- Think critically, creatively and reflectively
- Access, evaluate and synthesise information
- Communicate effectively
- Use technologies appropriately
- Utilise lifelong learning skills
- International perspective
- Cultural understanding
- Apply professional skills
Course Structure Form
Insert Course Structure Form here provided by Courses Management.
AQF Specifications Learning Designer and/or Course Coordinator
Accrediting authorities and those developing qualifications for accreditation must adhere to the AQF specification for this qualification type.
Please insert appropriate AQF Specifications table. CRO
First Year Curriculum Design to support retention (Kift 2009)
(To be considered when issues around retention have been identified).
Dimensions / CommentsTransition /
- Orientation and transition needs coherently and relevantly mapped to crucial time periods
- Management of Unit Coordinators or other teachers in the Y1 who are new to first year teaching
- Students provided with opportunity to self-assess their entry knowledge, skills and attitudes against discipline expectations
- Clear and consistent communication to commencing students regarding expectations and responsibilities
- Information provision about programs, processes and procedures pre-enrolment clear, accurate, consistent, and sufficiently detailed for informed choice and effective action
Diversity /
- Characteristics of Y1 cohort (diversity and their needs are determined)
- Access to academic, technical and other support assistance; communication just in time
- Self-assessment learning and support needs
- Flexibility in curriculum design to support diversity
- Exposed to a variety of learning engagement and assessment tasks
Design /
- Y1 curriculum objectives and coherence
- Intentional sequencing and integration of knowledge, skills and application of knowledge/skills
- Transition mapped out and curriculum scaffolds tertiary learning
- Co-curricular activities designed to support formal learning
- Exposed to a variety of learning engagement and assessment tasks
Engagement /
- Variety of engaging pedagogies
- Includes collaborative learning to facilitate social interaction
- Supplementary support eg PASS, JumpStart, peer mentoring
- Student – staff interactions
- Space and opportunity for intentional social interaction (importance of building friendships)
Assessment /
- Coherent and integrated strategy; manageable for students and staff; variety of types
- Consistency in course expectations between units
- Increase in complexity over time
- Early low stakes assessment where students receive feedback (at least one by Wk 4-5)
- How do students interpret and act on feedback provided?
Evaluation /
- Review of success of program with good outcomes
- Evidence based curriculum design
- First year staff included in evaluation and outcomes
- PD for Y1 teaching staff
- Strategy for managing student disengagement eg non-attendance, non-participation, fail, non-submission of assessment
SPK, v. Version,
Title / Curtin-OUA: SPK, v.Version,
Title / Credit Value:
Unit Coordinator: / Ext.
FOE: / OUA Unit Coordinator: / Ext. / Is this offered at Miri Sarawak? ☐Yes ☐No
Requisite(s): Enter Requisite SPK Title and Type of Requisition
Equivalent(s): Enter SPK, Version and Title of any active or planned equivalents / Result Type: / Year / Study Period: ,
Syllabus:
The syllabus must be less than 1275 characters in length, presented in a paragraph statement not list format. It provides a concise description of broad knowledge, skills and activities.
Learning Design / Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs)
Enter Unit Learning Outcome. Each outcome is to begin with a lower case letter, if a single outcome consists of more than one sentence, use a semi-colon followed by lower case. / Level of thinking / Course Learning Outcomes / Professional Competencies/Standards
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Unit Assessment
(See Appendix 3) / Assessment Task / Assessment Description / % / Week Due / ULOs
Max 3 / Type / Medium / Role / Supervision
1. / Enter Assessment Task (e.g. Marketing Environment and Conditions Report). / Enter Assessment Description (e.g. a meaningful description of the essay and the word count.
2.
3.
4.
WIL Descriptor: / Principal Assessor / Feedback / Moderation Arrangements / Strategies (See Appendix 4)
Authenticity Profile / Pre-Marking / Intra-Marking / Post-Marking
1.
2.
3.
4.
