2015
TRIENNIAL SECURITYREVIEW OF
THE NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (NCTD)
RAIL TRANSIT SAFETY BRANCH
SAFETYAND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
Draft Report
October 14, 2016
(PUBLIC-REDACTED)
Elizaveta Malashenko, Director
Safety and Enforcement Division
2015TRIENNIAL SECURITY REVIEW OF
THE NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT
(NCTD)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The California Public Utilities Commission’s Rail Transit Safety Branch(RTSB) staff conducted this system security program review. Staff members directly responsible for conducting review and inspection activities include:
Daren Gilbert – Program Manager
Stephen Artus – Program and Project Supervisor
Noel Takahara – Senior Utilities Engineer
Michael Warren – Utilities Engineer Rep to NCTD
Joey Bigornia – Utilities Engineer
Rupa Shitole – Utilities Engineer
Howard Huie – Utilities Engineer
Table of Contents
Page1 / EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / 1
2 / INTRODUCTION / 2
3 / NCTD BACKGROUND / 3
4 / REVIEW PROCEDURE / 5
5 / FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS* / 6
APPENDICES TABLE / 7
A. / Acronyms List / 8
B. / NCTD2015 Security Review Checklist Index* / 9
C. / NCTD2015 Security Review Recommendations List* / 10
D. / NCTD2015Security Review Checklists* / 11
1
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The California Public Utilities Commission’s (Commission) Safety and Enforcement Division (SED), Rail Transit Safety Branch staff (Staff) conducted an on-site security review of the North County Transit District (NCTD) on August 25, 2015. The review focused on verifying the effective implementation of the System Security and Emergency Preparedness Plan, addressing Threat VulnerabilityAssessment (TVA),and emergency response procedures.
Following the on-site security review, staff held a post-review conference with NCTD personnelonSeptember 10, 2015. Staff provided the NCTDChief of Transit Security a preliminary summary report detailing the on-sitereviewFindings.
The security reviewresults indicate NCTD has a comprehensive System Security and Emergency Preparedness Program Plan (SSEPP) and has effectively carried out that plan. Staff found NCTD’s progressive and effective security program very concise and efficient. Staff’sexceptions found during the revieware described in the Findings and Recommendations checklist section. Staff madesix (6)recommendations for corrective action.
The Introduction for this report is presented in Section 2. The Background, in Section 3, contains a description of the NCTD rail system. The Review Procedure is in Section 4, andSection 5 contains the Findings and Recommendations.
An Acronyms listing isprovided in Appendix A and the NCTD 2015TriennialSecurityReview Checklist Index and Recommendations List are included in Appendices B and Crespectively. The SecurityReview Checklists are presented in Appendix D.
2. INTRODUCTION
The Commission’s General Order (GO) 164-D, Rules and Regulations Governing State Safety Oversight of Rail Fixed Guideway Systems, and the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Rule, Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 659, Rail Fixed Guideway Systems: State Safety Oversight, require the designated State Safety Oversight Agencies to perform a review of each rail transit agency’s system safety and security program(s) at a minimum of once every three years. The purpose of the review is to evaluate the effectiveness of each rail transit agency’s SSP and to assess the level of compliance with GO 164-D as well as other Commission safety and security requirements.
On July 17, 2015, staff sent a letter, along with five security checklists, to the NCTD Chief of Transit Enforcement, advising NCTD the triennialsecurity review would be scheduled on August 25, 2015. Staff subsequently confirmed specific dates and times with NCTD’s Safety Compliance Officer.
An entrance meeting was held on August 18, 2015, followed by a records review. Staff providedpreliminary review findings and threerecommendations to NCTDmanagement at the exit meeting onSeptember 10, 2016.
Staff performed the on-site security review at NCTD’s 810 Mission Avenue officeutilizing five (5) checklists for the inspection of the System Security and Emergency Preparedness Plan. Staff derived the checklist review questions from CPUC GO 164-D, FTA 49 CRF659, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Baseline Security Review, and the NCTD SSEPP.
3. NCTD BACKGROUND
The San Diego North County Transit District (NCTD) was created by passage of Senate Bill 802 in 1975 and started operations as North County Transit District on July 1, 1976. The agency's responsibility is to plan, develop and implement a fixed route system throughout North County. The region is described as the San Diego County-Orange County border at the northern end, City of La Jolla at southern end, and from the western coast of the City of Oceanside to the City of Ramona at the eastern end. In June 1994, NCTD created San Diego Northern Railroad (SDNR) to operate the “Coaster” commuter rail which provides service from the City of Oceanside to downtown San Diego. SDNR is responsible for maintaining the San Diego rail subdivision, purchased in 1994, which extends from the San Diego County-Orange County border south to downtown San Diego for commuter rail service and extends from City of Oceanside to City of Escondido for Sprinter light rail service.
NCTD’s jurisdiction is 1100 square miles serving a population of over 1.0 million. The Coaster and Sprinter combined railroad right of way is 82 miles.
In 2002, Senate Bill 1703 was signed into law consolidating the roles and responsibilities of San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) with the transit planning and construction responsibilities of NCTDand the Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB). The planning, programming, project development, and construction functions of MTDB and NCTD were shifted to SANDAG to create a consolidated regional transportation planning and development agency. Operations and maintenance functions of the NCTD system remained with NCTD.
NCTD Sprinter Rail System Description
NCTD’s Sprinter light rail system consists of 22miles and operates through the cities of Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos, and Escondido. Sprinter revenue service began on March 9, 2008, and there are 15 light rail stations and the average ridership is 4,500-9,500 per day. The Escondido Transit Center Station and Vista Transit Center Station are the main transfer stations for light rail/bus connections and the Oceanside Transit Center Station provides service connections to Amtrak, Coaster Commuter Train, and NCTD’s bus system. Revenue service runsfrom 4:00a.m. to 9:00p.m. seven days a week with 30-minute headways.
The Sprinter vehicles, manufactured by Siemens AG Germany, are equipped with direct drive diesel powered engines similar to a bus. NCTD has a total of 12 trains for their Sprinter system.
NCTD dispatches locally from the Sprinter Operations Facility in Escondido, California. The Sprinter is governed by a Centralized Train Control (CTC) signal system for the safe movement of all trains operating on the system including the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) which provides freight service on the mainline during the Sprinter’s non-revenue service hours.
Sprinter Train Stations
The Sprinter’s fifteen stations are as follows: Oceanside Transit Center Station, Coast Highway Station, Crouch Street Station, El Camino Real Station, Rancho Del Oro Station, College Station, Melrose Station, Vista Transit Center, Civic Center –Vista Station, Buena Creek Station, Palomar Station, San Marcos Civic Center, California State University San Marcos, Nordahl Station, and Escondido Transit Center Station.
4. REVIEW Procedure
Staff conducted the 2015security review in accordance with Rail Transit Safety Section Procedure No. 4, Procedure for Performing Triennial Safety & Security Reviews of Rail Transit Systems. Staff developedfive(5) checklists to evaluate the adequacy of NCTD’s System Security and Emergency Preparedness Plan and the efficacy of its implementation.
The securityevaluation includes theNCTDsecurity department and programsand processes which have system securityfunctions and responsibilities. The security review is based onCommission and FTA requirements, NCTD’sSSEPP, American Public Transportation Association (APTA)system safety program guidelines, TSA baseline review list, TSAsecurity related documents, and the staff’s knowledge of the transit system. The five (5)elements reviewed are listed in Appendix B.
A summary of the elements reviewed identifies the core security-related elements and characteristics defined by FTA requirements for System Security Plans. Each of the checklists also referencesCommission requirements, NCTD procedures,and other documents that establish the security program requirements. The methods used to perform the review include:
- Discussions and interviews with NCTDManagement
- Reviews of SSEPP, documents, and records
Immediately following the securityreview, staffsummarized the findings andthe preliminary recommendationswith NCTD’s Chief of Transit Enforcement. The post-review summary is beneficial for clarifying findings or best-practices and provided NCTD an opportunity to promptly address any necessary securityimprovements.
Page 1
Sensitive Security Information (SSI)
5. FINDINGS AND ReCommendations
(CONFIDENTIAL)
“Warning: This record contains Sensitive Security Information (SSI) that is controlled under 49 CFR parts 15 and 1520. No part of this record may be disclosed to persons without a “need to know” as defined in 49 CFR parts 15 and 1520, except with the written permission of the Administrator of the transportation security Administration or the secretary of Transportation. Unauthorized release may result in civil penalty or other action. For U.S. government agencies, public disclosure is governed by 5 U.S.C. 552 and 49 CFR parts 15 and 1520.”
Page1
APPENDIX LIST
PageA. / Acronyms List / 8
B. / NCTD 2015 Triennial Security Review Checklist Index / 9
C. / NCTD 2015 Triennial Security Review Recommendations List / 10
D. / NCTD 2015 Triennial Security Review Checklists / 11
APPENDIX A
ACRONYMS LIST
Abbreviationor Acronym / Definition
CAP / Corrective Action Plan
CFR / Code of Federal Regulations
Commission / California Public Utilities Commission
CPUC / California Public Utilities Commission
DHS / Department of Homeland Security
ED / Executive Director
FTA / Federal Transit Administration
GO / General Order
ISA / Internal Safety & Security Audit
NIMS / National Incident Management System
NCTD / North County Transit District
POST / Peace Officer Standards and Training
RTSS / Rail Transit Safety Section
SANDAG / San Diego Association of Governments
SCIC / Security and Critical Incident Committee
SED / Safety and Enforcement Division
SSI / Sensitive Security Information
SSEPP
SSP / System Security and Emergency Preparedness Plan
System Security Plan
Staff / California Public Utilities Commission Staff
TSA / Transportation Security Administration
TVA / Threat & Vulnerability Assessment
APPENDIX B
NCTD 2015ANNUAL SECURITYREVIEWCHECKLISTS INDEX
1 / Identify Policies, Goals, and Objectives2 / Process Management of Threat and Vulnerability Assessments
3 / Identification Concepts for Passenger and Employee Security
4 / Process for Internal Security Reviews
5 / Process for Generating Its Security Plan
Page 1
Sensitive Security Information (SSI)
APPENDIX C
NCTD2015TRIENNIAL SECURITYREVIEW RECOMMENDATION LIST
(CONFIDENTIAL)
APPENDIX D
NCTD2015TRIENNIAL SECURITYREVIEW CHECKLISTS
Attachment 1:
FINAL Resolution ST-182 REDACTED NCTD Security.docx
“Warning: This record contains Sensitive Security Information (SSI) that is controlled under 49 CFR parts 15 and 1520. No part of this record may be disclosed to persons without a “need to know” as defined in 49 CFR parts 15 and 1520, except with the written permission of the Administrator of the transportation security Administration or the secretary of Transportation. Unauthorized release may result in civil penalty or other action. For U.S. government agencies, public disclosure is governed by 5 U.S.C. 552 and 49 CFR parts 15 and 1520.”
Page1