References
1. Anasetti,F, Galbusera,F, Aziz,HN et al (2010) Spine stability after implantation of an interspinous device: an in vitro and finite element biomechanical study. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 13: 568-575
2. Karahalios,DG, Kaibara,T, Porter,RW et al (2010) Biomechanics of a lumbar interspinous anchor with anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 12: 372-380
3. Kettler,A, Drumm,J, Heuer,F et al (2008) Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea. Clin.Biomech.(Bristol., Avon.). 23: 242-247
4. Lazaro,BC, Brasiliense,LB, Sawa,AG et al (2010) Biomechanics of a novel minimally invasive lumbar interspinous spacer: effects on kinematics, facet loads, and foramen height. Neurosurgery. 66: 126-132
5. Nandakumar,A, Clark,NA, Peehal,JP et al (2010) The increase in dural sac area is maintained at 2 years after X-stop implantation for the treatment of spinal stenosis with no significant alteration in lumbar spine range of movement. Spine J. 10: 762-768
6. Rolfe,KW, Zucherman,JF, Kondrashov,DG et al (2010) Scoliosis and interspinous decompression with the X-STOP: prospective minimum 1-year outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 10: 972-978
7. Sobottke,R, Rollinghoff,M, Siewe,J et al (2010) Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer. Minim.Invasive.Neurosurg. 53: 179-183
8. Agarwal,V, Wildstein,M, Tillman,JB et al (2009) Lumbar intersegmental spacing and angulation in the modified lateral decubitus position versus variants of prone positioning. Spine J. 9: 580-584
9. Collignon,F,Fransen,P (2010) [Treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis by a percutaneous stand-alone lumbar interspinous implant. Preliminary experience with the Aperius device]. Neurochirurgie. 56: 3-7
10. Kaibara,T, Karahalios,DG, Porter,RW et al (2010) Biomechanics of a lumbar interspinous anchor with transforaminal lumbar interbody fixation. World Neurosurg. 73: 572-577
11. Krappel,FA (2010) [Long-term results, status of studies and differential indication regarding the DIAM implant]. Orthopade. 39: 585-594
12. Trautwein,FT, Lowery,GL, Wharton,ND et al (2010) Determination of the in vivo posterior loading environment of the Coflex interlaminar-interspinous implant. Spine J. 10: 244-251
13. Wilke,HJ, Drumm,J, Haussler,K et al (2010) [Biomechanics of interspinous spacers]. Orthopade. 39: 565-572
14. Goyal,A, Goel,VK, Mehta,A et al (2008) Cyclic loads do not compromise functionality of the interspinous spacer or cause damage to the spinal segment: an in vitro analysis. J.Long.Term.Eff.Med.Implants. 18: 289-302
15. Idler,C, Zucherman,JF, Yerby,S et al (2008) A novel technique of intra-spinous process injection of PMMA to augment the strength of an inter-spinous process device such as the X STOP. Spine 33: 452-456
16. Lee,SH, Lee,JH, Hong,SW et al (2010) Spinopelvic alignment after interspinous soft stabilization with a tension band system in grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine 35: E691-E701
17. Mayer,HM, Zentz,F, Siepe,C et al (2010) [Percutaneous interspinous distraction for the treatment of dynamic lumbar spinal stensois and low back pain.]. Oper.Orthop.Traumatol. 22: 495-511
18. Miller,JD,Nader,R (2008) Treatment of combined osteoporotic compression fractures and spinal stenosis: use of vertebral augumentation and interspinous process spacer. Spine 33: E717-E720
19. Nardi,P, Cabezas,D, Rea,G et al (2010) Aperius PercLID stand alone interspinous system for the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis: experience on 152 cases. J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 23: 203-207
20. Oppenheimer,JH, DeCastro,I,McDonnell,DE (2009) Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg.Focus. 27: E9-
21. Park,SW, Lim,TJ,Park,J (2010) A biomechanical study of the instrumented and adjacent lumbar levels after In-Space interspinous spacer insertion. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 12: 560-569
22. Pfeiffer,M (2010) [Interspinous implant "InSWing(R)" for the lumbar spine.]. Oper.Orthop.Traumatol. 22: 512-523
23. Shim,CS, Park,SW, Lee,SH et al (2008) Biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous stabilizing device, Locker. Spine 33: E820-E827
24. Yi,X,McPherson,B (2010) Application of X STOP device in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Physician. 13: E327-E336
