/

LEONARDO DAVINIC HIGH SCHOOL

Match-Maker (Of Mice and Men)

/ PRESENTER: ______
PROJECT: ______
EVALUATOR: ______DATE: ______
CRITERIA
/

WEIGHT

/

UNSATISFACTORY

(Below Performance Standards) /

PROFICIENT

(Minimal Criteria) /

ADVANCED

(Demonstrates Superior Performance)

Structure, Organization and Features

Multimedia, Visuals and Project Completion / WE / ·  No formal introduction or introduction had no clear thesis statement nor offered any preview of topics to be discussed
·  Main ideas were not separated into a logical progression
·  Materials detracted from content or purpose of presentation or were of such low quality as to discredit speaker / ·  Introduction had clear thesis statement and a preview of topics to be discussed, including corporation name, logo and emblem
·  Main ideas were separated into a logical progression
·  Materials added, did not detract from presentation
·  Materials used were quality products; easy to see and hear / In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria …
·  Clever attention getting introduction or an imaginative preview
·  Ideas connected by original transitions, logical throughout; creative pattern
·  Speaker creatively integrated a variety of objects, charts and graphs to amplify the message
0 ------6 ------12 / 14 ------15 ------17 / 18 ------19 ------20
Character Analysis
Literary comprehension, textual evidence / CL / ·  Inaccurate picture of character personality
·  Little or no textual support when making claims of character traits
·  Insufficient client profile or uses irrelevant textual support / ·  Accurate character analysis including characteristics based on appearance, reputation, words and actions
·  Includes textual evidence to support claims of character traits and needs
·  Five accurate examples from novel in support of client (Mice and Men) character / In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria …
·  Analysis includes details and subtleties of character development including religious, political and life views or goals
0 ------3 ------6 / 7 ------8 / 9 ------10
Philosophy and Recommendation
Rationale and reasoning, Logical match / CT / ·  Superficial or vague philosophy
·  Recommendation based on limited textual evidence
·  Contradictory assumptions based on character analysis and recommendation / ·  Clearly defined philosophy highlighting guiding principles for character matching
·  Complex questions that elicit meaningful character traits
·  Presentation culminates with a detailed recommendation with convincing reasons for match
·  Recommendation reflects matching philosophy and system / In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria …
·  Philosophy integrates textual themes and philosophies studied over the year
·  Dynamic reasons, below superficial reading, for linking couples
0 ------3 ------6 / 7 ------8 / 9 ------10
Vocal ExpressionRate and Volume of Speech
Pitch, Articulation and
Pronunciation / OC / ·  Speaker was hard to hear or understand
·  Voice or tone distracted from purpose of presentation
·  Excessive use of verbal fillers / ·  Speaker was easy to hear and understand
·  Tone was conversational, but with purpose
·  Voice sounded natural, neither patterned nor monotone
·  Speaker pronounced words clearly, correctly and without verbal fillers / In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria …
·  Speaker was enjoyable to hear; used expression and emphasis
·  Speaker used voice to create an emotional response in audience
0 ------3 ------6 / 7 ------8 / 9 ------10

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: