TPCS 3rd Floor renovation 5211/A4L-452/962900
university of california, san diego
PREQUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE
For
TPCS 3RD FLOOR RENOVATION
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
5211/A4L-452/962900
SUBMITTED BY:
please enter your company name here
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
CAPITAL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
10280 NORTH TORREY PINES ROAD
LA JOLLA, CA 92037
ISSUE DATE: JULY 31, 2017
REVISION DATE: AUGUST 8, 2017
MANDATORY PREQUALIFICATION MEETING: AUGUST 8, 2017 at 11:30 A.M.
MANDATORY MEETING LOCATION: CPM, Large Conference Room, Suite 466
SUBMITTALS DUE: AUGUST 15, 2017 at 4:00 P.M.
LEVEL 1
PREQUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE
For
TPCS 3RD FLOOR RENOVATION
(Where a time period is given, such as the last ten [10] years, the period is to be measured backwards from the date this Level I prequalification questionnaire is required to be submitted to the University of California at San Diego.)
Note: Submission of an incomplete and/or unclear Level I Prequalification Questionnaire may result in the determination of the prospective Construction Manager/Contractor (CM/Contractor) as NON-PREQUALIFIED.
SUBMITTED BY: ______
(Name and Title) Printed or Typed
______
(Signature)
______
(Firm Name. If a Joint Venture, state name if JV Entity)
______
(Contact Name)
______
(Address)
______
(City, State, Zip Code)
______
(Telephone Number) (Facsimile Number)
______
(E-mail Address)
Each prospective CM/Contractor must have the following California General Building Contractor’s License: B, current, active and in good standing with the California Contractor’s State License Board on the date and time of the Prequalification Questionnaire submittal is due. This Prequalification Questionnaire with all portions completed, including required attachments must be submitted.
Each prospective CM/Contractor must answer all of the following questions and provide all requested information, where applicable. Any prospective Contractor failing to do so may be deemed to be non responsive and not responsible with respect to this Prequalification at the sole discretion of the University. Each prospective CM/Contractor must submit three (3) printed sets and one (1) flash drive with complete submittal of the questionnaire. All CM/Contractor’s which have submitted a Level I Prequalification Questionnaire will be notified in writing of either successfully or not successfully achieving Level I prequalification status. The decision of the University is final and is not appealable within the University of California system.
All information submitted for Prequalification evaluation will be considered official information acquired in confidence, and the University will maintain its confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.
It is critical that the prospective CM/Contractor complete all information required herein accurately, completely, truthfully and to the best of their knowledge. Ambiguous or incomplete information may lead to an unfavorable rating and subsequent status as non-prequalified.
WHERE NECESSARY, COPY THE FORMS IN THIS PACKAGE. USE ONLY THESE FORMS.
1. PREQUALIFICATION DECLARATION
I, ______, hereby declare that I am the
(Printed Name)
______of ______
(Title) (Name of Firm)
Submitting this Prequalification Questionnaire; that I am duly authorized to sign this Prequalification Questionnaire on behalf of the above named firm; and that all information set forth in this Prequalification Questionnaire and all attachments hereto are, to the best of my knowledge, true, accurate and complete as of its submission date.
The undersigned declares under penalty of perjury that all of the prequalification information submitted with this form is true and correct and that this declaration was executed in
______(County), ______, (State)
on ______(Date).
______
(Signature)
2. ATTENDANCE AT MANDATORY LEVEL I PREQUALIFICATION CONFERENCE
Did a representative of your firm attend the Mandatory Level I Prequalification Conference at Capital Program Management, 10280 N. Torrey Pines Road, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037?
YES NO
Name/names of those attending: ______
Date Meeting Attended: ______
3. LICENSE
A. Does your firm hold the following California contractor's license, which is current, valid, and in good standing with the California Contractor's State License Board?
License Classification: B – General Building Contractor
YES NO
B. Provide the following information about your firm's contractor's license:
1. Name of license holder exactly as on file with the California Contractor's State License Board:
______
2. License Classification: ______
3. License Number: ______
5. Date Issued: ______
6. Expiration Date: ______
C. Can you truthfully state that your firm's contractor's license has never been suspended or revoked by the California Contractor's State License Board within the last five (5) years?
