STS Dossier Format and Checklist

Tenure Review

1. Chair’s Letter

_____ Chair’s Recommendation

2. Procedural Steps

_____ Procedural steps for conducting tenure review

_____ Copy of departmental guidelines on tenure and promotion for STS faculty

_____ Candidate’s Special Title Series position description

_____ (if applicable) Request for review by Area Committee different from that specified in the Administrative

Regulations

3. Personal Data

_____ Up-to-date curriculum vitae

_____ Copies of DOEs since the date of hire

_____ Copies of the two-page chair’s rating sheets from merit review since the date of hire

4. Progress Reviews

_____ Copies of all progress reviews conducted by the department

5. External Letters

_____ List of outside evaluators suggested by candidate

_____ List of outside evaluators selected independently by chair

_____ Credentials of outside evaluators (including CVs, if possible)

_____ Letters from outside evaluators (these must be signed and on letterhead)

6. Internal Letters

_____ Roster of department faculty members and their academic rank

_____ Letters from appropriate department faculty members

7. Teaching

_____ Teaching portfolio

Mandatory:

_____ personal statement on teaching: This can be a synthesis of material in the teaching section of the FMER

_____ a list of all courses taught since the date of hire (with the course number, title, number of students enrolled,

and a brief course description)

_____ numerical course evaluations for all courses taught

_____ representative course syllabi

Optional: sample assignments, examples of graded work, accomplishments of former students, peer evaluation reports, evidence of recognition such as teaching awards or grants, enumeration and description of work with individual students, etc.

8. Service

_____ Statement and materials on service

9. Administration

_____ A statement and materials on administration

10. Research

_____ Personal statement on research

_____ Research materials

11. Miscellaneous

(if applicable) Written evaluations of individual by:

_____ Undergraduate student group

_____ Professional or graduate student group

_____ Individual graduate students

_____ Other