Implementation Guidelines


Measures and Methods for the National Reporting System for Adult Education

february 2016

Division of Adult Education and Literacy
Office of Vocational and Adult Education
U.S. Department of Education
Contract No. ED-VAE-10-O-0107

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 100 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain a benefit (20 U.S.C. § 9121) and voluntary. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210-4537 or email and reference the OMB Control Number 1830-0027. Note: Please do not return the completed annual performance report to this address.



Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Page

Chapter I. History and Overview of the National Reporting System 1

History of the NRS 1

NRS Development Phases 1

Revisions and Clarifications 2

Overview of the NRS Measures and Methods 3

NRS Measures 3

Core Outcome Measures 7

Descriptive and Participation Measures 8

Secondary Measures 8

NRS Methodologies 9

NRS Guidebooks, Resources, and Revised Guidelines 10

Overview of This Document 12

Sources Consulted in Development of NRS Measures and Methods 13

Chapter II. NRS Measure Definitions and Data Collection Methods 15

Core Outcome Measures 15

Educational Gain 15

Educational Functioning Levels 22

State Responsibilities in Assessing and Measuring Educational Gain 23

Standardized Assessment 24

Placing Students in Educational Functioning Levels 27

Follow-up Outcome Measures 28

Follow-up Measure #1: Entered Employment 30

Follow-up Measure #2: Retained Employment 30

Follow-up Measure #3: Receipt of a Secondary School Diploma 31

Follow-up Measure #4: Entered Postsecondary Education or Training 31

Guidance for Collecting the Follow-up Measures: Survey Method 33

Conducting a Local Follow-up Survey 33

Universe or Sample Survey 33

Time Period for Conducting the Survey 35

Method for Identifying Follow-up Students 36

State Survey Instrument 37

Local Resources to Conduct Surveys 37

Staff Trained on Surveying 37

Procedures to Improve Response Rate 37

Database and Procedures for Survey Reporting 38

Guidance for Collecting Follow-up Measures: Data Matching 39

Data Matching Models 39

Implementing Data Matching 42

Technical Guidance for Data Matching 43

Procedures to Collect and Validate Unique Identifiers 43

Common Format for Matching 43

Time Period for Data Matching 43

Data System Produces Individual Students Records 43

Core Demographic, Status, and Participation Measures 44

Demographic and Status Measure Definitions 44

Demographic Measure #1: Race/Ethnicity 44

Demographic Measure #2: Gender 45

Demographic Measure #3: Age 46

Student Status Measure #1: Labor Force Status 46

Student Status Measure #2: Public Assistance Status 46

Student Status Measure #3: Disability Status 46

Student Status Measure #4: Rural Residency Status 47

Student Status Measure #5: Highest Degree or Level of School Completed 47

Teacher Status Measure #1: Total Years of Adult Education Teaching Experience 47

Teacher Status Measure #2: Teacher Certification 47

Student Participation Measures 48

Student Participation Measure #1: Contact Hours 48

Student Participation Measure #2: Program Enrollment Type 49

Secondary Student Status and Outcome Measures (Optional) 50

Optional Student Status Measures 51

Secondary Student Status Measure #1: Low-Income Status 51

Secondary Student Status Measure #2: Displaced Homemaker 51

Secondary Student Status Measure #3: Single Parent Status 52

Secondary Student Status Measure #4: Dislocated Worker 52

Secondary Student Status Measure #5: Learning-Disabled Adult 52

Secondary Student Status Measure #6: Learner Goals for Attending 52

Secondary Outcome Measures 53

Secondary Employment Outcome Measure: Reduction in Receipt of Public Assistance 53

Secondary Community Measure #1: Achieved Citizenship Skills 54

Secondary Community Measure #2: Voting Behavior 54

Secondary Community Measure #3: General Involvement in Community Activities 54

Secondary Family Measure #1: Involvement in Children’s Education 55

Secondary Family Measure #2: Involvement in Children’s Literacy-Related Activities 55

Work-Based Project Learner Outcome Measure: Completed Work-Based Project Learner Activity 55