YES NO
If answer is “No,” explain on attached additional sheets.
D. Has a complaint ever been filed with the Contractor’s State License Board against your company that required a formal hearing or inquiry?
YES NO
E. Will your firm use computers with ability to log on to the Internet for this project?
YES NO
F. Does your firm have experience utilizing CPM logic, Primavera Project Planner scheduling software on your projects and would you utilize this experience on this project?
YES NO
If “No,” name the software application(s) used or the software application you would propose for use on this project for scheduling. ______
G. Did your firm complete and submit the UC San Diego Capital Program Management Company Registration form located on our website (http://rmp-web.ucsd.edu/CompanyEvaluation)?
YES NO
4. SURETY
Prospective CM/Contractor desiring to be prequalified are informed that they will be subject to and must fully comply with all fee bid conditions including 100% payment and 100% performance bonds.
Prospective CM/Contractor shall submit the below form, signed by representative of surety and notarized. If firm has used current surety for less than ten years, list sureties (ies) previously used and indicate number of years used to demonstrate ten (10) complete years of surety history.
A. Is the surety to be used listed in the latest published State of California Department of Insurance list of Insurance Organizations Authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to Transact Business of Insurance in the State of California?
YES NO
B. Is the prospective CM/Contractor able to obtain bonding up to and including the cost for this construction contract estimated at $6,000,000 of which no more than 50% is currently committed to other projects?
YES NO
C. Is it true that the surety has not paid out any monies for the construction activities of the prospective CM/Contractor whatsoever within the last ten (10) years?
YES NO
If answer is “No,” explain on attached additional sheets.
1. If the entity submitting this prequalification questionnaire is a Joint Venture, is it true that the surety has not paid out any monies for the construction activities of any member of the Joint Venture within the last ten (10) years?
YES NO N/A
D. How long has the Prospective CM/Contractor been with this surety? years
E. Surety Declaration:
Provide this Declaration of your surety (ies) for completion. Do not have the surety submit this information directly to the University.
The undersigned declares under penalty of perjury that all of the above surety information is true and correct and that this declaration was executed in
County, California, on (date).
(Signature)
(Name and Title - Printed or Typed)
(Representing [Surety Name])
(Firm Name)
(Address) (City, State, Zip Code)
______
Telephone Number) (Facsimile Number)
(Email Address)
(ATTACH NOTARIZATION of SURETY REPRESENTATIVE’S SIGNATURE)
5. INSURER
Prospective CM/Contractor desiring to be prequalified is informed that they will be subject to and must fully comply with all fee bid conditions including the following insurance coverage and associated limits.
Prospective CM/Contractor shall submit the below form, signed by representative of insurer and notarized. If firm has used current insurer for less than ten years, list insurer(s) previously used and indicate number of years used to demonstrate ten (10) complete years of insurer history.
A. Is the insurer to be used listed by Best with a rating of A- or better and a financial classification of VIII or better (or an equivalent rating by Standard & Poor’s or Moody's)?
YES NO
Indicate Best Rating:
Indicate Best Financial Classification:
B. Is the prospective CM/Contractor able to obtain insurance in the following limits for each of these construction contracts?
YES NO
1. If the entity submitting this prequalification questionnaire is a Joint Venture, is the Joint Venture entity itself able to obtain insurance in the following limits for each of these construction contracts?
YES NO N/A
Minimum
Comprehensive or Commercial Form General Liability Insurance - Limits of Liability Requirement
Each Occurrence - Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury and Property Damage $1,000,000
Products - Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000
Personal and Advertising Injury $1,000,000
General Aggregate - Not Applicable to Comprehensive Form $2,000,000
Business Automobile Liability Insurance - Limits of Liability
Each Accident - Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury and Property Damage $1,000,000
Professional Liability Insurance
Each Occurrence $1,000,000
Aggregate $2,000,000
C. How long has the Prospective CM/Contractor been with this insurer? years
D. Insurance Declaration:
Provide this Declaration to your insurance carrier for completion. Do not have the carrier submit this information to the University.
The undersigned declares under penalty of perjury that all of the above insurer information is true and correct and that this declaration was executed in
County, California, on (date).