25. Brussee,P, Hauth,J, Donk,RD et al (2008) Self-rated evaluation of outcome of the implantation of interspinous process distraction (X-Stop) for neurogenic claudication. Eur.Spine J. 17: 200-203
26. Gunzburg,R, Szpalski,M, Callary,SA et al (2009) Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion. Eur.Spine J. 18: 696-703
27. Korovessis,P, Repantis,T, Zacharatos,S et al (2009) Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion? Eur.Spine J. 18: 830-840
28. Liu,G, Zhao,JN,Dezawa,A (2008) Endoscopic decompression combined with interspinous process implant fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis. Chin J.Traumatol. 11: 364-367
29. Senegas,J, Vital,JM, Pointillart,V et al (2009) Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (the Wallis system) with a 13-year mean follow-up. Neurosurg.Rev. 32: 335-341
30. Wilke,HJ, Drumm,J, Haussler,K et al (2008) Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure. Eur.Spine J. 17: 1049-1056
31. Kuchta,J, Sobottke,R, Eysel,P et al (2009) Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur.Spine J. 18: 823-829
32. Sobottke,R, Schluter-Brust,K, Kaulhausen,T et al (2009) Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome? Eur.Spine J. 18: 1494-1503
33. Moojen,WA, Arts,MP, Brand,R et al (2010) The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication. BMC.Musculoskelet.Disord. 11:100.: 100-
34. Kantelhardt,SR, Torok,E, Gempt,J et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of a new percutaneously implantable interspinous process device. Acta Neurochir.(Wien.). 152: 1961-1967
35. Barbagallo,GM, Corbino,LA, Olindo,G et al (2010) The "sandwich phenomenon": a rare complication in adjacent, double-level X-stop surgery: report of three cases and review of the literature. Spine 35: E96-100
36. Barbagallo,GM, Olindo,G, Corbino,L et al (2009) Analysis of complications in patients treated with the X-Stop Interspinous Process Decompression System: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring system for patient selection and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 65: 111-119
37. Bono,CM, Bawa,M, White,KK et al (2008) Residual motion on flexion-extension radiographs after simulated lumbar arthrodesis in human cadavers. J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 21: 364-371
38. Bowers,C, Amini,A, Dailey,AT et al (2010) Dynamic interspinous process stabilization: review of complications associated with the X-Stop device. Neurosurg.Focus. 28: E8-
39. Burnett,MG, Stein,SC,Bartels,RH (2010) Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 13: 39-46
40. Chung,KJ, Hwang,YS,Koh,SH (2009) Stress fracture of bilateral posterior facet after insertion of interspinous implant. Spine 34: E380-E383
41. Crawford,RJ, Price,RI,Singer,KP (2009) The effect of interspinous implant surgery on back surface shape and radiographic lumbar curvature. Clin.Biomech.(Bristol., Avon.). 24: 467-472
42. Kabir,SM, Gupta,SR,Casey,AT (2010) Lumbar interspinous spacers: a systematic review of clinical and biomechanical evidence. Spine 35: E1499-E1506
43. Miller,JD, Miller,MC,Lucas,MG (2010) Erosion of the spinous process: a potential cause of interspinous process spacer failure. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 12: 210-213
44. Verhoof,OJ, Bron,JL, Wapstra,FH et al (2008) High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur.Spine J. 17: 188-192
45. Cabraja,M, Abbushi,A, Woiciechowsky,C et al (2009) The short- and mid-term effect of dynamic interspinous distraction in the treatment of recurrent lumbar facet joint pain. Eur.Spine J. 18: 1686-1694
46. Jerosch,J,Moursi,MG (2008) Foreign body reaction due to polyethylene's wear after implantation of an interspinal segment. Arch.Orthop.Trauma Surg. 128: 1-4
47. Park,SC, Yoon,SH, Hong,YP et al (2009) Minimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with interspinous u (coflex). J.Korean Neurosurg.Soc. 46: 292-299
48. Richolt,JA, Rauschmann,MA,Schmidt,S (2010) [Interspinous Spacers - Technique of Coflex Implantation.]. Oper.Orthop.Traumatol. 22: 536-544
49. Richter,A, Schutz,C, Hauck,M et al (2010) Does an interspinous device (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients. Eur.Spine J. 19: 283-289
50. Siepe,CJ, Heider,F, Beisse,R et al (2010) [Treatment of dynamic spinal canal stenosis with an interspinous spacer.]. Oper.Orthop.Traumatol. 22: 524-535
51. Yano,S, Hida,K, Seki,T et al (2008) A new ceramic interspinous process spacer for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Neurosurgery. 63: ONS108-ONS113
52. Anakwenze,OA, Auerbach,JD, Milby,AH et al (2009) Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine 34: 2001-2007
53. Anderson,PA, Puschak,TJ,Sasso,RC (2009) Comparison of short-term SF-36 results between total joint arthroplasty and cervical spine decompression and fusion or arthroplasty. Spine 34: 176-183
54. Anderson,PA, Sasso,RC,Riew,KD (2008) Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine 33: 1305-1312
55. Burkus,JK, Haid,RW, Traynelis,VC et al (2010) Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 13: 308-318
56. Crawford,NR, Arnett,JD, Butters,JA et al (2010) Biomechanics of a posture-controlling cervical artificial disc: mechanical, in vitro, and finite-element analysis. Neurosurg.Focus. 28: E11-
57. Goffin,J, van,LJ, Van,CF et al (2010) A clinical analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 12: 261-269
58. Heller,JG, Sasso,RC, Papadopoulos,SM et al (2009) Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine 34: 101-107
59. Lin,CY, Kang,H, Rouleau,JP et al (2009) Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Spine 34: 1554-1560
60. Park,JJ, Quirno,M, Cunningham,MR et al (2010) Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement. Spine 35: E285-E289
61. Phillips,FM, Allen,TR, Regan,JJ et al (2009) Cervical disc replacement in patients with and without previous adjacent level fusion surgery: a prospective study. Spine 34: 556-565
62. Antosh,IJ, DeVine,JG, Carpenter,CT et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of adjacent segments after cervical disc arthroplasty: magnet strength and its effect on image quality. Clinical article. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 13: 722-726
63. Barrey,C, Mosnier,T, Jund,J et al (2009) In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 11: 538-546
64. Buchowski,JM, Anderson,PA, Sekhon,L et al (2009) Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. Surgical technique. J.Bone Joint Surg.Am. 91 Suppl 2:223-32.: 223-232
65. Coric,D, Cassis,J, Carew,JD et al (2010) Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 13: 715-721
66. Cunningham,BW, Hu,N, Zorn,CM et al (2010) Comparative fixation methods of cervical disc arthroplasty versus conventional methods of anterior cervical arthrodesis: serration, teeth, keels, or screws? J.Neurosurg.Spine. 12: 214-220
67. Cunningham,BW, Hu,N, Zorn,CM et al (2010) Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Spine J. 10: 341-349
68. Kang,H, Park,P, La,MF et al (2010) Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Neurosurg.Focus. 28: E9-
69. Kikkawa,J, Cunningham,BW, Shirado,O et al (2010) Multidirectional flexibility of the spine following posterior decompressive surgery after single-level cervical disc arthroplasty: an in vitro biomechanical investigation. Spine 35: E1465-E1471
70. Kim,SW, Paik,SH, Castro,PA et al (2010) Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine J. 10: 683-688
71. Lazaro,BC, Yucesoy,K, Yuksel,KZ et al (2010) Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy Disc. Neurosurg.Focus. 28: E6-
72. Matz,PG, Ryken,TC, Groff,MW et al (2009) Techniques for anterior cervical decompression for radiculopathy. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 11: 183-197
73. Murrey,D, Janssen,M, Delamarter,R et al (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J. 9: 275-286
74. Riew,KD, Buchowski,JM, Sasso,R et al (2008) Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. J.Bone Joint Surg.Am. 90: 2354-2364
75. Riina,J, Anderson,PA, Holly,LT et al (2009) The effect of an anterior cervical operation for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy on associated headaches. J.Bone Joint Surg.Am. 91: 1919-1923
76. Sasso,RC,Best,NM (2008) Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty. J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 21: 19-22
77. Steinmetz,MP, Patel,R, Traynelis,V et al (2008) Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with fusion in a workers' compensation population. Neurosurgery. 63: 741-747
78. Terai,T, Faizan,A, Sairyo,K et al (2010) Operated and Adjacent Segment Motions for Fusion versus Cervical Arthroplasty: A Pilot Study. Clin.Orthop.Relat Res.