Chapter III. The NRS Data Collection Process 57

The NRS Data Flow Framework 57

Data Collection: The Federal Role 58

Data Collection: The State Role 60

Assessment Policy 60

Follow-up Methodology 60

Secondary (Optional) Measures 61

Data Reporting Timelines and Formats 61

A System of Quality Control 61

Software or Technical Standards for Local Data Collection and Reporting 61

Ongoing Training and Technical Assistance to Local Programs 62

Data Collection: The Local Role 62

Model Data Collection Process 63

Local Data Collection Policies and Procedures 65

Local Staff Training Policies and Procedures 68

Chapter IV. Quality Control and Reporting 71

Data Quality Checklist 71

Data Foundation and Structure 71

Data Collection and Verification 71

Data Analysis and Reporting 71

Staff Development 72

Levels of Quality and Quality Improvement 72

Improving Data Quality 72

Training 72

Local Data Collection 73

Local Monitoring: Data Reviews and Data Auditing 74

Data Systems and NRS Reporting 75

General Software and Architecture Requirements 75

Data Structure and Inputs 76

Basic Data System Functions 76

Reporting Capabilities 78

Federal Reporting Tables 80

List of Appendices

Appendix A: Sample Surveys A–1

Appendix B: NRS Data Quality Checklist B–1

Appendix C: NRS Reporting Tables C–1

Appendix D: Comments and Responses on Proposed Educational Functioning Level Descriptors for Adult Basic Education D–1

Appendix E: New Educational Functioning Level Descriptors for Adult Basic Education E–1


LIST OF EXHIBITS

Page

Exhibit 1.1 Summary of NRS Measures and Definitions 4

Exhibit 1.2 Goals and Core Indicators of the WIA Adult Education and Family Literacy Act and NRS Core Outcome Measures 7

Exhibit 2.1 Functioning Level Table 16

Exhibit 2.2 Guidance for Evaluating Assessments Used for Measuring Educational Gain 29

Exhibit 2.3 Summary of Assessment Guidelines for Measuring Educational Gain 30

Exhibit 2.4 Student Population and Collection Time for Core Follow-up Measures 35

Exhibit 2.5 Quarterly Periods for Collecting Entered and Retained Employment 36

Exhibit 2.6 Summary of Follow-up Survey Guidelines 38

Exhibit 2.7 Example of Shared Interagency Database—Data Warehouse 41

Exhibit 3.1 National Reporting System Data Flow Framework 59

Exhibit 3.2 Summary: State NRS Policies and Procedures 62

Exhibit 3.3 Local Data Collection: A Model 64

Exhibit 3.4 Summary: Local Program Data Collection Policies and Procedures 68

Exhibit 3.5 Summary: Local Staff Training Policies and Procedures 69

Exhibit 4.1 Guidance for Selecting Student Record Software To Meet NRS Requirements 77

Exhibit 4.2 Recommended Data Structure for NRS Reporting and Analysis 78

Exhibit 4.3 Basic Data Elements and Functions for the NRS 79

Exhibit 4.4 Sample Tables for Examining Program Improvement and Program Effectiveness 82

NRS Implementation Guidelines iv


Chapter I. History and Overview of the National Reporting System

Chapter I. History and Overview of the
National Reporting System

The National Reporting System (NRS) is the accountability system for the federally funded, State-administered adult education program. It addresses the accountability requirements of the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act, Title II of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA—P.L.105–220). This document presents (1) the NRS measures that allow assessment of the impact of adult education instruction, (2) methodologies for collecting the measures, (3) reporting forms and procedures, and (4) training and technical assistance requirements to assist States in collecting and reporting the measures.

History of the NRS

The NRS was born in the 1990s, a decade known for its emphasis on accountability of Federal programs, when all publicly funded programs and agencies faced increasing pressures to demonstrate that they had met their legislative goals and had an impact on their client populations. The requirement to demonstrate program impact was mandated in 1993 through the Government Performance and Review Act (GPRA). GPRA required all Federal agencies to develop strategic plans to ensure that services were delivered efficiently and in a manner that best suited client needs and to develop indicators of performance to demonstrate their agency’s impact.

In 1995, the U.S. Congress considered eliminating adult education as a separate delivery system by integrating the program into a general system of workforce development. Strong and convincing data on the impact of adult education at the State and Federal levels were demanded to demonstrate its importance as a separate education program. In response to these demands, the State directors of adult education asked the Division of Adult Education and Literacy (DAEL) to work toward developing a national system for collecting information on adult education student outcomes.

To address these demands, DAEL devoted its March 1996 national meeting of State directors of adult education to developing a framework for program accountability. This framework specified the purposes of the adult education program and the essential characteristics of an accountability system and identified seven categories of outcome measures. At the March 1997 DAEL national meeting, a broad group of adult education stakeholders validated the framework, identified outcome measures for a new national reporting system, and discussed possible methodologies for the system. Based on these decisions, a project to design and develop the reporting system began in October 1997. The proposed voluntary nature of the NRS changed in August 1998 with the passage of WIA, which required an accountability system. The NRS mandate was then expanded to establish the measures and methods to conform to WIA requirements.

