1. Quality of the Program Being Presented

CRITERIA REVIEW

Include this sheet with the manuscript and provide ratings for each of the following criteria. In addition, feel free to make notations on the manuscript seeking clarification or additional information.

1. Quality of the Program Being Presented

___ Program appears to be of high quality

___ Program appears to be of moderate quality

___ Program does not appear to be of sufficient quality to warrant inclusion in JPRA

2. Usefulness of Description to Other Practitioners

___ Very useful

___ Somewhat useful

___ Not very useful (should not be published in JPRA)

3. Overall Quality of Presentation

___ Manuscript is well written (needs only minor modifications as indicated)

___ Manuscript needs to undergo major revisions before publication (suggestions are included)

___ Manuscript is poorly written and should not be published in JPRA

4. Bottom Line

___ Publish manuscript with adjustments as noted.

___ I would like to reserve judgment until I see a revised manuscript

___ Manuscript should not be published in JPRA

Provide below (and/or on the manuscript itself or on separate sheets) other feedback that will help make the manuscript a more useful article if it is accepted to appear in JPRA.

Contact:

Editor–Programs that Work Papers

Karen Paisley

Assistant Professor, Director of Undergraduate Studies

Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism

University of Utah

1901 E. South Campus Drive, Room 1085

Salt Lake City, UT 84132

801-587-9617