79. Zindrick,M, Harris,MB, Humphreys,SC et al (2010) Cervical disc arthroplasty. J.Am.Acad.Orthop.Surg. 18: 631-637
80. Arts,MP, Brand,R, van den,AE et al (2010) The NEtherlands Cervical Kinematics (NECK) Trial. Cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation; a double-blind randomised multicenter study. BMC.Musculoskelet.Disord. 11:122.: 122-
81. Baaj,AA, Uribe,JS, Vale,FL et al (2009) History of cervical disc arthroplasty. Neurosurg.Focus. 27: E10-
82. Kishen,TJ,Diwan,AD (2010) Fusion versus disk replacement for degenerative conditions of the lumbar and cervical spine: quid est testimonium? Orthop.Clin.North Am. 41: 167-181
83. Shikinami,Y, Kawabe,Y, Yasukawa,K et al (2010) A biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc system composed of a cubic three-dimensional fabric. Spine J. 10: 141-152
84. Zhang,X, Ordway,NR, Tan,R et al (2008) Correlation of ProDisc-C failure strength with cervical bone mineral content and endplate strength. J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 21: 400-405
85. Walraevens,J, Demaerel,P, Suetens,P et al (2010) Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc. Neurosurgery. 67: 679-687
86. Walraevens,JR, Liu,B, Sloten,JV et al (2010) Postoperative segmental malalignment after surgery with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: is it related to the mechanics and design of the prosthesis? J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 23: 372-376
87. Ahn,HS,DiAngelo,DJ (2008) A biomechanical study of artificial cervical discs using computer simulation. Spine 33: 883-892
88. Ahn,PG, Kim,KN, Moon,SW et al (2009) Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 11: 688-695
89. Auerbach,JD, Jones,KJ, Fras,CI et al (2008) The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J. 8: 711-716
90. Barbagallo,GM, Corbino,LA, Papavero,L et al (2009) Anatomic midline marking during cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C: an alternative, simple, and reliable method: technical note. J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 22: 610-614
91. Cardoso,MJ,Rosner,MK (2010) Multilevel cervical arthroplasty with artificial disc replacement. Neurosurg.Focus. 28: E19-
92. Cho,BY, Lim,J, Sim,HB et al (2010) Biomechanical analysis of the range of motion after placement of a two-level cervical ProDisc-C versus hybrid construct. Spine 35: 1769-1776
93. de Jongh,CU, Basson,AH,Scheffer,C (2008) Predictive modelling of cervical disc implant wear. J.Biomech. 41: 3177-3183
94. Duggal,N, Bertagnoli,R, Rabin,D et al (2010) ProDisc-C. An in vivo kinematic study. J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 00: 1-5
95. Greiner-Perth,R, Allam,Y, Silbermann,J et al (2009) [First experience and preliminary clinical results with the cervical disc replacement DISCOVER]. Z.Orthop.Unfall. 147: 582-587
96. Grob,D (2010) [The spinal intervertebral disc]. Orthopade. 39: 335-347
97. Kang,KC, Lee,CS, Han,JH et al (2010) The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine J. 10: 689-696
98. Keachie,K, Shahlaie,K,Muizelaar,JP (2010) Upper thoracic spine arthroplasty via the anterior approach. J.Neurosurg.Spine. 13: 240-245
99. Phillips,FM, Tzermiadianos,MN, Voronov,LI et al (2009) Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics. Spine 34: E794-E799
100. Schluessmann,E, Aghayev,E, Staub,L et al (2010) SWISSspine: the case of a governmentally required HTA-registry for total disc arthroplasty: results of cervical disc prostheses. Spine 35: E1397-E1405
101. Xu,JX, Zhang,YZ, Shen,Y et al (2009) Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine 34: 1012-1017
102. Yang,S, Wu,X, Hu,Y et al (2008) Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single- and multiple-level. Spine 33: E371-E377
