AIS Steering Committee Meeting Minutes

AIS Steering Committee Meeting Minutes

IR&C Information Resources & Communications

User Provisioning Bi-weekly working session - 10/19/10 3:30-4:00 Ready Talk

ATTENDEES

Invited Attendees: David Walker/UCD, Arlene Allen/UCSB, Albert Wu/UCLA, Max Garrick/UCI, Dede Bruno/UCOP, Mary Doyle/UCSC, Datta Mahabalagiri/UCLA, Tony Merriweather/UCLA
Attendees Absent: Mary Doyle, Max Garrick
Guests: Not applicable

introduction, announcements, and Agenda review

  • User Provisioning P2 Team
  • User Provisioning P2 Next Steps
  • Wrap

Agenda Items

Item / Presenter / Notes
User Provisioning P2 Team- Volunteers for next steps/detail design / David /
  • Consultants/Attend meetings, review documentation and progress, provide architectural advice – David Walker, Arlene Allen
  • Detail Design Working Team – Albert Wu, Datta Mahabalagiri, Tony Merriweather and will continue with implementation of admin apps move from UCSB->UCLA (confirmed with Albert after meeting)
  • Albert, Datta, and Tony will provide resources needed for Detail Design at 11/5 meeting.

User Provisioning Phase 2 Next Steps / David /
  • David has a call into Steve Benedict to check on how the contract/negotiations are going with the Service Now vendor; Service Now is currently installed at UCLA, not sure if other campuses are planning to install/have already installed it. Service Now would be a good test of vendor willingness/ability to work with a common UC middleware. Update: David is trying to talk with Steve.
  • Confirm best candidate for User Provisioning Project based on David’s findings and update from Albert/Arlene (at 11/5 meeting)
  • Per Arlene, the UCSB->UCLA admin apps move is theoretically viable but practically a bad idea due to local budget constraints and severe lack of resources at UCSB.
  • Per Arlene, the provisioning on the UCSB side for UCSB->UCLA move will be done the ‘old fashioned’ way, with extracts using existing tools.
  • Design can move forward w/out knowing the specific application.
  • Question – could UCLA do the IDP & SP work on the middleware and thus this could still be a viable candidate? Even though UCLA will do the SP work and a lot of the IDP side work, there will still need to be SB involvement. SB would need to do some of the work and would need additional resources in order to do that.

Wrap / Dede /
  • Schedule meeting to prep for Detail Design Readout with Albert, Datta, Tony – done, 10/25
  • Schedule Detail Design Strategy Readout with larger team, done - 11/5
  • Will schedule further ongoing checkpoint meetings for detail design after the 11/5 meeting.

Decisions

N/A

ACTION ITEMS

List action items including item, person the item is assigned to, and the expected completion date.

Action Item / Assigned to / Completion Date / Status
  • Determine who will continue to participate from the High Level Design phase – all (at next meeting)
/ Team / 10/21 / Completed
  • Find out which campuses have Service Now installed and status of vendor negotiation/plans for future installations via conversation with Steve Benedict – David (provide update at next meeting)
/ David / 11/5 / In Progress
  • Provide update on UCSB->UCLA project – Albert/Arlene (at next meeting)
/ Arlene/Albert / 11/5 / In Progress
  • Confirm best candidate for User Provisioning Project based on David’s findings and update from Albert/Arlene (at next meeting)
/ Team / 11/5 / In Progress

Author: Dede Bruno, UCOP – IT Project Office Page 1 of 2 Date: 5/24/2019