(Signature)
(Name and Title - Printed or Typed)
(Representing [Insurer Name])
(Firm Name)
(Address) (City, State, Zip Code)
(Telephone Number) (Facsimile Telephone Number)
(Email Address)
(ATTACH NOTARIZATION of INSURER REPRESENTATIVE’S SIGNATURE)
6. CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE
Submit Project Data on a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) comparable projects successfully completed within the last ten (10) years constructed in the United States of America one of which was constructed in the State of California.
A comparable project is defined as having a construction cost at the bid date of at least $5,000,000 or a total of $18,000,000 for the projects submitted, and one of the following example building types:
· Office Building (tenant office examples include administrative, information technology, real estate, etc.)
· Renovation to an existing building that remains operational during construction
· Other facilities that contain a high degree of technical/aesthetic complexity and
Such projects should have possessed the following construction challenges:
· Urban site work with limited construction and staging areas
· Working within occupied buildings
· Renovations of buildings requiring proactive and innovative solutions due to unknown and/or unforeseen field conditions
· Repair of buildings requiring proactive and innovative solutions due to noise, dust, and pedestrian traffic while building is occupied
· Project complexity requiring tracking of multiple functions and phases
· Project complexity requiring close coordination of overlapping trades
· Accelerated construction schedule that may include 24/7 operations and/or two shift work schedules
· Integration of existing building systems into new construction
· Proactive pre-construction activities
· Owner furnished fixed budget and schedule
· Robust subcontractor prequalification process
· Effective procurement/scheduling strategies
· Documented critical path scheduling
· Aging building systems requiring integration with contemporary workplace strategy while meeting requirement to exceed CBC Building Energy Efficiency Standard Code, Title 24 by 20% (LEED Gold CI requirements)
Two (2) of the projects submitted must include experience as CM/Contractor providing both pre-construction services and acting as General Contractor during construction phase on the same project.
A. Listed projects must have been managed and constructed under the business name submitted for Level I prequalification. Projects completed by employees for former employers are not acceptable.
B. Submit the following Project Data Sheets for each project submitted as evidence of your firm's CM/Contractor experience.
PROJECT DATA SHEET
(A separate sheet must be prepared for each project submitted.)
1. Project Name: ______
2. Project Location: ______
3. Project Description: ______
4. Constr. Type:
5. Size (gross sq. ft.): ______
6. Business name of entity which constructed and managed this project: ______
______
7. Did your firm act as a CM/Contractor during the entire construction phase of this project, providing both pre-construction services and acting as General Contractor during the construction phase for this project? (At least two of the five submitted projects must have included pre-construction services.)
YES NO
8. Was the project completed under a CM/Contractor construction contract?
YES NO
9. How is this project comparable to the TPCS 3RD FLOOR RENOVATION project? ______
______
______
______
______
10. Was the project completed within budget?
Cost At Bid: $
Cost At Completion: $
Explanation: ______
11. For any differing amount between cost at completion and cost at bid, distribute the sources and/or causes of these changes into the following categories:
Document Problems: $
Unforeseen Conditions: $
Owner Generated Scope: $
Regulatory Agency: $
Other: $
12. Was construction begun and completed within the last ten (10) years?
YES NO
13. Was the project completed within the original contract time or the adjusted contract time?
YES NO
If completion did not occur within the original or the adjusted contract time, indicate elapsed time in whole calendar days between original or adjusted contract time and actual final completion.
______
14. Did the project include occupied facilities?
YES NO
15. What communication strategies were used by your firm to assist the project team in mitigating the impacts of construction on the adjacent occupied facilities? ______
16. Was the project for a university or public institution?
YES NO
17. What strategic decisions did your firm contribute to the project which supported the project’s success (e.g. value engineering, phasing, innovation, new technology, etc.)? ______
18. Did the project include baseline critical path scheduling with adherence to updates and meeting a hard opening date?
YES NO
If “Yes,” how many construction activities were included on the schedule? ______
19. What strategies did your firm use to adjust and/or correct for non-Owner generated slippage in the critical path schedule?
______
20. What measures were used to separate construction areas from occupied areas of the facility? How were noise, dust, construction circulation, and other potentially disruptive construction activities mitigated? ______
______
______
21. Did project include early demolition bid package such as phased buy out?