ETHICS & VALUES: Radio Lab podcasts, Health Paper [Pleaselist your name, classsection, Cooper, date on front]

[15pts]To listen to the podcasts, go to radiolab.org. Search to find “Playing God”.

Instructions for the paper: Length of the paper must be a maximum of2 pages only. Use 12pt font, Calibri or Times New Roman, black ink on white paper. Staple together on the left, upper side. You may use a double space form. No single spacing. No title page.

Instructions: Listen to the Radio Lab podcast “Playing God”. Write a response to the following.

  1. Defineethics in one sentence. Define or describe a triage.
  2. Name the 3 geographical locations referred to in the podcast “Playing God”.

2. PROMPT: Explain the ethical dilemma(s) presented in the podcast, “Playing God”.

Consider….What influenced the outcome to make it worse or better for those making decisions during the Katrina event? What could be changed to make future situations result in better outcomes? Where do you personally draw the line? Include your opinion. Lessons learned.

[5pts] Listen to the podcast Update:CRISPER (approximately 50 minutes)

  1. Describe what Crisper can do in 1-2 sentence. 2. List one ethical question involved with using CRISPER? What does CRISPER stand for? Write it out.

RUBRIC-each page is worth 5 points.

5-Sentence structure and grammar are excellent. Correct use of punctuation. No spelling errors. Responds to all aspects of the assignment. Displays critical thinking of information. All ideas in the paper flow logically. Avoids simplistic description. Position is easily identifiable, plausible, insightful, and clear.

4-Sentence structure and grammar are strong despite occasional layers. Punctuation often used correctly, with some minor spelling errors. Responds to most aspects of the assignment. Contains some evidence of critical thinking. Position promising but slightly unclear or lacking insight/originality.

3-Problems in sentence structure and grammar. Some errors in punctuation and spelling. Missing two to three major aspects of the assignment. Displays some critical thinking. Simplistic descriptions of information. Position may be unclear (contains vague items) offers little that is new.

2-Major problems in sentence structure and grammar. Frequent errors in punctuation and spelling. Several aspects of the assignment are not followed. Ideas do not flow at all. Simplistic description of dilemma. Does not create college level academic tone. Position difficult to identify.

1-Grammar is so poor it is difficult to read. Instructions were not followed at all. Aspects of the assignment were missing. Little or no critical thinking or logic were demonstrated. Position not stated.