LEONARDO DAVINIC HIGH SCHOOL
Match-Maker (Of Mice and Men)
/ PRESENTER: ______PROJECT: ______
EVALUATOR: ______DATE: ______
CRITERIA
/WEIGHT
/UNSATISFACTORY
(Below Performance Standards) /PROFICIENT
(Minimal Criteria) /ADVANCED
(Demonstrates Superior Performance)Structure, Organization and Features
Multimedia, Visuals and Project Completion / WE / · No formal introduction or introduction had no clear thesis statement nor offered any preview of topics to be discussed· Main ideas were not separated into a logical progression
· Materials detracted from content or purpose of presentation or were of such low quality as to discredit speaker / · Introduction had clear thesis statement and a preview of topics to be discussed, including corporation name, logo and emblem
· Main ideas were separated into a logical progression
· Materials added, did not detract from presentation
· Materials used were quality products; easy to see and hear / In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria …
· Clever attention getting introduction or an imaginative preview
· Ideas connected by original transitions, logical throughout; creative pattern
· Speaker creatively integrated a variety of objects, charts and graphs to amplify the message
0 ------6 ------12 / 14 ------15 ------17 / 18 ------19 ------20
Character Analysis
Literary comprehension, textual evidence / CL / · Inaccurate picture of character personality
· Little or no textual support when making claims of character traits
· Insufficient client profile or uses irrelevant textual support / · Accurate character analysis including characteristics based on appearance, reputation, words and actions
· Includes textual evidence to support claims of character traits and needs
· Five accurate examples from novel in support of client (Mice and Men) character / In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria …
· Analysis includes details and subtleties of character development including religious, political and life views or goals
0 ------3 ------6 / 7 ------8 / 9 ------10
Philosophy and Recommendation
Rationale and reasoning, Logical match / CT / · Superficial or vague philosophy
· Recommendation based on limited textual evidence
· Contradictory assumptions based on character analysis and recommendation / · Clearly defined philosophy highlighting guiding principles for character matching
· Complex questions that elicit meaningful character traits
· Presentation culminates with a detailed recommendation with convincing reasons for match
· Recommendation reflects matching philosophy and system / In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria …
· Philosophy integrates textual themes and philosophies studied over the year
· Dynamic reasons, below superficial reading, for linking couples
0 ------3 ------6 / 7 ------8 / 9 ------10
Vocal ExpressionRate and Volume of Speech
Pitch, Articulation and
Pronunciation / OC / · Speaker was hard to hear or understand
· Voice or tone distracted from purpose of presentation
· Excessive use of verbal fillers / · Speaker was easy to hear and understand
· Tone was conversational, but with purpose
· Voice sounded natural, neither patterned nor monotone
· Speaker pronounced words clearly, correctly and without verbal fillers / In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria …
· Speaker was enjoyable to hear; used expression and emphasis
· Speaker used voice to create an emotional response in audience
0 ------3 ------6 / 7 ------8 / 9 ------10
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: