TITLE：Japan Comments on DS462 in general
COMMENTS BY REVIEWERReviewer: NRA Page 1 of
Country/Organization: Japan/NRA Date: 10Oct. 2014 / RESOLUTION
No. / Para/Line No. / Proposed new text / Reason / Accepted / Accepted, but modified as follows / Rejected / Reason for modification/rejection
1 / General / Addall of the participants’ names in the NUSSC working Group meetingsin the contributors to drafting and review in all of the safety requirement documents.
TITLE：Japan Comments for Amendments to GSR Part 1on DS462
COMMENTS BY REVIEWERReviewer: NRA Page 1 of
Country/Organization: Japan/NRA Date: 10Oct. 2014 / RESOLUTION
No. / Para/Line No. / Proposed new text / Reason / Accepted / Accepted, but modified as follows / Rejected / Reason for modification/rejection
1 / Para 3.4/ line 4 / 3.4. The regulatory body shall establish and maintain a means for receivinginformation from other States and from authorized parties, as well as ameans for making available to others lessons learned from operatingexperience and regulatory experience. Especially, establishing means to liaise directly with regulatory bodies of other States and with international organizations is essential. The regulatory body shall requireappropriate corrective actions to be carried out to prevent the recurrence ofsafety significant events. This process involves acquisition of the necessaryinformation and its analysis to facilitate the effective utilization ofinternational networks for learning from operating experience and regulatoryexperience. / Keep consistency with newly added 2.8(f).
2.8 To be effectively independent from undue influences on its decisionmaking, the regulatory body:
(f) shall be able to liaise directly with regulatory bodies of other Statesand with international organizations to promote co-operation and theexchange of regulatory related information and experience.
TITLE：Japan Comments for Amendments to SSR-2/1on DS462
COMMENTS BY REVIEWERReviewer: NRA Page 1 of
Country/Organization: Japan/NRA Date: 10Oct. 2014 / RESOLUTION
No. / Para/Line No. / Proposed new text / Reason / Accepted / Accepted, but modified as follows / Rejected / Reason for modification/rejection
1 / 2.13. (4)
3rd sentence
5.21a, 5.73 / ...... Sequences that lead to large or early or large radioactive releases are required to be ‘practically eliminated’. / Change the order of ‘early radioactive release’ and ‘large radioactive release’ in accordance with timeline, and be consisted with other paras.
2 / Footnote 1 / ‘Early radioactive release’: release for which off-site protective measures are necessary but are unlikely to be fully effective in due time.‘Large radioactive release’: a release for which off-site protective measures limited in terms of times and areas of application are insufficient to protect people and the environment. / Change the order of‘early radioactive release’ and ‘Large radioactive release’ in accordance with timeline, and be consisted with other paras.
3 / 2.13. (5) L.2 / … emergency control centreresponse facilities” / Be consisted with “Emergency response facility” in requrement 68.
4 / 6.45ª, 6.68 / For defence in depth
→To further enhance safety / Be consisted with para. 5.73 in case for using non-permanent equipment.
TITLE：Japan Comments for Amendments to GSR Part 4on DS462
COMMENTS BY REVIEWERReviewer: NRA Page 1 of
Country/Organization: Japan/NRA Date: 10Oct. 2014 / RESOLUTION
No. / Para/Line No. / Proposed new text / Reason / Accepted / Accepted, but modified as follows / Rejected / Reason for modification/rejection
1 / 4.51 3rd sentence / ...... , and justification has toshallbe provided that the identification of all scenarios relevant for safety is sufficiently comprehensive. / Editorial.
2 / 4.51 4th sentence / ...... as well as complete failures have toshall be considered. / Editorial.
1