SHORTENED VERSION OF TITLE 3
↑ ↑ ↑
Remember this. Look, the running head is in all caps! Page numbers are required
A 12 Point, Times New Roman Font Title With Capitalized Letters Detailing the Lab Name
My Name
My College Where I Wrote the Paper
Author Note:
I start tabbed over here and include details about when the lab was conducted (i.e. the date and class the study was a part of), who helped out, how someone can contact me, and any special thanks necessary. I am also double-spaced.
After the author note, I will include a page break before the abstract.
↑ Abstract
Look, the words “Running head” are gone! ↑
I am centered, but not bolded
A good rule of thumb for the abstract is to have one sentence per section. First, write one introductory sentence. Second, write one methods sentence. Third, write one results sentence. Fourth, write one concluding sentence summing up the important findings of the study. It is often helpful to write the abstract last, after finishing all other parts of the paper.
I will insert a page break after the abstract because the introduction to my report should be at the beginning of a new page.
The title on this page is the same as the cover page.
↓
A 12 Point, Times New Roman Font Title With Capitalized Letters Detailing the Lab Name
↑
This title is not in bold and is not labeled “introduction” even though it starts the introduction.
An introduction should include a brief description of the topic area and the lab. For example, what is social psychology and how does it relate to social influence? The format of your introduction should resemble an inverted triangle with the most broad subject at the beginning of the intro and a more specific look at the paper towards the end. The introduction is a mini-paper about the current subject/study and should read as if you are re-writing your notes from lab, articles that were read for the course, or other studies that you find on your own and relate to the current subject. Using notes from the articles will be necessary for a good introduction, but a great introduction will mention articles that you found on your own.
The last paragraph of the introduction will describe various aspects of the study such as the independent variable (or variables), the dependent variable, the method that will be used to collect data (i.e. coding sheets, direct observation, etc.), and the hypothesis. You will also want to include relevant aspects of the experimental design that have been chosen for this particular study. For example, why would we code videos to learn about families? By the end of the introduction, the reader should have a general understanding about what the current study is examining and how it will be accomplished.
See last page of paper for instructions regarding in-text citations.
Method
↑
I am centered and bolded.
Participants→ I am aligned on the left and in bold
Under this subheading of the methods section is where you describe the people who served as subjects in your study. Participants does not refer to researchers and those involved in conducting the study, only the people you collected data from. Describe the number of participants, how many males and how many females, their age range (i.e. ranged in age from 18-22), and any other demographic information relevant to your study. Generally, the more detail, the better. Describe the selection criteria for participants. Describe any incentives offered to participants for involvement (i.e. course credit, etc.). If no incentives were offered, state that instead.
If your lab report is on a study that used animals instead of people, use the term “subjects” instead of “participants.”
Materials→ I am aligned on the left and in bold
In the materials section, you will describe (in paragraph form) any relevant materials that were used in order to conduct the experiment. For example, you will want to describe objects such as stopwatches, chemicals, pipettes, coding sheets, and special equipment like scales or BIOPAC. Professional papers will not only mention what type of equipment is used, but will go as far as to record the brand of equipment and serial numbers if available. However, there are some materials used in experiments that are not necessary to include in the materials section. If researchers recorded data with a black pen, it is not necessary to list their pen in a materials section unless someone could claim that using another color would affect the results. Sometimes pen color can be very important, but if pen color (or other materials) are not necessary for replication purposes, you do not need to include them in this section. After reading the materials section, someone should be able to use the listed materials to reconstruct the present study.
Procedure→ I am aligned on the left and in bold
This section accomplishes two things: the experimental design and the procedure followed. It is helpful to keep in mind that there is a distinction between what went into designing the procedure and the actual procedure itself.
For the experimental design component, note how groups were formed (by gender, age, etc.). Make sure you explicitly specify the operational definitions of the INDEPENDENT VARIABLES and how they were manipulated, and the operational definitions of the DEPENDENT VARIABLES and how they were measured. Then, describe how random selection of participants (or subjects) was established, and how participants were assigned to conditions. The last part of the experimental design component is to describe any control features that were included to help eliminate confounding variables.
In the procedure component of this section, describe how you actually carried out the experiment. Include answers to the following questions: How and when were instructions given to participants? In what manner? Include a summary of the instructions provided to participants. Also, include a description of how data was collected, and the statistical analyses carried out. By the end of the procedure section, your reader should be able to replicate your study in the exact same way you conducted it.
Ethical Considerations→ I am aligned to the left and in bold
A section on ethics will not be crucial to some of the papers written for the class, but you should be aware of ethics during every study. When writing about whether or not a study is ethical, be sure to ground your claims in evidence. For example, if you claim that debriefing subjects may cause them to be more suspicious in the future, cite a reputable study that actually supplies evidence for this claim. Your ethics section should show your reader that the current study is ethical and provide outside evidence that supports your claims. You can include a discussion about ethics as its own section (as shown here) or as part of the procedure section above.
