Article #1

Source:Guardian.co.uk, November 7th, 2011

Title: Thousands protest at the White House against Keystone XL pipeline

The Keystone project has emerged as a defining issue for Obama, cast as a choice between the environment and the economy

Demonstrators carry a giant mock pipeline while calling for the cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline during a rally in front of the White House.

Several thousand protesters, some shouldering a long black inflatable replica of a pipeline, formed a human chain around the White House on Sunday to try to convince Barack Obama to block the controversial Keystone XL project.

The protest, which had been weeks in the making, had been intended to put pressure on Obama to stop the pipeline, which would transport crude from the Alberta tar sands across the American heartland.

Organiser Bill McKibben described it as subjecting Obama to symbolic house arrest.

"That is the second biggest pool of carbon on the planet. If the US government goes ahead and makes it easier to develop that oil-sands project, then there is no credible way to insist that they're working hard on climate change," McKibben told the crowd.

Not that Obama was there to notice. As protesters gathered opposite the White House he took advantage of a glorious autumn day to go golfing, returning just as the protest was winding down.

A number of protesters carried blue signs quoting Obama's 2008 campaign promises to act on climate change. Others borrowed his election slogan, chanting: "Yes we can, stop the pipeline."

Organisers initially claimed a turnout of 6,000, later doubling the number to 12,000. They included the actor Mark Ruffalo, the climate scientist James Hansen and the Nobel peace prize winner Jody Williams.

Police said about 5,000 had come to the gathering.

The Obama administration had been due to decide on the fate of the pipeline by the end of the year. Over the last year, however, the Keystone project has emerged as a defining issue for Obama – cast as a choice between the environment and the economy.

Officials suggested this month that the deadline could slip. There could also be delays from a series of legal challenges along the pipeline's route. Legislators in the state of Nebraska this week are considering five separate bills to re-route the pipeline away from an important aquifer or challenge the company's rights to build over private land.

Environmental groups have warned Obama he could risk losing their support in the 2012 elections if he lets the pipeline go ahead. But that strategy is also a gamble for environmental groups.

A failure to persuade Obama would expose their own weaknesses.

TransCanada, the company building the pipeline, claims the project would create thousands of temporary construction jobs. "What these millionaire actors and professional activists don't seem to understand is that saying no to Keystone means saying yes to more conflict oil from the Middle East and Venezuela filling American gas tanks," James Millar, a spokesman for TransCanada said in an email.

"After the Washington protesters fly back home they will forget about the millions of Americans who can't find work."


Article #1

Source:Guardian.co.uk, November 7th, 2011

Title:Thousands protest at the White House against Keystone XL pipeline

Part A:True or False?

1 – Demonstrators are carrying an actual pipeline. _____

2 – The name of the proposed project is the BP pipeline. ____

3 – Several hundred people gathered to protest at the White House. _____

4 – The pipeline will transport crude oil from Alaska to the Gulf. ____

5 – Alberta is the second biggest pool of carbon on the planet. ____

6 – James Hansen is a famous actor. _____

7 – The fate of the pipeline will be decided by 2014. ____

8 – Some feel the pipeline should be rerouted around Nabraska’s valuable aquitard. _____

9 – Environmental groups are threatening Obama with withdrawing their support in the 2012 elections. _____

10 – James Millar, spokesman for TransCanada is against the proposed pipeline. ____

Part B: Short Answer

1 – Think about the pros and cons of building the pipeline. Where do you stand (yes, you have to choose for or against the pipeline.) Write a one paragraph response with at least 2 supporting arguments. Mind your spelling and grammar.

______

______

______