103. Beaurain,J, Bernard,P, Dufour,T et al (2009) Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up. Eur.Spine J. 18: 841-850
104. Bonkowski,J, Avadhani,A, Manu,A et al (2010) Cervical disc replacement C5-6. Eur.Spine J. 19: 345-346
105. Cheng,L, Nie,L, Zhang,L et al (2009) Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study. Int.Orthop. 33: 1347-1351
106. Finn,MA, Brodke,DS, Daubs,M et al (2009) Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty. Eur.Spine J. 18: 1520-1527
107. Heidecke,V, Burkert,W, Brucke,M et al (2008) Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease–clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Acta Neurochir.(Wien.). 150: 453-459
108. Kim,HK, Kim,MH, Cho,DS et al (2009) Surgical outcome of cervical arthroplasty using bryan(r). J.Korean Neurosurg.Soc. 46: 532-537
109. Kim,SW, Limson,MA, Kim,SB et al (2009) Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur.Spine J. 18: 218-231
110. Park,JH, Roh,KH, Cho,JY et al (2008) Comparative analysis of cervical arthroplasty using mobi-c(r) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using the solis(r) -cage. J.Korean Neurosurg.Soc. 44: 217-221
111. Schizas,C, Duff,JM, Tessitore,E et al (2009) [Non fusion techniques in spinal surgery]. Rev.Med.Suisse. 5: 2574-2577
112. Seo,M,Choi,D (2008) Adjacent segment disease after fusion for cervical spondylosis; myth or reality? Br.J.Neurosurg. 22: 195-199
113. Tian,W, Han,X, Liu,B et al (2010) Clinical and radiographic results of cervical artificial disc arthroplasty: over three years follow-up cohort study. Chin Med.J.(Engl.). 123: 2969-2973
114. Wenger,M, Hoonacker,P, Zachee,B et al (2009) Bryan cervical disc prostheses: preservation of function over time. J.Clin.Neurosci. 16: 220-225
115. Yang,YC, Nie,L, Cheng,L et al (2009) Clinical and radiographic reports following cervical arthroplasty: a 24-month follow-up. Int.Orthop. 33: 1037-1042
116. Zhao,YB, Sun,Y, Chen,ZQ et al (2010) Application of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc: long-term X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up results. Chin Med.J.(Engl.). 123: 2999-3002
117. Rohl,K,Rohrich,F (2009) Artificial disc versus spinal fusion in the treatment of cervical spine degenerations in tetraplegics: a comparison of clinical results. Spinal Cord. 47: 705-708
118. Garrido,BJ, Taha,TA,Sasso,RC (2010) Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 23: 367-371
119. Grupp,TM, Meisel,HJ, Cotton,JA et al (2010) Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Biomaterials. 31: 523-531
120. Kim,SW, Shin,JH, Arbatin,JJ et al (2008) Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Eur.Spine J. 17: 20-29
121. McAfee,PC, Cappuccino,A, Cunningham,BW et al (2010) Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 23: 1-8
122. Powell,JW, Sasso,RC, Metcalf,NH et al (2010) Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis. J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 23: 89-95
123. Sasso,RC, Best,NM, Metcalf,NH et al (2008) Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial. J.Spinal Disord.Tech. 21: 393-399
124. Roberto,RF, McDonald,T, Curtiss,S et al (2010) Kinematics of progressive circumferential ligament resection (decompression) in conjunction with cervical disc arthroplasty in a spondylotic spine model. Spine 35: 1676-1683
125. Jawahar,A, Cavanaugh,DA, Kerr,EJ, III et al (2010) Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials. Spine J. 10: 1043-1048
126. Altaf,F, Derbyshire,N,Marshall,RW (2010) Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis following cervical disc arthroplasty. J.Bone Joint Surg.Br. 92: 576-578
127. Bartels,RH, Donk,R,Verbeek,AL (2010) No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurgery. 66: 1153-1160