NRS Development Phases

The goals of the NRS project were to develop a national accountability system for adult education programs by identifying measures for national reporting and their definitions, establishing methodologies for data collection, developing standards for reporting to the U.S. Department of Education, and developing training materials and activities on NRS requirements and procedures. The development of the NRS proceeded in three phases.

The first phase, standardization, involved the development of standard measure definitions for State and local programs, standard data collection methodologies, and software standards for automated data reporting. In the summer of 1998, interim software standards were established, methodologies were identified for pilot testing, and draft definitions for use in the pilot test were distributed to adult education stakeholders.

The pilot test was the second phase of the project and was designed to have a small number of volunteer States and local programs test the draft measure definitions and proposed methodologies under realistic conditions. The pilot test assessed whether the draft measure definitions worked or needed to be refined. It also assessed costs, burden, and other difficulties in collecting the data using the proposed methodologies. The pilot test was completed in January 1999. Measures and methodologies were revised based on the pilot test.

The third phase of the project, training and technical assistance, which began in the summer of 2003, supported State and local program implementation of the NRS. The different types of assistance included instructional training packets for States to use in a “train the trainer” environment, technology-based materials for State and local staff that explained NRS measures and methods, and individual technical assistance to States that supported their implementation efforts.

An advisory board—consisting of State directors of adult education, representatives from volunteer provider agencies, directors of local adult education programs, and experts on accountability systems—guided the project and met three times between December 1997 and March 1999. The board made significant substantive contributions to the measure definitions and methodologies. Participants in the pilot test also provided advice and guidance on measures and methods.

DAEL released a draft of the NRS Implementation Guidelines in mid-1999 and another draft in June 2000, reflecting changes from State comments and early State experiences in implementing the requirements. The NRS formally went into effect on July 1, 2000, and DAEL issued a final Guidelines document in March 2001. Since that time there have been periodic updates to the Guidelines to clarify methodologies, provide further guidance on data collection and revisions to measures in response to ED requirements.

Revisions

· The Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education (OCTAE) published proposed modifications to the learning objectives associated with each educational functioning level (EFL) identified for Adult Basic Education (ABE) in the NRS and requested public comments in the Federal Register notice ED-2015-ICCD-0004-0001. A summary of the public comments received and OCTAE’s responses are included in Appendix D. The new EFL descriptors for ABE are included in Appendix E. The new descriptors will not be implemented until the Secretary has determined that there is at least one assessment that is both aligned with the revised descriptors and that is suitable for use in the NRS. Until that time, programs will continue to use the existing NRS educational functioning level descriptors in Exhibit 2.1 on pages 16-21.

· The Narrative Report instructions have been streamlined and updated. Two new prompts ask grantees to report the progress they are making on important initiatives.

· All references to specific secondary school credentials or high school equivalency tests have been revised.

Overview of the NRS Measures and Methods

NRS Measures

The requirements of WIA, consensus among the stakeholders and advisory board members, and the need for uniform valid and reliable data were major factors guiding the development of NRS measures. Other factors affecting the development of the measures included the need to accommodate the diversity of the adult education delivery system and the need for compatible definitions between related adult education and training programs.

As a State-administered program, the nature of adult education service delivery varies widely across States in its goals, objectives, and the resources available to States to collect and report data. It is especially important that the definitions for outcome measures be broad enough to accommodate these differences, yet concrete and standardized sufficiently to allow the NRS to establish a uniform national database.

To accommodate the diverse delivery system and compatibility with related systems, NRS staff conducted a thorough review of measure definitions planned or in use by all States and all Federal employment and training programs. To identify State measures used, for example, NRS staff conducted an evaluability assessment of all States in early 1998 and obtained copies of measure definitions from States that had their own measures. In addition, NRS staff reviewed the existing measure definitions used for DAEL’s annual statistical performance report and measures and definitions planned by the U.S. Department of Education for Title I of WIA. A full list of the main sources consulted in developing the measures and definitions is provided at the end of this chapter.

Exhibit 1.1 lists the core and secondary measures of the NRS. The core measures apply to all adult education students receiving 12 or more hours of service. There are three types of core measures:

· Outcome measures include educational gain, entered employment, retained employment, receipt of secondary school credential or its equivalent, and placement in postsecondary education or training.