English Language Proficiency Descriptor / Indigenous Perspectives Descriptor
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Additional
Curriculum Elements / eg. Additional comments/remarks relevant to the course. / Courses
Management
& CTL Use only / UNIT CONTENT / CHANGED? / RECOMMENDATIONS
Unit Details / ☐Yes
Syllabus / ☐Yes
ULOs / ☐Yes
Assessments / ☐Yes
Tuition Pattern / ☐Yes
Curriculum Map Template_16Mar2016_ECPage 1 of 21
COURSE ANALYSIS CHARTS: LEARNING OUTCOMES CRO
COURSE ANALYSIS CHARTS - LEARNING OUTCOMES
COURSE ANALYSIS CHARTS - ASSESSMENT TASKS
COURSE ANALYSIS CHARTS - ASSESSMENT TASKS
COURSE ANALYSIS CHARTS - ASSESSMENT TASKS
COURSE ANALYSIS CHARTS - ASSESSMENT TASKS
COURSE ANALYSIS CHARTS - ASSESSMENT TASKS BY WEEK DUE
COURSE ANALYSIS CHARTS - ASSESSMENT TASKS BY WEEK DUE
COURSE ANALYSIS CHARTS - LEARNING EXPERIENCES
COURSE ANALYSIS CHARTS - LEARNING EXPERIENCES
Appendix 1: Unit learning outcomes and levels of thinking
Unit learning outcomes are what students are expected to be able to do upon successful completion of the unit. They begin with a strong action verb and describe specific tasks, preferably requiring students to develop higher order thinking skills (levels 4 to 6 in this table). For more information on creating quality unit learning outcomes, and specific information on the table below relating to Bloom’s Taxonomy, see
Level of Thinking (LOT) / Skills Demonstrated and Assessment Verbs1. Remembering
/ Observation and recall of information; knowledge of dates, events, places, materials, objects; knowledge of major processes or procedures; mastery of subject matter.
Unit learning outcome and assessment verbs: arrange, cite, collect, define, describe, duplicate, enumerate, examine, find, identify, indicate, label, list, locate, match, memorise, name, order, outline, quote, recall, recite, recognise, record, relate repeat, reproduce, retrieve, select, show, state, tabulate
2. Comprehending
/ Understand information, grasp meaning; translate knowledge into new contexts; interpret facts; compare and contrast; order, group, infer causes, predict consequence.
Unit learning outcome and assessment verbs: arrange, articulate, associate, classify, compare, contrast, describe, differentiate, discuss, distinguish, exemplify, expand, explain, express, extend, identify, illustrate, indicate, interpret, locate, match, outline, paraphrase, recognise, relate, report, restate, review, select, summarise.
3. Applying
/ Use information; use methods, concepts, theories in new situations; solve problems using required skills or knowledge; use equipment, tools.
Unit learning outcome and assessment verbs: administer, apply, calculate, chart, classify, collect, compute, control, convert, demonstrate, determine, develop, dramatise, draw, employ, estimate, execute, exhibit, illustrate, implement, manipulate, model, modify, operate, practice, prepare, relate, report, select, show, sketch, transfer, use, utilise.
4. Analysing
/ Discern patterns; organise parts; recognise hidden meanings; identify components, simplify complex information; metacognition.
Unit learning outcome and assessment verbs: analyse, calculate, categorise, classify, compare, contrast, correlate, deconstruct, detect, differentiate, discriminate, distinguish, examine, explain, interpret, organise, quantify, research, scrutinise, separate, sequence, subdivide, survey, test, translate.
5. Evaluating
/ Compare and discriminate between ideas; think critically, make judgments about worth (based on stated premises); assess the value of theories, make choices based on reasoned argument; verify or question the value of evidence.
Unit learning outcome and assessment verbs: appraise, argue, assess, categorise, choose, compare, conclude, contrast, critique, debate, decide, deduce, defend, discriminate, dispute, establish, estimate, evaluate, gauge, generalise, hypothesise, infer, interpret, judge, justify, measure, monitor, negotiate, predict, prioritise, propose, prove, rank, rate, recommend, relate, select, solve, support, validate, verify.
6. Creating
/ Combining ideas to develop an original idea or product, engage in creative thinking.
Unit learning outcome and assessment verbs: adapt, anticipate, assemble, change, communicate, compare, compile, compose, construct, create, derive, design, develop, devise, formulate, generate, hypothesise, improve, incorporate, infer, initiate, integrate, interpret, invent, make, modify, originate, plan, produce, reconstruct, revise, synthesise, transform, visualise.
Curriculum Map Template_16Mar2016_ECPage 1 of 21
Appendix 2: Learning Design Capabilities Scales
IndigenousThere is evidence:
2 / Core / This is a core unit focused on Australian Indigenous knowledge systems
1 / Embedded / Of at least one unit learning outcome, and consequently at least one assessment, explicitly naming aspects associated with Australian Indigenous knowledge systems
NE / Not Evident / There is no evidence in the unit
Global
There is evidence:
2 / Core / This is a core unit focused on global, international or transnational aspects of that discipline or profession
1 / Embedded / Of at least one unit learning outcome, and consequently at least one assessment, explicitly naming aspects associated with global, international or transnational aspects of that discipline or profession
NE / Not Evident / There is no evidence in the unit
Ethics
There is evidence:
2 / Core / This is a core unit focused on the ethics and/or ethical behaviour relevant to the discipline or profession
1 / Embedded / Of at least one unit learning outcome, and consequently at least one assessment, explicitly naming aspects associated with ethics and/or ethical behaviour relevant to the discipline or profession
NE / Not Evident / There is no evidence in the unit
Leadership
There is evidence:
2 / Core / This is a core unit focused on leadership principles to effect social change relevant to the discipline or profession
1 / Embedded / Of at least one unit learning outcome, and consequently at least one assessment, explicitly naming aspects associated with leadership principles to effect social change relevant to the discipline or profession
NE / Not Evident / There is no evidence in the unit
Research
There is evidence:
2 / Core / This is a core unit focused on research strategies relevant to the discipline or profession
1 / Embedded / Of at least one unit learning outcome, and consequently at least one assessment, explicitly naming aspects associated with research
NE / Not Evident / No evidence of research in the unit
PS / Note if a unit has a major focus on primary research, otherwise it will be assumed all other research is secondary research
Appendix 2: Learning Design Capabilities Scales (continued…)
English Language ProficiencyThere is evidence:
2 / Elective / This is an English for Academic Purposes elective unit, available to students identified as at risk of failing due to inadequate ELP.
1 / Embedded / ELP is articulated in unit Learning Outcomes, developed through explicit instruction (bolt-on or embedded), and included as task-specific elements in rubrics or marking guides for major weighted assessment tasks.
NE / Not Evident / There is no English language development addressed in this unit.
OR / Task type that includes instruction and/or assessment of ELP elements is Oral
WR / Task type that includes instruction and/or assessment of ELP elements is Written
Communication Skills
There is evidence:
2 / Core / This is a Communication Skills core unit.
1 / Embedded / Communication Skills are articulated in at least one unit learning outcome, and consequently at least one assessment, explicitly naming aspects associated with communication skills relevant to the discipline or profession
NE / Not Evident / There is no evidence of Communication Skills being addressed in this unit.
OR / Task type that includes instruction and/or assessment of Communication Skills elements is Oral
WR / Task type that includes instruction and/or assessment of Communication Skills elements is Written
ICT Literacy
There is evidence:
2 / Core / This is a core unit focussed on using digital technology to think critically, communicate, collaborate, create and share knowledge
1 / Embedded / Of at least one unit learning outcome, and consequently at least one assessment, explicitly naming aspects associated with using digital technology to think critically, communicate, collaborate, create and share knowledge
NE / Not Evident / There is no evidence in the course of topics associated with using digital technology to think critically, communicate, collaborate, create and share knowledge
Information Literacy
There is evidence:
2 / Core / This is a core unit focussed on accessing, evaluating, referencing and/or managing information resources relevant to the discipline or profession
1 / Embedded / Of at least one unit learning outcome, and consequently at least one assessment, explicitly naming aspects associated with accessing, evaluating, referencing and/or managing information resources relevant to the discipline or profession
NE / Not Evident / There is no evidence in the course of subjects associated with accessing, evaluating, referencing and/or managing information resources relevant to the discipline or profession
Work Integrated Learning (WIL)
HD / Highly Developed / WIL Highly Developed: Work or community-based experience
D / Developing / WIL evident in all unit learning outcomes which are verified by authentic assessment
E / Emerging / WIL evident in some unit learning outcomes which are verified by authentic assessment
NE / Not Evident / WIL Not Evident: no evidence of WIL
NA / Not Applicable / WIL Not Applicable: WIL is not applicable in this unit
ART_Curriculum Map Template_16Mar2016_EC.docx (Enter course number, name, date, initials) Page 1 of 21
Appendix 3 – Assessment Data Source
Details about Assessments are shown in the categories below:Type / Task (examples) / Medium (examples) / Role / Supervision / Authenticity / Principal Assessors / Feedback (examples)
Choose from: /
- Performance
- Submission
- Examination
- Test
- Presentation
- Reflection Investigation
- Exercise
- Work placement
- Laboratory
- Exam
- Take home Exam
- Essay
- Report
- Case study
- Dissertation
- Portfolio
- Written
- Oral
- Practical
- Performance
- Visual
- Calculations
- Combination
- Other
- Individual
- Pair
- Group
- Invigilated
- non-invigilated
- Highly developed (e.g. work placement, fieldwork)
- Developing (e.g. simulation, role-play or case study)
- Emerging (e.g. theoretical information based on workplace)
- Not evident
- Not applicable
- Teaching staff only
- Industry only
- Peer only
- Self only
- Teaching staff/industry
- Teaching staff/peers
- Teaching staff/self
- External
- Grade
- Mark
- Rubric
- Verbal
- Annotated script
- Group report
- Individual email
- Peer feedback
- Specific feedback sessions
- Other electronic means
- Audio feedback
- Audio/video
- Self-feedback
Appendix 4 – Assessment Moderation Arrangement / Strategies
Submission / Performance / ExaminationPre-Marking / Assessment task was reviewed (based on previous student performance) and updated prior to publication of Unit Outline / Unit coordinator and co-assessor design/review assessment task(s) and rubric/marking key(s) prior to publication of unit outline / Unit coordinator and co-examiner design/review assessment task(s) and marking key(s)
Assessment task was reviewed (based on previous student / staff feedback) and updated prior to publication of Unit Outline / Marking team to discuss & reach consensus on applying marking key/rubric / Students provided with details of exam structure
Assessment task is distinguished from, but comparable to, task used in previous study periods / Students provided with rubric/marking key / Marking team to discuss & reach consensus on applying marking key
Students provided with rubric/marking key / Explicit induction of external supervisors for placement / fieldwork assessment
Students provided with exemplars or marked exemplars / Students provided with placement manual (includes details of assessment)
Student conduct self or peer review using rubric/marking key
Intra-Marking / Second marking of sample of assessments / Second marking of fails where presentations are recorded / Second marking of all fails
Blind double marking (of clean copy) of sample of assessments by two independent assessors / Unit Coordinator to check sufficient information and justification provided to support fail grades
Anonymous marking (student identity hidden from marker)
Post-Marking / Check or second marking of borderline / All marks entered in grade centre; Review of distribution of marks / Spot check of outliers (high or low scoring assessments)
Spot check of outliers (high or low scoring assessments) / Check marking of all threshold (around grade boundaries eg 59/69/79/89) assessments
Check marking or second marking of all threshold (around grade boundaries eg 59/69/79/89) assessments / All marks entered in grade centre; Review of distribution of marks
Type of Assessment:
Submission - an assessment task for which the student submits an artefact for evaluation. The artefact may be electronic (text-based, non-text-based or media based) or physical. Assessments in this category are recognised to have low to medium academic integrity depending on the strategies implemented to address assurance of individual student learning and originality of student work.
Performance – an assessment task that involves the evaluation of a student performance or demonstration of a skill or competency. The performance may be live or recorded. Assessments in this category are recognised to have medium to high academic integrity depending on the strategies implemented to assure fair and transparent assessment practices through moderation
Examination – an assessment conducted under controlled and invigilated conditions. Assessments in this category are recognised to have medium to high academic integrity depending on the nature of invigilation and strategies implemented to assure fair and transparent assessment practices through moderation.
N/E = Unable to ascertain from the unit outline
ART_Curriculum Map Template_16Mar2016_EC.docx (Enter course number, name, date, initials) Page 1 of 21