Results
↑
I am centered and bolded
This section is an objective description of your findings, without any interpretation (save that for the discussion section). The most important part of this section is to have strong, clear narrative describing your data in plain English. This description should take prominence over the presentation of numbers. You can choose to present descriptive numbers within the text, or separately in a table. Either way, make sure they are supplemental to your description, rather than the main focus of the section. For example, the description of the results of a t-test where the numbers are presented in text could be similar to the following: The groups were found to differ significantly from each other (t(21) = 2.34, p < .05), with the first group demonstrating a higher number (M = 26.00, SD = 2.00) than the second group (M = 16.00, SD = 4.20). Then, go on to describe the pattern of the data in more detail (are there outliers? trends?). It aids that description to include graphs and other figures, because that gives you more to talk about in terms of patterns. A note about presenting statistics in APA style: As shown in the above example, the letters representing different statistical things are all italicized (t, p, M, SD). When presenting the results of the t-test, italicize the lower-case t, then put the non-italicized degrees of freedom in a set of parentheses directly following the t. After the close-parentheses, there is a space, an equal sign, another space, and then the t-value. After the t-value is a comma, a space, an italicized p, a space and either a less-than or equal-to sign, another space, and then either the value that the p-value is below (usually .05, .01, or .001, if the less-than sign is used) or the exact p-value (if the equal-to sign is used). Similar guidelines go for reporting the descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation), with the M and the SD italicized, followed by a space, an equal sign, another space, and then the relevant value.
In order to present a correlation, there are different APA style guidelines to follow. A correlation tells you whether two variables are related to each other or not, whether they vary in relation to each other or not. Reporting the correlational statistics gives you the following information: the correlation coefficient tells you whether the correlation is positive or negative and the strength of the correlation; the p-value tells you the significance of the correlation. This is an example of reporting a correlation: There is a strong, negative correlation between variable A and variable B (r = -.78, p < .01). Then, go on to further describe the patterns seen in the data (scatter plots help a lot here). A note about APA style: as shown above, the letters representing statistical items are italicized (r and p). Within parentheses, put an italicized r, a space, an equal sign, a space, and the correlation coefficient, a comma, a space, an italicized p, a space, an equal or less than sign, a space, the p-value. And remember, a correlation does not imply causation.
All tables and figures should be numbered in order of presentation, and referred to by their numbers in the text (Figure 1, Table 1, etc.). It is your choice whether you include them within the results section, or as their own separate section at the end of the paper. Any table or figure you create must be verbally described in the results section. For formatting of tables and figures, see the end of this sample paper. Note that formatting for a table is different than formatting for a figure!
This section should also include any observations you made that may have influenced your results (i.e. observations from field notes). Be especially careful about not interpreting these results. Keeping the results section purely descriptive is a challenge, and remember that it’s okay if this section seems dry without interpretation -- that’s how it’s supposed to be! This section should have enough detail to support the conclusion you will be drawing in your discussion. Anything about your findings that comes up in the discussion should be described objectively in the results section.
Discussion
↑
I am centered and bolded
At the beginning of your discussion, be sure to briefly summarize the results of the study and what conclusions can be drawn from the data. You must tell the reader whether or not the results support the study’s hypothesis and, if not, why that may be. The discussion section is the place to analyze any unusual data patterns that were revealed in the results section. Once you have summarized the results of the study, you will want to link your conclusions back to material that you described in the introduction. How might the current data add to the larger body of work that was introduced in the beginning of your paper?
Remember, no study is perfect and every study will have several limitations. Your discussion should illuminate a few limitations, describe why they might be limiting factors, and illustrate how they could be controlled for in future research. You will want to focus on limitations that are relevant to the current study rather than basic limitations of psychological research. Moreover, it will be more beneficial to talk about one or two limitations in depth rather than simply listing a multitude of limitations without any evaluation or analysis.
Finally, remember to answer the “so what?” question. Why is the study important, why might the conclusions be worth future research, and how might the research be used to benefit the lives of others? Your discussion is the venue that shows the reader why they should pay attention to your research and how new scientific research can be used to augment past studies. Citing research articles that you found on your own is a fantastic way to show that you are thinking about how your study can be expanded and/or implemented and will supply evidence that your work is important.
Unlike the way in which your introduction was formatted, as if it were an inverted triangle, your discussion will read as if it was a regular triangle. Your first sentence will be very specific because it summarizes the details and conclusions that can be drawn from your data. On the other hand, your last paragraphs will act as the base of the triangle because they will concern broad and far-reaching subject matters, i.e. the importance of the study to the larger body of psychological research.
After the discussion, I will insert a page break before my reference section.
References
↑
I am centered, but not bolded
Remember, references appear in alphabetical order and the first line of the citation is aligned to the left. Use the hanging indent triangle in the ruler. Below, we will list some of the most common references.